Maria Caliban wrote...
As I said earlier, it's from the Dragon Age PnP book. It isn't 'word of god.'
I could swear David Gaider used it once long ago in some form of interview, panel, web video, or some such.
Maria Caliban wrote...
As I said earlier, it's from the Dragon Age PnP book. It isn't 'word of god.'
Guest_Puddi III_*
Modifié par Filament, 16 novembre 2012 - 06:41 .
Guest_Puddi III_*
I guess you'll get right on that after you stop browsing the forum for that mediocre video game series' sequel that hasn't even been announced yet.Kail Ashton wrote...
*bangs head to desk* this is still a thing? really?? REALLY???? fine! i guess i'll go cure cancer then while you talk about the politically correct term for a race of horned giants in a mediocre video game series
Kail Ashton wrote...
or go fist fight the bioware devs, whichever
Modifié par Urzon, 16 novembre 2012 - 08:06 .
That something occurs naturally does not make the occurence desirable.Wissenschaft wrote...
Language is naturally ambiguous. This problem is solved with a little thing called context.
It might have truthiness, but what it lacks is relevance.DreGregoire wrote...
Quoted for truthinessxsdob wrote...
The qunari do not consider the vashoth to be the same race anymore, since their religion is a much bigger identifier to them than their race is now.
Maria Caliban wrote...
As I said earlier, it's from the Dragon Age PnP book. It isn't 'word of god.'Foolsfolly wrote...
Apparently the one where you call a race a completely different name that's never used in-game or novels or comics. Just in one codex... if this thread's to be believed. I still don't see it.
I've looked under qun, qunari, tal-vashoth, and saarbas and still no kossith. At this point I believe the term exists in that space the Fex do.... in Word of God because we haven't seen or heard of them yet in-game.
It's rather obvious if you've read the thread that 'god' doesn't call them kossith.
But whenever I've told people I wanted to be a kossith in later games they've understood. I don't necessarily want to be a follower of the qun, though I wouldn't hate that option. I'm going to quote Cassandra in MotA: "The Qunari are not a race, they are a religion".David Gaider wrote...
Lucia69 wrote...
The difficulty stems from the fact that when we're first introduced to the word 'qunari', we thought it designated the race specifically. Then we learnt that it refers to all the followers of the Qun, including humans and elves, so now it seems to us (in my opinion) like we need another term to talk exclusively about the race. That's why you see the word Kossith tossed around so much, to fill in the blank.
Oh, I understand why. But you don't need another term. That's what we've said-- repeatedly.
Someone says "well, what do you call them in your documents?" Qunari. "No, what do you call the horned people, the race?" Qunari. "And the followers of the Qun?" Qunari... or, alternatively, 'followers of the Qun'. "But what about the horned people who aren't followers of the Qun?" Tal'Vashoth. "All of them?" Yes. "But that's what they call themselves... what do we call them both as a group?" Qunari. "But that's confusing!" Err... no. No, it's really not. Not unless you're trying to be pedantic.
Which, clearly some people really are. So... whatever? Call them floating cheese wheels, if that makes you happy. We'll just be referring to them in-game by their proper names. Don't know how we went from us saying "that's not an accurate term" to "OMG the writers get angry whenever it's mentioned! It's forbidden!" Kind of regret ever mentioning their former name at all, now.
Lord Aesir wrote...
The Jewish analogy is apt but it doesn't really make it any less frustrating or confusing for those of us that dislike ambiguous labels.
If Jewish people weren't human they'd be a different species, not a different race. I think that's part of the problem with comparing the different races in Thedas to humans. It seems more like elves, dwarves, qunari, and humans--and maybe mages, as well--are closely-related species (some more or less so, apparently) than they are what we would really consider races. That means that racial analogies don't really work well because the differences are deeper than mere ethnicity.Fawx9 wrote...
Not really, they are a nation of people, not a race by themselves(By this I mean you don't have humans and those that are jewish, you have jewish humans).Lord Aesir wrote...
The Jewish analogy is apt but it doesn't really make it any less frustrating or confusing for those of us that dislike ambiguous labels.
Whereas here the big grey horned people are Qunari or groups that don't follow the qun/oppose them. Which is the main problem I guess. We have one word that describes not only a race, but a religion/nation of that race and a subset of its people. All the while having other names for the race that don't take part in the religion.
So Sten is a Qunari, part of those that follow the Qun (Qunari), and is a Qunari
Not to be confused with this elf who is a Viddathari, part of those that follow the Qun (Qunari) and is an Elf
Nor this other grey skinned man who is Vashoth, not part of those that follow the Qun (Qunari), and is a Qunari.
It just get's silly. I mean when I ask which of these is a Qunari, do you a) name all of them,the two of the race c) Sten and the elf or d) just Sten.
Wulfram wrote...
How about "ox-men"? It's used in universe, it's meaning is fairly intuitive and it would be understood to refer to race not religion.
On the con side, it seems to be intended as an insult.
Modifié par StarcloudSWG, 17 novembre 2012 - 01:04 .
I was not suggesting otherwise, I just think that you've already planned things out a bit further and that there are other parts of the race which aren't from Boston ... and that you need a name for the collective.David Gaider wrote...
If we ever feel the need to introduce "Qunari from across the sea", then they'll likely be called something else entirely.
It drives me nuts when people use "Kossith" to refer to Qunari and Tal-vashoth. It's like using "****** Sapien" just for people from Boston.
Modifié par PinkysPain, 18 novembre 2012 - 01:20 .
StarcloudSWG wrote...
Heh. It would be a fascinating window into what domestic life is like with the ox-men under the Qun. Do they arrange marriages like they arrange for children to follow roles/occupations? Is it left up to the individual? Does marriage require a sanction from the Ariqun?
For that matter, is it possible to disagree with a *part* of the Qun as interpreted by the Ariqun, and still follow the rest? Would such a person still be considered Qunari?
Urzon wrote...
The Qunari don't have marriages. They have more of a breeding programs. I'd imagine they pull a person in for an evaluation every couple of years, to measure their different strengths and weaknesses (physical strength, endurance, intelligence, charisma, willpower, and etc.). Then they set up breeding partners that would hopefully strengthen positive traits, while also weakening negative ones.
Though i do have a question... Is their breeding program active full time, or is it more of a biannual or annual type of thing?
Modifié par motomotogirl, 18 novembre 2012 - 07:54 .