3d, there are 3 books and 4 comic series that prove you wrong. If you can't see that ME can be done with other peoples perspectives out side of Shepards that is your problem. The fact remain that you can't imagine any view point but you own. You're very single minded. ME is not just about Shepard. ME have many stories, and bw has done so with this series. If you can't detach you view out side of your Shepard...That you problem, not the games.3DandBeyond wrote...
dreman9999 wrote...
1. This will have nothing to do with the ending. It's about this new prespective we don't know what fate it ends in.KENNY4753 wrote...
Dreman, I'm done discussing this with you. I will just leave with my final thoughts.
A prequel that would take place during the 2 years missed by Shepard due to his death/resurrection would be a terrible idea for multiple reasons.
1. We already know the fate of the galaxy, making these events insignificant.
2. This prequel would have a very weak plot and the results would not be galaxy changing.
3. If our events in this prequel were truly significant why did we hear nothing about it through any way in Mass Effect (Citadel NewsNet, overhearing people talking, Spectre messages, etc)
4. Who would the enemy be? Based on what BW said they don't want another Shepard 2.0, so why would they include the Reapers or Collectors. It would be too much like the trilogy. All other possible enemies would a joke.
5. Mass Effect is Shepard's story. Especially in the time ranging from Eden Prime through the scene with the Starbrat.
Feel free to reply but frankly I honestly will not pay attention to what you say because I've heard it all before. Moral Conflict, "you not understand what I'm saying", as well as many others from your list of the same replies. Maybe I'll come back tomorrow and check it out but only if I'm so bored that I feel like talking to a brick wall.
2.I'm sorry. I would not. Nothing says the plot would be weak.
3.Like how everyone know that the sb changed? It does not need to be well know to be significat.
4.This is were imagination comes up. That can easily be thought up. An enemy is not the issue.
5. No, ME does not revolve around Shepard...Just like the books and comics do not. ME is easily can have many perspectives. Nothing SHepard done happers that.
Stop using baseless excuses.
These aren't baseless "excuses" they are reasons that make sense. You need a foe and unless there's some variety to them that is different from what we now have it'll be boring. And like it or not the galaxy (the whole galaxy) so far ends with ME3, story wise, until a story begins in the time period after ME3. We know what will happen to the whole galaxy so far. We have the totally unhinged, unbalanced, deranged endings that make any prequel pointless. And it is a prequel you are suggesting because it takes place prior to the story of ME3 and most of ME2. It doesn't matter who it's about.
Yes, ME does revolve around Shepard. The very first person you see in the game is Shepard-that's your avatar (you) in the game. You're contradicting yourself again-you said it was about the characters and no character is more important than Shepard.
Why if Shepard was not important, would you think this needed to be told during those 2 years-you already created a relationship to Shepard.
Even if it is from a new perspective, your idea that we wouldn't know how it ends is ridiculous. Considering that the end of ME3 takes place a few years after Shepard went missing, the people in your suggested content would be alive unless you decide they need balance and need to die too (or the reapers get them), by the end of ME3. They live in this galaxy that is being harvested by reapers. They are not going to escape all of that. So they will end up with green eyes, being under Shreaper's control, living in a post destroy galaxy, or dead. Their future is the same as everyone else's. Did you miss the fact that the reapers harvest the whole galaxy and that the choices impact the whole galaxy?
The books and comic books are mostly not that well written and have little really to do with the game, but they also suffer from the same problem. They are pointless as is the Vega movie coming out. You're talking about a game set during the same time as Shepard's story and not some books a heck of a lot of people don't consider important. And books don't cost $60USD.
Just like they could make Omega be without Shepard and you play as Aria (and that would be a mistake), they could do this, but it too would be a mistake.
Modifié par dreman9999, 20 octobre 2012 - 09:00 .





Retour en haut






