Ryan_H wrote...
DullahansXMark wrote...
cowwy wrote...
Ryan_H wrote...
Why Ashen's claim and submitted proof are not valid:
Sounds like you're calling him a liar to me, just in a flowery language. It would help if your whole post didn't reek of bitterness.
Pretty much this. As a student in Theory of Knowledge courses, I can say that not valid = false, and in some context (this one in particular), false = lying.
I could delve a whole lot deeper, but I don't think anyone's even reading at this point.
What? Bitterness? Wow! You must think the science community is full of bitter people as it is full of people who offer proofs and people who question the validity of those proofs.
If the scientific community was constantly referring to members of the corrected party with dismissive and derogatory remarks, we would call them bitter too. No one is questioning your math.
Someone put it well earlier
'All the bitterness and pettiness in this post offsets any informed value it had.'
Modifié par Elijini, 10 novembre 2012 - 05:20 .