253 réponses à ce sujet

[KingZayd]

Yate wrote...

Kabooooom wrote...

thanks for contributing

now diaf

I contributed earlier. Also, "diaf"? Seriously? How old are you, like twelve? That combined with when you called someone a "******" or something earlier makes me think you are either extremely young, or extremely immature since you apparently can take approximately zero criticism without resorting to insults.

Good job bro. Way to win the internet.

can't read lol*?

Modifié par KingZayd, 06 novembre 2012 - 01:55 .

[Yate]

MegaSovereign wrote...

Am I the only one that actually plays Mass Effect because of everything other than the plot? Seriously it's never been that great. The plot doesn't deserve this much brain power.

ME2's ending was functional and didn't require an extended cut...so it works. The original ME3 ending was so bad that Bioware had to push back their DLC schedule 6 months in order to patch it up.

Neither games have amazing endings or amazing plots. What attracted me to the ME universe was the amazing atmosphere, great side stories, and awesome characters .

I like this drell

he understands

[MegaSovereign]

What does diaf even mean?

You youngsters confuse me with your slang.

[KingZayd]

MegaSovereign wrote...

Am I the only one that actually plays Mass Effect because of everything other than the plot? Seriously it's never been that great. The plot doesn't deserve this much brain power.

ME2's ending was functional and didn't require an extended cut...so it works. The original ME3 ending was so bad that Bioware had to push back their DLC schedule 6 months in order to patch it up.

Neither games have amazing endings or amazing plots. What attracted me to the ME universe was the amazing atmosphere, great side stories, and awesome characters .

I link the plot to the universe. I don't really consider them to be separate. I find the ending makes the universe silly, and that's why it bothers me so much. I didn't really need a great ending, just one that wasn't so stupid.

I liked your post about using potatoes to stop the Reapers though.

Modifié par KingZayd, 06 novembre 2012 - 01:59 .

[KingZayd]

MegaSovereign wrote...

What does diaf even mean?

You youngsters confuse me with your slang.

 
googled it. means "die in a fire".. pleasant.

[Oni Changas]

Cthulhu42 wrote...

Yate wrote...

ME3:

- some of the best dialogue and voice acting in the game

@ this whole ****ing thread.

If I were to even grant OP's ass-pulling bullet points any credence...

ME2 is the middle point in a pre-announced trilogy. It has every right to hook for the sequel. It also has high variance in its decisions in regards to the SM squad. The base decision was meant to affect Shep's standind with TIM, but ME3 ****ed that up too.

You're blasting The Two Towers for setting up Return of The King.
(although Tolkein knew what the **** he was doing and how not to kill his 2nd world's immersion)

[Kabooooom]

MegaSovereign wrote...

What does diaf even mean?

You youngsters confuse me with your slang.

Hey, I'm not that young. I remember the beginning of the internet, and also playing on an Atari and thinking it was cool. Also playing outside. Like on a bike and stuff. Those were the days.

But I'm not THAT out of touch. It means "die in a fire". It is synonymous with "ingl" which is internetspeak for "I never get laid"

[Massa FX]

I read OP and skipped the rest of this thread. I'm sorry but no. ME2 was perfect as a second in a trilogy game. It setup the player for numerous possibilities. But ME3 didn't end well.

Please don't belittle ME by saying blatant falsehoods about the games. If the second game was so terrible, why did you buy the third game?

BSN noobs don't buy into this guys poop.

I really dislike posters that hate on things that are excellent because everything else they say carries little value.

ME2. Leave it out of the hate.

[Yate]

Massa FX wrote...

I read OP and skipped the rest of this thread. I'm sorry but no. ME2 was perfect as a second in a trilogy game. It setup the player for numerous possibilities. But ME3 didn't end well.

Please don't belittle ME by saying blatant falsehoods about the games. If the second game was so terrible, why did you buy the third game?

BSN noobs don't buy into this guys poop.

I really dislike posters that hate on things that are excellent because everything else they say carries little value.

ME2. Leave it out of the hate.

I fricken love ME2

[Nightwriter]

MegaSovereign wrote...

Am I the only one that actually plays Mass Effect because of everything other than the plot? Seriously it's never been that great. The plot doesn't deserve this much brain power.

ME2's ending was functional and didn't require an extended cut...so it works. The original ME3 ending was so bad that Bioware had to push back their DLC schedule 6 months in order to patch it up.

Neither games have amazing endings or amazing plots. What attracted me to the ME universe was the amazing atmosphere, great side stories, and awesome characters .

The plot is difficult to extricate from other elements one might care about.

For instance, if you don't care about the plot, but you care about the Shepard you have created, you cannot avoid the fact that the plot is in full control of what happens to Shepard. Inevitably, that plot thing you don't care about is going to kill your PC (unless you wipe out EDI and the geth, in which case it only might kill your PC).

Or for another instance, if you don't care about the plot, but you care about the characters, their stories, and the relationships you form with them, you cannot avoid the fact that the plot often controls all of those things as well. It might take you far away from them, or kill them, or force them into a development you don't like. The plot might dominate conversations that you'd rather spend talking about something else with them.

Plot's hard to avoid, yo.

[Oni Changas]

Massa FX wrote...

I read OP and skipped the rest of this thread. I'm sorry but no. ME2 was perfect as a second in a trilogy game. It setup the player for numerous possibilities. But ME3 didn't end well.

Please don't belittle ME by saying blatant falsehoods about the games. If the second game was so terrible, why did you buy the third game?

BSN noobs don't buy into this guys poop.

I really dislike posters that hate on things that are excellent because everything else they say carries little value.

ME2. Leave it out of the hate.

Indeed. ME3 is in its own bin.

[Yate]

plot's fine

destroy evil machines before they destroy you

grade-A plot right there

quit overanalysing things

[Yate]

Massa FX wrote...
I really dislike posters that hate on things that are excellent because everything else they say carries little value.

think about this for a second

[KingZayd]

Yate wrote...

Massa FX wrote...
I really dislike posters that hate on things that are excellent because everything else they say carries little value.

think about this for a second

I think you missed a part when reading that.

[MegaSovereign]

Nightwriter wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Am I the only one that actually plays Mass Effect because of everything other than the plot? Seriously it's never been that great. The plot doesn't deserve this much brain power.

ME2's ending was functional and didn't require an extended cut...so it works. The original ME3 ending was so bad that Bioware had to push back their DLC schedule 6 months in order to patch it up.

Neither games have amazing endings or amazing plots. What attracted me to the ME universe was the amazing atmosphere, great side stories, and awesome characters .

The plot is difficult to extricate from other elements one might care about.

For instance, if you don't care about the plot, but you care about the Shepard you have created, you cannot avoid the fact that the plot is in full control of what happens to Shepard. Inevitably, that plot thing you don't care about is going to kill your PC (unless you wipe out EDI and the geth, in which case it only might kill your PC).

Or for another instance, if you don't care about the plot, but you care about the characters, their stories, and the relationships you form with them, you cannot avoid the fact that the plot often controls all of those things as well. It might take you far away from them, or kill them, or force them into a development you don't like. The plot might dominate conversations that you'd rather spend talking about something else with them.

Plot's hard to avoid, yo.

As long the plot doesn't destroy everything I love about the ME universe then I don't care all that much. And the EC leaves the galaxy in a good light.

[GreyLycanTrope]

MegaSovereign wrote...

Am I the only one that actually plays Mass Effect because of everything other than the plot? Seriously it's never been that great. The plot doesn't deserve this much brain power.

ME2's ending was functional and didn't require an extended cut...so it works. The original ME3 ending was so bad that Bioware had to push back their DLC schedule 6 months in order to patch it up.

Neither games have amazing endings or amazing plots. What attracted me to the ME universe was the amazing atmosphere, great side stories, and awesome characters .

The gameplay mechanics weren't that great in ME1, story is what kept me invested, the characters and improved gameplay mechanics added to the experiance but the over all storyline with it's the potential for varried outcomes AND characters/universe is what kept me hooked.

[GreyLycanTrope]

MegaSovereign wrote...

As long the plot doesn't destroy everything I love about the ME universe then I don't care all that much. And the EC leaves the galaxy in a good light.

Plot destroyed everything I loved about the universe. The second part is subjective.

[XxBrokenBonezxX]

0/10

Not funny at all.

Comparing ME3's ending to ME2's is like comparing Batman and Robin to The Dark Knight.
ME3's ending is even more absurd than bat nipples and bat credit cards.

[mauro2222]

Ha! Nope.

[drayfish]

What the hell have I stumbled into here?

Yate wrote...

'Didn't read lol'?

'no, you're a ******'?

'troll another thread'?

'Your stupidity makes me cry'?

'Die in a fire'?

And an entire scornful thread predicated on the notion that your opinion automatically trumps anyone else's?

Yate, I've been surprised by the ugliness of your posts before, but such infantile, hateful theatrics are pitiful. If you are the self-appointed advocate that Bioware needs - god help them.

[MegaSovereign]

Greylycantrope wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

As long the plot doesn't destroy everything I love about the ME universe then I don't care all that much. And the EC leaves the galaxy in a good light.

Plot destroyed everything I loved about the universe. The second part is subjective.

Well your ending of choice is Refuse unless I'm mistaken. If your canon ending involves everyone dying then I can understand why you would feel devastated.

For me most of the characters I worked hard to save survived and the galaxy is free of the Reaper threat. 

And the second part really isn't subjective. A galaxy without the Reaper threat is automatically a brighter one. It's clear there will be a reconstruction period but the galaxy will make a comeback.

Modifié par MegaSovereign, 06 novembre 2012 - 02:31 .

[ghost9191]

Yate wrote...

plot's fine

destroy evil machines before they destroy you

grade-A plot right there

quit overanalysing things

i think it is around the time that it says oh btw you can merge or control. bout the time the plot went out the window . oh and in the process of completing the destroy part of the plot , you can also destroy another majore plot point in the game , if you well upgraded them

was expecting control . but didn't really expect the merge part . not a ideal solution lol

that is if you weren't being sarcastic:D

[Yate]

drayfish wrote...

What the hell have I stumbled into here?

Yate wrote...

'Didn't read lol'?

'no, you're a ******'?

'troll another thread'?

'Your stupidity makes me cry'?

'Die in a fire'?

And an entire scornful thread predicated on the notion that your opinion automatically trumps anyone else's?

Yate, I've been surprised by the ugliness of your posts before, but such infantile, hateful theatrics are pitiful. If you are the self-appointed advocate that Bioware needs - god help them.

the real ugliness is the morons who think that if they rant about the fixed endings enough that their fan fiction will be made canon

[Konfined]

OniTYME wrote...

@ this whole ****ing thread.

If I were to even grant OP's ass-pulling bullet points any credence...

ME2 is the middle point in a pre-announced trilogy. It has every right to hook for the sequel. It also has high variance in its decisions in regards to the SM squad. The base decision was meant to affect Shep's standind with TIM, but ME3 ****ed that up too.

You're blasting The Two Towers for setting up Return of The King.
(although Tolkein knew what the **** he was doing and how not to kill his 2nd world's immersion)

If Commander Shepard weren't already dead, this would be their favorite post in the thread.

[Yate]

ghost9191 wrote...

Yate wrote...

plot's fine

destroy evil machines before they destroy you

grade-A plot right there

quit overanalysing things

i think it is around the time that it says oh btw you can merge or control. bout the time the plot went out the window . oh and in the process of completing the destroy part of the plot , you can also destroy another majore plot point in the game , if you well upgraded them

was expecting control . but didn't really expect the merge part . not a ideal solution lol

that is if you weren't being sarcastic:D

sure, whatever your piece of cake