208 réponses à ce sujet

[futurepixels]

I take back my outrage...

Schrijver wrote...

Yanick Roy wrote it on Twitter (choices) and here (relationships).

So good news!

UPDATE: It will have both the shooter and the rpg elements still there.

Modifié par futurepixels, 13 novembre 2012 - 07:04 .

[Ithurael]

How bout we just wait and see m'kay?

Then...when it is out...and the RPG is...Ashes...Then you have my permission to whine.

[Davik Kang]

You might be right. It would seem odd though to discard one of the most successful systems implemented in their blockbuster IP.

If they do ditch it, I can only assume it'll be because they maybe felt like the reaction to ME3 showed them that developing a system around choice can create too many problems when trying to please the fanbase.

However if they take it out, they won't have the same USP to differentiate them from the other big blockbuster games.

I reckon at least something similar will remain. Choice at the very least, even if it's not (necessarily) dialogue-based.

Modifié par Davik Kang, 12 novembre 2012 - 06:44 .

[LiarasShield]

Ithurael wrote...

How bout we just wait and see m'kay?

Then...when it is out...and the RPG is...Ashes...Then you have my permission to whine.

What they did to me3 I think already got at least half of the fanbase permission to be pissed off or upset

[Rune-Chan]

Ithurael wrote...

How bout we just wait and see m'kay?.

Generally speaking that is the most logical thing to do. Although people kept saying that in regards to Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3. Especially after the demo's came out and people complained.

They were then repeatedly told "It's just a demo, wait until the real game comes out."

That is not to say people should judge this early, but people should not dismiss everything bad they hear as "It's not out yet" either.

Modifié par Machines Are Us, 12 novembre 2012 - 05:59 .

[Restrider]

Well, the players complained about having not enough choices or that they did not matter. The logical conclusion would NOT be to scrap that part...

Modifié par Restrider, 12 novembre 2012 - 05:50 .

[LisuPL]

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

[Fiery Phoenix]

The next game is either going to be a straight-up shooter, or something along the lines of Rage and Borderlands.

You may quote me for around this time next year.

[LiarasShield]

LisuPL wrote...

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

Some of us don't play this game for it to be another gow of shooter U_u they should keep the rpg elements

[hiraeth]

Machines Are Us wrote...

That is not to say people should judge this early, but people should not dismiss everything bad they hear as "It's not out yet" either.

agreed. i just-waited-and-saw ME3, and i didn't like what i saw, so i think i'm entitled to a little premature judgment here and there.

[Conniving_Eagle]

I already knew this.

[LisuPL]

LiarasShield wrote...

LisuPL wrote...

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

Some of us don't play this game for it to be another gow of shooter U_u they should keep the rpg elements

I will accept and FPS as a ME4, as long as there is quality and content .

If ME4 keeps to the ME3 gameplay mechanics I will also be glad.

I love the soul of the universe BioWare has created, it's gameplay mechanics are second in line of things I care about.

[AresKeith]

Gears of Mass: Deus Effect 4

[LiarasShield]

LisuPL wrote...

LiarasShield wrote...

LisuPL wrote...

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

Some of us don't play this game for it to be another gow of shooter U_u they should keep the rpg elements

I will accept and FPS as a ME4, as long as there is quality and content .

If ME4 keeps to the ME3 gameplay mechanics I will also be glad.

I love the soul of the universe BioWare has created, it's gameplay mechanics are second in line of things I care about.

Then why the **** are you trying to tell bioware to abandon the rpg elements that make this series great in the first place?

[Conniving_Eagle]

Greylycantrope wrote...

ME4: Pimp My Mass

[futurepixels]

MassEffectFShep wrote...

Machines Are Us wrote...

That is not to say people should judge this early, but people should not dismiss everything bad they hear as "It's not out yet" either.

agreed. i just-waited-and-saw ME3, and i didn't like what i saw, so i think i'm entitled to a little premature judgment here and there.

Agreed, and futhermore, the only chance the fanbase really has to impact major decisions about the devlopement of a game is early on.  Once they have been working on the game for a long time, they can just write off suggestions as not being compatiable with how they've already devloped the game.

[Linkinator]

i just wanna play as an asari with her own story and ill be fine with that ill go for female human too bust mainly asari

[ParkBom]

LiarasShield wrote...

LisuPL wrote...

LiarasShield wrote...

LisuPL wrote...

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

Some of us don't play this game for it to be another gow of shooter U_u they should keep the rpg elements

I will accept and FPS as a ME4, as long as there is quality and content .

If ME4 keeps to the ME3 gameplay mechanics I will also be glad.

I love the soul of the universe BioWare has created, it's gameplay mechanics are second in line of things I care about.

Then why the **** are you trying to tell bioware to abandon the rpg elements that make this series great in the first place?

First of all, it was said that he'd accept ME4 as a shooter or with ME3 gameplay. Acceptance=/=Telling Bioware to abandon RPG. And RPG elements did not make this series great. ME2 was much less of an RPG than ME1 and in most peoples' opinions, ME2 was better.

[ParkBom]

Linkinator wrote...

i just wanna play as an asari with her own story and ill be fine with that ill go for female human too bust mainly asari

Also, this.  ME3MP Asari are nice but I'd rather have a whole storyline.

[Dr_Extrem]

LisuPL wrote...

LiarasShield wrote...

LisuPL wrote...

Mass Effect 4 does not need to be RPG to be a "Mass Effect".

It can even be an FPS, just make them slap TONS of various characters, dialogue, choices into the game and interesting locations and missions -> I'm buyin'

Some of us don't play this game for it to be another gow of shooter U_u they should keep the rpg elements

I will accept and FPS as a ME4, as long as there is quality and content .

If ME4 keeps to the ME3 gameplay mechanics I will also be glad.

I love the soul of the universe BioWare has created, it's gameplay mechanics are second in line of things I care about.

bioware traded this soul in for fast cash. if you want it, buy it - but the soul of this game died together with shepard.



we all waited to see, how they are going to end this glorious series ..

they came, we saw, they destroyed the hopes of many fans.
the damage is done and transfering the franchise to another studio is the answer we were looking for. mass effect is dead - and there will be no forther changes or attempts to save what little there is left.

(my opinion - if you dont like it, dont reply)


i will stick to mods from now on ...

[Rafficus III]

If it's an MMO, I won't buy. I strongly want the next ME to be a SP RPG with MP as an option.

[Vlk3]

BioWare was great at making RPG, the trouble started when they began heading more into action - RPG. They should go back to their roots... But I'm afraid they want to attract FPS players instead. Too bad, because there are only a few of good RPGs and it seems we can't count on BioWare anymore. I hope I'm wrong, I really do.

[LiarasShield]

I definitly do agree the soul of me died or went away with shepard

[Wulfram]

You never know, they might be turning it into an out and out RPG. Or a strategy game. Or an Xcom clone.

The bit about cinematic story could have done with mentioning interactive in there some way.

[Robhuzz]

Vlk3 wrote...

BioWare was great at making RPG, the trouble started when they began heading more into action - RPG. They should go back to their roots... But I'm afraid they want to attract FPS players instead. Too bad, because there are only a few of good RPGs and it seems we can't count on BioWare anymore. I hope I'm wrong, I really do.

I'm afraid you're right. ME3 was an RPG only in name already. Now they want to 'explore a new direction' which I'm afraid means they'll turn it into a generic tps with tacked on rpg elements... pretty much like ME3 but even worse.

I just wish they hadn't messed up ME3 like that, if they want to turn the franchise into another shooter (as if we don't have enough of those already) then that's their business but they could've finished the trilogy properly and THEN mess it up.

ETA: Not to say that a shooter can't be good. I loved Half Life 2 because it had an awesome story. Sadly, BioWare storytelling is not what it used to be either. If they can't even wrap up the trilogy story without resorting to a deus ex machina (and a ridiculous one at that), I have very low hopes for a completely new game.

Modifié par Robhuzz, 12 novembre 2012 - 06:14 .