This, my friends, is talent.
Modifié par HYR 2.0, 19 octobre 2012 - 05:26 .
Modifié par HYR 2.0, 19 octobre 2012 - 05:26 .
Indeed, but what has to change is our mind and not our body.Xilizhra wrote...
But you are. This is self-evident. Human history is one of endless strife and bloodshed, no matter how advanced we've become in terms of pure technology, and likely how advanced we ever will, unless we change ourselves.
I'm more putting it a context of the choice kind of way. The four choices are as followsAdmiralCheez wrote...
But there's a problem: it's not consensual. Nobody chose to be synthesized, and the person who made that choice died, so in effect did not undergo the process him/herself. Is it still okay if it's not consensual?pmac_tk421 wrote...
I feel that a change that makes everyone more intelligent, less aggresive, less discriminatory and other things implied in synthesis, I would call it a positive change, and everyone wants a future where everyone isn't an **** right... RIGHT... oh wait. This is BSN.
Let's pretend that doctors invent a pill that makes people stop being violent or racist or whatever. This pill also has the added benefit of making people smarter, healthier, and happier. Now, would it be okay for the government to force everyone to take this pill? Would it be okay if they sent soldiers out in the middle of the night to sneak into your room and place a tablet under your tongue while you slept?
Compounding the issue, we're not sure what Synthesis actually does. We don't know exactly how it changes people, much less how much it changes them. We don't know if there are side effects. In fact, in this case our "pill" has never been tested on anyone, ever. The only evidence we have to go by is that a bunch of genocidal maniacs went around slaughtering people and destroying cities under the claim that they were doing everyone the same favor.
Oh, and there are pretty cutscenes with a nice voiceover to make you feel good about it. I guess you can count that as evidence.
@Septimus: Duh!
Modifié par pmac_tk421, 19 octobre 2012 - 07:31 .
Yes, they are. They were needed for the rest of the galaxy to learn, how to co-exist, how to come along.LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all. ... Are they really worth that much?
hukbum wrote...
Yes, they are. They were needed for the rest of the galaxy to learn, how to co-exist, how to come along.LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all. ... Are they really worth that much?
In destroy the kid kinda says: I can't allow you to prove me wrong. So I destroy what's needed to do this.
Like a huffy little boy stomping his feet on the ground.
Modifié par LilLino, 19 octobre 2012 - 07:50 .
They will forget. Organics are stupid. Look at the QuariansLilLino wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Yes, they are. They were needed for the rest of the galaxy to learn, how to co-exist, how to come along.LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all. ... Are they really worth that much?
In destroy the kid kinda says: I can't allow you to prove me wrong. So I destroy what's needed to do this.
Like a huffy little boy stomping his feet on the ground.
On the contrary, the loss of synthetic race may be forever remember as an ultimate sacrifice and can lead to recreating them and actually treating them as heroes and martyrs. Politics/Shepard (since s/he is alive in destroy) just have to play their cards right.
Nothing unites people more than misery.
Thats kind of cold. Also, about synthetics being treated as marytrs, the first part is that seeing as AIs like the geth had personality and free thought, so talking about them like their replacable is kinda messed up. Also, in this scenario, the catalysts words still apply,"but the peace won't last". Besides the fact that man will not see them as martyrs still, the people who did will eventually die, and their children will not view them in the same way.LilLino wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Yes, they are. They were needed for the rest of the galaxy to learn, how to co-exist, how to come along.LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all. ... Are they really worth that much?
In destroy the kid kinda says: I can't allow you to prove me wrong. So I destroy what's needed to do this.
Like a huffy little boy stomping his feet on the ground.
On the contrary, the loss of synthetic race may be forever remember as an ultimate sacrifice and can lead to recreating them and actually treating them as heroes and martyrs. Politics/Shepard (since s/he is alive in destroy) just have to play their cards right.
Nothing unites people more than misery.
Guest_Arcian_*
That's exactly what's pissing people off.pmac_tk421 wrote...
Also, the whole point of the EC slides was to show you what the consequences of your choices were. They aren't fan reactions, they're the writers canonical results.
Eterna5 wrote...
It's like you think you're funny or something.
But the argument we're having is whether Destroy or Synthesis In the cannon is the better ending. Head cannon and what you wanted the endings to be doesn't apply.Arcian wrote...
That's exactly what's pissing people off.pmac_tk421 wrote...
Also, the whole point of the EC slides was to show you what the consequences of your choices were. They aren't fan reactions, they're the writers canonical results.
LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all.
LilLino wrote... Are they really worth that much?
LilLino wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Yes, they are. They were needed for the rest of the galaxy to learn, how to co-exist, how to come along.LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all. ... Are they really worth that much?
In destroy the kid kinda says: I can't allow you to prove me wrong. So I destroy what's needed to do this.
Like a huffy little boy stomping his feet on the ground.
On the contrary, the loss of synthetic race may be forever remember as an ultimate sacrifice and can lead to recreating them and actually treating them as heroes and martyrs. Politics/Shepard (since s/he is alive in destroy) just have to play their cards right.
Nothing unites people more than misery.
Modifié par Eterna5, 19 octobre 2012 - 09:45 .
Saving with enslaving?SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Control - because there are no negatives.
hukbum wrote...
Saving with enslaving?SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Control - because there are no negatives.
Jep. Enslaved ones.Eterna5 wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Saving with enslaving?SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Control - because there are no negatives.
Reapers don't enslave people in control. They become benevolent peace keepers.
yeah, just like they are preserving organic life nowEterna5 wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Saving with enslaving?SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Control - because there are no negatives.
Reapers don't enslave people in control. They become benevolent peace keepers.
DrGunjah wrote...
yeah, just like they are preserving organic life nowEterna5 wrote...
hukbum wrote...
Saving with enslaving?SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Control - because there are no negatives.
Reapers don't enslave people in control. They become benevolent peace keepers.
Eterna5 wrote...
Lets not play pretend here. If you made the choice to pick Destroy at least acknowledge what you've done. The Geth did not sacrifice themselves, you made that choice for them. You murdered them.
Modifié par LilLino, 19 octobre 2012 - 10:02 .
LilLino wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Lets not play pretend here. If you made the choice to pick Destroy at least acknowledge what you've done. The Geth did not sacrifice themselves, you made that choice for them. You murdered them.
Stop putting 'organics are idiots and need to be synthesised' everywhere. It's pain in the ass, how the hell am I supposed to have an argument against that. It's silly. If you don't believe in human kind at all I won't be able to convince you no matter what I say.
Modifié par Eterna5, 19 octobre 2012 - 10:04 .
SeptimusMagistos wrote...
LilLino wrote...
Destroy kills the influence of the Reapers once and for all.
I'm not killing people on the off-chance that something goes wrong at some point in the future.
LilLino wrote... Are they really worth that much?
Yup. This is the moment when Shepard proves to the Reapers that he won't throw synthetics under the bus. This is the time when synthetics and organics work together in defiance of the Catalyst's theories. Most importantly, this is the moment when Shepard finally uploads his mind into a computer just like he'd always planned on doing.
Control - because there are no negatives.
Eterna5 wrote...
I never made that argument though. Also, evidence in the universe would suggest that organics are in fact stupid. If not for Shepard most of them would be extinct.
Modifié par LilLino, 19 octobre 2012 - 10:13 .
I'm not going to feel guilty about breaking a bunch of machines that could be alive (and aren't if you take synthesis literally in the EC) when it means defeating an enemy that's bent on destroying all organic races that ARE, in fact, alive.Eterna5 wrote...
Lets not play pretend here. If you made the choice to pick Destroy at least acknowledge what you've done. The Geth did not sacrifice themselves, you made that choice for them. You murdered them.
Modifié par 4stringwizard, 19 octobre 2012 - 10:10 .