EmperorSahlertz wrote...
No, the problem would be with magic. Sadly you can't seperate magic from the mage without rendering the mage Tranquil. I would wish that the Rite of Tranquility left the amge with all his faculties intact, since that would be the ideal situation in my eyes, and would solve a whole lot of the problems. Sadly that isn't so.Auintus wrote...
Human nature isn't incredibly difficult to understand. Signs of corruption would be visible to, say, another mage who knows about this kind of stuff. If a mage were outnumbered by a group of humans and resorted to a demonic deal to save their own life, yes, we have a rather large problem. But that problem would not have originated from the mage themself.
But attach a gun to a man and you know he will use it in desperate situations. Liekwise with mages, we KNOW they will use it, so we just try to prevent the sitution from ever arising.
And yes, "human nature" acn be incredibly complex and diverse. And a simple yes/no question based on "astude observation of an untrained" simply won't be accurate enough to warrant the use of your proposed system.
Magic is not the problem any more than guns are the problem. Like with a gun, they should be trained and the mage's superiors should be confident that they won't be a problem.
A mage should be allowed to rely on magic in a desperate situation. The situations in which accepting a demon's offer is the only way out were only ever the result of templars.
The yes/no isn't presented to the mage, but to the enchanter teaching them. Ideally, one throughout their entire training, one that knows them, and knows what kind of moral risk they pose.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




