Aller au contenu

Photo

we want our devastator and supply pylon back!


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
288 réponses à ce sujet

#176
rubynorman

rubynorman
  • Members
  • 1 373 messages
/signed

#177
Sovereign24

Sovereign24
  • Members
  • 856 messages
Don't mind the Destroyer nerf, but the Demolisher nerf is just wierd. I rarely see that class used in Gold PUGS

Modifié par Sovereign24, 25 octobre 2012 - 09:21 .


#178
Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout
  • Members
  • 1 169 messages

Madeline Lightning wrote...

and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.

So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?

The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.

TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.

#179
Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout
  • Members
  • 1 169 messages

Sovereign24 wrote...

Don't mind the Destroyer nerf, but the Demolisher nerf is just wierd. I rarely see that class used in Gold PUGS

I use her all the time in PUGS and I will continue to do so. She is awesome at holding positions and less grenades will just mean that they are a more tactical resource now instead of throwing candy - that´s fine with me. She can hold herself against tons of advancing enemies and that hasn´t changed.

#180
Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout
  • Members
  • 1 169 messages
edited for unneeded rage... :pinched:
going to take a chill pill.

Modifié par Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout, 25 octobre 2012 - 09:44 .


#181
DAFerelden91

DAFerelden91
  • Members
  • 258 messages
Signed. They are called Destroyer and Demolisher for very unique reasons.

#182
Siran

Siran
  • Members
  • 1 760 messages
I won't miss them that much. The challenges re-introduced me to the other awesome kits out there. Here's looking at you Turian Soldier :)

#183
Impius

Impius
  • Members
  • 436 messages
Don't mind, both are/were beginner-friendly chars. Actually should no experienced player mind it, since they are much better or way more effective with other chars than the best player with destroyer or demolisher.

so, sign.

Modifié par Impius, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:06 .


#184
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages
 Are people honestly waiting the full time for the Pylon to refill rather than keeping their weight down and redeploying it? 

:pinched:

#185
Ronnie Blastoff

Ronnie Blastoff
  • Members
  • 1 933 messages
Since I think outside the box and realize that nerfing is done for a reason. I support the change.

/De-NIGHEGHED!!

Seriously though, Demolisher with full grenade spec could run with 13x5 grenades MINIMUM per game and did AoE damage to everything and debuffed/DoT/prime for detonation at the same time while it shot things.

Destroyer was just to powerfull overall with tanking ability, non stagger ability, and being able to carry devistating weaponry without any cost to performance. It was the #1 choice of soldiers and completely outshined the rest of the class.

People really need to stop b*tchin and complaining and start thinking BW has a mind behind nerfs/buffs. The classes needed to be balanced and they were, if it was your favorite class, tough, if you can't adjust, there are other classes/games to play, play singleplayer a bit, perhaps a break from MP will do some good.

#186
ThatGuyThatPlaysThisGame

ThatGuyThatPlaysThisGame
  • Members
  • 1 660 messages

LoboFH wrote...
Let the devs balance the game, the childish mantra "don't touch my toys" doesn't make games.

Oh right only the childish montra of, "this toy outscored mine. Make it worthless" does.

Modifié par ThatGuyThatPlaysThisGame, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:11 .


#187
RecoonHoodie

RecoonHoodie
  • Members
  • 578 messages
/signed

#188
skiadopsendow

skiadopsendow
  • Members
  • 929 messages

Sovereign24 wrote...

Don't mind the Destroyer nerf, but the Demolisher nerf is just wierd. I rarely see that class used in Gold PUGS


I've encountered a lot of demolishers, and i play a lot of gold matches, and they have data about all the matches, so...

But i still don't like what they did, there are a lot of characters, variety is already there, i don't see the need to nerf kits to promote variety, i can understand why they did it, but i just don't like it 

Modifié par skiadopsendow, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:15 .


#189
Madeline Lightning

Madeline Lightning
  • Members
  • 375 messages

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...

Madeline Lightning wrote...

and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.

So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?

The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.

TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.

You don't understand.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me  and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.  

Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles  (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.

Modifié par Madeline Lightning, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:21 .


#190
Maker MEDA

Maker MEDA
  • Members
  • 905 messages
Ya, bring them back!

#191
shumworld

shumworld
  • Members
  • 1 556 messages
sure i like my destroyer and demolisher to be op.

#192
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

Madeline Lightning wrote...

Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. 


And you are?  :huh:

#193
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages
 I see we still have our share of overentitled Idiots who think they know more about the game than the people who created it.... hilarious. 

Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:31 .


#194
Mindfane

Mindfane
  • Members
  • 759 messages
/signed.

Devastator mode nerf should be undone.

don't know about Demolisher. Haven't unlocked her yet.

#195
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages

Madeline Lightning wrote...

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...

Madeline Lightning wrote...

and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.

So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?

The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.

TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.

You don't understand.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me  and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.  

Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles  (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.


your nonsensical rant will accomplish nothing. IT IS DONE GET OVER IT.

#196
djbrownout

djbrownout
  • Members
  • 10 messages
signed

#197
Pavs719

Pavs719
  • Members
  • 610 messages
I want it back, the only class which does not have much powers compared to the other biotics, bioware put it back, stop messing with one of my fav characters, less nerfing and fix the damn game, namely the shieldgate problem. I was looking forward to the balance changes but what can I say but disgusted.

#198
Madeline Lightning

Madeline Lightning
  • Members
  • 375 messages

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

Madeline Lightning wrote...

Samerandomscreennameidontcareabout wrote...

Madeline Lightning wrote...

and the destroyer isn't called the destroyer for nothing. I can't wait until this game is unimportant to bioware and people mod the hell out of it, at least on the PC. Someday it'll be good when it's out of the hands of the devs who make poor choices with it and probably don't passionately love it as much as I do. I only post because I DO care.

So, if there would be a class called "Destroyer of Worlds" just for giggles, you´df expect him to win matches within one shot? What a crap way to think is that?

The destroyer is still awesome. palyed him yesterday and he like one shot less in the sabre, that was it. He looses like 5% ROF, which is negligible, and the missiles have been buffed even in Evo 4.

TL:DR; Stop complaining, destroyer is still good. Just not overpowering anymore and other choices become more viable.

You don't understand.
he never was overpowered and should have never been changed. I challenge Fagnan or any of the devs to play with me  and various assortments of classes and see just how he's not overpowered and never was. Not this weapon balance fable. I dont suck up to the devs because they say something is true. It's not always the case there' sbeen some sinister **** in other games and no destroyer ever outscored any character I made in it's old form. EVen joke characters I made. He was never overpowered. Maybe on the limited xbox, but the PC - NO WAY. NEVER. I could beat his old unnerfed setup which was decent, with even the volus engineer (not the adept.) Now he just sucks and I noticed in games I played last night people playing him with the launcher and all that crap were having trouble keeping up.  

Again I'm not here to argue it with you. You have no power, thus are unimportant. the developers have the power, they need to address it. not this "we can't do our jobs balancing effectively because we are amateur in multiplayer games, and thus here's some excuse was to why we nerfed him. I mean nerfing him was about as needed as nerfing a volus. he just wasn't that strong before. Again, no idea how he plays on the limited consoles  (and no offense I'm not here for console war battles and won't engage in them, pm me if you think you need to tell me off) but the PC version was never overpowered. I can't say that enough.


your nonsensical rant will accomplish nothing. IT IS DONE GET OVER IT.


I can prove everything I say to them. It's over for you but not me. Care to share your gamertag? Nevermind i have it.

Modifié par Madeline Lightning, 25 octobre 2012 - 10:37 .


#199
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages
yes, soxfan231642

#200
PimplyPete

PimplyPete
  • Members
  • 277 messages
/Signed

Stop the nerfing madness please.