Ninja Stan wrote...
SimonTheFrog wrote...
SNIP
It's this sort of attitude that is keeping the developers you want to talk to, from engaging with you. Feeling entitled to answers, insulting those who are providing answers, insulting the company? That's supposed to demonstrate that you want to have a respectful discussion with developers?
Did you really feel insulted by this?
It was not intended as an insult.
Yes, I am passionate about the relationship between BioWare and the fans and yes, things in the past have made me angry.
And I think we customers have all rights to be angry if that's what we feel. And we have all rights to express that feeling to you guys so you know what's what.
That is basically what I tried to say: if something BioWare did made some people angry than those angry people should feedback that to BioWare. It's in BioWares own interest to be informed about how their actions and statements are viewed outthere.
And if the moderator say things like: we only want nice and calm discussions than yes, sure they want that, who doesn't like nice and calm? But that is not realistic. You have to see that not everything BioWare does is awesome, especially when it comes to promising features and hyping a product and then delivering something different entirely. BioWare is making mistakes like everybody else and if these mistakes make people angry then there is angry feedback. That's just the way feedback works.
And like I said, BioWare simply can't expect only nice and calm. And they shouldn't. Sure I can see how that is annoying but there you go.
The word entitlement is thrown around quite a lot, mostly as a means to discredit unwelcomed customer feedback. And sure, some people feel overly entitled to all sorts of things.
But as a customer you are by nature entitled to certain things, for example we are entitled to have the stuff in the product that has been promised by BioWare employees shortly before release (there's legal whiggle room of course but I'm sure you get my drift). That's part of the deal. That doesn't include status updates of upcoming products, though, I agree.
But that is not what my post was about. I surely don't feel entitled to certain information. But I was surprised that you said that one reason for giving little information is, that if you give some, people will want to have more. And it seems you agree that this is not a bad thing. So I kind of fail to understand your point here.
Ninja Stan wrote...
People always want more information than what can be give at a time. If your company can't handle that you are really in a very sorry state.
Developers are people too, and they generally don't like dealing with a group of people who insult them, swear at them, yell at them, or call for them to be fired just because the people don't like a videogame. "If the fans can't handle that, they are really in a very sorry state." See what I did there? 
A company's default "information policy" is press releases. BioWare has always believed in more personal, close interaction with their fans and that is reflected in their participation in discussions in their online community and with fans at conventions. Because fans know they are being listened to, some of them kind of take BioWare for granted, believing that BioWare will answer any and all questions or address all concerns to those fans' satisfaction. This is, of course, incorrect, since both the ME and DA teams have been active on the BSN.
That is similar to what I said earlier. The internet is surely a very bad place. But a lot of poison in BSN is homegrown and could have been avoided. It is in my eyes important that BioWare faces the ****storm that they caused among their core audience. They did cause it and now saying that they don't like to talk to angry or bitter fans is a bit hmm... sure it's (very) unpleasant but hiding and avoiding is just no solution to the problem. If BioWare wants to fix things with the core audience they will have to pick up the pieces at some point, unpleasant or not. And press releases will probably not be enough.
When i mentioned information policy i meant the content, not the means of distribution, btw.
Ninja Stan wrote...
Yes, because I am a Moderator and a former developer who participated in discussions here. Are you saying you have a right to violate the forum rules because something BioWare did made you angry or upset? And that they owe you some kind of explanation or apology because you didn't like one of their games?
Did I violate the forum rules with my post? I was under the impression I didn't. I don't think swearing and being overly impolite gains anything for any one. But nice and friendly doesn't either.
And yes, I do believe BioWare owes the customers of ME3 and apology for hyping their product way beyond what they actually did put on the disc. BioWare is free to create whatever they want, that is a no-brainer. But they shouldn't claim in interviews, in the BioWare - Pulse, in magazines, posters and whatnot to sell something different than what they do.
I'm sorry if my post came across as sloppy and overly agressive. I sometimes try to press to much sentiment into too few words. Like I said, I'm passionate about BioWare and equally passionate about being treated correctly as a customer. And i strongly feel that BioWare has to improve their communication with fans. More in an honest direction. Not because customers are entitled but because its BioWares interest to have the fans believing in them and trusting them to make awesome games that the are worth buying, even before they are being released.