11 réponses à ce sujet

[Elohim_07]

So Dragon Age III is in the horizon and lot of spectation is on hold of it's fan base. Looking at DA History, it's past success needs to be evaluated from the Origins 9/10 score vs DA II 7/10. And Did I mentioned Awakenings expansion between the two titles that received a 5/10?

I just follow Angry Joe Show game reviews cause it its simply a gamers review unbiased. But before I share that review from 2009 lets see first the video of what Origins was all about....

Spoiler Alert!!!

Link:

[Elohim_07]

So after looking into that video I just fell goose bumps! Yes it is 2012 and today Origins still emerge above evrything after it. So just look what it did offered in this gamer review and lets hope Bioware turn to its roots in DAIII

Link:

[Elohim_07]

....and what happened next, an expansion went out, the same I told you it received 5/10. See the video that self explain why in this link:



I think this is where the franchise start falling... but...

[Elohim_07]

A good game follow yet not up to the rank of the one that start it all. Dragon Age II review link here:



And Bioware what is going to come after DAII, what are you up to? Anything you do please look at its roots! I expect a good game one like a 10/10 game of the year type.....

Maybe this review here can give you an example of the type of game it should offer:



Now Lets the comments begin... if any but please see the videos to get the whole picture....

[Nashimura]

I totally disagree on Awakening, it was an expansion and had a good story...plus Anders, Justice, Sigrun and Nathanial were good companions. It didnt have everything Origins had but it was an expansion and should be treated as such. 

Oh, and if Dragon Age is anything like Skyrim i wont buy it....

Modifié par Nashimura, 28 octobre 2012 - 06:59 .

[Elohim_07]

Nashimura wrote...

I totally disagree on Awakening, it was an expansion and had a good story...plus Anders, Justice, Sigrun and Nathanial were good companions. It didnt have everything Origins had but it was an expansion and should be treated as such. 

Oh, and if Dragon Age is anything like Skyrim i wont buy it....

Thanks for the reply Nashimura, my point is what Origins offered vs all others. You did mention it:

"....it didnt have everything Origins had but...."

Your reply was fast. Bring me to think you didn't see (or already did in the past) watch the videos of the reviews to understand the point of view I bring in the history developement of the game. Skyrim was the last video and the review only talks how the developer company bring again something better than the past game. Improvement instead of fast game production sacrificing content... just saying... (I haven't bought Skyrim but plan to do when it hits $30 or lower)....

[Elohim_07]

FemaleMageFan wrote...

I can't express my opinion because as for me angry joe isn't the most credible game reviewer

Any recommendations for me? I don't have a long list, just liked that what he pointed out was the same I felt on the games...

[ThisIsZad]

I love Angry Joe!

[ioannisdenton]

Angry joe is spot on for me.
besides a 7 is not a bad score. and besides score means nothing.
I do not trust professional reviews anymore. Prof reviewers are gamers second and reviewers first.

[Ausstig]

He has too much punctuation.

Also I don't care what reviewers say I have my own tastes.

[David Gaider]

Posting reviews for past games neither constitutes "massive spoilers", nor does it qualify as DA3 discussion. If you have something to say regarding DA3, please say it.

Modifié par David Gaider, 28 octobre 2012 - 09:02 .