Aller au contenu

Photo

Magic is meant to serve man, never to rule him. It's not ruling to want the same rights as any man. (Templar-Mage War Topic)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
656 réponses à ce sujet

#576
BerzerkGene

BerzerkGene
  • Members
  • 520 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Becasue it doesn't matter what caused Eamon to fall ill.
What if it was simply old age? What if Connors puppy died?

Like it or not, poeple will be faced trought their whole lives with situations like that. Plenty of opportunities for temptation and desire.

True but Isolde was afraid and Jowan was an idiot. I mean lesson number one should have been 'don't listen to demons'.
Why Isolde didn't give him over to the circle is because he would be taken away from her, she loved him more than her own life, Redcliffe being too far to go for regular visits and she being the Arl's wife would not leave her a lot of free time. And seeing as it seems to take several years at least before you can leave the circle, she might barely know him the next time she saw him.


And yet, we see planty of mages that ARE healthy adults.

Obviously at some points the Chantry saw that removing demons point of influence makes the situation better. They didn't institue that for sh**s and giggles. The Circles after all, have a 1000 years of history.

Oh, btw - parents can visit children.

But most parents never do, because magic is seen as a curse, i mean being able to manipulate reality according to your will seems like the coolest curse ever, but whatever.
Magic itself is seen as some kind of evil thing, while sure, it can be used for evil, but the ability itself isn't. Being taken from your parents would probably upset most of the children and we know thats true, like that elf kid that ran away cause Wynne was too harsh. Then the templars hunt down and kill them(well mostly, templars aren't particularly thorough).
Not having parents is not a good thing, there will always be something missing



This is exactly where you are wrong. Say a mage is possesed. Abominations forms as a result.
You are telling me that abomination being contained in a Circle and neutralized and not killing hundered in a vaillage accomplishes nothing?

Being contained in the circle did not help with Uldred. The templars died in droves. It probably helped he made more abomiinations, but the Templars, when it comes down to it, are seriously ineffective. My Warden is a mage and just destroyed everything in the way. Tempalrs are wimps. They train, but they're not effective. They stand around all day instead of training or something. They also need to train their minds too, many templars in DA and DA2 succumb to desire demons. Mages at least can resist demons, if only for a while, the only templars who did that were Cullan and Kerran(?) but Cullen kind of went insane, Kerran was mostly just lucky.

Modifié par BerzerkGene, 25 octobre 2012 - 07:54 .


#577
BerzerkGene

BerzerkGene
  • Members
  • 520 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Vit246 wrote...

EDIT:

Again with that damn "quarantine" argument. As if mages are ready to spontaneously explode or become possessed.

There are already existing free mages peacefully integrated into their respective society.

Rivain, the Dalish, the Chasind, even Tevinter.

Tevinter may be a freaking dictatorship ruled by unethical mages, but its stable and functional in its own way The only problem is the lack of ethics.


You mean the Dalish, who are a band of roming, nomadic clans? Who have clans go missing (guess why)?
Who's only two clans we've seen are both brough to ruin by their mage leaders?

You mean Rivain, that hasa Circle (the shamans are apostates hiding in woods, like Morrigan)

You mean Tevinter, the capital  of slavery that ALSO has Circles (because even mages realised they need to lock up other mages) and whos stabiltiy is questionable?

The Dalish rarely come together and are more likely to be hunted down by humans than have their First/Keeper go rogue. The first clan we meet isn't brought to ruin, the curse didn't help but if Zathrian dies and his first takes over, she is an excellent leader.
The second is an odd case, more accurately it was brought down by the Keeper's emotions more than anything else. Getting a demon to possess you is pretty stupid at the best of times, but she did keep it under control for quite a while. and it is possible to not have to murder the entire clan. So while its not great for them, it didn't really hurt them too much.

Rivain is normal so whatever.

Tevinter is ruled by its circle, they aren't locked up. Its stable to a point. Stable enough to put down any rebellions at least as well as fight the Qunari. The real problem is that power gets you everything there. Odds are if abominations happen they're put down pretty quick because they would be outmatched by the sheer number of mages.

#578
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages
[quote]BerzerkGene wrote...

[quote]Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Becasue it doesn't matter what caused Eamon to fall ill.
What if it was simply old age? What if Connors puppy died?

Like it or not, poeple will be faced trought their whole lives with situations like that. Plenty of opportunities for temptation and desire.[/quote]
True but Isolde was afraid and Jowan was an idiot. I mean lesson number one should have been 'don't listen to demons'.
Why Isolde didn't give him over to the circle is because he would be taken away from her, she loved him more than her own life, Redcliffe being too far to go for regular visits and she being the Arl's wife would not leave her a lot of free time. And seeing as it seems to take several years at least before you can leave the circle, she might barely know him the next time she saw him.[/quote]

1) We know that Eamon and Isolde can visit Connor. It's in the epilogues.
2) Isolde is overprotective. I know the type.


[quote]
And yet, we see planty of mages that ARE healthy adults.

Obviously at some points the Chantry saw that removing demons point of influence makes the situation better. They didn't institue that for sh**s and giggles. The Circles after all, have a 1000 years of history.

Oh, btw - parents can visit children. [/quote]

But most parents never do, because magic is seen as a curse, i mean being able to manipulate reality according to your will seems like the coolest curse ever, but whatever.
Magic itself is seen as some kind of evil thing, while sure, it can be used for evil, but the ability itself isn't. Being taken from your parents would probably upset most of the children and we know thats true, like that elf kid that ran away cause Wynne was too harsh. Then the templars hunt down and kill them(well mostly, templars aren't particularly thorough).
Not having parents is not a good thing, there will always be something missing[/quote]

Magic is seen as dangerous. Both a blessing and a curse. And that description fits.

Wether or not parents can coem or want to come to visit their children is not the templars problem or responsiblity.
That is stricly down to the individuals.




[quote][quote]
This is exactly where you are wrong. Say a mage is possesed. Abominations forms as a result.
You are telling me that abomination being contained in a Circle and neutralized and not killing hundered in a vaillage accomplishes nothing?
[/quote]
Being contained in the circle did not help with Uldred. The templars died in droves. It probably helped he made more abomiinations, but the Templars, when it comes down to it, are seriously ineffective. [/quote]

It didn't?
Uldred was contained. Of course it helped.
The purpose of the Circles is to NOT let abominations kill normal folk.

You seriously underestimate abominations. Templars are effective at what they do.
But Gregoir isn't a moron. Waiting for reinforcements is a smart move.

[quote]My Warden is a mage and just destroyed everything in the way. Tempalrs are wimps. They train, but they're not effective. They stand around all day instead of training or something. They also need to train their minds too, many templars in DA and DA2 succumb to desire demons. Mages at least can resist demons, if only for a while, the only templars who did that were Cullan and Kerran(?) but Cullen kind of went insane, Kerran was mostly just lucky.
[/quote]

Not this argument again.
Look, the PC has the amazing power of protagonsit and save/load. also, this is a game so everyone is ineffectivce compared to the protagonist. Games are designed to be winnalbe and to boost hte players ego. So of course hte Warden is the hottest thing sine baked bread.
Fluff-wise, the Warden should have beeen dead 100 tiems over. Fluff-wise, abominatiosn are far more powerfull than the in-game counterparts.

Also, the templars were possesed because blood mages tortured them and forced demons inside using blood magic.
A mage is NOT more resistant to possesion than a templar.

#579
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

BerzerkGene wrote...
The Dalish rarely come together and are more likely to be hunted down by humans than have their First/Keeper go rogue.


Source pls. I want to see statistics.

The first clan we meet isn't brought to ruin, the curse didn't help but if Zathrian dies and his first takes over, she is an excellent leader.
The second is an odd case, more accurately it was brought down by the Keeper's emotions more than anything else. Getting a demon to possess you is pretty stupid at the best of times, but she did keep it under control for quite a while. and it is possible to not have to murder the entire clan. So while its not great for them, it didn't really hurt them too much.


Stop trying to exuse them.
We've seen 5 dalish mages and 3 clans. And the pattern is obvious.

No matter how you try to rationalize or jsutify it, we have keepers (mages) endangering their clans.
Remove the Warden from the equation.

Without the Warden (or with it) Zathrian clan IS brought to ruins.
Without Hawke, who will stop Methahari abomination? You dont' think it would destroy the clan?

Another poste (Dave I think) before me made a logn and detailed anylsis of the subject.
Assume all you want, but what we've seen doesn't paint the alish system in a good light. AT ALL.


Tevinter is ruled by its circle, they aren't locked up. Its stable to a point. Stable enough to put down any rebellions at least as well as fight the Qunari. The real problem is that power gets you everything there. Odds are if abominations happen they're put down pretty quick because they would be outmatched by the sheer number of mages.


It's a Circle. They are locked up. They do have templars there.
The only mages that are free in Tevinter are the most powerfull ones.

#580
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages

Plaintiff wrote...
Because it wanted to keep them so it could use their power for its own selfish reasons. What saints.


Selfish gains? Such as...fighting darkspawn and qunari, those who would kill and/or forcibly convert the human race? Keeping the Eternal Fire ablaze? Sell enchatments so they can support the constantly growing population of the Circle? Meanwhile, sending only the barest minimum to fight the aforementioned threats because of how scared of mages they are and never sending mages or templars to fight Orlais' expansionist wars.

If you want to argue how the Chantry has let fear override its compassion or how it doesn't do enough for Thedas, I can see where you are coming from.
But I've yet to see evidence of this oportunism so many attribute to the Chantry.

#581
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Plaintiff wrote...

Because it wanted to keep them so it could use their power for its own selfish reasons. What saints.


Vilifying mages to the people and forcing mages into servitude in the Chantry controlled Circles is why some people feel so strongly about not working for the Chantry (with their protagonist). Even the fall of the Dales is attributed by the Dalish people and the elven protagonist to be the result of the elves refusing to convert to the Chantry, which lead to templars entering the elves' sovereign territory.

#582
Terrorize69

Terrorize69
  • Members
  • 2 665 messages
So I hear the leader of the mages is a innocent female mage who plays host to the uncorrupted spirit of hope, she is to be the living image and symbol of hope for all mages.

#583
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 584 messages
Unless I'm missing some information about DA3, the only girl with a spirit of hope in her body is Evangeline who is not a mage but a mundane. And she is not a leader of mages, just the consort of a soon to be magister.

#584
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages
Wow. It's just terrible that she's part of the rebellion instead of part of the solution. Off with her head.

#585
zambingo

zambingo
  • Members
  • 1 460 messages
Magic is meant to serve man, never to rule him.

I've always felt that this is one of those situations whereby a religious group due to time and the "telephone game" has misinterpreted their own dogma.

I think the verse simply means: Magic is a tool. Learn it. Use it. Control it. But it is not a means by which one man is better than the other.

#586
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages

) The Chantry is a bully. It uses its own religious dogma to create an oppressive system that is inherently abusive, and not even just to mages, which we've already discussed extensively. Templars suffer under Chantry rule by being force-fed lyrium, an addictive substance. If they find that they don't like being Templars, they can't leave.


The Circle system is neccessary and not all that horrible in most places, it just needs some reform. Templars have to be given Lyrium to perform their duties. Would you rather we grab normal soldiers and send them into the breach, fighting demigods who can hurl fire and lightning and cause earthquakes with their mind? Needs of the few, needs of the many.

 The Chantry is incredibly hypocritical. It ignored the historical contributions the elves had made to free Andraste's followers from the enslavement of the Tevinter Imperium, and removed the Book of Shartan from the Chant of Light. It did these things in order to justify attacking the elves of the Dales.


Your kidding right? People still know about Shartan and his contributions. The Second Exalted March was caused by many things. For instance, when Montsimmard was attacked by the horde during the Second Blight, the walls broke and darkspawn poured into the city, slaughtering everyone. The Dalish had a massive army overlooking the city, but they literally sat down and watched the city burn at the hands of the darkspawn. This severely soured relations with Orlais, understandably. Continued border skirmishes and attempts at conversion by the Chantry ended when the Elves up and declared war, attacking the town of Red Crossing and then attacking the city of Montsimmard, which they had abandoned to its fate before. It was only when they were on the doorsteop of Val Royeaux that the Chantry stepped in and called an Exalted March.

So the elves let us get massacred and then attacked us. Just for the record. 

It preaches the "evils" and "dangers" of magic and mages, and uses this stance as the excuse to deny the general public access to services like healing and enchantment,  but sees nothing wrong with using these resources to consolidate and/or maintain it's own authority (using mages as a military force against the Qunari, etc). It brings the mages out when it suits them to do so, and then shuts them back up again without even having the common courtesy to thank them for their valuable service.


Ok, I'm sure the Templars thank the mages when they're done getting healed by them. The Templars don't force the mages to go out and heal peasants or enchant shovels, it tries to contain them in one place for security reasons. We both agree that needs to change.

You'll probably say "Ohhhh, but what about all the orphans the Chantry takes in? What about in Lothering and Redcliffe where the Chantry was used as shelter? What about the poor people it collects donations for?", to which I say the Chantry does not deserve credit for simply looking after its own. It is in the Chantry's own best interests to try and prevent the slaughter of its own adherents. Bullies are nice to their friends, but that doesn't change the fact that they are bullies.


So, the Chantry does not deserve credit for helping people all across Thedas, giving sanctuary to travelers all across Thedas, caring for widows and orphanages all across Thedas, guiding community efforts and then paying for them out of their own pocket (most quests on the chanters board are about fixing roofs you know, not just killing people). We totally shouldn't give them credit for offering their buildings as a sanctuary in times of crisis, or having their templars fight to protect people (Lothering, Qunari Invasion, Mages, whether you like their methods or not). No let's dismiss all of that because... it makes them look good? I'm not following you on this. It almost seems like your trying to dismiss all the notable day to day ways the Chantry helps people in favour of going on about mages, but that's absurd.

And that's all just physical good deeds they do. The Chantry holds services for the nearby people, teach Andraste's word, and give counsel to those in need, just like any modern church would.

The Chantry isn't just guilty of hoarding magic and lyrium, but also physical wealth. In any given city, town, village or settlement, the Chantry is the largest building and the most lavishly decorated, with perhaps the exception of the local lord's keep. If the Chantry in Kirkwall, just as an example, were serious about helping the "less fortunate", then it could sell off its tapestries and paintings, and its hundred-foot-high golden statues.


Unfortuante truth, its hard to get people to donate money to a shack, and its hard to find a place for travelers to sleep in a shack, not to mention all the widows and orphans. People give money to the Chantry, and the Chantry sews tapestries of Andraste and buy books for people to read. What villians.

The Kirkwall Chantry was very lavish and expensive, but you also have to remember that the Chantry is a political force as well. They have to command respect, which is hard to do from a shack. Plus, all those statues look cool, and some would argue their continued presence will do more good for the world than giving 30 peasants one meal.

Furthermore, Meredith blatantly violated the Chantry's own laws by taking de facto control over the city. She even tried to force Aveline to cede authority of the city guard over to the Templars.

The position of Viscount is supposed to be decided by the nobility, not the Templars. If the Chantry had any respect for secular authority, or even cared about simply following its own goddamn rules, it would have reined Meredith in, if not expelled her from the organization outright. The fact that it took no such action absolutely proves that it cares for nothing beyond the increase and maintenance of its own authority.


Meredith is the worst the Chantry has to offer, let's keep that in mind. Frankly, the Chantry not intervening is a plot hole more than anything else. Divine Justinia would totally knock her down, but I guess we can chalk it up to distance. Orlais is a ways away, maybe she was sending orders but her messenger showed up too late. Constraints of the story, We had to have our mage-templar fight, blah blah blah.

Modifié par Palidane, 25 octobre 2012 - 04:34 .


#587
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages
Sorry, double post.

Modifié par Palidane, 25 octobre 2012 - 04:35 .


#588
the_one_54321

the_one_54321
  • Members
  • 6 112 messages
I don't care about the Chantry. Magic is dangerous. Submit to regulation or be put down.

#589
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Palidane wrote...

Your kidding right? People still know about Shartan and his contributions.


Hardly anyone outside the Dalish, as we see in the City Elf Origin.

Palidane wrote...

The Second Exalted March was caused by many things. For instance, when Montsimmard was attacked by the horde during the Second Blight, the walls broke and darkspawn poured into the city, slaughtering everyone. The Dalish had a massive army overlooking the city, but they literally sat down and watched the city burn at the hands of the darkspawn. This severely soured relations with Orlais, understandably. Continued border skirmishes and attempts at conversion by the Chantry ended when the Elves up and declared war, attacking the town of Red Crossing and then attacking the city of Montsimmard, which they had abandoned to its fate before. It was only when they were on the doorsteop of Val Royeaux that the Chantry stepped in and called an Exalted March.

So the elves let us get massacred and then attacked us. Just for the record.


You mean the elves of the Dales avoided the imperialist empire that was conquering it's neighbors?

Also, the Dalish claim the war started when the Chantry sent templars into their nation because they refused to convert. The elven protagonist can condemn the Chantry for sacking the Dales for not worshipping the Maker. Just for the record.

#590
Sainna

Sainna
  • Members
  • 97 messages
In the moment religion goes to the ''Believe this, worship this or we bring war and destory everything you have" it turns ebul :( reason why no matter how nice the nun-things are in DA I still wish they gave us more opertunitys to start a few fires.

#591
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

[quote]Palidane wrote...

Your kidding right? People still know about Shartan and his contributions. [/quote]

Hardly anyone outside the Dalish, as we see in the City Elf Origin.[quote/]

The City Elves are not the most educated people in Ferelden. Whenever you learn about the First Exalted March, you will hear about Shartan and the Elves.

[quote]Palidane wrote...

The Second Exalted March was caused by many things. For instance, when Montsimmard was attacked by the horde during the Second Blight, the walls broke and darkspawn poured into the city, slaughtering everyone. The Dalish had a massive army overlooking the city, but they literally sat down and watched the city burn at the hands of the darkspawn. This severely soured relations with Orlais, understandably. Continued border skirmishes and attempts at conversion by the Chantry ended when the Elves up and declared war, attacking the town of Red Crossing and then attacking the city of Montsimmard, which they had abandoned to its fate before. It was only when they were on the doorsteop of Val Royeaux that the Chantry stepped in and called an Exalted March.

So the elves let us get massacred and then attacked us. Just for the record. [/quote]

You mean the elves of the Dales avoided the imperialist empire that was conquering it's neighbors?

Also, the Dalish claim the war started when the Chantry sent templars into their nation because they refused to convert. The elven protagonist can condemn the Chantry for sacking the Dales for not worshipping the Maker. Just for the record.
[/quote]

You mean the elves left thousands to die at the hands of the darkspawn when they could have saved them, over a grudge?

That's what the Dalish say, but I doubt the Chantry sent a host of 10,000 templars to randomly execute people who wouldn't convert. What happened to the Dales afterward is a different argument entirely.

#592
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

You mean the elves left thousands to die at the hands of the darkspawn when they could have saved them, over a grudge?

Would you want your nation to intervene in a huge war between two untrustworthy powers?

That's what the Dalish say, but I doubt the Chantry sent a host of 10,000 templars to randomly execute people who wouldn't convert. What happened to the Dales afterward is a different argument entirely.

You may doubt, but it can't be proven regardless. All we have proof of is the Chantry's elven genocide.

#593
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Palidane wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

You mean the elves of the Dales avoided the imperialist empire that was conquering it's neighbors?

Also, the Dalish claim the war started when the Chantry sent templars into their nation because they refused to convert. The elven protagonist can condemn the Chantry for sacking the Dales for not worshipping the Maker. Just for the record.


You mean the elves left thousands to die at the hands of the darkspawn when they could have saved them, over a grudge?


You mean they didn't leave themselves vulnerable to an invasion, via when Orlais used the Third Blight to conquer Nevarra?

Palidane wrote...

That's what the Dalish say, but I doubt the Chantry sent a host of 10,000 templars to randomly execute people who wouldn't convert. What happened to the Dales afterward is a different argument entirely.


Considering the Chantry forced the elves who submitted to human rule to convert, it seems to fit. And we only need to look at the Chantry's support of the Orlesian occupation to see how intertwined they are with the imperialistic Orlesian Empire.

#594
DarthLaxian

DarthLaxian
  • Members
  • 2 034 messages
well...

firstly:

i will - in almost any circumstance - support the mages! (at least as long as they do not use wide-spread slavery and want to be rulers based on their magic alone)

secondly:

"magic is there to serve man, never to rule over him"

=> why is should a mage not rule over men, if he is just and righteous? - just because he has an inborn talent that sets him appart from everybody else?...sorry, but no, mages should be alowed to rule, it should however not mean that non mages can't rule anymore (meaning: i do not want mages to suppress mundanes - or vice versa!)

thirdly:

the chantry should stopp playing politics alltogether, they are a CHURCH not lords, ladies, kings and queens and so should not have worldly power!

as for forcing the elves into submission:

that is a criminal injustice and would get me to demand the end of the chantry's oppression of free will and believe, if i would not allready be calling for the end of this organisation over the mage issue!

forthly:

imprisoning mages is no "gun control issue" it is a civil-rights one (!) - like imprisoning black people and treating them badly is also civil-rights!

greetings LAX

Modifié par DarthLaxian, 25 octobre 2012 - 05:18 .


#595
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Xilizhra wrote...
You may doubt, but it can't be proven regardless. All we have proof of is the Chantry's elven genocide.


Wrong. You don't have proof of anything.

The Chantry doesn't directly control the armies of other nations (which are the armes that compromise an Exhalted March).

#596
DarthLaxian

DarthLaxian
  • Members
  • 2 034 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...
You may doubt, but it can't be proven regardless. All we have proof of is the Chantry's elven genocide.


Wrong. You don't have proof of anything.

The Chantry doesn't directly control the armies of other nations (which are the armes that compromise an Exhalted March).


they CONTROL the TEMPLARS (who ARE AN ARMY!) literally, because they controll the LYRIUM!

so, yes, they commited genocide!

and they attacked a foreign nation not only once (the tevinter imperium) but many times...so yes, they more or less command many armies beside their own (funny, that this "attack dog" of theirs (the templars) chose to rebel...it is POETIC JUSTICE!) and are not afraid to use that power...like the roman popes of old in the crusades...sorry, but if there is a chance, i want to make them stopp, once and for all (i do not want do destroy the chantry, also i would do it, if i had no other choice, i want to make it into a real church without an army (besides a few guards and templars (less then a 1000) for protection), without any political power and without secret agents (seekers)!

#597
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages
[quote]LobselVith8 wrote...

[quote]Palidane wrote...
You mean the elves left thousands to die at the hands of the darkspawn when they could have saved them, over a grudge? [/quote]

You mean they didn't leave themselves vulnerable to an invasion, via when Orlais used the Third Blight to conquer Nevarra?[/quote]

At least half their soldiers are archers. They are on a hill. I don't think they would have taken horrific casualties. Besides, what if the darkspawn win? How do you know they're not going come for you? I'd say a massive hoard of darkspawn on the border of your nation is well worth military intervention. They could have killed two birds with one stone by helping Montsimmard, but they left them to die out of pure spite.

[quote]Palidane wrote...

That's what the Dalish say, but I doubt the Chantry sent a host of 10,000 templars to randomly execute people who wouldn't convert. What happened to the Dales afterward is a different argument entirely.[/quote]

Considering the Chantry forced the elves who submitted to human rule to convert, it seems to fit. And we only need to look at the Chantry's support of the Orlesian occupation to see how intertwined they are with the imperialistic Orlesian Empire.[/quote]

Yes, the Chantry has enormous power in Orlais. Yes, they probably had a lot more say in the aftermath of the war than they should have. But I'm still pretty sure they didn't send an army into randomly slaughter people. I'm thinking more they sent Templars to provide security for their priests. Which isn't a bad idea, since the only other Chantry missionary we know of got killed in a peaceful protest several months after he showed up.

#598
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

At least half their soldiers are archers. They are on a hill. I don't think they would have taken horrific casualties. Besides, what if the darkspawn win? How do you know they're not going come for you? I'd say a massive hoard of darkspawn on the border of your nation is well worth military intervention. They could have killed two birds with one stone by helping Montsimmard, but they left them to die out of pure spite.

And when Orlais won, they did come for the Dalish. And given the intense anti-elven bigotry that continued to exist, it isn't like the Chantry was grateful for the Dalish's earlier contribution.

Yes, the Chantry has enormous power in Orlais. Yes, they probably had a lot more say in the aftermath of the war than they should have. But I'm still pretty sure they didn't send an army into randomly slaughter people. I'm thinking more they sent Templars to provide security for their priests. Which isn't a bad idea, since the only other Chantry missionary we know of got killed in a peaceful protest several months after he showed up.

No, they sent in an army to deliberately slaughter people. Well, later on, during the Exalted March. But they should have just kept the missionaries out after that and only tried for economic relations.

#599
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages
A mage is inherently different than anyone else, their potential is far greater and they have abilities far above those who live normally. They're also in a position which tempts demons, shining as beacons of power in the fade and appealing everything.

When they're asking for the same rights as anyone else, they're dismissing the fact that they're unlike everyone else by their very nature and can very well influence everyone else with their abilities. How worrisome would it be not knowing if your neighbor is using blood magic on yourself? You could willingly hand over everything you've ever owned without a sign of struggle. What would occur if someone in a more important position was tampered with? A captain of the guard, a noble or maybe even a monarch controlled by a blood mage could lead to very disastrous results.

"But most mages wouldn't do that!", I can hear you say from your computer. Really? They'd never consider abusing their powers? You're deluding yourself if you believe that someone with the capability of doing such things wouldn't do so when starving or cold, the lifestyle of Thedosian citizens is hardly great--something which most mages never deal with due to the Circles treating them like nobility.

"But the Templar abuse them!", you say. So what? Guards abuse commoners, nobility abuse anyone lesser than them, monarchy can do whatever the hell they want and there's little accountability. A nobleman can order purges of the commoners and there's nothing done in response, the commoner must accept it. It's surprising that despite all of this, the Templar are actually accountible for their actions to the Grand Cleric or the Knight-Commander.

Two points which I imagine seeing from this:
"I want to fix the entire world starting with mages!", you say. Umm... yeah... no, go do something else with your self-inserted morals and hoping to lead Thedas into enlightenment while dismissing everything inbetween.

"Kirkwall wasn't accountable, Meredith was allowing abuses!", you say. Mind I point out that most Templar transgressions weren't made known to Meredith or Elthina and were mostly resolved immediately after they were introduced when Hawke killed everyone involved. In addition, Elthina was probably the most incompetent Grand Cleric they could've had as she refuses to do her duty to the Chantry and allowed the escalation. This is by no means showing the Templar weren't accountable, just that the person in charge for the accountability never did their job.

"That's enough reason for me to overthrow the system, it doesn't work!", you say. Any system with too much incompetence doesn't work, doesn't mean the system is flawed as the core of the system has it's own reasons to exist. You don't proclaim to destroy the prison system because prisoners might be abused by their guards, no? You just make the guards face consequences and replace those which didn't do their job, no matter how long said abuses might've went on.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 25 octobre 2012 - 06:08 .


#600
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
When we say genocide - do we actually mean the conquering of a nation?

Because genocide is a VERY specific term.

I don't recall reading that elven men, women and children were rounded up and systematically killed.

Not every war of conquest is a "genocide".

What happened to the elves is actually more reminiscent to what happened to the northern Native American populations... and that is not considered a genocide by historians.