286 réponses à ce sujet

[corporal doody]

crimzontearz wrote...

corporal doody wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

Yes, we are really listening.

Now, and I know this sounds a little harsh, but there is a difference between "listening" and "obeying". We do listen to fans and take their feedback into consideration when we make games, DLC, balance changes, etc. However, that does not mean we are going to blindly obey what is requested by some people.

Not everyone agrees on what should or should not be in the game. And not everythign that people ask for is possible to be implemented based on the way the code of the game is structured. And not everything is possible for story and design reasons that I can't say.

I know that not all choices made by the team are in line with what all fans want (incoming "you can say that again Priestly" in 3..2...1...), but Omega IS very strong and I think you'll enjoy it if you give it a chance.

the same was said about the latest published COJ and too human


 

 
Ball is in your court Chris

were those made by BW as well?

no I am just saying that believing their shtick their is pure idiocy at this point

huh.

so lets blame BW for every bad game that any developer or publisher said was gonna be the bestest ever? makes sense...........

OH...and CANCER....damn you BW for cancer!!!

[crimzontearz]

let's see

• there are no plans for a PC version of Mass Effect
• there are no plans for a PS3 version of ME2
• there are no plans for a PS3 version of ME1
• that quarian in the screenshots is not Tali
• there are no plans for MP in Mass Effect 3



do I really need to keep going?

Modifié par crimzontearz, 08 novembre 2012 - 04:57 .

[fiendishchicken]

I won't do that. But I will blame BW for everything that was bad about ME3.

[crimzontearz]

corporal doody wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

corporal doody wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

Yes, we are really listening.

Now, and I know this sounds a little harsh, but there is a difference between "listening" and "obeying". We do listen to fans and take their feedback into consideration when we make games, DLC, balance changes, etc. However, that does not mean we are going to blindly obey what is requested by some people.

Not everyone agrees on what should or should not be in the game. And not everythign that people ask for is possible to be implemented based on the way the code of the game is structured. And not everything is possible for story and design reasons that I can't say.

I know that not all choices made by the team are in line with what all fans want (incoming "you can say that again Priestly" in 3..2...1...), but Omega IS very strong and I think you'll enjoy it if you give it a chance.

the same was said about the latest published COJ and too human


 

 
Ball is in your court Chris

were those made by BW as well?

no I am just saying that believing their shtick their is pure idiocy at this point

huh.

so lets blame BW for every bad game that any developer or publisher said was gonna be the bestest ever? makes sense...........

OH...and CANCER....damn you BW for cancer!!!

...are you trying to be obtuse? It's an analogy backed up by the empty promises of the pre release period


 
Oh and my previous post was not for you

[corporal doody]

crimzontearz wrote...

corporal doody wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

corporal doody wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

Yes, we are really listening.

Now, and I know this sounds a little harsh, but there is a difference between "listening" and "obeying". We do listen to fans and take their feedback into consideration when we make games, DLC, balance changes, etc. However, that does not mean we are going to blindly obey what is requested by some people.

Not everyone agrees on what should or should not be in the game. And not everythign that people ask for is possible to be implemented based on the way the code of the game is structured. And not everything is possible for story and design reasons that I can't say.

I know that not all choices made by the team are in line with what all fans want (incoming "you can say that again Priestly" in 3..2...1...), but Omega IS very strong and I think you'll enjoy it if you give it a chance.

the same was said about the latest published COJ and too human


 

 
Ball is in your court Chris

were those made by BW as well?

no I am just saying that believing their shtick their is pure idiocy at this point

huh.

so lets blame BW for every bad game that any developer or publisher said was gonna be the bestest ever? makes sense...........

OH...and CANCER....damn you BW for cancer!!!

...are you trying to be obtuse? It's an analogy backed up by the empty promises of the pre release period


 
Oh and my previous post was not for you

No man..IM OVER-REACTING!!! that is the proper and most logical thing to do here on the BSN....isnt it?

[crimzontearz]

Only if you do not want to be taken seriously, I let the steam blow off sure, but only if I feel Bioware is insulting my intelligence

Which lately happens kinda often

[ste100]

Ithurael wrote...
chris said Leviathan was the best selling dlc to date. 

Because Leviathan is more than just another shooter. 
It only shows that ME community want a good and interesting story, not just running with a gun.

Chris - do we really expect so much ?
Apparently, you create those DLC's for us - so listen what we ask for...

Ps. I'll give chance to Omega - i just hope that it will not be 4 hours on mindless shooting and 30 minutes of story.

Modifié par ste100, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:08 .

[fiendishchicken]

Chris Priestly,

BW may be listening, but are you caring?

I know I'm going to sound entitled here, and I admit I put a lot of emotion into writing this as well. Looking back I kind of sound entitled. But just bear with me.

I ask this legitimately. Why weren't decisions and characters better implemented into ME3? 'They might be dead' doesn't cut it. You should have made the game to tailor to those decisions and make them have meaning beyond a numbered war asset. That way, ME could truly be called a game that is tailored to the individual.

I'm not complaining that BW did things I didn't like (there were a lot though).

I'm complaining that BW didn't do enough for the game. EVERYTHING should have been included. It should have been the culmination of everything. Did Conrad Verner live or die. If he lived and you got his dissertation, I want to see a cutscene showing how that dissertation improved the Crucible or something. I want to see my efforts being rewarded, not being told by some number. I want the War Assets to matter in the final battle. I want to see the Volus dreadnought fight a destroyer and stop it from blowing up a carrier.

That is my disappointment. I had the same issue with Leviathan. I want to see the Levi's using their skills to get a husk army on my side on London. It all needs to come down to affecting how it works.

The biggest failure for ME3 is that instead of being shown anything, we were told everything. We as players weren't adequately rewarded for our efforts. And it goes into seeing as how the player agency didn't matter. It simply felt that whatever I did wasn't worth it so long as one way or another my war asset number went past 3100.

Thank you for your time if you decided to look at this post.

Modifié par fiendishchicken, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:10 .

[ste100]

fiendishchicken wrote...

Chris Priestly,

BW may be listening, but are you caring?

I know I'm going to sound entitled here, and I admit I put a lot of emotion into writing this as well. Looking back I kind of sound entitled. But just bear with me.

I ask this legitimately. Why weren't decisions and characters better implemented into ME3? 'They might be dead' doesn't cut it. You should have made the game to tailor to those decisions and make them have meaning beyond a numbered war asset. That way, ME could truly be called a game that is tailored to the individual.

I'm not complaining that BW did things I didn't like (there were a lot though).

I'm complaining that BW didn't do enough for the game. EVERYTHING should have been included. It should have been the culmination of everything. Did Conrad Verner live or die. If he lived and you got his dissertation, I want to see a cutscene showing how that dissertation improved the Crucible or something. I want to see my efforts being rewarded, not being told by some number. I want the War Assets to matter in the final battle. I want to see the Volus dreadnought fight a destroyer and stop it from blowing up a carrier.

That is my disappointment. I had the same issue with Leviathan. I want to see the Levi's using their skills to get a husk army on my side on London. It all needs to come down to affecting how it works.

The biggest failure for ME3 is that instead of being shown anything, we were told everything. We as players weren't adequately rewarded for our efforts. And it goes into seeing as how the player agency didn't matter. It simply felt that whatever I did wasn't worth it so long as one way or another my war asset number went past 3100.

Thank you for your time if you decided to look at this post.

Agree.
Our effort has been omitted.
War Assets DLC strongly recommended.
I would really like to see how for example Batarian ships take revenge for destruction of Bahak system; or what happened to Conrad Verner... 
You still have time BW.

Modifié par ste100, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:19 .

[crimzontearz]

^^ time, yes

Will or care?...doubtful

[Steelcan]

This DLC looks terrible. If the reviews are good enough and there's positive fan reactions I might get it. But if my impressions are ight this looks like a load of crap.

[Tasker]

GiarcYekrub wrote...

Orkboy wrote...

LilLino wrote...

And it's obvious Bioware is listening, adding a female Turian and making her more than just a male in the cape is a great way to express that. 

So anyone saying that Bio doesn't care at all is either blind or arrogant.

How do you know that the female Turian wasn't done so they could add it to multiplay and milk more money out of it?

Are you saying sharing assets between MP and SP is wrong in some way?

No, just that the inclusion of a female Turian in the DLC is in no way indicative of Bioware listening to anybody.

It was only a matter of time untill they started to exhaust the options for their multiplayer cash cow.

[laudable11]

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

$15 for a 4 hour DLC.
Aria and Nyreen aren't permanent Squad members.
You cannot romance Aria.
Omega is not a new Hub.

Wow Bioware, way to go all out with your "biggest dlc ever". This should be an easy pass for anyone.

You left out a few other things..

Kasumi DLC cost $7 bucks and we keep her as a squadmate.
Omega DLC cost $15 bucks and we KEEP NOTHING.
We cant even go back to Omega after we are done!

Major ripoff.

Modifié par laudable11, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:31 .

[fiendishchicken]

laudable11 wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

$15 for a 4 hour DLC.
Aria and Nyreen aren't permanent Squad members.
You cannot romance Aria.
Omega is not a new Hub.

Wow Bioware, way to go all out with your "biggest dlc ever". This should be an easy pass for anyone.

You left out a few other things..

Kasumi DLC cost $7 bucks and we keep her as a squadmate.
Omega DLC cost $15 bucks and we KEEP NOTHING.
We cant even go back to Omega after we are done!

Major ripoff.

If this is the case, then no, Mr. Priestly, I will not give your Omega DLC a chance.

[laudable11]

fiendishchicken wrote...

laudable11 wrote...

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

$15 for a 4 hour DLC.
Aria and Nyreen aren't permanent Squad members.
You cannot romance Aria.
Omega is not a new Hub.

Wow Bioware, way to go all out with your "biggest dlc ever". This should be an easy pass for anyone.

You left out a few other things..

Kasumi DLC cost $7 bucks and we keep her as a squadmate.
Omega DLC cost $15 bucks and we KEEP NOTHING.
We cant even go back to Omega after we are done!

Major ripoff.

If this is the case, then no, Mr. Priestly, I will not give your Omega DLC a chance.

yep, all true. The info is all over the place.

[Steelcan]

Maybe BioWare should give us a reason to want Omega DLC...... Dont just say "give it a chance". Make us want to give it a chance

Modifié par Steelcan, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:41 .

[Killdren88]

Steelcan wrote...

Maybe BioWare should give us a reason to want Omega DLC...... Do t just say "give it a chance". Make us want to give it a chance

Agreed.I bought Leviathan because I thought we get somethning that is able to not only able one shot a Reaper as we saw, but also control Repear forces. And did that change anything at all stroy wise? No..It did not.So yes, Bioware Why should I buy Omega? What do I gain from it?

Modifié par Killdren88, 08 novembre 2012 - 05:43 .

[Mcfly616]

Killdren88 wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Maybe BioWare should give us a reason to want Omega DLC...... Do t just say "give it a chance". Make us want to give it a chance

Agreed.I bought Leviathan because I thought we get somethning that is able to not only able one shot a Reaper as we saw, but also control Repear forces. And did that change anything at all stroy wise? No..It did not.So yes, Bioware Why should I buy Omega? What do I gain from it?

you gain several hours of new content....

[Mcfly616]

Steelcan wrote...

Maybe BioWare should give us a reason to want Omega DLC...... Dont just say "give it a chance". Make us want to give it a chance

Priestly's point is that you're not even giving it the benefit of the doubt. Omega isn't even out yet and people are saying its completely worthless. Well, such people cannot be pleased. Oh well.

[DrGunjah]

Mcfly616 wrote...
 you gain several hours of new content....

several hours of cerberus bashing... yay!! As if there wasn't enough of that sh!t in the main game.

[ste100]

DrGunjah wrote...
several hours of cerberus bashing... yay!! As if there wasn't enough of that sh!t in the main game.

Yep. Too much Cerberus.

[KieranW]

DrGunjah wrote...

Mcfly616 wrote...
you gain several hours of new content....

several hours of cerberus bashing... yay!! As if there wasn't enough of that sh!t in the main game.

Nope, never enough Cerberus bashing. As far as I'm concerned. more Mass Effect with Shepard is good Mass Effect. If you don't like it, don't buy it. And although the odds of him seeing this are rather slim, all things considered, well said Priestly.

[tettenjager]

Djeez give the guy a break, he is just doing his job

[Vortex13]

Mcfly616 wrote...

Killdren88 wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Maybe BioWare should give us a reason to want Omega DLC...... Do t just say "give it a chance". Make us want to give it a chance

Agreed.I bought Leviathan because I thought we get somethning that is able to not only able one shot a Reaper as we saw, but also control Repear forces. And did that change anything at all stroy wise? No..It did not.So yes, Bioware Why should I buy Omega? What do I gain from it?

you gain several hours of new content....

Which in the end will still make no difference.

I'm sorry, I know that this has been discussed ad nausum but the point still stands.


I can not stomach playing a new DLC, filled with interesting characters and locations, a DLC that allows us to recruit war changing Reaper Killers (Leviathian) or allow us to assist allies devot their full efforts to the war in the form of a whole fleet and strategic locations (Omega); only for us to get to the end and still have the Catalyst say:

"None of that matters. Now pick R, B, or G."

Several hours of quality DLC doesn't change the fact that at the end of the line we still have the ending do look forward to.