Aller au contenu

Photo

Sooo... vampires..


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
216 réponses à ce sujet

#151
Harle Cerulean

Harle Cerulean
  • Members
  • 679 messages

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

Harle Cerulean wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

CrustyBot wrote...

Why so much Twilight bashing?

Doesn't half the forum want Cullen to be an LI?


I've never understood Twilight bashing, myself. The books were written for preteens/teens. Kids, essentially. Why so much upset over entertainment meant for young adults? It's not for grownups, so of course the books are going to read a certain way. It's not Kafka, you know? lol.


1) The writing is atrocious.  This is bad enough, but not the major issue.

2) The relationship protrayed in incredibly disturbing, but it's treated as though it's ideal, and not dangerous.  Edward Cullen stalks Bella.  He disables her vehicle so that she can't spend time with her friends.  He watches her through her window.  The first time they have sex, Edward injures her, he's so rough. 

And this is all portrayed as romantic.

That is the real issue with Twilight.  It takes a dangerous, abusive relationship, and portrays it as something ideal.  I live almost in the center of Twilight-mania - my town is mentioned in the books, and is very close Forks - and the things you hear from the Twilight-tourists are terrifying.  Mothers who want a boy ~just like Edward~ for their daughters, sort of thing.

I'm not saying portraying abusive, dangerous relationships shouldn't happen - but the narrative shouldn't glorify it and treat it like it's the romantic ideal.  One of my favourite books as a teenager had a relationship in it much like Bella and Edward's, and I remember it fondly to this day.  The difference?

The 'Edward' of the pair was the villain, not the hero.  The relationship was treated as the dangerous, disturbing thing it was, and the stalkery, brutal, jealous **** was not treated as a good guy.  He had sympathetic qualities, enough to understand why the heroine liked him, but he was, beyond a doubt, the villain.

That's why I bash Twilight.


Lol. Well, then that means you should bash nearly every vampire story there is, starting with Dracula. Those stories all romanticize monsters who prey on women. After reading your description of Twilight (because I've never read the books, myself) I can safely say that Meyer pretty much re-imagined the same storyline and character dynamic between Vlad Dracul and Mina Harker - a notorious human-female-to-male-vampire romance that was riddled with insanity, abuse, emotional manipulation, and more. Hell, Vlad seduced/attacked/murdered Mina's friend Lucy - that's a far cry from disabling a vehicle in order to put a stop to a sleepover. 

Besides, what person A considers romantic won't always be what person B considers romantic. Some people are turned on by the things you described above. I can see the appeal in it. It's dangerous. Danger excites people. It's also just a fantasy - not real. You know? Plus, your interpretation of stalking/creepy behavior is subjective, you know? Some readers most likely don't see it that way. Anyone will walk away from any book with various interpretations. 

I don't know. It all just seems kinda petty to me. (I don't mean to offend you by saying that, Harle...)


First, you clearly haven't paid much attention to your example.  Dracula?  Not a hero.  I've read it, I'm quite aware of the contents of the book, and no, Twilight is not a re-imagining of it.  Same with many other vampire novels.  Trust, I've read quite a few!

The difference is that Edward Cullen, the stalker and abuser in question, is presented as a hero, and the things he does are presented as good.  When you present abuse and controlling behavior as "normal" or "good," it is a problem.  It's neither normal nor good, in fact, it's very, very wrong.

Moreover, as you said youself, the Twilight books are aimed at a younger audience.  Do you have any idea how many teenage girls end up in abusive relationships?  Presenting an abusive relationship as "good" in a book meants for them is irresponsible at best.

And no.  Stalking is not subjective.  Someone watching someone else through their window?  Unless the watcher has explicit permission from the person they're watching to do so, that behavior is stalking (or, you know, if it's legal police survellance or whatnot).  Abuse is not subjective.  Controlling behavior is not subjective.   There's a far cry between BDSM and "this is the wedding night, they are not being particularly kinky, and the woman spends the next week in pain, and this is treated like it's normal." 

I would not take issue with Twilight's romance, if Edward were not presented as the hero of the story, and the things he does were portrayed in the narrative as being wrong.  However, they are not, and that is a serious issue.

Modifié par Harle Cerulean, 29 octobre 2012 - 01:26 .


#152
HurricaneGinger

HurricaneGinger
  • Members
  • 2 197 messages

Harle Cerulean wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

Harle Cerulean wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

CrustyBot wrote...

Why so much Twilight bashing?

Doesn't half the forum want Cullen to be an LI?


I've never understood Twilight bashing, myself. The books were written for preteens/teens. Kids, essentially. Why so much upset over entertainment meant for young adults? It's not for grownups, so of course the books are going to read a certain way. It's not Kafka, you know? lol.


1) The writing is atrocious.  This is bad enough, but not the major issue.

2) The relationship protrayed in incredibly disturbing, but it's treated as though it's ideal, and not dangerous.  Edward Cullen stalks Bella.  He disables her vehicle so that she can't spend time with her friends.  He watches her through her window.  The first time they have sex, Edward injures her, he's so rough. 

And this is all portrayed as romantic.

That is the real issue with Twilight.  It takes a dangerous, abusive relationship, and portrays it as something ideal.  I live almost in the center of Twilight-mania - my town is mentioned in the books, and is very close Forks - and the things you hear from the Twilight-tourists are terrifying.  Mothers who want a boy ~just like Edward~ for their daughters, sort of thing.

I'm not saying portraying abusive, dangerous relationships shouldn't happen - but the narrative shouldn't glorify it and treat it like it's the romantic ideal.  One of my favourite books as a teenager had a relationship in it much like Bella and Edward's, and I remember it fondly to this day.  The difference?

The 'Edward' of the pair was the villain, not the hero.  The relationship was treated as the dangerous, disturbing thing it was, and the stalkery, brutal, jealous **** was not treated as a good guy.  He had sympathetic qualities, enough to understand why the heroine liked him, but he was, beyond a doubt, the villain.

That's why I bash Twilight.


Lol. Well, then that means you should bash nearly every vampire story there is, starting with Dracula. Those stories all romanticize monsters who prey on women. After reading your description of Twilight (because I've never read the books, myself) I can safely say that Meyer pretty much re-imagined the same storyline and character dynamic between Vlad Dracul and Mina Harker - a notorious human-female-to-male-vampire romance that was riddled with insanity, abuse, emotional manipulation, and more. Hell, Vlad seduced/attacked/murdered Mina's friend Lucy - that's a far cry from disabling a vehicle in order to put a stop to a sleepover. 

Besides, what person A considers romantic won't always be what person B considers romantic. Some people are turned on by the things you described above. I can see the appeal in it. It's dangerous. Danger excites people. It's also just a fantasy - not real. You know? Plus, your interpretation of stalking/creepy behavior is subjective, you know? Some readers most likely don't see it that way. Anyone will walk away from any book with various interpretations. 

I don't know. It all just seems kinda petty to me. (I don't mean to offend you by saying that, Harle...)


First, you clearly haven't paid much attention to your example.  Dracula?  Not a hero.  I've read it, I'm quite aware of the contents of the book, and no, Twilight is not a re-imagining of it.  Same with many other vampire novels.  Trust, I've read quite a few!

The difference is that Edward Cullen, the stalker and abuser in question, is presented as a hero, and the things he does are presented as good.  When you present abuse and controlling behavior as "normal" or "good," it is a problem.  It's neither normal nor good, in fact, it's very, very wrong.

Moreover, as you said youself, the Twilight books are aimed at a younger audience.  Do you have any idea how many teenage girls end up in abusive relationships?  Presenting an abusive relationship as "good" in a book meants for them is irresponsible at best.

And no.  Stalking is not subjective.  Someone watching someone else through their window?  Unless the watcher has explicit permission from the person they're watching to do so, that behavior is stalking (or, you know, if it's legal police survellance or whatnot).  Abuse is not subjective.  Controlling behavior is not subjective.   There's a far cry between BDSM and "this is the wedding night, they are not being particularly kinky, and the woman spends the next week in pain, and this is treated like it's normal." 

I would not take issue with Twilight's romance, if Edward were not presented as the hero of the story, and the things he does were portrayed in the narrative as being wrong.  However, they are not, and that is a serious issue.


Despite how off topic the thread is now, I agree with this person. XD


But back on topic: I certainly hope they don't add vampires. I don't know why, but vampires don't seem to fit with the lore in Dragon Age - or the world, whatever you want to call it. We have Blood Mages, I think that's close enough.

#153
Foune

Foune
  • Members
  • 156 messages
Vampires dosn't mean twilight people, remember that BG2 had some awesome vampires, Bodhi still scares the **** outta me.

#154
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages
If they add vampires and make it where yo can become one I will buy this game Bloodrayne FTW!

#155
SafetyShattered

SafetyShattered
  • Members
  • 2 866 messages

Rawgrim wrote...

Twilight and simmilar stuff has ruined vamps for me, I`m afraid. Werewolves are getting close to that fate too.


This. As soon as I saw the "sparkly" twilight vampires I died a little inside. *sigh* I miss the days when vampires were scary Image IPB

#156
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

Shadowfang12 wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...

Twilight and simmilar stuff has ruined vamps for me, I`m afraid. Werewolves are getting close to that fate too.


This. As soon as I saw the "sparkly" twilight vampires I died a little inside. *sigh* I miss the days when vampires were scary Image IPB

Vampires where romanticized long before Twilight.

#157
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 230 messages

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

Shadowfang12 wrote...

Rawgrim wrote...

Twilight and simmilar stuff has ruined vamps for me, I`m afraid. Werewolves are getting close to that fate too.


This. As soon as I saw the "sparkly" twilight vampires I died a little inside. *sigh* I miss the days when vampires were scary Image IPB

Vampires where romanticized long before Twilight.

Yes, but rarely with such a paradoxical popularity and atrocious writing, and never have they sparkled :pinched:

#158
Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*

Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*
  • Guests

Harle Cerulean wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

Harle Cerulean wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

CrustyBot wrote...

Why so much Twilight bashing?

Doesn't half the forum want Cullen to be an LI?


I've never understood Twilight bashing, myself. The books were written for preteens/teens. Kids, essentially. Why so much upset over entertainment meant for young adults? It's not for grownups, so of course the books are going to read a certain way. It's not Kafka, you know? lol.


1) The writing is atrocious.  This is bad enough, but not the major issue.

2) The relationship protrayed in incredibly disturbing, but it's treated as though it's ideal, and not dangerous.  Edward Cullen stalks Bella.  He disables her vehicle so that she can't spend time with her friends.  He watches her through her window.  The first time they have sex, Edward injures her, he's so rough. 

And this is all portrayed as romantic.

That is the real issue with Twilight.  It takes a dangerous, abusive relationship, and portrays it as something ideal.  I live almost in the center of Twilight-mania - my town is mentioned in the books, and is very close Forks - and the things you hear from the Twilight-tourists are terrifying.  Mothers who want a boy ~just like Edward~ for their daughters, sort of thing.

I'm not saying portraying abusive, dangerous relationships shouldn't happen - but the narrative shouldn't glorify it and treat it like it's the romantic ideal.  One of my favourite books as a teenager had a relationship in it much like Bella and Edward's, and I remember it fondly to this day.  The difference?

The 'Edward' of the pair was the villain, not the hero.  The relationship was treated as the dangerous, disturbing thing it was, and the stalkery, brutal, jealous **** was not treated as a good guy.  He had sympathetic qualities, enough to understand why the heroine liked him, but he was, beyond a doubt, the villain.

That's why I bash Twilight.


Lol. Well, then that means you should bash nearly every vampire story there is, starting with Dracula. Those stories all romanticize monsters who prey on women. After reading your description of Twilight (because I've never read the books, myself) I can safely say that Meyer pretty much re-imagined the same storyline and character dynamic between Vlad Dracul and Mina Harker - a notorious human-female-to-male-vampire romance that was riddled with insanity, abuse, emotional manipulation, and more. Hell, Vlad seduced/attacked/murdered Mina's friend Lucy - that's a far cry from disabling a vehicle in order to put a stop to a sleepover. 

Besides, what person A considers romantic won't always be what person B considers romantic. Some people are turned on by the things you described above. I can see the appeal in it. It's dangerous. Danger excites people. It's also just a fantasy - not real. You know? Plus, your interpretation of stalking/creepy behavior is subjective, you know? Some readers most likely don't see it that way. Anyone will walk away from any book with various interpretations. 

I don't know. It all just seems kinda petty to me. (I don't mean to offend you by saying that, Harle...)


First, you clearly haven't paid much attention to your example.  Dracula?  Not a hero.  I've read it, I'm quite aware of the contents of the book, and no, Twilight is not a re-imagining of it.  Same with many other vampire novels.  Trust, I've read quite a few!

The difference is that Edward Cullen, the stalker and abuser in question, is presented as a hero, and the things he does are presented as good.  When you present abuse and controlling behavior as "normal" or "good," it is a problem.  It's neither normal nor good, in fact, it's very, very wrong.

Moreover, as you said youself, the Twilight books are aimed at a younger audience.  Do you have any idea how many teenage girls end up in abusive relationships?  Presenting an abusive relationship as "good" in a book meants for them is irresponsible at best.

And no.  Stalking is not subjective.  Someone watching someone else through their window?  Unless the watcher has explicit permission from the person they're watching to do so, that behavior is stalking (or, you know, if it's legal police survellance or whatnot).  Abuse is not subjective.  Controlling behavior is not subjective.   There's a far cry between BDSM and "this is the wedding night, they are not being particularly kinky, and the woman spends the next week in pain, and this is treated like it's normal." 

I would not take issue with Twilight's romance, if Edward were not presented as the hero of the story, and the things he does were portrayed in the narrative as being wrong.  However, they are not, and that is a serious issue.


Hm. Well I confess I haven't read the books (of Meyer's). And it doesn't matter if Dracula is a hero or not - he's glorified either way. Whether he be hero, anti-hero, or villain - our culture has always glorifed Dracula. (That's all you need to put a character up on a pedestal. Doesn't matter what his or her actual alignment is.) 

But I just feel like this is an extreme over-analysis of a book. Also, I'm not one for censorship - I think people should be free to write whatever they want. (e.g. The Catholic community wanted to shut down Pullman's "His Dark Materials" series which is aimed at kids and it has atheist undertones. I say to hell with that. Pullman has a right to write what he wants and if parents don't want to expose their kids to atheist literature, then they should take the responsibility to censor it out in the home - not in the library or bookstore...)

If parents don't want their kids to read it... well... that's their responsibility. Honestly, I don't think Twilight is corrupting our society. That seems farfetched. Besides, with or without these books, teen issues (pregnancy, bad relationships, drug use, and the like) have always been, and will continue to be, around. 

Modifié par Trista Faux Hawke, 29 octobre 2012 - 05:36 .


#159
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages
Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.

#160
Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*

Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*
  • Guests
^^^ I've never seen it nor have I read the books. I have no interest in it. But I've always thought the Twilight bashing has always been completely out of line, far-fetched, and over the top. It just kind of seems like the trendy thing to do: bash on Twilight. It's like you're not cool/sane/normal unless you do it. I just don't feel the series is worth that much of an emotional investment. I say let it do its thing.

#161
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

^^^ I've never seen it nor have I read the books. I have no interest in it. But I've always thought the Twilight bashing has always been completely out of line, far-fetched, and over the top. It just kind of seems like the trendy thing to do: bash on Twilight. It's like you're not cool/sane/normal unless you do it. I just don't feel the series is worth that much of an emotional investment. I say let it do its thing.


The first time I saw twilight, I went into it with my views colored by all the sparkle bashing, so I was expecting to hate it, but it turned out to be really good to me and I've been following the series ever since.So yes, I believe the twibashing herd is packed full of sheep.

I don't read the books either, I'm a visual media person.

#162
Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*

Guest_Trista Faux Hawke_*
  • Guests

Emzamination wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

^^^ I've never seen it nor have I read the books. I have no interest in it. But I've always thought the Twilight bashing has always been completely out of line, far-fetched, and over the top. It just kind of seems like the trendy thing to do: bash on Twilight. It's like you're not cool/sane/normal unless you do it. I just don't feel the series is worth that much of an emotional investment. I say let it do its thing.


The first time I saw twilight, I went into it with my views colored by all the sparkle bashing, so I was expecting to hate it, but it turned out to be really good to me and I've been following the series ever since.So yes, I believe the twibashing herd is packed full of sheep.

I don't read the books either, I'm a visual media person.


Truthfully I just think people have the freedom and the right to enjoy whatever it is they want to enjoy - books, film, artwork, and so forth. There's always a group that is trying to shove its opinions onto others, pushing to censor out whatever it is they're biased against for various reasons. It's a violation of freedom. 

Stephanie Meyer has as much right to write Twilight as James Joyce had to write Ulysses. Both were literary works met with great disapproval and the sudden onslaught of bashing. Book burnings swallowed up the likes of Ulysses at one point in history, in fact.

If we tolerate venomous hatred for books - even if they are poorly written - then we find ourselves taking numerous steps backward, tossing books into the fire pits and tacking their names onto banned book lists. 

As a writer, I don't stand for that sh*t. Stephanie Meyer can write whatever she pleases. People can read it or they can ignore it. 

Modifié par Trista Faux Hawke, 29 octobre 2012 - 06:00 .


#163
Zanallen

Zanallen
  • Members
  • 4 425 messages
Vampires, werewolves and zombies are already in the game.

#164
Urzon

Urzon
  • Members
  • 979 messages

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.


The movies are only good in the Mystery Science Theater style. Because if it wasn't for the laughs, the whole movie series would be a big melodramatic bore.

#165
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

Trista Faux Hawke wrote...

^^^ I've never seen it nor have I read the books. I have no interest in it. But I've always thought the Twilight bashing has always been completely out of line, far-fetched, and over the top. It just kind of seems like the trendy thing to do: bash on Twilight. It's like you're not cool/sane/normal unless you do it. I just don't feel the series is worth that much of an emotional investment. I say let it do its thing.


The first time I saw twilight, I went into it with my views colored by all the sparkle bashing, so I was expecting to hate it, but it turned out to be really good to me and I've been following the series ever since.So yes, I believe the twibashing herd is packed full of sheep.

I don't read the books either, I'm a visual media person.


Truthfully I just think people have the freedom and the right to enjoy whatever it is they want to enjoy - books, film, artwork, and so forth. There's always a group that is trying to shove its opinions onto others, pushing to censor out whatever it is they're biased against for various reasons. It's a violation of freedom. 

Stephanie Meyer has as much right to write Twilight as James Joyce had to write Ulysses. Both were literary works met with great disapproval and the sudden onslaught of bashing. Book burnings swallowed up the likes of Ulysses at one point in history, in fact.

If we tolerate venomous hatred for books - even if they are poorly written - then we find ourselves taking numerous steps backward, tossing books into the fire pits and tacking their names onto banned book lists. 

As a writer, I don't stand for that sh*t. Stephanie Meyer can write whatever she pleases. People can read it or they can ignore it. 


I'm certainly not one to argue the finer points of literature.Personally, I'd rather watch trueblood then read through the entire sookie stackhouse mystery book collection.I don't hate books at all, I just don't have the attention span to read through chapter after chapter.But movies based on books? I can watch those all day.

#166
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

Urzon wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.


The movies are only good in the Mystery Science Theater style. Because if it wasn't for the laughs, the whole movie series would be a big melodramatic bore.


The appeal for me was the wars and drama.I can't honestly say I ever saw anything funny in the movie. I'm not saying they didn't implement humour, it just wasn't humour that appealed to me.

#167
EpicBoot2daFace

EpicBoot2daFace
  • Members
  • 3 600 messages

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.

I have seen the first one. I thought it was a **** movie.

IMO, there's already too much focus on romance without the need to include vampires. That's one of Bioware's problems right now. They're too focused on making video game soap operas and not focusing enough on making good video games.

#168
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.

I have seen the first one. I thought it was a **** movie.

IMO, there's already too much focus on romance without the need to include vampires. That's one of Bioware's problems right now. They're too focused on making video game soap operas and not focusing enough on making good video games.


The first movie had a few romantic moments at the end but there was no real romance in the first movie.The first movie focused on bella getting settled into a new town with her dad and edward trying to keep her in the dark about the town history.

Modifié par Emzamination, 29 octobre 2012 - 06:33 .


#169
EpicBoot2daFace

EpicBoot2daFace
  • Members
  • 3 600 messages

Emzamination wrote...

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.

I have seen the first one. I thought it was a **** movie.

IMO, there's already too much focus on romance without the need to include vampires. That's one of Bioware's problems right now. They're too focused on making video game soap operas and not focusing enough on making good video games.


The first movie had a few romantic moments at the end but there was no real romance in the first movie.The first movie focused on bella getting settled into a new town with her dad and edward trying to keep her in the dark about the town history.

It's been years since I've seen it. But I remember most of the movie was about those two characters getting together and her discovering he's a vampire. Either way, it doesn't matter. We both know what happens in the other movies.

Modifié par EpicBoot2daFace, 29 octobre 2012 - 06:45 .


#170
Urzon

Urzon
  • Members
  • 979 messages

Emzamination wrote...

The appeal for me was the wars and drama.I can't honestly say I ever saw anything funny in the movie. I'm not saying they didn't implement humour, it just wasn't humour that appealed to me.


The humor, for me at least, came from the fact that nothing made sense in the movies. Not to mention, most of the conflicts in the books/movies could have been solved with a phone call. Bella thought the villain in the first movie had her mother, and she came up with the scheme to go save her. She broke her father's heart, got driven all the way to Arizona, and was about to give herself over to the bad guy.

Yet not once, did she ever think to mayber, just maybe, call her mom or her mother's boyfriend, just to make sure she is all right. The same simple solution, the telephone, can be applied to the second book/movie. All it would have taken was a phone call for Edward to find out that Bella's alright.  

#171
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

Twilights actually a really good movie.I betting most of the people bashing it have never seen it, such is the way these things go.

I have seen the first one. I thought it was a **** movie.

IMO, there's already too much focus on romance without the need to include vampires. That's one of Bioware's problems right now. They're too focused on making video game soap operas and not focusing enough on making good video games.


The first movie had a few romantic moments at the end but there was no real romance in the first movie.The first movie focused on bella getting settled into a new town with her dad and edward trying to keep her in the dark about the town history.

It's been years since I've seen it. But I remember most of the movie was about those two characters getting together and her discovering he's a vampire. Either way, it doesn't matter. We both know what happens in the other movies.


The love triangle was definitely a sub-plot.

#172
Arawr

Arawr
  • Members
  • 115 messages
No.

#173
Emzamination

Emzamination
  • Members
  • 3 782 messages

Urzon wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

The appeal for me was the wars and drama.I can't honestly say I ever saw anything funny in the movie. I'm not saying they didn't implement humour, it just wasn't humour that appealed to me.


The humor, for me at least, came from the fact that nothing made sense in the movies. Not to mention, most of the conflicts in the books/movies could have been solved with a phone call. Bella thought the villain in the first movie had her mother, and she came up with the scheme to go save her. She broke her father's heart, got driven all the way to Arizona, and was about to give herself over to the bad guy.

Yet not once, did she ever think to mayber, just maybe, call her mom or her mother's boyfriend, just to make sure she is all right. The same simple solution, the telephone, can be applied to the second book/movie. All it would have taken was a phone call for Edward to find out that Bella's alright.  


A killer vampire who specialized in tracking people called her from her mother's home, why wouldn't she believe him? In a state of shock, I would. People are capable of formulating grand nonsensical notions when the ones they care about are in danger.

Take Anakin skywalker from the starwars series for instance.Instead of talking to his wife and mentor about his dreams of his wife dying, he let his pride get in the way and partnered up with sidious to murder innocent children in a attempt to save her instead.

#174
Urzon

Urzon
  • Members
  • 979 messages
Because you never should trust or believe anything a bad guy says, much less one that is out to kill you.

#175
n7stormrunner

n7stormrunner
  • Members
  • 1 605 messages
in less they are fae then trust them to forget to tell you something important but never lie... hmm instead of new vamps, how about more things like witherfang or the elder tree