Aller au contenu

Photo

Let dead characters stay dead


325 réponses à ce sujet

#201
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

Fast Jimmy wrote...

Its still a great one. Honestly, in terms of continuity, overall story and moving the plot forward while referencing the original story, its one of the best trilogies of all time. They should use it as a teaching reference in film schools (I am not in the least bit being sarcastic here).


Really?

I never got into the third one. I loved the first one, liked the second one... and just could never dig the third one.

#202
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...
Anders is actually in Kirkwall at the same time when he is in Amaranthine too. So Hawke meets him before he dies at Vigil`s Keep...go figure.


I've seen this supposition before, and I'm uncertain how someone arrives at it. With a year's jump after Hawke arrives at Kirkwall, how is that the same time period of Awakening, exactly? 


I believe there's a reference inside DA:O that the game takes place roughly in a year. 


Wynne notes that it's been an entire year since the mage protagonist left the Circle of Ferelden. There's also the months that transpired between the demise of the Archdemon Urthemiel and the royal ceremony where the Hero of Ferelden can ask for a royal boon (as the developers said it took place a few months afterward and not immediately), and the six months that took place between the royal ceremony and the events of Amaranthine.

#203
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

Fast Jimmy wrote...

I honestly have a feeling that the end fo DA3 is going to have a rather large reset button. An event that happens that will put all previous histories, lore, choices and possiblities into the realm of "completely irrelevant." Something like a world changing event, where entire kingdoms are toppled and up becomes down, day becomes night sort of deal. A way to wipe the slate clean and start fresh.


I hope that happens, actually.

But it isn't necessary yet. A simple DA3 (DA4, DA5, what have you) takes place after the last game's wrap up. Then pick a new spot in Thedas far away from the last spot and that's enough of a fresh start. I mean certain things should have global ramifactions but many of them... why would they?

Like the DA2 crew for example, the only one I could see coming back in any capacity would be Varric. And only him because of the leaked survey saying you build a spy network. It's largely assumed Cassandra will be a companion and she knows the most well connected man in the Free Marches. Varric's an easy source of information and if I were building a spy network he'd be my first stop to get as an informer.

...not that I wouldn't mind further cameos it's just Varric would fit in best.

#204
jackofalltrades456

jackofalltrades456
  • Members
  • 577 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Why does BSN really hate Leliana? She's pretty, has a wonderful voice actress, and gives us a face for Dorothea's reign as Divine.



Leliana was one of my favorite characters in Origins.

For me, it really wasn't about her coming back to life as she's never died in my games. My issuse is nothing really seemed to matter much with her as she transfered into the new Dragon age.  Every single choice made with her amounted to nothing in Dragon Age 2. She always comes back. She always rejoins the Chantry. She always becomes the Divine's chief agent, even if Leliana never even met the Warden. She always seperates her Warden.

She appears to be heading in the same direction Anders went after Awakening and could easily end up begin like the Dragon Age 2 Anders if this railroading, handwaves, and retcons continue with her.

#205
unbentbuzzkill

unbentbuzzkill
  • Members
  • 654 messages
some people dislike lelianna because if your warden romanced her and then he/she dissapears and it seems like lelianna doesn't even care.

#206
DarkKnightHolmes

DarkKnightHolmes
  • Members
  • 3 603 messages

unbentbuzzkill wrote...

some people dislike lelianna because if your warden romanced her and then he/she dissapears and it seems like lelianna doesn't even care.



Thanks for reminding me. :crying:

#207
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

unbentbuzzkill wrote...

some people dislike lelianna because if your warden romanced her and then he/she dissapears and it seems like lelianna doesn't even care.


8-10 years is a long time. Sometimes people grow apart. I know people really want happily ever after romances though. I don't know. Alistair acknowledges a romance and so does Zevran. I don't remember what Leliana says. But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?

#208
unbentbuzzkill

unbentbuzzkill
  • Members
  • 654 messages
if he/she is dead yes. But in my case my warden is alive and missing and all she says is "he's dear to my heart" or something like that. Imean really WTF?!

#209
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead?

#210
Foolsfolly

Foolsfolly
  • Members
  • 4 770 messages

Bfler wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead?


I remember an epilogue where she sang a sad song about the Warden and then disappeared. Got that one a few times in Origins. The implication I gathered from that was probably dead but maybe just wandering aimless waiting for death.

Both are a little dramatic isn't it? But than again... it is Leliana...

#211
bzombo

bzombo
  • Members
  • 1 761 messages

David Gaider wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...
Anders is actually in Kirkwall at the same time when he is in Amaranthine too. So Hawke meets him before he dies at Vigil`s Keep...go figure.


I've seen this supposition before, and I'm uncertain how someone arrives at it. With a year's jump after Hawke arrives at Kirkwall, how is that the same time period of Awakening, exactly?

I believe the Awakening epilogue hints that Anders, after leaving BRIEFLY, returns to Vigil's Keep for several years.

#212
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Bfler wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right? 


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead? 


Yes, that was heavily implied if The Warden perished (if Leliana's personality wasn't hardened). This Epilogue outcome was (obviously) changed for Dragon Age II.

#213
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages

Bfler wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead?

The epilogue slides don't mean anything anymore.

#214
Bfler

Bfler
  • Members
  • 2 991 messages

Foolsfolly wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead?


I remember an epilogue where she sang a sad song about the Warden and then disappeared. Got that one a few times in Origins. The implication I gathered from that was probably dead but maybe just wandering aimless waiting for death.

Both are a little dramatic isn't it? But than again... it is Leliana...


I thought it is suicide, because of the story with Alindra and her soldier.

#215
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 531 messages

LobselVith8 wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...
Anders is actually in Kirkwall at the same time when he is in Amaranthine too. So Hawke meets him before he dies at Vigil`s Keep...go figure.


I've seen this supposition before, and I'm uncertain how someone arrives at it. With a year's jump after Hawke arrives at Kirkwall, how is that the same time period of Awakening, exactly? 


I believe there's a reference inside DA:O that the game takes place roughly in a year. 


Wynne notes that it's been an entire year since the mage protagonist left the Circle of Ferelden. There's also the months that transpired between the demise of the Archdemon Urthemiel and the royal ceremony where the Hero of Ferelden can ask for a royal boon (as the developers said it took place a few months afterward and not immediately), and the six months that took place between the royal ceremony and the events of Amaranthine.


Yup. Meaning Anders is two places at once + he is alive when he should be dead too. Way worse than Leliana being retconned. Dead Anders actually starts a war. Doubt that whould have happened if our choices in the previous games actually, you know, mattered one bit. When DA3 comes out I am going to ditch my imports. They arn`t working well anyway.

#216
Tommyspa

Tommyspa
  • Members
  • 1 397 messages

Rawgrim wrote...

Yup. Meaning Anders is two places at once + he is alive when he should be dead too. Way worse than Leliana being retconned. Dead Anders actually starts a war. Doubt that whould have happened if our choices in the previous games actually, you know, mattered one bit. When DA3 comes out I am going to ditch my imports. They arn`t working well anyway.


The problem is that do you really believe that Act 1 takes place Immediately after the blight is ended? Or that act 1 actually has to take place if the first month or so of that year. It could easily fit anywhere within the year considering Awakening starts 6 months after DAO ends and it doesn't seem to take a great deal of time to be over considering you are traveling very short distances compared to DAO so it could be over in a month or two if not simply a few weeks. Act 1 could easily just be 6-8 months into the year. Meaning there is no timeline error at all.

#217
Sejborg

Sejborg
  • Members
  • 1 569 messages

Atakuma wrote...

Bfler wrote...

Foolsfolly wrote...

But if the Warden's dead surely 8-10 years later she's over that, right?


Doesn't she commit suicide if he is dead?

The epilogue slides don't mean anything anymore.


Huh? Well they do to me. I rather have an epilogue like in Origins than that abrupt ending DA2 had. 

#218
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 531 messages

Tommyspa wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...

Yup. Meaning Anders is two places at once + he is alive when he should be dead too. Way worse than Leliana being retconned. Dead Anders actually starts a war. Doubt that whould have happened if our choices in the previous games actually, you know, mattered one bit. When DA3 comes out I am going to ditch my imports. They arn`t working well anyway.


The problem is that do you really believe that Act 1 takes place Immediately after the blight is ended? Or that act 1 actually has to take place if the first month or so of that year. It could easily fit anywhere within the year considering Awakening starts 6 months after DAO ends and it doesn't seem to take a great deal of time to be over considering you are traveling very short distances compared to DAO so it could be over in a month or two if not simply a few weeks. Act 1 could easily just be 6-8 months into the year. Meaning there is no timeline error at all.


During act 1, even with Anders in the party, you start hearing news that the blight has just ended. I belive people mention it in the tavern. I doubt it takes half a year for the news to reach Kirkwall. Blight starts - Hawkes flees. Hawke Arrives in Kirkwall - Warden just gets started with recruiting armies. 1 year passes- Blight is ended.  News about it is about Kirkwall. Anders is in Kirkwall at the time, in Hawke`s party. When he would actually be on his way to Amaranthine, or having just arrived there.

#219
Tommyspa

Tommyspa
  • Members
  • 1 397 messages

Rawgrim wrote...

Tommyspa wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...

Yup. Meaning Anders is two places at once + he is alive when he should be dead too. Way worse than Leliana being retconned. Dead Anders actually starts a war. Doubt that whould have happened if our choices in the previous games actually, you know, mattered one bit. When DA3 comes out I am going to ditch my imports. They arn`t working well anyway.


The problem is that do you really believe that Act 1 takes place Immediately after the blight is ended? Or that act 1 actually has to take place if the first month or so of that year. It could easily fit anywhere within the year considering Awakening starts 6 months after DAO ends and it doesn't seem to take a great deal of time to be over considering you are traveling very short distances compared to DAO so it could be over in a month or two if not simply a few weeks. Act 1 could easily just be 6-8 months into the year. Meaning there is no timeline error at all.


During act 1, even with Anders in the party, you start hearing news that the blight has just ended. I belive people mention it in the tavern. I doubt it takes half a year for the news to reach Kirkwall. Blight starts - Hawkes flees. Hawke Arrives in Kirkwall - Warden just gets started with recruiting armies. 1 year passes- Blight is ended.  News about it is about Kirkwall. Anders is in Kirkwall at the time, in Hawke`s party. When he would actually be on his way to Amaranthine, or having just arrived there.

People don't speak in absolutes of time though. And they start talking about the blight because it is the first oppurtunity to do so in game not proof of it just ended, but for the player to hear reactions about their former character. Not to mention that the game also acknowledges that the events of Awakening have taken place when to get the quest to kill the nobles who conspired against the warden commander in Awakening. And the people in the tavern talk about the blight years after too. I don't think you can go with that source as being reliable or indicitive of time past. IIRC the only mention of a "year" since the blight ended came directly from Varric who doesn't mention time past between the trip to Gwaren or overly exact in saying a year, which would be easier than just saying 9 months have past since the blight was ended and lumped it together with the year of servitude for the sake of shortening lines for the actor to not convolute the intro, for example.

#220
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 531 messages
They were mentioning that it had "just ended" as in: its news to them. First time they heard it.

#221
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 914 messages
To keep things simple it's better to imagine that Hawke meets Anders 3 months after Awakening's epilogue.

#222
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 531 messages

The Hierophant wrote...

To keep things simple it's better to imagine that Hawke meets Anders 3 months after Awakening's epilogue.


This is true. Problem is, he died in my epilogue.

#223
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 914 messages

Rawgrim wrote...

The Hierophant wrote...

To keep things simple it's better to imagine that Hawke meets Anders 3 months after Awakening's epilogue.


This is true. Problem is, he died in my epilogue.

Justice probably found his body in the keep, but it reaches wtf territory if you gave Anders to the Templars in the beginning.

#224
Tommyspa

Tommyspa
  • Members
  • 1 397 messages

Rawgrim wrote...

They were mentioning that it had "just ended" as in: its news to them. First time they heard it.


So you've never refered to the end of a war as just ending within the space of days instead of a couple/few months?

#225
Rawgrim

Rawgrim
  • Members
  • 11 531 messages

Tommyspa wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...

They were mentioning that it had "just ended" as in: its news to them. First time they heard it.


So you've never refered to the end of a war as just ending within the space of days instead of a couple/few months?


Yes, but it was the way they said it. it was somethig like this "Have you heard?! The blight just ended". It left no indications that they were discussing news that rolled in 6 months ago. The people talking about it had more or less heard about it 5 mins ago.