stayposi1990 wrote...
Lol. I've enjoyed watching this thread progress.
Flamer can't take down an unshielded atlas in a single cast
#101
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:54
#102
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:54
Never expect flamer to be able to do that, good job Feneckus.
#103
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:54
Troll confirmedRyan_H wrote...
Ashen Earth wrote...
I never said that power boosting gear wasn't necessary either, But I probably would have included that in my original post if I had known someone was going to get this massively butthurt over it.
Btw, you might want to edit your thread title, while you're still in the spirit of whining about what you percieve as a false claim. Because you know, irony.
LOL...yes the title is misleading. BTW this is getting fun!
Modifié par Mahrac, 10 novembre 2012 - 03:07 .
#104
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:55
MofuggerX wrote...
cowwy wrote...
Also I'm hoping a mod locks this thread soon.
I sure hope not. This thread is clearly very important and has a dramatic life-changing impact in not only Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, but many of our day-to-day lives. I would like to see it continue.
I too would like to see this thread remain open as a testament to the level of idiocy and denial that only a messageboard could foster.
#105
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:55
Guest_MasterReefa_*
#106
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:55
Seems pretty relevant.
Modifié par bob2.0, 10 novembre 2012 - 02:57 .
#107
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:57
Seerezaro wrote...
Umm, I really didn't want to post. To be honest I read the rest of the posts for the gifs.
However, It seems that you don't know that acolyte shots have an innate damage penalty against armor. IIRC they do half damage on armor. Whatever was left over after the shields would have hit shield gate for 75% reduction, the remaining bit would then be reduced by an additional 50%. Even on bronze, this is neglible damage with its reduced shieldgate. While the half damage penalty isn't enough to make it completely neglible going through shield gate added by this would have made it insignificant damage.
Actually the acolyte has no penalty against armour. It also ignores shield gate. Bleedthrough damage is still insignificant though.
#108
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:57
Ashen Earth wrote...
I too would like to see this thread remain open as a testament to the level of idiocy and denial that only a messageboard could foster.
Well there are plenty of other examples... guess this one's just the latest and most popular right now.
#109
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:57
Lord_Sirian wrote...
Ryan_H wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
You used an Engineering Kit V. That invalidates your video as proof of Ashen's claim that no HM and Power Amp III is sufficient to destroy an unshielded atlas. If Ashen needed to the extra power damage to accomplish the job he should've included it in his original claim.
No number of facepalms is enough to describe how much you are failing right now Ryan.
This is not like you.. I've played with you, you're not like this in-game. Why be a douchebag on the forums?
LOL...sorry not going to concede that I'm wrong because a player that's better than I am says I should.
BTW, this is actually amusing to me. People, like yourself, are getting amazingly butthurt about me being obstinate in my claim that Ashen is wrong. Fenechus even made a video!!
#110
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 02:58
Ashen Earth wrote...
MofuggerX wrote...
cowwy wrote...
Also I'm hoping a mod locks this thread soon.
I sure hope not. This thread is clearly very important and has a dramatic life-changing impact in not only Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, but many of our day-to-day lives. I would like to see it continue.
I too would like to see this thread remain open as a testament to the level of idiocy and denial that only a messageboard could foster.
Well... I'm outnumbered. But know this...
Turtles, all the way down!
#111
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:00
Guest_MasterReefa_*
Satire at its best? Please?Ryan_H wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
Ryan_H wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
You used an Engineering Kit V. That invalidates your video as proof of Ashen's claim that no HM and Power Amp III is sufficient to destroy an unshielded atlas. If Ashen needed to the extra power damage to accomplish the job he should've included it in his original claim.
No number of facepalms is enough to describe how much you are failing right now Ryan.
This is not like you.. I've played with you, you're not like this in-game. Why be a douchebag on the forums?
LOL...sorry not going to concede that I'm wrong because a player that's better than I am says I should.
BTW, this is actually amusing to me. People, like yourself, are getting amazingly butthurt about me being obstinate in my claim that Ashen is wrong. Fenechus even made a video!!
#112
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:01
Guest_Lord_Sirian_*
Ryan_H wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
Ryan_H wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
You used an Engineering Kit V. That invalidates your video as proof of Ashen's claim that no HM and Power Amp III is sufficient to destroy an unshielded atlas. If Ashen needed to the extra power damage to accomplish the job he should've included it in his original claim.
No number of facepalms is enough to describe how much you are failing right now Ryan.
This is not like you.. I've played with you, you're not like this in-game. Why be a douchebag on the forums?
LOL...sorry not going to concede that I'm wrong because a player that's better than I am says I should.
BTW, this is actually amusing to me. People, like yourself, are getting amazingly butthurt about me being obstinate in my claim that Ashen is wrong. Fenechus even made a video!!
I'm not 'getting butthurt'. I'm trying to prevent you from looking like an even bigger moron than you already do.
If that's your attitude though I won't bother. Enjoy looking like a moron.
#113
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:01
cowwy wrote...
Well... I'm outnumbered. But know this...
Turtles, all the way down!
OH SHI-
#114
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:02
Ryan_H wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
You used an Engineering Kit V. That invalidates your video as proof of Ashen's claim that no HM and Power Amp III is sufficient to destroy an unshielded atlas. If Ashen needed to the extra power damage to accomplish the job he should've included it in his original claim.
The engineering kit's bonus is additive, it boosts flamer damage by like 5%. If you can take an atlas down to 5% of its health with one cast it's effectively dead, or close enough to not be worth spending three threads deliberating it.
#115
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:03
MasterReefa wrote...
Satire at its best? Please?Ryan_H wrote...
Lord_Sirian wrote...
Ryan_H wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
You used an Engineering Kit V. That invalidates your video as proof of Ashen's claim that no HM and Power Amp III is sufficient to destroy an unshielded atlas. If Ashen needed to the extra power damage to accomplish the job he should've included it in his original claim.
No number of facepalms is enough to describe how much you are failing right now Ryan.
This is not like you.. I've played with you, you're not like this in-game. Why be a douchebag on the forums?
LOL...sorry not going to concede that I'm wrong because a player that's better than I am says I should.
BTW, this is actually amusing to me. People, like yourself, are getting amazingly butthurt about me being obstinate in my claim that Ashen is wrong. Fenechus even made a video!!
You wish. This is typical behavior from someone who just lost an argument.
First they create an irrelevant topic. Second they argue that point vehemently, usually with little proof to back up their side. Third they realize that they're wrong, but they've invested too much into the thread to let it go, so they... Fourth, claim that it was all an elaborate trolling, and that we're all dumb for falling for it.
#116
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:03
i) Someone makes a claim you feel you know something about
ii) You rebut the claim
iii) You're proven wrong
iv) You attempt to increase the conditions to make you right.
v) You're still proven wrong
vi) You attempt to laugh it off as "Haha i got you, suckers" posing it as a joke thread or you say "You're rude and because you're rude, i'm not going to answer you any more"
#117
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:04
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
#118
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:06
#119
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:07
LOLThe Mad Hanar wrote...
Ah, yes. The "I'm losing the argument so I'm going to say that you're butthurt/I was kidding" tactic. Very clever Ryan_H, very clever.
#120
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:07
#121
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:07
sclera wrote...
embarrassing now.
It's been embarrasing for five pages now.
#122
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:08
It was embarrassing yesterday.sclera wrote...
embarrassing now.
#123
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:08
It's like a "how many episodes of Star Trek are there" argument.
#124
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:09
#125
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Posté 10 novembre 2012 - 03:11
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
Ultimas Dragon wrote...
To both sides of the "argument" who...the f*** cares..period. one or the other.. really who?
It's like a "how many episodes of Star Trek are there" argument.
79?




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut




