Aller au contenu

Photo

Avellone on romance: New interview


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
157 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Gibb_Shepard wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Seboist wrote...

That's the correct approach, to make "romance" serve a narrative or thematic purpose and not as mere juvenile sexual wish fulfillment like a "certain" other company does.


Yeah, CDPR really needs to step up their game. Sex Cards? And Playboy covers?

Sooooooooo juvenile. :devil::innocent:



I love the Witcher 2, but it quite possibily has the most juvenile 'romances' of any RPG I've ever played. Bioware looks mature in comparison.



The Triss relationship isn't juvenile, it is a relationship intertwined heavily with the plot. Once she's taken. it gives Geralt reason to move his ass, it layers the chase with a personal element, and it ends the game with a heart wrenching decision. 


It is juvenile, esp. with her mewling at Geralt like a cat in heat. Intertwined? Forced on, rather, Esp. since she is in your bed, even if you chose Shani. She isw introduced ass first. Very mature. I didn't care when she was taken.

SPOILER!!!!!













And that decision is not heart wrenching, as Triss gets saved anyway.


















SPOILER OVER

Pointless, that's what TW2's Triss is. Geralt had to leave for Loc Muinne anyway. She, as the playboy nonsense confirms, was in it for some ****** and ass. Esp. given how badly written she is. Ugh.

Modifié par Persephone, 04 novembre 2012 - 04:20 .


#52
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 464 messages
She's just like she is in the books. Has a crush on Geralt, her own motivations, and she's a source of aid, someone he can turn to. If you don't like that blame Sapkowski. And if you don't like the nudity either I don't know what to say other than nudity =/= romance. I've become critical of Bioware's emphasis on dating in their games. You know it's there, possible with nearly every character. What was a fairly bold innovation in Mass Effect has become trite and predictable. To be honest after reading that eloquent diatribe by Avellone, I'd like to see his hand at it.

Modifié par slimgrin, 04 novembre 2012 - 04:10 .


#53
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

slimgrin wrote...

She's just like she is in the books. Has a crush on Geralt, her own motivations, and she's a source of aid, someone he can turn to. If you don't like that blame Sapkowski. And if you don't like the nudity either I don't know what to say other than nudity =/= romance. I've become critical of Bioware's emphasis on dating in their games. You know it's there, possible with nearly every character. What was a fairly bold innovation in Mass Effect has become trite and predictable. To be honest after reading that eloquent diatribe by Avellone, I'd like to see his hand at it.


I don't care about the books. If she is a simpering tool in the books, fine, she was not like that in the first game.

No problem with nudity. But a leading female character being introduced ass first AND the nudity being exclusively female REEKS of pandering to teens who want to see boobies. The playboy garbage only confirms this.

Bioware has had romance in all their games since BG1. ME was not the first. And no, not every character is available. That's nonsense. Besides. you can finish ANY Bioware game without a LI or a single love scene if you wish. In TW2 I'll always have Triss in my bed. No matter what. Yeah, that is so much better. Give me a break here.

#54
Pedrak

Pedrak
  • Members
  • 1 050 messages
You might want to put a warning in your post for that pretty huge spoiler about TW2, Persephone - it kind of ruins a crucial (supposedly - at least it seems so while you are playing for the first time) decision in the game.

Modifié par Pedrak, 04 novembre 2012 - 04:20 .


#55
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Pedrak wrote...

You might want to put a warning in your post for that pretty huge spoiler about TW2, Persephone - it kind of ruins a crucial (supposedly) decision in the game.


Ah, true. Will fix that ASAP.

#56
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages
BG1 didn't have any romances.

#57
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

GodWood wrote...

BG1 didn't have any romances.


The latest Restoration patch (Based on planned content, or so it said) included them. And they were fantastic. But never mind that.

I simply think that saying Bioware is obsessed with sex scenes and romances is nonsense, since they are completely optional.

#58
GodWood

GodWood
  • Members
  • 7 954 messages

Persephone wrote...
The latest Restoration patch (Based on planned content, or so it said) included them.

Likely fan mods.

In an interview with David Gaider (believe it was this one) it was stated that they started putting romances in their games from BG2 onwards because so many fans were already modding in their own.

#59
Nordicus

Nordicus
  • Members
  • 445 messages

Persephone wrote...
I don't care about the books. If she is a simpering tool in the books, fine, she was not like that in the first game.

Wait wait wait, so you played a version of Witcher 1 where Triss wasn't constantly craving for Geralt's attention?





Triss pushing Geralt back on the bed without giving you a chance to reject at 00:50 never happened?


I'd also find a clip with Triss saying how she wants a house, children, picket fence, etc. with Geralt in Act 5, almost saying it out of nowhere, but it's not available unless I search LPs. Geralt gives her an inch, she takes a mile

Modifié par Nordicus, 04 novembre 2012 - 04:43 .


#60
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 974 messages

Persephone wrote...

Seboist wrote...

That's the correct approach, to make "romance" serve a narrative or thematic purpose and not as mere juvenile sexual wish fulfillment like a "certain" other company does.


Yeah, CDPR really needs to step up their game. Sex Cards? And Playboy covers?

Sooooooooo juvenile. :devil::innocent:


You're more predictable than the sun rising from the east.

0/10

#61
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Seboist wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Seboist wrote...

That's the correct approach, to make "romance" serve a narrative or thematic purpose and not as mere juvenile sexual wish fulfillment like a "certain" other company does.


Yeah, CDPR really needs to step up their game. Sex Cards? And Playboy covers?

Sooooooooo juvenile. :devil::innocent:


You're more predictable than the sun rising from the east.

0/10


Right back at you. ^_^ Aw, was that supposed to be an insult?

Try again, dearie.

#62
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Nordicus wrote...

Persephone wrote...
I don't care about the books. If she is a simpering tool in the books, fine, she was not like that in the first game.

Wait wait wait, so you played a version of Witcher 1 where Triss wasn't constantly craving for Geralt's attention?





Triss pushing Geralt back on the bed without giving you a chance to reject at 00:50 never happened?


I'd also find a clip with Triss saying how she wants a house, children, picket fence, etc. with Geralt in Act 5, almost saying it out of nowhere, but it's not available unless I search LPs. Geralt gives her an inch, she takes a mile


Constantly? No. But even that does not make her TW2's simpering tool.

And the last time I got the house & kids line, it struck me as wistful sarcasm. It's been a while though.

#63
Pedrak

Pedrak
  • Members
  • 1 050 messages
I think a good way to improve romances in RPGs would be making them LESS a formulaic, easy (even more with that heart icon!! mini-quest when you just have to 1)say something nice 2)listen to the LI's angsty issues 3) say something nice again 4)agree about everything he/she says and 5) get the fade to black scene

...and MORE something that is 1) difficult to achieve (remove that icon!) 2) connected to the overaching plot and to major decisions. I already mentioned in a previous post the (IMHO successful) Morrigan one involving the final choice in DAO.

Romances shouldn't exist in a vacuum, as wish-fulfilling mini-games. They should be tied to the main story and have a resonance on some important decisions.

#64
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

Pedrak wrote...

I think a good way to improve romances in RPGs would be making them LESS a formulaic, easy (even more with that heart icon!! mini-quest when you just have to 1)say something nice 2)listen to the LI's angsty issues 3) say something nice again 4)agree about everything he/she says and 5) get the fade to black scene

...and MORE something that is 1) difficult to achieve (remove that icon!) 2) connected to the overaching plot and to major decisions. I already mentioned in a previous post the (IMHO successful) Morrigan one involving the final choice in DAO.

Romances shouldn't exist in a vacuum, as wish-fulfilling mini-games. They should be tied to the main story and have a resonance on some important decisions.


Agreed on all accounts. Which is why I like the way DAO did it with Alistair and Morrigan. (Even though they are not my fave LIs) Or in DAII with Anders/Izzy. Or KOTOR with Bastila.

#65
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 464 messages

Persephone wrote...

Pedrak wrote...

I think a good way to improve romances in RPGs would be making them LESS a formulaic, easy (even more with that heart icon!! mini-quest when you just have to 1)say something nice 2)listen to the LI's angsty issues 3) say something nice again 4)agree about everything he/she says and 5) get the fade to black scene

...and MORE something that is 1) difficult to achieve (remove that icon!) 2) connected to the overaching plot and to major decisions. I already mentioned in a previous post the (IMHO successful) Morrigan one involving the final choice in DAO.

Romances shouldn't exist in a vacuum, as wish-fulfilling mini-games. They should be tied to the main story and have a resonance on some important decisions.


Agreed on all accounts. Which is why I like the way DAO did it with Alistair and Morrigan. (Even though they are not my fave LIs) Or in DAII with Anders/Izzy. Or KOTOR with Bastila.


Well, through sheer quantity Bioware's going to get it right ocassionally, I'll grant you that. Samara is probably the best because what seems like fan service or wish fullfulment is ultimately denied the player. Also, Pedrak is spot on.

Modifié par slimgrin, 04 novembre 2012 - 06:01 .


#66
Persephone

Persephone
  • Members
  • 7 989 messages

slimgrin wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Pedrak wrote...

I think a good way to improve romances in RPGs would be making them LESS a formulaic, easy (even more with that heart icon!! mini-quest when you just have to 1)say something nice 2)listen to the LI's angsty issues 3) say something nice again 4)agree about everything he/she says and 5) get the fade to black scene

...and MORE something that is 1) difficult to achieve (remove that icon!) 2) connected to the overaching plot and to major decisions. I already mentioned in a previous post the (IMHO successful) Morrigan one involving the final choice in DAO.

Romances shouldn't exist in a vacuum, as wish-fulfilling mini-games. They should be tied to the main story and have a resonance on some important decisions.


Agreed on all accounts. Which is why I like the way DAO did it with Alistair and Morrigan. (Even though they are not my fave LIs) Or in DAII with Anders/Izzy. Or KOTOR with Bastila.


Well, through sheer quantity Bioware's going to get it right ocassionally, I'll grant you that. Samara is probably the best because what seems like fan service or wish fullfulment is ultimatley denied the player. Also, Pedrak is spot on.


Well, my wish-fulfilment has been denied in lotsa Bioware games. DAO....couldn't romance Loghain or Sten or Teagan.... DAII: Dammit, I want some Varric! ^_^ But yeah, I agree about Samara.

Modifié par Persephone, 04 novembre 2012 - 05:17 .


#67
AllThatJazz

AllThatJazz
  • Members
  • 2 758 messages
Ooh, Triss in TW2 is annoying as all hell to me. She can't seem to get anywhere without needing to be rescued by big stwong Gewalt. She needs saving in Every. Single. Act. Triss being weak and helpless and a bit useless seems to be the thing that gives the plot its momentum. In fact, nearly all the women in TW2 are either completely manipulative beyotches or helpless victims (Philippa even starts out as the former and then becomes the latter at the end). The only exception to this is Ves, who rewards getting smacked down by Geralt by letting him into her pants. Yay. And even the new 'character' (Yennefer) who is introduced in TW2, is yet another female who will presumably need rescuing at some point.

I really like TW games, they are a lot of fun. But the main female characters were far better presented in the first game, I thought. Neither Shani nor Triss were pathetic - they were both strong and independent, their entire existence didn't revolve around Geralt even though they both clearly liked him, and they both had their own agendas and lives to lead. In TW2, Shani has disappeared altogether and Triss has been reduced to a standard damsel in constant distress type.

It's not an 'OMG I'm never buying another CDPR game!' moment or anything, but it is disappointing to see so many incredibly two-dimensional female characters in a game that otherwise excels at characterisation (Roche, Iorveth, Dandelion, Zoltan etc are all wonderfully portrayed).

I do like that some Bioware women (Aveline, Morrigan, Samara especially for me) seem to have a little something more about them than either being  easy and malleable shag muffins for the central character, or evil master manipulators with no redeeming features aside from the purely physical.

Er, sorry for heading off topic. At any rate, I would rather see well-drawn characters in general than romances or sexual encounters, if such a choice has to be made. But I really have no worries about 'well-drawn characters' with Obsidian.

Modifié par AllThatJazz, 04 novembre 2012 - 05:37 .


#68
Dominus

Dominus
  • Members
  • 15 426 messages

Samara is probably the best because what seems like fan service or wish fullfulment is ultimately denied the player.

And you could say the same with Morinth. Even if morinth truly had what could be defined as love or affection for the PC, you're pretty much not getting any of that without death by Snu-Snu.

As far as Avellone's outlook on romance, it's harsh but realistic. I feel little to no interest in romances, and mostly play them out for the purpose of completionism. If I buy a game, I generally want to experience as much as possible(as long as the content quality is maintained).

Regarding the implied question of "Are Romances Necessary in Gaming? Why is BioWare Obsessed?" Well, I personally don't believe such a high quantity of companions need to be romanceable in the game. As mentioned above, there are examples of BioWare getting it right...but it often comes as too much and too little. If you're going to explore romance, make sure it's worth the ride. Looking back, I see poor examples like Diana Chobot, Jack, Jacob, and a couple others that make me wonder why the Developers bothered investing in it. Though I will say the priiize meme was worth the lameness. :P

#69
mousestalker

mousestalker
  • Members
  • 16 945 messages
Mr. Avellone's statement was a disappointment. Were I aware of his sentiments regarding romance prior to the Kickstarter campaign, I would have made certain decisions differently.

Romance is not only part of life, it's an adventure. Part of the reason we are all here are the mysterious workings of romance in our ancestors' lives.

The net result is that I am likely to not buy the game at release and may never buy. Despite coming out on Linux, which is wicked cool, it doesn't sound like much more than a smash 'n bash.

#70
slimgrin

slimgrin
  • Members
  • 12 464 messages

AllThatJazz wrote...

Ooh, Triss in TW2 is annoying as all hell to me. She can't seem to get anywhere without needing to be rescued by big stwong Gewalt. She needs saving in Every. Single. Act. Triss being weak and helpless and a bit useless seems to be the thing that gives the plot its momentum. In fact, nearly all the women in TW2 are either completely manipulative beyotches or helpless victims (Philippa even starts out as the former and then becomes the latter at the end). The only exception to this is Ves, who rewards getting smacked down by Geralt by letting him into her pants. Yay. And even the new 'character' (Yennefer) who is introduced in TW2, is yet another female who will presumably need rescuing at some point.

I really like TW games, they are a lot of fun. But the main female characters were far better presented in the first game, I thought. Neither Shani nor Triss were pathetic - they were both strong and independent, their entire existence didn't revolve around Geralt even though they both clearly liked him, and they both had their own agendas and lives to lead. In TW2, Shani has disappeared altogether and Triss has been reduced to a standard damsel in constant distress type.

It's not an 'OMG I'm never buying another CDPR game!' moment or anything, but it is disappointing to see so many incredibly two-dimensional female characters in a game that otherwise excels at characterisation (Roche, Iorveth, Dandelion, Zoltan etc are all wonderfully portrayed).

I do like that some Bioware women (Aveline, Morrigan, Samara especially for me) seem to have a little something more about them than either being  easy and malleable shag muffins for the central character, or evil master manipulators with no redeeming features aside from the purely physical.

Er, sorry for heading off topic. At any rate, I would rather see well-drawn characters in general than romances or sexual encounters, if such a choice has to be made. But I really have no worries about 'well-drawn characters' with Obsidian.


I don't even know where to begin...

-Triss bails Geralt out of trouble far more than the other way around. As a man, that doesn't bother me. It really seems to bother some women though when a female character gets rescued. :whistle:

-Yes, some of the sorceresses are manipulative b*tches. Again, it's that way in the books, and there's reasons for it, though they won't be palattable to everyone.

-Phillippa Eilhart, helpless? Please. There isn't a single other character in the Witcher games I'd rather not ****** off.

-Look at Vess' background - elven sex slave. She has something to prove, that she's no man's plaything. That's why she won't sleep with you until you treat her as an equal. Anyways, yes, off topic but I think you're way off base there.

Modifié par slimgrin, 04 novembre 2012 - 06:02 .


#71
twincast

twincast
  • Members
  • 829 messages
It's not like he's the only writer on Project Eternity, you know.

#72
Dominus

Dominus
  • Members
  • 15 426 messages

Romance is not only part of life, it's an adventure.

It is, but I'd prefer the real thing. What BioWare is doing now, albeit great for what it is, feels like it's still in its primitive stages. Saying the right thing at the right times by checking up on your LI after killing everything in a dungeon doesn't feel like romance to me. It feels like a dialogue path leading up to a sex scene. Until they start experimenting beyond that formula, my hunger for virtual love is minimal at best. I will say they've thrown some cool ideas out though. ME3 has great LI dialogue mid-mission, which took me by surprise. The Tali One in the ship above rannoch was hilarious. :P

#73
AllThatJazz

AllThatJazz
  • Members
  • 2 758 messages

slimgrin wrote...

AllThatJazz wrote...

Ooh, Triss in TW2 is annoying as all hell to me. She can't seem to get anywhere without needing to be rescued by big stwong Gewalt. She needs saving in Every. Single. Act. Triss being weak and helpless and a bit useless seems to be the thing that gives the plot its momentum. In fact, nearly all the women in TW2 are either completely manipulative beyotches or helpless victims (Philippa even starts out as the former and then becomes the latter at the end). The only exception to this is Ves, who rewards getting smacked down by Geralt by letting him into her pants. Yay. And even the new 'character' (Yennefer) who is introduced in TW2, is yet another female who will presumably need rescuing at some point.

I really like TW games, they are a lot of fun. But the main female characters were far better presented in the first game, I thought. Neither Shani nor Triss were pathetic - they were both strong and independent, their entire existence didn't revolve around Geralt even though they both clearly liked him, and they both had their own agendas and lives to lead. In TW2, Shani has disappeared altogether and Triss has been reduced to a standard damsel in constant distress type.

It's not an 'OMG I'm never buying another CDPR game!' moment or anything, but it is disappointing to see so many incredibly two-dimensional female characters in a game that otherwise excels at characterisation (Roche, Iorveth, Dandelion, Zoltan etc are all wonderfully portrayed).

I do like that some Bioware women (Aveline, Morrigan, Samara especially for me) seem to have a little something more about them than either being  easy and malleable shag muffins for the central character, or evil master manipulators with no redeeming features aside from the purely physical.

Er, sorry for heading off topic. At any rate, I would rather see well-drawn characters in general than romances or sexual encounters, if such a choice has to be made. But I really have no worries about 'well-drawn characters' with Obsidian.


I don't even know where to begin...

-Triss bails Geralt out of trouble far more than the other way around. As a man, that doesn't bother me. It really seems to bother some women though when a female character gets rescued. :whistle:

-Yes, some of the sorceresses are manipulative b*tches. Again, it's that way in the books, and there's reasons for it, though they won't be palattable to everyone.

-Phillippa Eilhart, helpless? Please. There isn't a single other character in the Witcher games I'd rather not ****** off.

-Look at Vess' background - elven sex slave. She has something to prove, that she's no man's plaything. That's why she won't sleep with you until you treat her as an equal. Anyways, yes, off topic but I think you're way off base there.


Oh, you shouldn't feel like you don't know where to begin. Debating is fun! And all opinions are valid. as long as we remain respectful to one another, all will be well :)

Wasn't Philippa blinded and left for dead in the Dungeons, where Geralt had the option to rescue her or kill her? So yes, over the course of the game she goes from unrepentantly manipulative and nasty, to helpless and powerless victim whose fate can be decided by Geralt.

Honestly not sure I recall Triss bailing out Geralt in TW2 much. TW1? Yes. But in TW2, I recall Triss needing to be carried by Roche after she faints when her magic fails; Triss being kidnapped by Letho; Triss being kidnapped and held hostage by Nilfgaardian spies. Triss then being rescued either by Letho or Geralt. Would maybe have been nice if she could have got herself out of trouble just once. 

If Ves is no man's plaything, then why make her shaggable by Geralt at all? It would surely have made more logical sense in that case to have her tell Geralt to get lost, or that she only likes him as a friend, or even tell him that he needs to prove himself a bit more or something (setting up an encounter in the next game or whatever). Having sex with Geralt after he defeats her in combat doesn't say 'no man's plaything'. It says 'man's plaything provided he kicks the crap out of her first'. She's come a loooong way from that elven sex slave mentality :P

Hah, I certainly don't object to the odd occasion of a woman (or man, or child or dog or whatever) needing to be rescued occasionally in games, I am very used to that plot device by now :P.  Having been a gamer for twenty years now, I'm way past being offended by silly female stereotypes, as much as I would like to see a bit more creativity from game developers in this regard. It struck me as being an overused narrative device in TW2, is all, particularly with regard to Triss. 

Guess we'll agree to disagree on that.

Modifié par AllThatJazz, 04 novembre 2012 - 06:35 .


#74
Fidget6

Fidget6
  • Members
  • 2 437 messages
While I'm tired of all the hate towards the people that enjoy romances, and romance is something I very much look forward to in Bioware games, I don't feel every single RPG should feel compelled to include them. If they can make it work, go for it, if they'd prefer not to with the kind of story they want to tell that's fine too. The vast majority of games I've played didn't have romance after all.

Modifié par Fidget6, 04 novembre 2012 - 06:41 .


#75
Chromie

Chromie
  • Members
  • 9 881 messages

AllThatJazz wrote...
If Ves is no man's plaything, then why make her shaggable by Geralt at all? It would surely have made more logical sense in that case to have her tell Geralt to get lost, or that she only likes him as a friend, 


I've had sex with my friends before. Romance doesn't equal sex.


mousestalker wrote...
Romance is not only part of life, it's an adventure. Part of the reason we are all here are the mysterious workings of romance in our ancestors' lives. 


Some of our parents may have been forced into marriage. Is that romantic? Bioware has made romances into some formulaic expression all we ever have to do is talk several times and we win a sex scene. Yes, win because it comes off as cheap.

Modifié par Skelter192, 04 novembre 2012 - 06:50 .