Aller au contenu

Photo

Magic is meant to serve man, never to rule him. It's not ruling to want the same rights as any man. (Templar-Mage War Topic)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
656 réponses à ce sujet

#526
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Palidane wrote...

Ok, let's try to move discussion along.

DA3 has just started and your an Inquisitor. Let's just say your job is to end the Mage-Templar War. The mages are holed up in Andoral's Reach, where they await the onslaught of the Templars, who have broken ties with the Chantry in order to kill more mages.

What do you do?

Make contact with both parties to see if there is anyone on either side willing to listen to reason.  Sweeten the pot with an offer of amnesty to any mage or Templar willing to return to the fold.  If not enough mages and Templars take advantage of the offer then the Chantry will have to raise a whole new army all it's own or rely on the Crowned Heads of Thedas to supply the forces to put down these twin rebellions.

Modifié par General User, 25 octobre 2012 - 01:05 .


#527
TK514

TK514
  • Members
  • 3 794 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

TK514 wrote...

KDD-0063 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

Snipped some of the pyramid.

And there is absolutely zero causation between the circle and the abuses of Wilhelm or Connor, and only marginally Uldred because he was in a Circle when his pride got the better of him.

Yet the Circle is explicitly designed to prevent both Wilhelm and Connor's situations.  Had both been in the Circle, Connor's situation never would have come up, and if Wilhelm did still go ahead with his demon studies somehow, the results would have been contained by the people best equipped to deal with them, instead of waiting to be unleashed by an innocent little girl on an isolated villiage in the middle of nowhere.

In fact, the Circle DID work when it came to containing Uldred.  Instead of him bargaining away his soul in some defenseless town or villiage, he was immediately contained and the damage he could do was minimized.

Connor and Uldred had the same problem:  They were both mages who would do anything, and make any deal, to get what they wanted.  The only difference is that what Connor wanted was born of love and Uldred's wants were born of pride.

In all three situations, given what we are explicity shown, the Circle is the answer, not the problem.


Here, the problem is obvious. The circle is surely great ... and let us make it a prison.
And that is explicitly the reason why these three mages want to stay away from the circle.
It would be much better had the circle been a simple magic academy.

Also Uldred would not bargain his soul away in some defenseless town. For a senior enchanter, bargain with demon is clearly a last resort.


It was more of a leper colony than a prison, and for very good reasons, as already illustrated.

Edit:  And Connor's actions had nothing to do with fear of being sent to the Circle.  His motivation was purely and simply to save his father at any cost.  The only way, in fact, to have prevented what happened in Redcliffe would have been to send him to the Circle, where they would have cut ties with his parents.  And they would have cut ties with his parents for this very reason.

Or the Circle could be set up differently so that parents weren't tempted to hide their mage children in the first place. Or it could allow for a certified mage to go to Redcliffe and tutor Connor, so that Isolde didn't have to turn to an apostate who was himself not fully trained.

There are plenty of ways that situations like Connor's could be prevented, if the Chantry and Templars were more reasonable.


Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.

#528
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages

TK514 wrote...

Palidane wrote...

Ok, let's try to move discussion along.

DA3 has just started and your an Inquisitor. Let's just say your job is to end the Mage-Templar War. The mages are holed up in Andoral's Reach, where they await the onslaught of the Templars, who have broken ties with the Chantry in order to kill more mages.

What do you do?


The Templars are in a tough spot here.  Normally, I'd say just maintain the seige of The Reach, because Mages need to eat just like everyone else.  Poison the water supplies, throw festering animal corpses over the walls, that sort of thing, and wait until desperation forces the mages out into open battle.

The main reason this doesn't seem to be a valid strategy for the Templars is because they are also fighting against time.  Since they have broken with the Chantry, the Templars have to bring the mages to battle and defeat them before the lyrium supply runs out.  That means instead of a protracted seige, the Templars are going to be forced into a costly assault.  That means breaking down the fortress and dealing with whatever horrors the more extremist mages have done to themselves and their supposed allies inside.  Avernus, Uldred and Orsino (And Decimus, and Grace, and....) give us some pretty good examples of what extremist mages will do when given the chance, and thus what the Templars will face once they get inside.  Past that, even should the Templars prevail, I'd say they're still in trouble.  Ultimately they have to secure another supply of Lyrium or cease to be a functioning organization.  


The Mages also can't get their own food. The population isn't very sympathetic, they've all grown up in towers, and their confined to one castle anyway. I don't think you can magically summon food, so they have to survive on whatevers in the fortress. So if they're limited by food, and the templars are limited by Lyrium, all signs point to this being one enormous knock-down battle

That said, Lord Seeker Lambert might have found ways to get around the Chantry's lyrium trade. If the mages can likewise magically summon food, we are looking at a very odd situation. When the defenders can call down fire from above, your gonna need more than a battering ram to break in. I'm thinking long range catapults and ballista will be neccessary, which I'm not sure the templars have. Heck, they might need explosives, which is only available from the Qunari (who might donate it if they think it will help the baas learn to tame their mages) or a certain dwarf friend of ours.

In the meantime, were I Justina and the Chantry, I would begin rebuilding the Chantry aligned Templars and Circles with an eye towards a more progressive and humane system of checks and balances.  I would make the Mages and Templars partners in the quarantine, rather than watcher and watched.  I'd also use the Chantry's considerable economic power to strengthen the monopolistic flow of lyrium from the dwarves to the Chantry.  I'd want the breakaway Templars to get just enough lyrium to deal with the rebel mages, and then cut off what remains of both sides.


Exactly what I'm planning on. The Circle system works, the mages just need more say. A lot more, but still. I think I'd cut off the templars immediatley though. These guys have gone rogue completely, and are the ultimate loose cannons. This is a very delicate situation, and the Chantry has to do everything it can to bring down the fanatics on it's own side. Mages are more polite when they know your the only thing keeping the zealots off them.

If I'm a mage, I'm in the most trouble of all.  On one hand, I'm in a fortress besieged by an army that wants to kill me because I'm a mage.  On the other hand, I'm locked inside a fortress with a fair number of desperate people and lunatics who are going to start turning to blood magic once the lyrium runs out, and most likely going to start summoning demons and fade spirits to bolster their forces.  It's not much of a step before that sort of thing starts leading to sacrifice and possession.  In short, the mages have to win quickly and decisively enough to scatter and escape before they are destroyed from within, and even should that happen, life is looking pretty bleak.  A mage would spend the rest of their lives in fear, wondering if today is the day the mage hunters show up or, perhaps even worse, the day that friends and neighbors finally clue in to the fact that they have a mage among them and set up the bonfire in the middle of town.

Regardless of if they win or not, the Mages have chosen pretty much the single worst method they could have of gaining their 'freedom', because ultimately they will never be free.  Normal society simply has too much reason to fear them, and too many years of Andrastian reminders to hate them.  A smarter council of mages would have petitioned the Divine directly to address the worst of the abuses, and worked from within to change the system.  Now, I'm afraid it's too late for those who fled to the Reach.


The situation has mostly been taken out of their hands now. But your right, the mages have to either come to and understanding with the Chantry or wipe it out, which is beyond their capabilities. 

One thing we have to keep in mind though is that not every mage in Thedas is as at Andoral's Reach. We have many still in their Circles, right along side the templars. The Ferelden Circle was able to overpower their resident Templars though, and they weren't even unified. If most Circles can take out the templars immediatley on hand (assuming ALL templars are breaking ties with the Chantry, which doesn't strike me as likely), then they have time to get their act together before reinforcements arrive from the capital. This could start sieges all across Thedas.

#529
SeptimusMagistos

SeptimusMagistos
  • Members
  • 1 154 messages

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.


Right, because this policy worked out beautifully for the Jedi.

If your plan for dealing with a group of supernaturally empowered people involved removing the ties that bind them to the rest of humanity, please stop.

#530
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.

Which would've been completely unnecessary if Isolde had a legitimate mage tutor for Connor because Loghain wouldn't be able to manipulate Jowan to poison Eamon in the first place. Do you see how that works?

How come people look at Connor's situation and say "mage kids need to be locked up", instead of saying "poisoning people's parents is bad, mmmkay"?

#531
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

SeptimusMagistos wrote...

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.


Right, because this policy worked out beautifully for the Jedi.

If your plan for dealing with a group of supernaturally empowered people involved removing the ties that bind them to the rest of humanity, please stop.

THANK YOU

#532
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.

Which would've been completely unnecessary if Isolde had a legitimate mage tutor for Connor because Loghain wouldn't be able to manipulate Jowan to poison Eamon in the first place. Do you see how that works?

How come people look at Connor's situation and say "mage kids need to be locked up", instead of saying "poisoning people's parents is bad, mmmkay"?

Because the fact "mage kids need to be 'locked up'" is (apparently) not obvious to alot of people.

#533
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

General User wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.

Which would've been completely unnecessary if Isolde had a legitimate mage tutor for Connor because Loghain wouldn't be able to manipulate Jowan to poison Eamon in the first place. Do you see how that works?

How come people look at Connor's situation and say "mage kids need to be locked up", instead of saying "poisoning people's parents is bad, mmmkay"?

Because the fact "mage kids need to be 'locked up'" is (apparently) not obvious to alot of people.

It's not obvious because it's a moronic answer.

Demons prey on emotional instability. Yanking young children away from their parents, dragging them across the country and shutting them up in a tower is not generally conducive to the cultivation of happy and healthy adults.

It's not the least bit surprising that many Circle Mages go insane or turn to demons and blood magic. What is surprising is that there are any sane mages at all.

#534
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

General User wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

TK514 wrote...

Any situation that doesn't cut ties between Connor and his parents doesn't prevent what happened in Redcliffe.  Connor had a child's love for a parent, and, as a child, did anything he could to save said parent.

Which would've been completely unnecessary if Isolde had a legitimate mage tutor for Connor because Loghain wouldn't be able to manipulate Jowan to poison Eamon in the first place. Do you see how that works?

How come people look at Connor's situation and say "mage kids need to be locked up", instead of saying "poisoning people's parents is bad, mmmkay"?

Because the fact "mage kids need to be 'locked up'" is (apparently) not obvious to alot of people.

It's not obvious because it's a moronic answer.

Demons prey on emotional instability. Yanking young children away from their parents, dragging them across the country and shutting them up in a tower is not generally conducive to the cultivation of happy and healthy adults.

Children are already emotionally unstable by nature.  Add to that an inborn ability to burn, kill, destroy and turn entire towns into living nightmares and it should become obvious that sending mages to Circles as soon as they first show their abilities is simply the responsible thing to do. 

Modifié par General User, 25 octobre 2012 - 01:33 .


#535
Auintus

Auintus
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

General User wrote...
Children are already emotionally unstable by nature.  Add to that an inborn ability to burn, kill, destroy and turn entire towns into living nightmares and it should become obvious that sending mages to Circles as soon as they first show their abilities is simply the responsible thing to do.  


There could be a better way, but I will agree that training is definately necessary. Malcolm was able to teach Bethany and my Hawke just fine, so the Circle isn't the only answer.

#536
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

General User wrote...
Children are already emotionally unstable by nature.

So let's yank them away from their loved ones and the only home they've ever known! Trauma? What's that? I'm sure they'll get over it, what with all those books to read! I can't forsee any possible negative repurcussions of this strategy!

The Circle prevents nothing. Mages and non-mages alike get possessed regardless. We only have the Chantry's word for it that things would be worse wthout their oversight, and they have every incentive to lie to us.

#537
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Demons prey on emotional instability.


Which, by nature, most humans experience throughout their lives, making mages very vulnerable to more common problems and any desperation suddenly becomes a demon's free dinner.

Taking away a child from his/her parents only saves them from emotional grief down the line, either by parental abuse (who hadn't wanted a mage), the abuse of their peers, the abuse of the villagers, the hardships of life and much more. Same reason why adult mages cannot keep their children, it causes more problems.

Add already that children are prone to bouts of emotional instability by nature and powerful abilities such as lighting things on fire and you've got a problem, any child would abuse the powers they had unless constantly watched by those who'd make them pay for it.

Hell, the Chantry taking the child away often saves the child's life as well because most children don't even make it to the Circle.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 25 octobre 2012 - 01:41 .


#538
SeptimusMagistos

SeptimusMagistos
  • Members
  • 1 154 messages
[quote]General User wrote...

Demons prey on emotional instability. Yanking young children away from their parents, dragging them across the country and shutting them up in a tower is not generally conducive to the cultivation of happy and healthy adults.
[/quote]Children are already emotionally unstable by nature.  Add to that an inborn ability to burn, kill, destroy and turn entire towns into living nightmares and it should become obvious that sending mages to Circles as soon as they first show their abilities is simply the responsible thing to do. 
[/quote]

Training is necessary. Imprisonment isn't.

Why is the distinction so hard to grasp?

#539
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

It's not the least bit surprising that many Circle Mages go insane or turn to demons and blood magic. What is surprising is that there are any sane mages at all.

That much is true, though not for the reasons you seem to fancy.  The truth is mages are ordinary people with extraordinary abilities.  When you take a mere human being, replete with all the failings that implies, and give them access to such a broad array of fantastic powers it is indeed a wonder any of them do manage to stay sane. 

Infact much hope for mages to stay sane is rightly based on them being insulted from the world in general.  With the obvious corollary being that that same process of insulation also makes it easy for the authorities to deal with things that do go wrong.

Modifié par General User, 25 octobre 2012 - 02:17 .


#540
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Which, by nature, most humans experience throughout their lives, making mages very vulnerable to more common problems and any desperation suddenly becomes a demon's free dinner.

Regular humans are just as susceptible. Lady Harriman wasn't a mage. The templars that were possessed in DA2 and DA:O were not mages.

Taking away a child from his/her parents only saves them from emotional grief down the line, either by parental abuse (who hadn't wanted a mage), the abuse of their peers, the abuse of the villagers,

All things that could've been easily prevented if the Chantry hadn't spread all that mage-hate around to begin with.

Add already that children are prone to bouts of emotional instability by nature and powerful abilities such as lighting things on fire and you've got a problem, any child would abuse the powers they had unless constantly watched by those who'd make them pay for it.

Because the only way to deal with disobedient children is merciless beatings!

Hell, the Chantry taking the child away often saves the child's life as well because most children don't even make it to the Circle.

How incredibly convenient for the Chantry.

#541
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

SeptimusMagistos wrote...


Training is necessary. Imprisonment isn't.

Why is the distinction so hard to grasp?

Because the "imprisonment" of the Cirlces (which is actually a type of segregation/confinement more akin to a quarantine or a cloistered religious order) is necessary due to the danger uncontrolled mages and magic represent.  Until and unless a mage can demonstrate that they can control their abilities and their emotions, confinement to Circles must be both universal and compulsory.

Modifié par General User, 25 octobre 2012 - 01:56 .


#542
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Regular humans are just as susceptible. Lady Harriman wasn't a mage. The templars that were possessed in DA2 and DA:O were not mages.


Lady Harriman was a mage and the Templar were possessed because Blood Mages forced the demons inside of them.

All things that could've been easily prevented if the Chantry hadn't spread all that mage-hate around to begin with.


Mage-hate existed long before the Chantry spread it around, it's the entire reason behind the Inquisition in the first place.

Because the only way to deal with disobedient children is merciless beatings!


... I won't even bother responding to this.

#543
alhamel94

alhamel94
  • Members
  • 611 messages
i dont like the chantry i never have it seems like a cop out. but i do think mages are very dangerous.


#544
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

Auintus wrote...

General User wrote...
Children are already emotionally unstable by nature.  Add to that an inborn ability to burn, kill, destroy and turn entire towns into living nightmares and it should become obvious that sending mages to Circles as soon as they first show their abilities is simply the responsible thing to do.  


There could be a better way, but I will agree that training is definately necessary. Malcolm was able to teach Bethany and my Hawke just fine, so the Circle isn't the only answer.

I think that depends on how you look at it.  Malcolm Hawke did a fine job of teaching his children to control their magic.  But of course, the supply of Malcolm Hawke-s is quite limited. 

I have no doubt that Malcolm Hawke could have pretty much written the book on how to train young mages (it's a shame he didn't actually), but in any case a community or a nation as a whole will still need some institution in charge of making sure that any such training is indeed carried out, hence the Circles.

Modifié par General User, 25 octobre 2012 - 02:01 .


#545
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Regular humans are just as susceptible. Lady Harriman wasn't a mage. The templars that were possessed in DA2 and DA:O were not mages.


Lady Harriman was a mage and the Templar were possessed because Blood Mages forced the demons inside of them.

All things that could've been easily prevented if the Chantry hadn't spread all that mage-hate around to begin with.


Mage-hate existed long before the Chantry spread it around, it's the entire reason behind the Inquisition in the first place.

Because the only way to deal with disobedient children is merciless beatings!


... I won't even bother responding to this.

And most of the pro mage people forget it was the Chantry that reformed the witch hunting Inquistion into an organization that didn't kill mages on sight.

#546
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Lady Harriman was a mage

Says who? The game unequivocally tells you that she displayed no magical talent prior. 

And the Templar were possessed because Blood Mages forced the demons inside of them.

But Keran was able to resist, as far as we've seen. And there's no indication that the blood mages in DA:O did anything of the kind. Uldred was turning senior mages into abominations, but the Templars on the lower levels of the tower could have easily succumbed on their own.

Mage-hate existed long before the Chantry spread it around, it's the entire reason behind the Inquisition in the first place.

Our modern, Western society used to hate lots of things, but we got over it by and large by shutting up and/or ignoring the people who continue to toss bigotry around. The Chantry keeps the mage-hate fresh in the minds of people who have likely never encountered a mage, by spouting baseless assumptions that cannot be proven.

... I won't even bother responding to this.

What exactly did you mean by "making children pay for it", then?

#547
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Arcane Warrior Mage Hawke wrote...

Dave of Canada wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Regular humans are just as susceptible. Lady Harriman wasn't a mage. The templars that were possessed in DA2 and DA:O were not mages.


Lady Harriman was a mage and the Templar were possessed because Blood Mages forced the demons inside of them.


All things that could've been easily prevented if the Chantry hadn't spread all that mage-hate around to begin with.


Mage-hate existed long before the Chantry spread it around, it's the entire reason behind the Inquisition in the first place.


Because the only way to deal with disobedient children is merciless beatings!


... I won't even bother responding to this.

And most of the pro mage people forget it was the Chantry that reformed the witch hunting Inquistion into an organization that didn't kill mages on sight.

Because it wanted to keep them so it could use their power for its own selfish reasons. What saints.

#548
SeptimusMagistos

SeptimusMagistos
  • Members
  • 1 154 messages

General User wrote...

SeptimusMagistos wrote...


Training is necessary. Imprisonment isn't.

Why is the distinction so hard to grasp?

Because the "imprisonment" of the Cirlces (which is actually a type of segregation/confinement more akin to a quarantine or a cloistered religious order) is necessary due to the danger uncontrolled mages and magic represent.  Until and unless a mage can demonstrate that they can control their abilities and their emotions, confinement to Circles must be both universal and compulsory.


Okay, let's go over this again:

You're not allowed to lock away innocent people to make yourself feel safer.

How is this a controversial statement?

#549
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages

SeptimusMagistos wrote...

General User wrote...

SeptimusMagistos wrote...


Training is necessary. Imprisonment isn't.

Why is the distinction so hard to grasp?

Because the "imprisonment" of the Cirlces (which is actually a type of segregation/confinement more akin to a quarantine or a cloistered religious order) is necessary due to the danger uncontrolled mages and magic represent.  Until and unless a mage can demonstrate that they can control their abilities and their emotions, confinement to Circles must be both universal and compulsory.


Okay, let's go over this again:

You're not allowed to lock away innocent people to make yourself feel safer.

How is this a controversial statement?

Because it's not reflective of the situation Thedas faces with mages and magic.

#550
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Okay, let's go over this again:

You're not allowed to lock away innocent people to make yourself feel safer.

How is this a controversial statement?

A small population of people are carriers of an infectious deadly disease.

Instead of quarantining said people you allow the infection to spread and kill countless innocents in the name of liberty.