103 réponses à ce sujet

[AlanC9]

ghost9191 wrote...

1) edi doesn't die in destroy

The memorial wall disagrees with you.

Note that EDI survives in low-EMS Control even if you get her fembot body destroyed on the beam run. Guess she's back to being a ship until someone builds a new one.

[Steelcan]

chefcook90 wrote...

I'll give you several reasons why I don't like the destroy ending.

1. EDI dies.
2. The geth are wiped out, and Legion's sacrifice was for nothing.
3. If you failed to make peace between quarians and geth and sided with the geth, the quarians also died for nothing.
4. The reapers contained the history of every dead race ever harvested - now that history is lost forever.
5. Oh yeah, EDI dies.
6. Harbinger is one of my favorite characters. Now he's dead too.
7. Shepard is still alive, even though Bioware said ME3 would be the end of Shepard's story.
8. Did I mention EDI dies?

. The only real point you make relates to the history that the reapers have, and to be honest it really is irrelevant.
  The cycles ensure that one cycle is no more advanced than the others, we are only missing what we never had.

[Liamv2]

my guess is they will canon synthasis even though i hate it as my 2 to worst ending

[Iakus]

DarkSpiral wrote...

Iakus, there will be a flaming storm of whatever substance you prefer regardless of what BW does. That's the nature of forums everywhere.

True enough, but the storm would likely be somewhat less if Destroy is canonized, since it's by far the least unpopular of the endings...

But imo, they'd do best to not canonize any of them.  Just say "Yeah there was a Reaper War, and we won"  no synthetic holocaust, no Reaper overlords, no green eyed shiny happy people.  Bury the endings, walk away, and never bring them up again.

Modifié par iakus, 13 novembre 2012 - 02:44 .