Aller au contenu

Photo

well i wont be getting mass effect 4


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
98 réponses à ce sujet

#1
chmarr

chmarr
  • Members
  • 1 604 messages
http://www.digitalsp...er-shepard.html


mass effect without the main charactor of the series is like james bond without bond.

you cannot take out the person that made the mass effect series, after the total screw up of mass effect 3 the  damage that the now EX-CEO's attitude towards the people that made bioware damaged the franchise as well as biowares reputation.

the ONLY way for all of this to be fixed is to release a post me3 SP mission and i dont mean a couple of hours i mean something that takes at MINIMUM 6 hours to fix the ending and give our shepard the ending that WE WANT.

look at thegears of war series, the ending was what everyone wanted, OUR fenix gets a happy ending abet with the loss of his father but we still got the ending we wqanted, it gave us satisfaction knowning the person we gave YEARS of our life dedicated to our char but we were satisfied.

mass effect 3, so many pre-release interviews, so many promises so many garentee's so much stuff promised and guess what, EVERY SINGLE ONE WAS BROKEN, we then had CEO'sderate and belittle US, the people that BOUGHT THE GAME and now those CEO's are quitting because they cannot take critisisim and yet they STILL berate and belittle US.

mass effect 4, no shepard and were to play a soilder, thats NOTHING new because we all know why, oh yeah multiplayer, being a soilder gives then soooooooooo many new options, na i dont think so toss in the fact we cannot import our save is obviously  going to be true.

so this is why i wont be getting mass effect 4 unless it is shepard, remember bioware LISTEN TO US WE KNOW GAMES better than you on that front.

#2
Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*

Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*
  • Guests
They can take out the main character, didn't you notice they don't mind making stupid decisions.

Also I was disappointed with Gears of war 3.
Didn't get an epilogue and I didn't get to see Anna do something naughty.

Not only that I wanted to see the queen get a future too.
None of that happened.

Modifié par A Bethesda Fan, 19 octobre 2012 - 12:22 .


#3
Dav3VsTh3World

Dav3VsTh3World
  • Members
  • 567 messages
In all seriousness it'd be impossible for Shepard to be the protagonist in ME4 since 2 of the 3 possible starts of the game has Shepard being dead.

Also if you ask me the series needs to be set at a different time period

#4
Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*

Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*
  • Guests

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

In all seriousness it'd be impossible for Shepard to be the protagonist in ME4 since 2 of the 3 possible starts of the game has Shepard being dead.

Also if you ask me the series needs to be set at a different time period



2 of those endings were wrong so the canon ending would be him alive.
The majority rules, per say.

#5
Zazzerka

Zazzerka
  • Members
  • 9 532 messages

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Also I was disappointed with Gears of war 3.
Didn't get an epilogue and I didn't get to see Anya do something naughty.

You think that Marcus would allow himself to be seen expressing an emotion besides anger?

#6
jstme

jstme
  • Members
  • 2 007 messages
I agree with you about ME3. But lets be reasonable - making 4th game that takes into the account various choices and characters from previous 3 will end even worse then ME3 did.
They cannot do it with schedule/budget they have,even if the writing team will have enough talent to pull it off - which is a very big IF by itself as can be witnessed by ME3.
Thus the need to take as little various choices as possible from previous games while remaining in Mass Effect universe. Impossible to do if main hero is Shepard.
They will go either for prequel,DA2 style sequel or distant future sequel.
And personally i do not see any reason to boycott anything before release. Just lots of reasons not to preorder.

#7
fchopin

fchopin
  • Members
  • 5 061 messages
I have no problem with the no more Shepard as i did not expect Shepard to return again.

For the rest we will see what they do but i don’t want a prequel in the same Mass Effect universe or anything to do with Synthesis.

#8
Dav3VsTh3World

Dav3VsTh3World
  • Members
  • 567 messages

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

In all seriousness it'd be impossible for Shepard to be the protagonist in ME4 since 2 of the 3 possible starts of the game has Shepard being dead.

Also if you ask me the series needs to be set at a different time period



2 of those endings were wrong so the canon ending would be him alive.
The majority rules, per say.


F*** NO!!!!

If 2 of those choices were wrong why would Bioware have even put them in the game to begin with?

Plus canonizing Mass Effect would destroy the very foundation of what made Mass Effect ... Mass Effect, The different choices that made your storyline different to everyone else,

The minute you start to make the game straightforward with no choices is the minute ME3 becomes another generic Space Marine TPS

#9
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages
They have been saying this right from the start. If this piece of 'news' disappoints you, it's your own damn fault.

#10
Beama Beorhtost

Beama Beorhtost
  • Members
  • 167 messages
Why is the Montreal studio commenting on the next Mass Effect? Aren't they in charge of the Multiplayer and MMO projects?...

#11
mumba

mumba
  • Members
  • 4 997 messages
Bioware shouldn't allow themselves to make a new Mass Effect game without Shepard since they screwed ME3 up completely. They've already shot themselves in the foot twice, what's next?

#12
Matchy Pointy

Matchy Pointy
  • Members
  • 1 229 messages
Shepard was the main character of this trilogy, as announced from the start. Not the Mass Effect universe.

#13
Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*

Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*
  • Guests

GT Zazzerka wrote...

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Also I was disappointed with Gears of war 3.
Didn't get an epilogue and I didn't get to see Anya do something naughty.

You think that Marcus would allow himself to be seen expressing an emotion besides anger?


Glad you fixed her name I forgot what it was, I was lucky to even get anna.
Marcus did display some emotions in GOW1 that were not anger.

It went like "surprised face... shocked face.... angry face", as you can see everything ends in anger for him.

#14
Nicksta92

Nicksta92
  • Members
  • 501 messages
Q_Q

They've said this from the start. It'd be really dumb if Shep returned. And about your James Bond comment, this series isn't called Commander Shepard for a reason: it's not just about Shepard. They've told us, I don't know, maybe a million times or more that this TRILOGY is about Shep and ME3 was THE END OF SHEP'S STORY.

So, yeah. I'll play ME4, you can fester in anger because nothing went your way. Cya

#15
Discouraged_one

Discouraged_one
  • Members
  • 356 messages
Not sure how this is going to work.

Time will tell I guess (I mean, DLC)

#16
CrazyRah

CrazyRah
  • Members
  • 13 280 messages
Shepard is larger than Mass Effect for me so naturally a game without Shepard is way less interesting to me. But that Shepard wouldn't return in a new Mass Effect game has been known for a long time so this is no shocker

#17
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages

Mumba1511 wrote...

Bioware shouldn't allow themselves to make a new Mass Effect game without Shepard since they screwed ME3 up completely. They've already shot themselves in the foot twice, what's next?

They didn't screw up anything, what are you talking about?

#18
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages

GT Zazzerka wrote...

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Also I was disappointed with Gears of war 3.
Didn't get an epilogue and I didn't get to see Anya do something naughty.

You think that Marcus would allow himself to be seen expressing an emotion besides anger?


That doesn't prevent the scene from happening ; )

And her name is Anya, Bethesda...

Image IPB'd by GT.

Modifié par Jade8aby88, 19 octobre 2012 - 01:06 .


#19
Isichar

Isichar
  • Members
  • 10 124 messages

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Mumba1511 wrote...

Bioware shouldn't allow themselves to make a new Mass Effect game without Shepard since they screwed ME3 up completely. They've already shot themselves in the foot twice, what's next?

They didn't screw up anything, what are you talking about?


No one answer that!

Its a trap!


#20
Gravbh

Gravbh
  • Members
  • 539 messages

Nicksta92 wrote...

Q_Q

They've said this from the start. It'd be really dumb if Shep returned. And about your James Bond comment, this series isn't called Commander Shepard for a reason: it's not just about Shepard. They've told us, I don't know, maybe a million times or more that this TRILOGY is about Shep and ME3 was THE END OF SHEP'S STORY.

So, yeah. I'll play ME4, you can fester in anger because nothing went your way. Cya


It's true, they've said this multiple times, well before ME3 was even released.

To be fair, Bungie said the same thing about Masterchief. Oh hey look who's back? Granted, Bungie doesn't own Halo anymore.

#21
Jadebaby

Jadebaby
  • Members
  • 13 229 messages

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Mumba1511 wrote...

Bioware shouldn't allow themselves to make a new Mass Effect game without Shepard since they screwed ME3 up completely. They've already shot themselves in the foot twice, what's next?

They didn't screw up anything, what are you talking about?


I love it when you're sarcastic, Brovikk Image IPB

#22
Zazzerka

Zazzerka
  • Members
  • 9 532 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

GT Zazzerka wrote...

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Also I was disappointed with Gears of war 3.
Didn't get an epilogue and I didn't get to see Anya do something naughty.

You think that Marcus would allow himself to be seen expressing an emotion besides anger?


That doesn't prevent the scene from happening ; )

And her name is Anya, Bethesda...

:ph34r:'d by GT.

I beat you by 36 minutes, it was hardly a ninja, Jade. :)

And you could be right.

"OH GOD ANYA, KILLING LOCUST TURNS ME ON HELL YEAH HOO RAH DELTA SQUAD."

Hmm. Maybe save it for 'Gears of ****.'

Modifié par GT Zazzerka, 19 octobre 2012 - 01:09 .


#23
Brovikk Rasputin

Brovikk Rasputin
  • Members
  • 3 825 messages

Jade8aby88 wrote...

Brovikk Rasputin wrote...

Mumba1511 wrote...

Bioware shouldn't allow themselves to make a new Mass Effect game without Shepard since they screwed ME3 up completely. They've already shot themselves in the foot twice, what's next?

They didn't screw up anything, what are you talking about?


I love it when you're sarcastic, Brovikk Image IPB

I love it when you're wrong, Jade. 

#24
CrimsonNephilim

CrimsonNephilim
  • Members
  • 1 648 messages
Bioware is in an awkward spot right now. The last few games they have released have flopped in one form or another: DA2, SWTOR, ME3.

A lot of staff got fired after TOR's failure, other major key players left, and now the Co-founders are leaving next month. Ray and Greg's love for story driving the plot of games is why we ended up with games like DA:O and ME1 & 2, with them gone it's hard to tell if we'll continue to get games that are story driven.

Modifié par CrimsonNephilim, 19 octobre 2012 - 01:16 .


#25
LilLino

LilLino
  • Members
  • 886 messages

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

A Bethesda Fan wrote...

Dav3VsTh3World wrote...

In all seriousness it'd be impossible for Shepard to be the protagonist in ME4 since 2 of the 3 possible starts of the game has Shepard being dead.

Also if you ask me the series needs to be set at a different time period



2 of those endings were wrong so the canon ending would be him alive.
The majority rules, per say.


F*** NO!!!!

If 2 of those choices were wrong why would Bioware have even put them in the game to begin with?

Plus canonizing Mass Effect would destroy the very foundation of what made Mass Effect ... Mass Effect, The different choices that made your storyline different to everyone else,

The minute you start to make the game straightforward with no choices is the minute ME3 becomes another generic Space Marine TPS


Oh dude, because maybe they realised some people wanted to end the story with Control or Synthesis. That doesn't suddenly mean sequel has to goddamn consider them. Just like in any random Star Wars game you had Dark Side/Light Side endings in which case Light Side was always the cannon one and people don't whine about it.

Face it, Destroy (EVENTUALLY) Control are the ending most fit for a game in the future. The Reapers are gone, the galaxy is recovering and millions of things can happen. Old guns are still there, but well, old. So it gives us opportunities for cameos, while still having a completely new storyline and tons of new characters.