BasilKarlo wrote...
LinksOcarina wrote...
The Better Business Bureau is also accused of being corrupt, and being run by a number of executives who try to hush-hush complaints on their own companies. So their intregity is suspect at best, and not credible as a barometer of good business practices.
The BBB has been accused of being corrupt since its inception. And yet nothing has ever been proven. Pro tip- businesses don't like being held accountable.
As for Amazon, that is their business decision as a company, just like Gamestop has the right to stop selling games from the 1990s or deny trades from customers as they see fit. So again, that tells us nothing since it is an independent decision on the part of the business, not on the part of the quality of the product.
This is really nonsensical. Amazon reached an independent conclusion that cost them money, but that someone has nothing to do with ME3?
To the first point, the integrity is still in question. So why should I trust it or what it says? And if you really want to go this route, what about the UK Advertising Standards Authority, which said the endings were thematically different? Is that corrupt, I don't live in England so I don't know. But this is where the crux of this comes from, subjectivity of interpretation.
As for Amazon, you basically said what I said before. It was an independent conclusion to give money back. They didn't have to do it, but they felt that was right? Does it say anything about the quality of Mass Effect 3? Perhaps it does, but if that was the case why was Amazon the only group offering refunds? Once again, it is subjective of quality in the end.
I am sorry if I am being long-winded, my point is this is all subjective, which is why there is no victim here, and no concrete case to stand on.
If it goes to court thats a different story. But since that will never happen i'm not sure why we are arguing over this.
Modifié par LinksOcarina, 12 novembre 2012 - 02:15 .