135 réponses à ce sujet

[PhonesLNC]

Gearsofwarowns wrote...

....Am I the ONLY one who finds the Geth to be the ONLY easy faction to fight??

Well I don't think its the ONLY one, but for me is the easiest, AND I don't need tankie classes against them, kicked some geth ass with, adept, soldier, engineer, infiltrator (I don't play sentinel and vanguard much...) and I'm talking about gold.

I find it really odd when I see all these threads saying "GETH ARE ANOYING" or "GETH ARE OP NERF NOW!"
because they are the only faction that I can easily defend a hot spot alone without having to retreat because they don't have fast units with Insta Kill abilities, I just leave cover when a happy bomber well... drop bombs on my spot, with the n7 paladin I just put down my omni-shield, snap freeze, omni-shield, shield drain, cryo explosion, repeate, and I can defend a spot perfectly (but sometimes in laggy servers when I use my shield is like it's not there... and I take full dmg) and yes, n7 paladin can defend pyro flames (for those who didn't know...) and recently I've been playing Human adept, and he is a geth raper!  (I know I said I don't need tankie classes, but the paladin is just an example of possible estrategy against the geth)

So my response about the OP.... NO I don't think they should be deleted, and yes they can be annoying (geth bombers, sentry and drones XD) but for me and some people they are the easiest, if is to ask to a faction to be deleted, following your ideia, then they should delete cerberus until they balance the dragoons? I don't like them, for me they make cerberus a annoying faction to play against but I'm not asking to remove them!


EDIT: in red

Modifié par PhonesLNC, 17 octobre 2012 - 03:38 .

[HiddenInWar]

CINCTuchanka wrote...

No, we must rewrite them.

[tetsutsuru]

PhonesLNC wrote...

Gearsofwarowns wrote...

....Am I the ONLY one who finds the Geth to be the ONLY easy faction to fight??

Well I don't think its the ONLY one, but for me is the easiest, AND I don't need tankie classes against them, kicked some geth ass with, adept, soldier, engineer, infiltrator (I don't play sentinel and vanguard much...) and I'm talking about gold.

I find it really odd when I see all these threads saying "GETH ARE ANOYING" or "GETH ARE OP NERF NOW!"
because they are the only faction that I can easily defend a hot spot alone without having to retreat because they don't have fast units with Insta Kill abilities, I just leave cover when a happy bomber well... drop bombs on my spot, with the n7 paladin I just put down my omni-shield, snap freeze, omni-shield, shield drain, cryo explosion, repeate, and I can defend a spot perfectly (but sometimes in laggy servers when I use my shield is like it's not there... and I take full dmg) and yes, n7 paladin can defend pyro flames (for those who didn't know...) and recently I've been playing Human adept, and he is a geth raper!  (I know I said I don't need tankie classes, but the paladin is just an example of possible estrategy against the geth)

So my response about the OP.... NO I don't think they should be deleted, and yes they can be annoying (geth bombers, sentry and drones XD) but for me and some people they are the easiest, if is to ask to a faction to be deleted, following your ideia, then they should delete cerberus until they balance the dragoons? I don't like them, for me they make cerberus a annoying faction to play against but I'm not asking to remove them!

EDIT: in red

I was being facetious in my OP since BioWare won't delete them obviously, which many understood.  My apologies that I did not state so in the OP.

However, their abilities do need to be adjusted as they violate established game mechanics.  As in another example I stated;  when players do some of the things some of the Geth faction's units do, they get banned.  So why are the Geth continued to be allowed to do so, right?  BTW, just to be clear.  When I say "adjusted", I DO NOT instantly and/or only mean "nerf".

Regardless, I have, to-date, *NEVER* stated anywhere/anytime that "they're unplayable other than using a Kroguard".  They are playable by ANY class.  The Kroguard just happens to have characteristics which negate some (but NOT all) of their cheapness and BS.

If I search for a Gold PUG that throws me into an ongoing match at, say, wave 2 or whatever, against Geth as my N7 Fury, I'll groan and roll my eyes, BUT whatever team I join WILL get my A-game.

BioWare does know the Geth faction needs a major overhaul, and so do many of the players.  Technically, they're playable, but they're just not "fun" to fight against.  After all, isn't that what playing this game is all about, to have fun?

Side question:  what issue(s) do you have regarding the Dragoons?  I personally find them alright.  Their addition to the Cerberus faction has required no change to my gameplay.  In fact, I would prefer that they be buffed to have even a smidgen of Barriers.  No, really.  Them having Barriers will increase my N7 Fury's survivability, actually.

Modifié par tetsutsuru, 17 octobre 2012 - 05:30 .

[tetsutsuru]

Janus382 wrote...

tetsutsuru wrote...

Dear BioWare,

Until you figure out what direction you want to reconfigure and adjust the Geth faction, please, for the love of all that is good and holy, please, please, PLEASE DELETE THEM FROM THE GODDAMN GAME.

Thanks,
TetsuTsuru

In the interim, replace their tile in the enemy select section with a BSOD.

LOL!  That happens anyway.  If they do that, at least we'll know it's intentional.

[tetsutsuru]

Vandicus wrote...

tetsutsuru wrote...

ryanshowseason3 wrote...

tetsutsuru wrote...

ryanshowseason3 wrote...

tetsutsuru wrote...

Who says you could only "plow down it" should one decide to pass it?  Can't one tread carefully and cautiously instead, should there happen to have a situation you may need to take that road?

Let's evaluate some of the nuggets of wisdom in your post:

1.  "What else are you going to do?" *facepalm* Typical myopic perspective.

You report the road to City Management for them to fix.  So you're fine with an unpassable street in your neighborhood?

2.  "Benefit for BioWare if they fix the Geth faction?"

They end up with a better product (game) which, in itself, is a selling point, which could lead to more sales?

Any more demonstrations of utter ignorance you want to display?  Seriously, there are many other threads in this forum alone.  And there are other forums on BSN too.  Please don't further clutter this thread up with more of your fingertip diarrhea.

I don't know what argument you're trying to make anymore. Because it is sounding like mine. Your original point and the threads title states you'd like to remove them from the game. From your last post it sounds like you want to fix them now.

I'm saying to fix them now. Instead of removing them entirely, fixing, and then adding them again. So yes fix the road. But avoid it for now.

Your insults are quite quite un needed for a civilized conversation though. BTW I will post in whatever thread I like. Deal with it.

That's because you posted (on the previous page) without understanding what the thread is really about.  There are many posts by other members in this thread alone.

All you (and a handful of others) got was, "Aww the Geth are too hard for you?  Go play Bronze.  Or don't play against them at all", which couldn't be any FARTHER from the points being discussed.  Or maybe it could.  BSN, after all.

Maybe you shouldn't mislead the masses with your first post and topic title then. What did you expect people to respond to? I saw your opinion you stated in title and first post and responded to it.

Still though your demeanor, insults, and vulgar language haven't helped to further the discussion. And when the same coin of humor has been played on you "Aww the Geth are too hard for you?" you've responded with hostility so suddenly that tactic is not acceptable even if you used it to start the thread. This seems hypocritical to me. It more seems like your goal was to stir a hornets nest originally rather than start a conversation.

Mislead the masses?  Only you (and a mere handful of others) "misunderstood" the OP, and the following discussion.  Then you post based on your misunderstanding.  I responded in kind.  And now you cry foul?

Yeeeahhh okayyy....

So contrary to your OP and the title you're not asking for Geth to be deleted from the game? <_<

Hey, I have no problem whatsoever if BioWare implements my suggestion.  I could care less about the Geth faction.  But BioWare could do whatever they want to with the Geth.  As long as they do something about them, even in the meantime while they're undecided as to "how" the Geth faction needs to be properly adjusted.

Read 2 posts above this one.

Modifié par tetsutsuru, 17 octobre 2012 - 01:58 .

[ryanshowseason3]

tetsutsuru wrote...

Mislead the masses?  Only you (and a mere handful of others) "misunderstood" the OP, and the following discussion.  Then you post based on your misunderstanding.  I responded in kind.  And now you cry foul?

Yeeeahhh okayyy....

You responded with hostility instead of trying to promote understanding. We misunderstood the OP and posted based on what we read in the topic title and the original post. They were misleading as to your intent, I guess the sarcasm was subtle enough. So what is the proper response? Beration and name calling? Or perhaps an indication that the post was sarcastic? How are we supposed to know we misunderstood the OP otherwise?

You're saying we should already know that we misunderstood which is asking a bit much of anyone without omnipotence buddy.

[tetsutsuru]

ryanshowseason3 wrote...

tetsutsuru wrote...

Mislead the masses?  Only you (and a mere handful of others) "misunderstood" the OP, and the following discussion.  Then you post based on your misunderstanding.  I responded in kind.  And now you cry foul?

Yeeeahhh okayyy....

You responded with hostility instead of trying to promote understanding. We misunderstood the OP and posted based on what we read in the topic title and the original post. They were misleading as to your intent, I guess the sarcasm was subtle enough. So what is the proper response? Beration and name calling? Or perhaps an indication that the post was sarcastic? How are we supposed to know we misunderstood the OP otherwise?

You're saying we should already know that we misunderstood which is asking a bit much of anyone without omnipotence buddy.

Seriously man, are you kidding me?  I wonder who it was that started with saying the discussion lacked "common logic" and wanted me to "ride the short bus"?

Regarding your other point, YOU misunderstood the discussion points.  MANY OTHERS HERE did not.  The failing is YOURS.  Washing your hands and making it my problem?  LOL!

Wow.  Evaluate yourself before you even THINK to start point fingers.

Modifié par tetsutsuru, 17 octobre 2012 - 03:08 .

[darkchief10]

play reapers if you're looking for an opponent that won't make cry out your soul in despair, they only give you a bad sunburn

[GriM_AoD]

Delete the Geth... That sounds like a plan to me.

But seriously. Removing a faction? I love stomping Geth, even though the bugs are annoying at times

Just don't play against them if it bothers you that much

[stinekandts]

not a very bright idea

[tetsutsuru]

There. Edited OP for the special few and the new comers (since we're already on page 6 and the most recent posts reflect them NOT having read through the discussion).

Modifié par tetsutsuru, 17 octobre 2012 - 03:17 .