Maria Caliban wrote...
So because you believe morality is subjective, there is no good or evil in the Dragon Age series.
No. I believe that morality is subjective, and
in addition, it's also
extremely clear that the creators intended the Dragon Age series to reflect moral subjectivity. The player is provided with a range of opinions on every subject, by his companions, and the game never tries to impose any sort of morality on the player. The actions a player takes are never definitively stated to be "right" or "wrong". The fact that we continue to argue about each other's choices on this very forum is absolute proof of that.
By that rationalization, no work of fiction has good or evil.
Not really. If an author creates a fictional world where good and evil are a tangible reality, then they are objective
in that fictional world. That doesn't change the fact that "real" good and evil are just lies that we tell ourselves to shield us from the harsh reality of a cold and indifferent universe.
Can you provide any indication from the game itself that Quinton was criminally insane or that he shouldn't be held culpable for his actions? Because we are talking about the Dragon Age series, not the world according the Plaintiff.
He truly believed, with incredible fervor, despite a complete lack of evidence, that his wife's... soul, I suppose you'd call it, could be pulled out of the Fade and transplanted into a mish-mash of corpses. And if there was any doubt of the invalidity of his "research", then the ultimate failure of the experiment is definitive proof that he was insane.