It's the least stupid of the three, so I'd be for it.
Would you be pissed if High EMS Destroy became canon?
Débuté par
Fogg
, oct. 28 2012 03:09
Retour en haut
#102
Posté 28 octobre 2012 - 11:02
Zakuspec089
-
- Members
- 924 messages
Yes I would actually because it not be fair and I'm a Paragon too.
#103
Posté 28 octobre 2012 - 11:10
jijeebo
-
- Members
- 2 034 messages
I'd be disappointed if any of the endings became canon, including High EMS Paragon Control.
#104
Posté 28 octobre 2012 - 11:19
Random Geth
-
- Members
- 526 messages
Zakuspec089 wrote...
Yes I would actually because it not be fair and I'm a Paragon too.
Right. And as a paragon, the choice that ISN'T raping the galaxy or being arrogant enough to assume your lone mind won't succumb to Reaper influence ever should be a no-brainer.
#105
Posté 28 octobre 2012 - 11:49
Demon560
-
- Members
- 463 messages
It'd be ok with Destroy, and you should change the title it says the opposite of what your post says.
#106
Posté 28 octobre 2012 - 11:55
blueumi
-
- Members
- 1 237 messages
destroy is the best of a very bad bunch of endings so it would be good if they used that ending over the other bull
#107
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 12:04
Guest_simfamUP_*
Guest_simfamUP_*
-
- Guests
No. I wouldn't mind. There is no need to mind, what happened happened. As far as I'm concerned that chapter of the Mass Effect universe is over, I can build upon it whenever I wish. Look at the Fallout games and Baldur's Gate games. They have their own 'canon.' Though choices are cool when imported, they can seriously screw up things too.
#108
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 12:21
AlanC9
-
- Members
- 35 638 messages
Random Geth wrote...
Zakuspec089 wrote...
Yes I would actually because it not be fair and I'm a Paragon too.
Right. And as a paragon, the choice that ISN'T raping the galaxy or being arrogant enough to assume your lone mind won't succumb to Reaper influence ever should be a no-brainer.
Genocide's a no-brainer? For a Paragon?
#109
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 12:26
Red Panda
-
- Members
- 6 934 messages
Arcian wrote...
I'd be pissed if they do not simultaneously retcon EDI and the geth to be alive.
No.
Their sacrifice will not be honored in the coming empire.
#110
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 12:27
Red Panda
-
- Members
- 6 934 messages
AlanC9 wrote...
Random Geth wrote...
Zakuspec089 wrote...
Yes I would actually because it not be fair and I'm a Paragon too.
Right. And as a paragon, the choice that ISN'T raping the galaxy or being arrogant enough to assume your lone mind won't succumb to Reaper influence ever should be a no-brainer.
Genocide's a no-brainer? For a Paragon?
Obviously refuse is the best choice.
Embrace the reaper's blessing peons!!!
#111
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 12:49
Malanek
-
- Members
- 7 838 messages
Random Geth wrote...
Zakuspec089 wrote...
Yes I would actually because it not be fair and I'm a Paragon too.
Right. And as a paragon, the choice that ISN'T raping the galaxy or being arrogant enough to assume your lone mind won't succumb to Reaper influence ever should be a no-brainer.
IMO Paragons don't mind taking risks. Needless risk sure, avoid that. But they will take risks to not compromise their values.
IMO from most paragon to least paragon
Refuse
Control (Would assume that the Reapers would be destroyed by Shep rather than kept in long term slavery)
----------------neutral
Synthesis
Destroy
#112
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 02:12
Someone With Mass
-
- Members
- 38 558 messages
Nope. Didn't care about the geth beyond Legion and EDI made it clear that she was willing to sacrifice herself.
Besides, Destroy seems to be the ending that can spawn a wide variety of situations in the future that aren't just about overthrowing some AI overlord. Less restrictions and such.
A game based on Synthesis would probably not be that interesting either, since everything seems to be soooo "perfect" in that little world of theirs.
Besides, Destroy seems to be the ending that can spawn a wide variety of situations in the future that aren't just about overthrowing some AI overlord. Less restrictions and such.
A game based on Synthesis would probably not be that interesting either, since everything seems to be soooo "perfect" in that little world of theirs.
#113
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 02:14
Zazzerka
-
- Members
- 9 532 messages
No. I'd actually find it absolutely glorious.
But it won't happen.
But it won't happen.
#114
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 02:29
TheWerdna
-
- Members
- 1 583 messages
I would be happy with Destroy being canon. I would be a bit irritated if control was canon, but I would probably accept it eventually. If synthesis is canon, I would be pissed as all hell, as pissed as I was at the endings in the first place.
#115
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 02:32
Gruntburner
-
- Members
- 989 messages
Not really. If they were to make a sequel, this scenario is by far the easiest to do it from.
#116
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 09:05
Spectre-61
-
- Members
- 939 messages
If there will be any canon ending, it would be destroy.
#117
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 09:29
Eckswhyzed
-
- Members
- 1 889 messages
HYR 2.0 wrote...
I never really cared what they canonize.
Though I am beginning to want Synthesis canon for the ensuing nuclear apocalypse on BSN.
God this would be hilarious. Also, cyberpunk synthesis future video game would be sweet.
#118
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 09:50
Ieldra
-
- Members
- 25 183 messages
This...jtav wrote...
I'd hate it if high EMS Destroy became canon. Destroyers have spent too much time ruining the game for others.
...and this. Mwahahaha....HYR 2.0 wrote...
I never really cared what they canonize.
Though I am beginning to want Synthesis canon for the ensuing nuclear apocalypse on BSN.
Synthesis is inevitable anyway, so why not go with it.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 29 octobre 2012 - 09:53 .
#119
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 09:51
elarem
-
- Members
- 146 messages
As far as I'm concerned there is only Destroy - with or without high EMS - and so I wouldn't be pissed.
#120
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:06
CroGamer002
-
- Members
- 20 673 messages
Oh you have no idea how pissed I would be.
#121
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:10
Mcfly616
-
- Members
- 8 988 messages
First things first. With the inclusion of the Extended Cut, I enjoy each and every ending. However, Destroy has been my Canon ending since the beginning(since ME1). If it were a real world scenario, I would choose Destroy, every single time.
Now, with that being said....Yes, I would be highly disappointed if they declared one of the choices to be the "Canon ending". It's not right. Why even bother with giving us a choice if that's the way they were going to handle it?!
I think the next Mass Effect game should be released for the next generation of consoles....but, if they were to release it for the current consoles and if it takes place Post-ME3, then there's no reason that you shouldn't be able to import your decision of the final choice of ME3.
Unless they do that, I see no point in creating a game for the current consoles that takes place after ME3.
For any game taking place "after" the events of ME3, they shouldn't shoehorn any of the choices as "Canon". If a game takes place after ME3, it better damn sure take our final choice into account above anything else.....otherwise, what was the point?!
If Bioware went the route of declaring a Canon ending, they would effectively render The Shepard completely pointless.
Now, with that being said....Yes, I would be highly disappointed if they declared one of the choices to be the "Canon ending". It's not right. Why even bother with giving us a choice if that's the way they were going to handle it?!
I think the next Mass Effect game should be released for the next generation of consoles....but, if they were to release it for the current consoles and if it takes place Post-ME3, then there's no reason that you shouldn't be able to import your decision of the final choice of ME3.
Unless they do that, I see no point in creating a game for the current consoles that takes place after ME3.
For any game taking place "after" the events of ME3, they shouldn't shoehorn any of the choices as "Canon". If a game takes place after ME3, it better damn sure take our final choice into account above anything else.....otherwise, what was the point?!
If Bioware went the route of declaring a Canon ending, they would effectively render The Shepard completely pointless.
#122
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:20
Deitar
-
- Members
- 379 messages
Arcian wrote...
I'd be pissed if they do not simultaneously retcon EDI and the geth to be alive.
This.
#123
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:22
magnuskn
-
- Members
- 1 056 messages
Every other ending is not really doable, IMO.
Mmmmaybe Control, but I wouldn't be sure that having eternal cthulhoid overlords everywhere is conducive to a good story in the Mass Effect universe.
Synthesis just would not go over well for anybody. You seriously want everybody to have green glowy eyes and circuitboard skin?
Destroy is the only ending which lends itself to a sequel.
Mmmmaybe Control, but I wouldn't be sure that having eternal cthulhoid overlords everywhere is conducive to a good story in the Mass Effect universe.
Synthesis just would not go over well for anybody. You seriously want everybody to have green glowy eyes and circuitboard skin?
Destroy is the only ending which lends itself to a sequel.
#124
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:43
Ironhandjustice
-
- Members
- 1 093 messages
If they allow us to save geth and edi (CHOICES MATTER), I'll be fine with this.
#125
Posté 29 octobre 2012 - 10:52
Foolsfolly
-
- Members
- 4 770 messages
Schrijver wrote...
I guess a decent majority considers destroy the best ending for your canon playtrough. ME4 will be much better when it's set after the events of ME3 than before. To make this possible, there probably should be a canon ending. So, wether destroy is your favourite ending or not, would you be okay with it being canon?
I'd be more upset if Synthesis became the canon ending.
I'd be... really weary if Control became the ending but it is the closest to a status quo ending and so it's a strong contender for canon ending.
But High EMS Destroy? That's the ideal ending in my opinion. The Reapers are dead. The universe is free of them.
