Ieldra2 wrote...
The lack of differentiation in arguments like this never ceases to amaze me. The Reapers should never have been created, and nobody denies that the Reaperization was evil. However, a Reaper is "billions of organic minds, uploaded and conjoined". It doesn't matter how they were created, they are valid life. Actually, there is no such thing as "invalid life" at all.fr33stylez wrote...
Killing Reapers is not genocide, that's ridiculous.
That is unless you equate the sentient organic beings that were forcibly kidnapped and processed into goo with the Reaper that were used to create. And if that the case, why are you stopping the Reaper cycle at all? You're just the same as you were whether you're a human or part of a Reaper, right?Again the lack of distinction. I value life, but not any specific biochemical composition thereof. What the hell does it matter if some process changes my DNA into some other stuff with added functionality, as long as I remain who I am? I'm not saying applying this to the whole galaxy isn't problematic, but the idea of the "sanctity of life" is much abused in arguments like yours.And if you really care about the sanctity of all life, it makes no sense to force synthesis on trillions of people as an alternative to killing the Reapers.
All of which would make some twisted sense if by definition Synthesis didn't already explicitly change 'who you are'. No one has the right to alter the 'specific biochemical composition' of a single, solitary person without their permission, never mind an entire galaxy. As such, Synthesis is most definitely a violation of life (whether you value biochemical diversity or not).
Modifié par Fandango9641, 27 octobre 2012 - 10:28 .





Guest_Fandango_*
Retour en haut




