l7986 wrote...
That apparently jumps out at you the second you turn it on...
Maybe they had deeply ingrained hate towards paper clips that started with word processors that they immediately ignored the VI?
l7986 wrote...
That apparently jumps out at you the second you turn it on...
The battle for Earth would never have happened if the VI were recovered sooner; if the Asari government hadn't sat on their secret so long. The Reapers move the Citadel to Earth because TIM told them the Crucible needed to dock with it - which he learns from the VI.David7204 wrote...
It really didn't make any difference. Shepard gets the VI back two missions later. Knowing the Citadel was the Catalyst slightly ahead of time wouldn't have changed anything in the battle for Earth.
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 11 novembre 2012 - 07:58 .
Gotta love cutscene dumbassery. I still say that back during the Citadel coup (even ignoring the whole "stand and watch Thane get shanked" incident), when Kai Leng lands on the hood of the car, Shepard should have just pulled up and let the next passing bridge scrape him off.SeptimusMagistos wrote...
I agree with the Thessia thing, by the way. Losing the VI? Totally on Shepard. He forgot he could kill gunships, he forgot he can burn through Kai Lang's shields in literally a second, he forgot he has self-targeting bionic powers that could have killed the guy from inside that pit. That's Shepard's fault entirely.
Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 11 novembre 2012 - 08:04 .
There's no logical reason that Thessia wouldn't continue to resist. The game doesn't present it well, but there's no possible way it would just fold right then. Thessia then is about the same as Earth was at the beginning of the game; bad but salvageable.And on that note, my Shepard would definitely agree with Joker. The Alliance has enough biotics to fill an academy and the first thing they do is turn them into a major war asset. Thessia has enough biotics to fill the entire planet and the first thing they do is lose to the Reapers. Earth and Palhaven, meanwhile, are still holding out after mutli-day sieges.
Which is completely doable if you're not an insensitive jackass to her.Also, while Liara deserves to grieve in the aftermath of Thessia, I do expect her to keep going. Everyone else's worlds are in just as much trouble and if Shepard can ignore the situation, then so can she.
DeinonSlayer wrote...
The battle for Earth would never have happened if the VI were recovered sooner; if the Asari government hadn't sat on their secret so long. The Reapers move the Citadel to Earth because TIM told them the Crucible needed to dock with it - which he learns from the VI.David7204 wrote...
It really didn't make any difference. Shepard gets the VI back two missions later. Knowing the Citadel was the Catalyst slightly ahead of time wouldn't have changed anything in the battle for Earth.
Xilizhra wrote...
Which is completely doable if you're not an insensitive jackass to her.
Liara was quite sympathetic about Earth, and Palaven never truly fell, nor would the turians want sympathy delivered in any way that would imply that Palaven fell.SeptimusMagistos wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Which is completely doable if you're not an insensitive jackass to her.
Honestly, my Shepards consider Liara to be the insensitive one. She was all business when Earth fell and Palhaven was set on fire, but when it's the asari homeworld that gets hit suddenly she's sad. That kind of ethnocentrism is unacceptable. If you don't care equally about all sapient life, my Shepards consider you to be a bad person.
Kataphrut94 wrote...
There's that bit where James mentioned a "Cerberus spy working with the Collectors". I get that he's not omniscient and that Cerberus could have had spies for the Collectors, but it still rubbed me the wrong way.
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Kanaris wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
Thanks, and huh, interesting. EDI being a bit of a b*tch. Though it's interesting to note how her arguments can be easily used on the opposite side of things.
Modifié par Eterna5, 11 novembre 2012 - 09:02 .
Modifié par Sauruz, 11 novembre 2012 - 09:06 .
Eterna5 wrote...
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Kanaris wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
Thanks, and huh, interesting. EDI being a bit of a b*tch. Though it's interesting to note how her arguments can be easily used on the opposite side of things.
I don't see how she's being a ****. She upset and hurt because she knows her commander would sacrifice her in a instant if it cae to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
I mean, how would you feel? You co pilot the ship, you mantain the ship, you even risk yourself to fight for someone only to find out they would kill you no problem.
CDR David Shepard wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Kanaris wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
Thanks, and huh, interesting. EDI being a bit of a b*tch. Though it's interesting to note how her arguments can be easily used on the opposite side of things.
I don't see how she's being a ****. She upset and hurt because she knows her commander would sacrifice her in a instant if it cae to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
I mean, how would you feel? You co pilot the ship, you mantain the ship, you even risk yourself to fight for someone only to find out they would kill you no problem.
See...this is part of the reason why it pisses me off.
She...just like you are now...assumes that Shepard simply picked organics over sythetics...when that wasn't the case at all.
She...and you...assume that Shepard would kill her in an instant if it came to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
That fact is...if Joker allied himself with the Reapers...and then I rewrote his data so that he would no longer be under their control...and then he again allied himself with the Reapers...I would absolutely sacrifice Joker to save EDI.
These are the points that she...and you...seem to forget for some reason.
Raddx Fusion wrote...
In regards to the way your Shepard would normally behave? Not including the ending of course.
I loved ME3 but for me it has to be when you talk to Joker after the mission on Thessia. He cracks a small joke and the only option for Shepard is to scald him for it. I find this to be very annoying as there is no way of casually agreeing with him or even joke back, I get the reason for it story-wise but it is completely out of character for my Shep to lash out and it somewhat disassociates me as the player from Shepard.
How about you guys?
Modifié par l7986, 11 novembre 2012 - 09:21 .
Eterna5 wrote...
CDR David Shepard wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Kanaris wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
Thanks, and huh, interesting. EDI being a bit of a b*tch. Though it's interesting to note how her arguments can be easily used on the opposite side of things.
I don't see how she's being a ****. She upset and hurt because she knows her commander would sacrifice her in a instant if it cae to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
I mean, how would you feel? You co pilot the ship, you mantain the ship, you even risk yourself to fight for someone only to find out they would kill you no problem.
See...this is part of the reason why it pisses me off.
She...just like you are now...assumes that Shepard simply picked organics over sythetics...when that wasn't the case at all.
She...and you...assume that Shepard would kill her in an instant if it came to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
That fact is...if Joker allied himself with the Reapers...and then I rewrote his data so that he would no longer be under their control...and then he again allied himself with the Reapers...I would absolutely sacrifice Joker to save EDI.
These are the points that she...and you...seem to forget for some reason.
EDi isn't a mind reader and the Geth/Quarian conflict isn't very cut and dry. It comes down to whose extinction you can live with, you picked a Synthetic race and EDi is upset about that.
Modifié par CDR David Shepard, 11 novembre 2012 - 09:25 .
CDR David Shepard wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
CDR David Shepard wrote...
Eterna5 wrote...
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Kanaris wrote...
www.youtube.com/watch
Thanks, and huh, interesting. EDI being a bit of a b*tch. Though it's interesting to note how her arguments can be easily used on the opposite side of things.
I don't see how she's being a ****. She upset and hurt because she knows her commander would sacrifice her in a instant if it cae to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
I mean, how would you feel? You co pilot the ship, you mantain the ship, you even risk yourself to fight for someone only to find out they would kill you no problem.
See...this is part of the reason why it pisses me off.
She...just like you are now...assumes that Shepard simply picked organics over sythetics...when that wasn't the case at all.
She...and you...assume that Shepard would kill her in an instant if it came to a choice between her and an organic crewmember.
That fact is...if Joker allied himself with the Reapers...and then I rewrote his data so that he would no longer be under their control...and then he again allied himself with the Reapers...I would absolutely sacrifice Joker to save EDI.
These are the points that she...and you...seem to forget for some reason.
EDi isn't a mind reader and the Geth/Quarian conflict isn't very cut and dry. It comes down to whose extinction you can live with, you picked a Synthetic race and EDi is upset about that.
Yes...but the point of this thread is about dialog that is completely out of place.
It is in my opinion...that EDI saying that is completely out of place. EDI has never been and never should be that illogical. What she assumes is completely illogical.
She illogically equates all synthetics as one in the same...assuming that since Shepard choose the Quarians over the Geth that it would be a close minded choice between her and an organic....just because she is synthetic.
Yet...she's been helping us to eliminate a synthetic race (the Reapers) ever since ME2.
Fact is...it's completely out of place for her to be like that.