tictactucrac wrote...
Aedolon wrote...
tictactucrac wrote...
KainD wrote...
Talon is for shooters, Acolyte is for casters. easy as that.
Acolyte is better than talon on my destroyer or GI or anything. What does really have Talon that Acolyte has NOT, making it better in X situation ?
Acolyte X burst DPS against armor: 326.67, sustained DPS with reload cancel: 275.28
Talon I burst DPS against armor: 702.75, sustained DPS with reload cancel: 556.63
Talon X burst DPS against armor: 878.25, sustained DPS with reload cancel: 695.64
Then now show me acolyte DPS against shields, talon DPS against shields, and Harrier/reegar/hurricane dps against armor, and tell me why i would take the Talon if i just can take Acolyte + Harrier 
So basically, your argument is that because of the Harrier, the Talon is a worse option? The DPS overall wouldn't actually be the DPS of each because of the time it takes to switch, and you're now using the combined weight of the Harrier and Acolyte (1.45) vs. the Talon's 0.6.
I run the Talon on all of my adepts except for the Drell (Wraith+Acolyte for him) so that I can get the stupid little 'Commando Package' bonus to both biotics and the pistol damage. It's light, and it can handle shields/barriers (1317.375 single-clip DPS against them, Acolyte is 1633.35) as well as health (878.25 vs 326.67, Harrier 1,187.08) and armor. Considering that the Harrier's a rapid-fire weapon, before armor piercing mods, I bet the armor damage negation actually eats a fair chunk of its DPS, but I could be wrong. Don't know how to do those calculations.
Talon isn't absolute awesometasticness, but it's good enough against everything that you won't really need to switch, unlike the Acolyte.