Destroy validates Javik, and that's not good
#126
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 08:35
#127
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 08:50
Guest_Arcian_*
Wat.Xilizhra wrote...
The Catalyst was the one performing all of those old tricks. In Control, I replace it. In Synthesis, the Reapers are severed from the Catalyst and gain free will.Control and Synthesis ends with the Reaper fleet entirely intact. How do you guarantee that they'll never return to old tricks?
I disagree. The endings aren't stupid, just poorly set up. They're actually fairly intelligent in some areas.CosmicGnosis, we've had this
discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random
number generator or something.
#128
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 10:07
#129
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 10:25
#130
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 10:39
#131
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 10:41
#132
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 10:56
there is a reason ppl hate the cost ,. some do say they don't mind,. but others hate having to sacrifice the geth but by doing so save every other race
some would choose to sacrfice organics , some would choose to upload themselves and become the new catalyst . which puts synthetics on top. and probably has shep caring more for "organics" then say geth . the ones s/he will care about are all organics, crew wise so suck it
i get your looking for a canon ending. but all endings are wrong in their own way . "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" simple. the reapers need to be stopped. there was going to be a cost . and well it happened to be a geth
Modifié par ghost9191, 06 novembre 2012 - 11:06 .
#133
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:09
Or, the cost can just be the sense of security of the paranoid. I prefer that one.i get your looking for a canon ending. but all endings are wrong in their own way . "needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few" simple. the reapers need to be stopped. there was going to be a cost . and well it happened to be a geth
#134
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:19
Guest_Cthulhu42_*
#135
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:25
Xilizhra wrote...
Or, the cost can just be the sense of security of the paranoid. I prefer that one.
Unfortunately, the "ostrich defence mechanism" isn't usually very successful.
#136
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:35
It's fun how you try to tell me how to play my own character, even after uploading into the Catalyst.ElSuperGecko wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Or, the cost can just be the sense of security of the paranoid. I prefer that one.
Unfortunately, the "ostrich defence mechanism" isn't usually very successful.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 06 novembre 2012 - 11:35 .
#137
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:45
Xilizhra wrote...
It's fun how you try to tell me how to play my own character, even after uploading into the Catalyst.
I don't believe I was trying to tell you how to play anything. I was just pointing out that burying your head in the sand rarely works, even if you believe it does.
#138
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:45
My point is that I'm not burying my head in the sand over anything.ElSuperGecko wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
It's fun how you try to tell me how to play my own character, even after uploading into the Catalyst.
I don't believe I was trying to tell you how to play anything. I was just pointing out that burying your head in the sand rarely works, even if you believe it does.
#139
Posté 06 novembre 2012 - 11:48
Xilizhra wrote...
My point is that I'm not burying my head in the sand over anything.
Where did I say you were? I made an observation, that's all.
#140
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:02
I expect Control to take a thorough thrashing in Omega DLC.
In the next one rumored to be The Citadel which is rumored to be about the keepers, will Destroy take a thorough thrashing? Will we discover where Casper is located? Will be blow up Casper? Who knows?
Will we then get a redone Priority Earth DLC the way it should have been done the first time? Then we get one that is not a solution of Casper finally even though they said they're not going to do it because if they said they were going to do they'd have to admit they were wrong and we know from hundreds of years of experience that companies and corporations never admit they were wrong. They just do it because it was "part of the plan all along." Which is why "if you knew what we had planned you'd hang onto your games forever."
Puzzle Theory.
#141
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:08
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
Synthesis got thoroughly trashed in Leviathan if you really look at it. Who still thinks that Casper is still a good idea? Leviathan. What is Leviathan waiting for? Synthesis. Just not the version they got the first time. They want the new version. Why? So they don't need the orbs to control the Reapers, Synthetics and Organics as thralls. This is since each race retains their original characteristics.
I expect Control to take a thorough thrashing in Omega DLC.
In the next one rumored to be The Citadel which is rumored to be about the keepers, will Destroy take a thorough thrashing? Will we discover where Casper is located? Will be blow up Casper? Who knows?
Will we then get a redone Priority Earth DLC the way it should have been done the first time? Then we get one that is not a solution of Casper finally even though they said they're not going to do it because if they said they were going to do they'd have to admit they were wrong and we know from hundreds of years of experience that companies and corporations never admit they were wrong. They just do it because it was "part of the plan all along." Which is why "if you knew what we had planned you'd hang onto your games forever."
Puzzle Theory.
yeah like that lol . as i think Mike Gamble said, if the fans knew what was planned they wouldn't be surprised. or something like that .
#142
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:10
Seboist wrote...
Who cares what Javik thinks? The so called "Prothean Commander" goes "Yes Massa" and becomes a private in Shepard's goon squad almost instantly.
That's exactly how military works.
#143
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:11
sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...
*nonsense snip*
Puzzle Theory.
Figures.
Modifié par HYR 2.0, 07 novembre 2012 - 12:11 .
#144
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:11
HYR 2.0 wrote...
My opinion of Javik is funny because while I tend to agree with most of the things he says, I end up doing almost everything differently than he would. He'd sabotage the genophage cure; I was close, but decided against it. He'd free the rachni-queen as an ally; I say it's too risky given her exposure to Reaper tech (kind of contradicts what Javik says earlier about mercy, though). Javik wants Legion tossed out the airlock, would destroy the geth in a heartbeat; I'm more inclined to save them on Rannoch than the quarians, disagree that they can't be allies.
And then of course, choosing Synthesis at the end of the game. But hey, he told me not to care what others think.
yeah bout the reasons i am iffy on the geth, the rachni were kinda forced into it. same can be said about th egeth but they did join by their own free will . they knew what the reapers would do , and what they would have the geth do but they chose to side with them. and some geth see the reapers as gods. it is just iffy with them . a lot of risk in helping them. they proved to be a threat .
not disagreeing,. but the rachni and geth can be seen the same way
Modifié par ghost9191, 07 novembre 2012 - 12:12 .
#145
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:26
ghost9191 wrote...
yeah bout the reasons i am iffy on the geth, the rachni were kinda forced into it. same can be said about th egeth but they did join by their own free will . they knew what the reapers would do , and what they would have the geth do but they chose to side with them. and some geth see the reapers as gods. it is just iffy with them . a lot of risk in helping them. they proved to be a threat .
Rachni being forced doesn't matter. If they're indoctrinated in the process then all bets are off.
Geth may not be the most dependable allies, but we're putting all our chips into one fight, so I take strength over security.
#146
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:39
HYR 2.0 wrote...
ghost9191 wrote...
yeah bout the reasons i am iffy on the geth, the rachni were kinda forced into it. same can be said about th egeth but they did join by their own free will . they knew what the reapers would do , and what they would have the geth do but they chose to side with them. and some geth see the reapers as gods. it is just iffy with them . a lot of risk in helping them. they proved to be a threat .
Rachni being forced doesn't matter. If they're indoctrinated in the process then all bets are off.
Geth may not be the most dependable allies, but we're putting all our chips into one fight, so I take strength over security.
what i am saying. would be the same with the geth . gotta do what you have to to beat the reapers. but the rachni were not indoctrinated, they were forced, prettty much as the geth were. well geth joined out of free will . which then the reapers gained control over them
you say strength over security , you contradict yourself
Modifié par ghost9191, 07 novembre 2012 - 12:40 .
#147
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:51
AdmiralCheez wrote...
CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.
But if I pick anything other than Destroy, I'm a bad guy. Just ask most of BSN.
#148
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:53
Don't let the BSN influence your decision. All endings have bad implications anyway, so at least one person will think you're a bad guy regardless of what you do.CosmicGnosis wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.
But if I pick anything other than Destroy, I'm a bad guy. Just ask most of BSN.
#149
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:55
CosmicGnosis wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.
But if I pick anything other than Destroy, I'm a bad guy. Just ask most of BSN.
yeah pretty sure a lot of ppl call ppl that pick destroy bad
just pick what you feel is the right choice. there isn't one so when it comes down to it it is up to u.
like shep has no one to ask , well besides the catalyst. so same should be for you
like i don't pick destroy because of bsn, i pick it cause it is my choice. one that gives the most hope . at least i think
think i will give you more crap if you pick it because it is what bsn wants . you conformist
#150
Posté 07 novembre 2012 - 12:57
CosmicGnosis wrote...
AdmiralCheez wrote...
CosmicGnosis, we've had this discussion. All the endings are stupid. Just use a frickin' random number generator or something.
But if I pick anything other than Destroy, I'm a bad guy. Just ask most of BSN.
Who cares what they think. If you're comfortable with a decision, go for it. It's not like they're playing YOUR game, lol. Plus, most of the time, people arguing about the endings, don't go in the argument expecting to have their mind changed, now do they?
Modifié par spirosz, 07 novembre 2012 - 12:58 .





Retour en haut






