Aller au contenu

Photo

Destroy validates Javik, and that's not good


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
256 réponses à ce sujet

#101
KingZayd

KingZayd
  • Members
  • 5 344 messages

Bill Casey wrote...

Bzzt WRONG


Sovereign has improved him. Upgraded him. After Virmire, he's a vision of the future. The evolution of all organic life...


After Vermire he is forcefully implanted to "strengthen" his "resolve". It's only on the Citadel where he begins extolling the virtues of synthesis. And it is on the Citadel that he is content to serve Sovereign.

#102
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages
Even if Javik is wrong about the Geth it doesn't make him wrong about the Reapers.

Most of the time he's right, at least so far as keeping Shepard focused on the mission and advising him to do whatever it takes to destroy the Reapers.

Javik has an excellent quote that I think could be applied to the ending choices, and a possible unwillingness to make an extremely tough call regarding the Geth.

"You think you can win this war your honor intact? Stand in the ashes of a trillion dead souls, and ask the ghosts if honor matters."

Modifié par Han Shot First, 06 novembre 2012 - 06:53 .


#103
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Control and Synthesis are stalemate endings that fail to achieve victory over the Reapers. As stalemates they also represent a partial failture of Shepard's mission.

Both end with the Reaper fleet still intact and capable of wiping out the galaxy. Refuse of course is an outright defeat. The only ending that truly guarantees that the space faring civilizations of the galaxy are saved from the Reapers for all time is Destroy.

And that leads to open season for the Leviathans, or possibly the krogan. Ultimately, what I care about is stopping the harvest; if I may do so by making peace, then all the better.

"You think you can win this war your honor intact? Stand in the ashes of
a trillion dead souls, and ask the ghosts if honor matters."

Which is funny because I won't be standing in the ashes of any dead souls due to my decision. I would say that it's more an anti-Destroy quote, talking about asking the geth.

Modifié par Xilizhra, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:03 .


#104
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Control and Synthesis are stalemate endings that fail to achieve victory over the Reapers. As stalemates they also represent a partial failture of Shepard's mission.

Both end with the Reaper fleet still intact and capable of wiping out the galaxy. Refuse of course is an outright defeat. The only ending that truly guarantees that the space faring civilizations of the galaxy are saved from the Reapers for all time is Destroy.

And that leads to open season for the Leviathans, or possibly the krogan..



Both of whom are much lesser threats than the Reapers, and not actively engaged at the moment in trying to eradicate all sapient life.

Forgive me for going Godwin, but that would be like the Britain and the United States deciding to make a seperate peace with N-zi Germany because Germany's defeat might create a vacuum for the Soviets to exploit.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:05 .


#105
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Control and Synthesis are stalemate endings that fail to achieve victory over the Reapers. As stalemates they also represent a partial failture of Shepard's mission.

Both end with the Reaper fleet still intact and capable of wiping out the galaxy. Refuse of course is an outright defeat. The only ending that truly guarantees that the space faring civilizations of the galaxy are saved from the Reapers for all time is Destroy.

And that leads to open season for the Leviathans, or possibly the krogan..



Both of whom are much lesser threats than the Reapers, and not actively engaged at the moment in trying to eradicate all sapient life.

Nor will the Reapers be, once I'm through with them.

Forgive me for going Godwin, but that would be like the Britain and the
United States deciding to make a seperate peace with **** Germany
because Germany's defeat might create a vacuum for the Soviets to
exploit.

Assuming the **** part was removed from power and all of their genocidal actions stopped, with everyone involved who committed them removed (as that's what happens in Control or Synthesis), that wouldn't be completely unreasonable.

Modifié par Xilizhra, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:06 .


#106
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Control and Synthesis are stalemate endings that fail to achieve victory over the Reapers. As stalemates they also represent a partial failture of Shepard's mission.

Both end with the Reaper fleet still intact and capable of wiping out the galaxy. Refuse of course is an outright defeat. The only ending that truly guarantees that the space faring civilizations of the galaxy are saved from the Reapers for all time is Destroy.

And that leads to open season for the Leviathans, or possibly the krogan..



Both of whom are much lesser threats than the Reapers, and not actively engaged at the moment in trying to eradicate all sapient life.

Nor will the Reapers be, once I'm through with them.


Control and Synthesis ends with the Reaper fleet entirely intact. How do you guarantee that they'll never return to old tricks?

#107
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages
CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.

#108
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Control and Synthesis ends with the Reaper fleet entirely intact. How do you guarantee that they'll never return to old tricks?

The Catalyst was the one performing all of those old tricks. In Control, I replace it. In Synthesis, the Reapers are severed from the Catalyst and gain free will.

CosmicGnosis, we've had this
discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random
number generator or something.

I disagree. The endings aren't stupid, just poorly set up. They're actually fairly intelligent in some areas.

Modifié par Xilizhra, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:07 .


#109
Tyrannosaurus Rex

Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Members
  • 10 793 messages

Han Shot First wrote...
Forgive me for going Godwin, but that would be like the Britain and the United States deciding to make a seperate peace with N-zi Germany because Germany's defeat might create a vacuum for the Soviets to exploit.


No Han, that is completely inaccurate.

The Reapers in control are under new leadership. It would be more like if the US invited West-Germany into NATO. Which is exactly what happend.

Modifié par Lizardviking, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:10 .


#110
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

I disagree. The endings aren't stupid, just poorly set up. They're actually fairly intelligent in some areas.

It's the poor setup that makes them stupid, Xil.  They would have been jolly good endings in a different game.

Like Deus Ex.

PS: Don't make me go off on narrative themes and consistency again because I totally will.

#111
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

I disagree. The endings aren't stupid, just poorly set up. They're actually fairly intelligent in some areas.

It's the poor setup that makes them stupid, Xil.  They would have been jolly good endings in a different game.

Like Deus Ex.

PS: Don't make me go off on narrative themes and consistency again because I totally will.

You can if you want to, but I don't feel that I broke any narrative themes in Control. Or even, for that matter, in Synthesis, truly. And Destroy is a perfectly in-theme Renegade ending.

#112
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Lizardviking wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...
Forgive me for going Godwin, but that would be like the Britain and the United States deciding to make a seperate peace with N-zi Germany because Germany's defeat might create a vacuum for the Soviets to exploit.


No Han, that is completely inaccurate.

The Reapers in control are under new leadership. It would be more like if the US invited West-Germany into NATO. Which is exactly what happend.



Control would the equivalent of killing Hitler and replacing him as dictator.

And can the Shepard catalyst truly be trusted? After all it isn't exactly Shepard anymore. Who is to say it won't eventually reach the same conclusions as the Catalyst it replaced?

Synthesis is even worse in that it leaves the original Catalyst firmly in control of the Reapers.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:18 .


#113
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

Control would the equivalent of killing Hitler and replacing him as dictator.

And can the Shepard catalyst truly be trusted? After all it isn't exactly Shepard anymore. Who is to say it won't eventually reach the same conclusions as the Catalyst it replaced?

Synthesis is even worse in that it leaves the original Catalyst firmly in control of the Reapers.

The Catalyst has no further control over the Reapers in Synthesis, and I think it's been destroyed anyway. As for whether Shepard can be trusted, that's the PC and up to the player to decide.

#114
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Control would the equivalent of killing Hitler and replacing him as dictator.

And can the Shepard catalyst truly be trusted? After all it isn't exactly Shepard anymore. Who is to say it won't eventually reach the same conclusions as the Catalyst it replaced?

Synthesis is even worse in that it leaves the original Catalyst firmly in control of the Reapers.

The Catalyst has no further control over the Reapers in Synthesis, and I think it's been destroyed anyway. As for whether Shepard can be trusted, that's the PC and up to the player to decide.


That is head canon.

The only endings that destroy the Catalyst are Control and Destroy. Control and Destroy are the only two ending choices where it is explicitly stated that the Catalyst would be destroyed. It isn't mentioned as one of the consequences of Synthesis. Not suprisingly, Synthesis is the ending the Catalyst prefers.

Modifié par Han Shot First, 06 novembre 2012 - 07:21 .


#115
Dr_Extrem

Dr_Extrem
  • Members
  • 4 092 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

KingZayd wrote...

Not picking destroy is validating the Reapers, and that's not good.



Control: If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.

Synthesis: Lets all hold hands--tentacles--whatever, and single Kumbaya.

Refuse: Winning is so mainstream. *Quits*

Posted Image


control is more like:

if you can destroy them, join them nonetheless.

the choice is there ... control is just the mother of all powertrips.

#116
Tyrannosaurus Rex

Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Members
  • 10 793 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...
It's the poor setup that makes them stupid, Xil.  They would have been jolly good endings in a different game.

Like Deus Ex.

PS: Don't make me go off on narrative themes and consistency again because I totally will.


I weep every night for Sovereign being reduced to a child's action figure.

#117
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

The only endings that destroy the Catalyst are Control and Destroy. Control and Destroy are the only two ending choices where it is explicitly stated that the Catalyst would be destroyed. It isn't mentioned as one of the consequences of Synthesis. Not suprisingly, Synthesis is the ending the Catalyst prefers.

If you want to define it that way, fine. The safety of it is one of the reasons I pick Control.

#118
RadicalDisconnect

RadicalDisconnect
  • Members
  • 1 895 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...

Control would the equivalent of killing Hitler and replacing him as dictator.

And can the Shepard catalyst truly be trusted? After all it isn't exactly Shepard anymore. Who is to say it won't eventually reach the same conclusions as the Catalyst it replaced?

Synthesis is even worse in that it leaves the original Catalyst firmly in control of the Reapers.

The Catalyst has no further control over the Reapers in Synthesis, and I think it's been destroyed anyway. As for whether Shepard can be trusted, that's the PC and up to the player to decide.


That is head canon.

The only endings that destroy the Catalyst are Control and Destroy. Control and Destroy are the only two ending choices where it is explicitly stated that the Catalyst would be destroyed. It isn't mentioned as one of the consequences of Synthesis. Not suprisingly, Synthesis is the ending the Catalyst prefers.


Well, this happens in Synthesis. Considering that the Citadel is the Catalyst, yeah...

Posted Image

#119
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Well, this happens in Synthesis. Considering that the Citadel is the Catalyst, yeah...

Yes, it's widely considered in the Synthesis thread that the Citadel is outright destroyed by Synthesis.

#120
Tyrannosaurus Rex

Tyrannosaurus Rex
  • Members
  • 10 793 messages

Han Shot First wrote...

Lizardviking wrote...

Han Shot First wrote...
Forgive me for going Godwin, but that would be like the Britain and the United States deciding to make a seperate peace with N-zi Germany because Germany's defeat might create a vacuum for the Soviets to exploit.


No Han, that is completely inaccurate.

The Reapers in control are under new leadership. It would be more like if the US invited West-Germany into NATO. Which is exactly what happend.



Control would the equivalent of killing Hitler and replacing him as dictator.


Now we are just arguing semantics. The point is that the Reapers are under new leadership which has no ill intentions or desires to continue the cycle.

I will argree that renegade control is bad. Because Shepard has more or less become the new villain of the story.

#121
ElectronicPostingInterface

ElectronicPostingInterface
  • Members
  • 3 789 messages
The intent matters, not the fact that it makes Javik happy. That's an ancillary side effect.

#122
AdmiralCheez

AdmiralCheez
  • Members
  • 12 990 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

You can if you want to, but I don't feel that I broke any narrative themes in Control. Or even, for that matter, in Synthesis, truly. And Destroy is a perfectly in-theme Renegade ending.

Destroy: LOL SYNTHETICS AND ORGANICS CAN NEVER GET ALONG SO KILL THE ROBOTS OBVIOUSLY.

Control: LOL SYNTHETICS AND ORGANICS CAN NEVER GET ALONG SO CREATE A REAPER DICTATORSHIP OBVIOUSLY.

Synthesis: LOL SYNTHETICS AND ORGANICS CAN NEVER GET ALONG SO MAKE EVERYONE PEACE BORG OBVIOUSLY.

Note that all three have the LOL SYNTHETICS AND ORGANICS CAN NEVER GET ALONG thing in common, even though huge portions of ME2 and 3 were devoted to proving that wrong.  Also note that the Catalyst invalidates pretty much everything the Reapers previously stood for (HEY LOOK THEY WERE INNOCENT PUPPETS ALL ALONG ISN'T THAT JUST PRECIOUS).  In addition, Synthesis came entirely out of left field (like when was that even a thing in Mass Effect ever seriously).

Destroy and Control wouldn't be that bad if it weren't for the stupid Catalyst shenanigans.

Ooh, and let's not forget that bonus EC ending!

Refuse: OH DON'T LIKE THE ENDINGS, CHAMP?  YOU LOSE!  LOLOLOLOL.

We could also talk about total lack of foreshadowing, the importance of hope and free will in the Mass Effect narrative (EC fixed the hope part but free will is still enormously neglected), and that whole "using power you didn't earn and don't understand is bad" thingy the series had going, plus the "you have no right to dictate the destinies of other people" bit.

Narrative WTFness aside, the endings are still stupid in their moral dubiousness:

Destroy: Peace through the total elimination of anyone not just like you.
Control: Peace through technological superiority and the constant threat of force.
Synthesis: Peace through the removal of invididuality and self-determination.
Refuse: Give up in the name of idealism and let everyone die.

Anyone with a sound mind and basic level of compassion cannot feel comfortable choosing any of them.  Each ending forces the player to become a monster, thus robbing him or her of any sense of victory or accomplishment.  One does not rob the player of the right to feel awesome, especially in the last five minutes of a series that made a name for itself through making the player feel awesome.

I seriously question the sanity of any and all individuals who did not feel at least some guilt or discomfort at their choice, regardless of what they actually chose.  That means you, Xil.

#123
GreyLycanTrope

GreyLycanTrope
  • Members
  • 12 709 messages

AdmiralCheez wrote...

CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.

Or go with the mod if you're on PC

#124
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

I seriously question the sanity of any and all individuals who did not feel at least some guilt or discomfort at their choice, regardless of what they actually chose. That means you, Xil.

It took some time to decide. However, at this point, I feel no guilt. I was given a set of options and chose the best one, and to the best of my knowledge, it worked out. I won the war. The Reapers are mine. I will protect the galaxy, and release the Reapers when it's safe to do so. As a matter of fact, everything went better than I expected, and the only substantial thing I had to sacrifice was Liara's happiness... emotionally wrenching, but not that relevant in the grand scheme of things. Moreover, without the galaxy itself pulling together for this move, I never could have gotten that far. When the Crucible deploys, I know it was my work that enabled it to be built, and when it fires, I know that it was my own choice to make. What I did, in the end, very definitely mattered. And if I have to die to bring that about, so be it. It was a better sacrifice than I thought I'd get.

#125
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 818 messages
Look. No matter what. Someone gets validated. Legion agrees not to upload the code, then does anyway. It's rammed down your throat. The whole situation is contrived. I hate the way they ended that mission. I mean let's at least scrub the damned code first. Remember the Reaper IFF and what that did to EDI?

Grab a copy of the code, scrub it, then upload it. And what's this "I must go to them" crap?