139 réponses à ce sujet

[Rune-Chan]

Welsh Inferno wrote...

Guarenteed every single person considers themselves part of section 3 though.

Of course. It's human nature to always think that you are perfectly rational and capable of having a real debate.

[Fast Jimmy]

Welsh Inferno wrote...
Guarenteed every single person considers themselves part of section 3 though.

I know I'm #2 who happens to be so wordy that people mistake me for #3 sometimes. And I'm cool with that.

[Androme]

Haha at the people jumpong on the OP, 13 year olds.

Yes OP, DA3 will > most likely < be garbage like DA2, but I'm still hoping :'(

[macrocarl]

Everyone is still here checking out the boards for more info.

Don't call it a come back, I been here for years!

Modifié par macrocarl, 26 octobre 2012 - 02:21 .

[jillabender]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

Welsh Inferno wrote...
Guarenteed every single person considers themselves part of section 3 though.

I know I'm #2 who happens to be so wordy that people mistake me for #3 sometimes. And I'm cool with that.

And we love you for it, Jimmy!

Modifié par jillabender, 26 octobre 2012 - 02:23 .

[Fast Jimmy]

macrocarl wrote...

Everyone is still here checking out the boards for more info.

Don't call it a come back, I been here for years!

I'm rockin' my peers, puttin' suckers in fear...

[Maria Caliban]

Machines Are Us wrote...

Welsh Inferno wrote...

Guarenteed every single person considers themselves part of section 3 though.

Of course. It's human nature to always think that you are perfectly rational and capable of having a real debate.

I'm going to disagree about it being natural. People have only claimed to be perfectly rational beings* since the 1800s as part of a larger movement in Western thought for rationality and objectivity to be valued as opposed to personal experience, passion, or intuition.

If you look at the "Age of Enlightenment" you'll see a call to reason in the form of removing religious dogma from society and valuing science, but there's still a very romantic view of human nature and goodness.

*People here meaning 'in general.' Aristotle claimed that women had less teeth than men without bothering to count because he believed he'd reached that conclusion from pure reason.

Modifié par Maria Caliban, 26 octobre 2012 - 02:38 .

[Plaintiff]

Androme wrote...

Haha at the people jumpong on the OP, 13 year olds.

Yes OP, DA3 will > most likely < be garbage like DA2, but I'm still hoping :'(

"Everyone who disagrees with me is a child! Gross, sweeping assumptions are the mature way to debate!"

[Rune-Chan]

Maria Caliban wrote...

Machines Are Us wrote...

Welsh Inferno wrote...

Guarenteed every single person considers themselves part of section 3 though.

Of course. It's human nature to always think that you are perfectly rational and capable of having a real debate.

I'm going to disagree about it being natural. People have only claimed to be perfectly rational beings since the 1800s as part of a larger movement in Western thought for rationality and objectivity to be valued as opposed to personal experience, passion, or intuition.

If you look at the "Age of Enlightenment" you'll see a call to reason in the form of removing religious dogma from society and valuing science, but there's still a very romantic view of human nature and goodness.

I was not aware that you were over 200 years old.

People may have had more strong religious views back then, but I sincerely doubt the majority of people considered themselves stupid or incapable of rational thought.

If you said to somebody "You are not worth arguing with, because you are too stupid to think for yourself" I doubt their response would be "You're right, you should ignore what I have to say."

Maria Caliban wrote...

*People here meaning 'in general.'
Aristotle claimed that women had less teeth than men without bothering
to count because he believed he'd reached that conclusion from pure
reason.

Exactly my point.

He came up with something stupid, but believed himself to be reasonable. That is exactly what I said when I suggested that most people would consider themselves to be option 3 (AKA the only non-idiotic option).

Modifié par Machines Are Us, 26 octobre 2012 - 02:41 .

[Sanunes]

Personally, besides the few major mistakes that they made with Dragon Age 2 it felt equal with Dragon Age: Origins. It seems to be people are unwilling to accept that something has to be sacrificed to deliver the product they keep demanding with such a high production value and since they are steadfast on not paying more for a game the development time has been greatly reduced.

As far as the comparing complaints against Dragon Age: Origins and Mass Effect 3, there were more complaints against Dragon Age: Origins, but complaints against Mass Effect 3 were more vocal and I think part of that has to deal with changes in society, for back when Dragon Age: Origins was first released Facebook and Twitter weren't around and I found the internet became a lot more negative once everyone could start posting whatever they wanted about someone with next to no consequences. This is starting to change, but only in drastic circumstances and especially when it starts to deal with bullying.

Do I want Dragon Age 3 will be like Dragon Age: Origins or Dragon Age 2, I really hope not, for that is when they are really going to start being a Call of Duty or most of sequel clone because then they aren't improving the game at all and just giving people a slightly modified version of what they already bought.

BioWare like any company will change, its how it works for I really don't want companies to be exactly like they were years ago for that means they would be making the exact same mistakes they did back then, even BioWare made mistakes, I just think people were more accepting of them and didn't use it as "proof" that BioWare isn't the company it used to be.

[In Exile]

Machines Are Us wrote...

People may have had more strong religious views back then, but I sincerely doubt the majority of people considered themselves stupid or incapable of rational thought. 

It's not about that. Things like being intuitive, etc. we're valued differently. This idea that you have to derive things from "first principles" is quite recent, and the whole economic calculus that goes along with it too.

[Kail Ashton]

Seriously? this topic hasn't been locked down yet? i guess any troll thread that says sumth'n negative toward bioware gets a free pass cause biowares too scared of "biowares teh censorizingz us!!" backlash

[LilyasAvalon]

Oh nolstagia... I'm not going to lie, DA:O is one of the BEST or at least most memorable games I've played in my short life. It's why I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt for DA3. We KNOW they're capable of doing much better than they have in their last two games.

[Xewaka]

Kail Ashton wrote...
Seriously? this topic hasn't been locked down yet? i guess any troll thread that says sumth'n negative toward bioware gets a free pass cause biowares too scared of "biowares teh censorizingz us!!" backlash

If you believe the topic deserves lockdown, contact a moderator through private message.
You pointing out which rules have been broken by the thread might also help.
They haven't been afraid of locking down negative threads in the past if they were also against site rules, and I don't see that changing anytime soon.

[Allan Schumacher]

Locking.