whateverman7 wrote...
TheThirdRace wrote...
whateverman7 wrote...
TheThirdRace wrote...
I play mostly Adepts, I top the scoreboard 99% of the time all the while killing less enemy than any other players and having only 3 medals. My point? Biotic explosions give a ridiculous amount of experience compared to guns. Thus, your argument cannot be considered to evaluate how good or not Adepts really are.
adepts are weaker, but yet you top the scoreboard 99% of the time using one in plat games?...so either you've been arguing just to argue or you just felt like bragging about your skills....lol...it doesnt even matter, i'm done
Neither, I was just pointing out that the scores doesn't reflect what happened in-game. With less medals and less kills I still had a better score... Does that really sound like bragging my goodness or me saying there's a problem with the score calculation and you shouldn't base your argument on it? In case you really doubt, it's the later...
actually it does...this whole time you've been arguing how weak the biotics are compared to other character types....how they dont do as much damage as those other types...yet, you come back and say how you top the score board 99%of the time in plat games using the very thing that's you're calling weaker....that comment says either: they're not as weak as you claim; or, if you still think they are weaker, you're just bragging about skills claiming how you top the scorebaord using something that's weaker.....
i dont think you can base an argument about skill on the scorebaord, but you can use it to tell if a character type is doing damaging....if the character is doing damage, it's gonna score points....if it's not doing damage, it wont....the fact that you and others claim to be doing well on the scoreboard using these 'weaker' characters means they are during damage and arent as weak as yall claim
If you take something out of context you can make it tell whatever you want. I took the liberty to repeat the whole discussion with the other guy so you can see the reasonning behind it.
As you can read, I top the scoreboard
BUT with only 3 medals and less kills than everyone else. Biotic explosions give a ridiculous amount of experience. If I can pull 25 kills with BE, I've got more than 75% of that score done. Killing a Canibal with Warp will give me something like 300 experience while killing it with a biotic explosion will give me more than 3 times as much.
Because of biotic explosions giving that much experience, I can top the scoreboard even by being the worst player of the game. You cannot base yourself on the scoreboard when it comes to Biotics because of this. My score means nothing, only that I managed to pull off some biotic explosions along the way and that's it. The other players killed much more enemies than me and at a faster pace too. Would you say a character would be overpowered if he had a score of 100k for 5 melee kills while doing nothing else for the remaining of the game? No, I would say he benefits from a bad design in how experience is calculated, nothing to do with how he fared in the game.
How can you think I try to brag when I openly state that I'm the worst player of the game? I'm good, don't get me wrong, but I'm still the weakest player on the team when I use an Adept (other than Fury). Curiously, I can never get the same score with any other class, just like if there was something special with Adepts, something like biotic explosions that give way too much experience...
Modifié par TheThirdRace, 10 novembre 2012 - 02:31 .