Seival wrote...
Harry Harrison might be little known only to the ones who don't know what the sci-fi really means.
Star Wars title is just silly adventure without any good story. Just action, action, more action, and overhyped popularity. Completely empty and useless universe.
Seival wrote...
...I'm glad that BioWere writers were inspired by true sci-fi
Modifié par Bill Casey, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:05 .
Seival wrote...
Harry Harrison might be little known only to the ones who don't know what the sci-fi really means.
Star Wars title is just silly adventure without any good story. Just action, action, more action, and overhyped popularity. Completely empty and useless universe.
Modifié par Greylycantrope, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:56 .
Seival wrote...
The Night Mammoth wrote...
Seival wrote...
...I'm glad that BioWere writers were inspired by true sci-fi, and not by Star Wars.
You're glad BioWare were (allegedly) inspired by some little-known sci-fi conceptualist, rather than the most popular science fiction franchise in history?
Seival's made up rules about fiction are hilarious.
Harry Harrison might be little known only to the ones who don't know what the sci-fi really means.
Star Wars title is just silly adventure without any good story. Just action, action, more action, and overhyped popularity. Completely empty and useless universe.
LOL you always died in itDavik Kang wrote...
Bioware writers did KotOR a while back, which they built within the SW universe...
It was maybe silly and action-packed, but tbh it was also by far one of my favourite videogame stories...
Davik Kang wrote...
Seival wrote...
Harry Harrison might be little known only to the ones who don't know what the sci-fi really means.
Star Wars title is just silly adventure without any good story. Just action, action, more action, and overhyped popularity. Completely empty and useless universe.
Bioware writers did KotOR a while back, which they built within the SW universe...
It was maybe silly and action-packed, but tbh it was also by far one of my favourite videogame stories...
Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*
Huh?Greylycantrope wrote...
LOL you always died in it [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
? None taken... (?)Seival wrote...
To say I dislike everything about Star Wars is to say nothing. That silly universe deserved to end up in MMO, and to be sold to Disney...
...No offence.
Davik Kang, he's dead, always.Davik Kang wrote...
Huh?Greylycantrope wrote...
LOL you always died in it [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie]
Modifié par Dr_Extrem, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:04 .
Modifié par Archonsg, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:06 .
Archonsg wrote...
@Seival
I am pretty sure the person who gave us the Character of James DiGriz would not condone the enforced conformity and acceptance at gunpoint a choice such as oh, Synthesis.
For one to quote an author and use one of his works as the basis of your "proof", isn't it rather pretentious to ignore his OTHER works and claim that the author would support *your* view point, contrary to what hus other works would suggest?
Guest_A Bethesda Fan_*
Seival wrote...
Archonsg wrote...
@Seival
I am pretty sure the person who gave us the Character of James DiGriz would not condone the enforced conformity and acceptance at gunpoint a choice such as oh, Synthesis.
For one to quote an author and use one of his works as the basis of your "proof", isn't it rather pretentious to ignore his OTHER works and claim that the author would support *your* view point, contrary to what hus other works would suggest?
You didn't get it, did you? OP was not used to approve or disprove Synthesis, Control, or Destroy. It was used to show that any good sci-fi story has deep philosophical meaning, and different people might have different points of view on that meaning.
Very few people understood what I meant here. And if the rest can't understand that simple OP, then how can they understand ME3 ending in first place?
Modifié par Greylycantrope, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:20 .
Greylycantrope wrote...
Deep philosophical concept implies having a certain theme run through the entirety of the work, weigh in on the positive and negative perspectives of both sides of the issue presented and than present a resolution that shows the the author's view point or leave a question to be resolved by the audience. It's not throwing random concepts out and hoping they stick, which is the case with ME3.
Modifié par Davik Kang, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:37 .
Greylycantrope wrote...
Deep philosophical concept implies having a certain theme run through the entirety of the work, weigh in on the positive and negative perspectives of both sides of the issue presented and than present a resolution that shows the the author's view point or leave a question to be resolved by the audience. It's not throwing random concepts out and hoping they stick, which is the case with ME3.
Modifié par Seival, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:35 .
You mean that they took the time to craft the story over 8 years, rather than just spit the whole thing out in one all-nighter?Suspire wrote...
they themselves said they made up the story as they went along...
Suspire wrote...
It's useless, anyone that doesn't like the ending just doesn't get the deep meaningful (f)art of Bioware writers, you should all know by now.
Ignore that they themselves said they made up the story as they went along, and just pretend it was all planned as the trolling to end all trollings.
I mean that they had no idea how the following games in the sequel would be like, and they had a lot of different ideas for the ending, so they decided on what to write as they went along They had no ending planned from ME1. So "respect teh artistz intent, u didnt noe it!!" is bull****.Davik Kang wrote...
You mean that they took the time to craft the story over 8 years, rather than just spit the whole thing out in one all-nighter?Suspire wrote...
they themselves said they made up the story as they went along...
Right the Krogan arc had everything to do with the Synthetics organics conflict, as did our action agains the collectors/ sarcasm.Seival wrote...
ME3 never throw any random concepts. The ending and everything we learned before are the organic whole.
Organic-vs-synthetic problem was there from the very beginning. Everything was coming to what we've seen in ME3 ending. Ending was unpredictable, and it showed us what the story is about, and that was brilliant. Everything that happend before matters.
He should frown louder, having trouble noticing with all that rumble on top of him.Davik Kang wrote...
Davik Kang finds your lack of faith... disturbing...
Modifié par Greylycantrope, 06 novembre 2012 - 08:47 .
Seival wrote...
Suspire wrote...
It's useless, anyone that doesn't like the ending just doesn't get the deep meaningful (f)art of Bioware writers, you should all know by now.
Ignore that they themselves said they made up the story as they went along, and just pretend it was all planned as the trolling to end all trollings.
The fact is that they didn't "made up the story as they went along". Untill the story isn't told to the very end - it's incomplete. You can't say what the story is about while it's incomplete. Only completely finished story can show you the whole picture that was intended.
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
