we want our devastator and supply pylon back!
#176
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 08:58
#177
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 09:21
Modifié par Sovereign24, 25 octobre 2012 - 09:21 .
#178
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 09:35
So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?Madeline Lightning wrote...
and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.
The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.
TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.
#179
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 09:37
I use her all the time in PUGS and I will continue to do so. She is awesome at holding positions and less grenades will just mean that they are a more tactical resource now instead of throwing candy - that´s fine with me. She can hold herself against tons of advancing enemies and that hasn´t changed.Sovereign24 wrote...
Don't mind the Destroyer nerf, but the Demolisher nerf is just wierd. I rarely see that class used in Gold PUGS
#180
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 09:42
going to take a chill pill.
Modifié par Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout, 25 octobre 2012 - 09:44 .
#181
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 09:58
#182
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:00
#183
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:04
so, sign.
Modifié par Impius, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:06 .
#184
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:07
#185
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:07
/De-NIGHEGHED!!
Seriously though, Demolisher with full grenade spec could run with 13x5 grenades MINIMUM per game and did AoE damage to everything and debuffed/DoT/prime for detonation at the same time while it shot things.
Destroyer was just to powerfull overall with tanking ability, non stagger ability, and being able to carry devistating weaponry without any cost to performance. It was the #1 choice of soldiers and completely outshined the rest of the class.
People really need to stop b*tchin and complaining and start thinking BW has a mind behind nerfs/buffs. The classes needed to be balanced and they were, if it was your favorite class, tough, if you can't adjust, there are other classes/games to play, play singleplayer a bit, perhaps a break from MP will do some good.
#186
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:10
Oh right only the childish montra of, "this toy outscored mine. Make it worthless" does.LoboFH wrote...
Let the devs balance the game, the childish mantra "don't touch my toys" doesn't make games.
Modifié par ThatGuyThatPlaysThisGame, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:11 .
#187
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:13
#188
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:13
Sovereign24 wrote...
Don't mind the Destroyer nerf, but the Demolisher nerf is just wierd. I rarely see that class used in Gold PUGS
I've encountered a lot of demolishers, and i play a lot of gold matches, and they have data about all the matches, so...
But i still don't like what they did, there are a lot of characters, variety is already there, i don't see the need to nerf kits to promote variety, i can understand why they did it, but i just don't like it
Modifié par skiadopsendow, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:15 .
#189
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:18
You don't understand.Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...
So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?Madeline Lightning wrote...
and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.
The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.
TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.
Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.
Modifié par Madeline Lightning, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:21 .
#190
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:19
#191
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:20
#192
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:24
Madeline Lightning wrote...
Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant.
And you are?
#193
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:27
Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:31 .
#194
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:29
Devastator mode nerf should be undone.
don't know about Demolisher. Haven't unlocked her yet.
#195
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:29
Madeline Lightning wrote...
You don't understand.Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...
So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?Madeline Lightning wrote...
and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.
The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.
TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.
Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.
your nonsensical rant will accomplish nothing. IT IS DONE GET OVER IT.
#196
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:33
#197
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:34
#198
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:35
darkpassenger2342 wrote...
Madeline Lightning wrote...
You don't understand.Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...
So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?Madeline Lightning wrote...
and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.
The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.
TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.
Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.
your nonsensical rant will accomplish nothing. IT IS DONE GET OVER IT.
I can prove everything I say to them. It's over for you but not me. Care to share your gamertag? Nevermind i have it.
Modifié par Madeline Lightning, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:37 .
#199
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:36
#200
Posté 25 octobre 2012 - 10:37
Stop the nerfing madness please.





Retour en haut






