The Dragon Age series story alone was very good. Including the DLC's too. What I thought was lacking was there was no multiplayer like Mass Effect 3. Having an arena would be fun and gaining exp with it too. For Example. Borderlands 2 and Darksiders 2.
Multiplayer or Horde Mode
Débuté par
Bookphan
, oct. 20 2012 04:38
#1
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:38
#2
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:47
That works nice and well for those games because, well, they're not really traditional RPGs like DA is suppose to be. ME is more an action rpg, and BL is a FPS and Darksiders is a beat'em up or something. I don't think an arena is the worse way to handle multiplayer, but I don't think DA should even have a multiplayer option. Maybe something like Neverwinter nights, but even then...
#3
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 04:52
I think Multyplayer shoud be a separate DLC. I hate it.
It has no reason to exist in DA.
It already have little meaning in ME3. In DA3 is ridiculus, ad absorb resources for the Single Player.
It has no reason to exist in DA.
It already have little meaning in ME3. In DA3 is ridiculus, ad absorb resources for the Single Player.
#4
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 05:05
I personally don't see how a multiplayer mode can add to the game, I play RPGs because I want it to be all about me. Multiplayer whether co-op or vs kinda takes away from that feeling. Much of the reason why I don't like MMOs. I will admit ME suprised me with its MP and I enjoy it, but they put it together in a way that fits with the main campaign. I can't see it done for Dragonage, likely because the difference in mechanics.
#5
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 05:08
Felya87 wrote...
I think Multyplayer shoud be a separate DLC. I hate it.
It has no reason to exist in DA.
It already have little meaning in ME3. In DA3 is ridiculus, ad absorb resources for the Single Player.
Let us wait till Mp actually exist and we are given a reason for its existence before we start the stoning and condemnations.Everything deserves a fair trial, no?
#6
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 05:14
Emzamination wrote...
Felya87 wrote...
I think Multyplayer shoud be a separate DLC. I hate it.
It has no reason to exist in DA.
It already have little meaning in ME3. In DA3 is ridiculus, ad absorb resources for the Single Player.
Let us wait till Mp actually exist and we are given a reason for its existence before we start the stoning and condemnations.Everything deserves a fair trial, no?
If it is not going to exist, it will be even better. But there is too much word about it.
But why shouldn't be a separated thing from the game? I'm one of those people who is not going to use it if there is, so why can't be something someone can or not download when and if he/she want?
And a function useless for some people would not going to take away space for the SP.
#7
Posté 20 octobre 2012 - 05:18
Emzamination wrote...
Felya87 wrote...
I think Multyplayer shoud be a separate DLC. I hate it.
It has no reason to exist in DA.
It already have little meaning in ME3. In DA3 is ridiculus, ad absorb resources for the Single Player.
Let us wait till Mp actually exist and we are given a reason for its existence before we start the stoning and condemnations.Everything deserves a fair trial, no?
Because then people wouldn't have anything to pre-emptively complain about.
I was on the anti-MP bandwagon with ME, until I actually tried it and loved it. As a result I won't condemn any possible MP mode in DA, even if I do feel it has even less of a place in a DA game than it does in ME.





Retour en haut






