151 réponses à ce sujet

[Fogg]

I guess a decent majority considers destroy the best ending for your canon playtrough. ME4 will be much better when it's set after the events of ME3 than before. To make this possible, there probably should be a canon ending. So, wether destroy is your favourite ending or not, would you be okay with it being canon? 

[Daiyus]

I'd see no harm in it. After all, as more games are added the variations become exponential. BioWare will have to call it one day so they can actually keep making games. Its not feasable to have ME1 repurcussions ten games down the line. ME3 is a good place to draw that line. The Beth could easily be rebuilt and its like nothing happened after 100 years.

[Samtheman63]

No to the title, yes to the post

[Restrider]

It is the only literal ending that makes sense for a sequel...

[DoomsdayDevice]

I'd love it!

[d1ta]

Nope. But I always choose destroy anyways don't know if that counts..

[jtav]

I'd hate it if high EMS Destroy became canon. Destroyers have spent too much time ruining the game for others.

Modifié par jtav, 28 octobre 2012 - 03:24 .

[SNascimento]

Yes because it's the second worst choice.

[MegaSovereign]

Yea I would be pissed. But I'd headcanon the IT-con and just get over it.

[Eryri]

I'd be OK with high EMS Destroy, if not exactly happy that Edi and the Geth had to bite the bullet.

I'd still prefer for Bioware to use IT though.

[N7 Assass1n]

I would be completely fine with it. It's more plausible than the other two (Three if you will) choices, and opens the path way for another game. With the other two, the Reapers are still around, leaving remnants of the past plot. Majority of the community picks Destroy anyways, so you can cry me a river if it becomes canon.

[AlanC9]

Works for me. Hopefully the relays are still inoperable and we have to get around in normal FTL, while worrying about drive discharge, fuel scooping, and so forth.

[Jere85]

Since i favor destroy, by all means.

[AlanC9]

Arcian wrote...

Eryri wrote...

I'd be OK with high EMS Destroy, if not exactly happy that Edi and the Geth had to bite the bullet.

I'd still prefer for Bioware to use IT though.

But IT is not even a real thing.

Bio could retcon it into existence if they wanted to. I'd hate it, but it isn't impossible.

[jtav]

I'd prefer Synthesis, both to spite certain people and because a game with more cyberpunk elements could be cool.

[ghost9191]

well idk, it seems to be the best in some ways. synthesis changes the universe too much. not sure if it would be the same universe i fell for.

control would be pretty much the same,. maybe ppl can live and such but the reaper threat will be there. i mean the harvest stops but the reapers will be a influence still.

plus they can make it so the geth survive ( which they may have , doesn't really show that outcome ) but edi is a sacrifice , she is after all made using parts of sovereign. which will make it a tad better

Modifié par ghost9191, 28 octobre 2012 - 03:55 .

[Argolas]

If Bioware listens, it will happen.

[Doofe2012]

No, in fact if they decide to make any ending canon, I hope it's High EMS Destroy.

Modifié par Doofe2012, 28 octobre 2012 - 03:56 .

[Unschuld]

Destroy (any iteration) or successful refuse, those are the only ones I'd be pleased with being cannon.

[Aarkaan]

Nop that was my choice either way