in response to "when is it going to get nerfed..." [paraphrased].
Modifié par krknight, 13 novembre 2012 - 02:26 .
Modifié par krknight, 13 novembre 2012 - 02:26 .
Charaxan wrote...
DHKany wrote...
Charaxan wrote...
Oh, if I may add :
DPS for the acolyte (in burst) is 264.9
DPS for... Geth Plasma SMG is... 268.
Yeah, sure we have an OP pistol.
multiply that by five for any protection whatsoever.
Also if I may add,
GPSMG doesn't stagger
GPSMG doesn't taze unshielded enemies
GPSMG doesn't do 100% of its damage to armor, the Acolyte does.
GPSMG needs charge up, Acolyte doesn't.
People always forget utility. And when they do, it's usually because they barely played the game.
All right... Compare it to the predator X : DPS burst : 612.5.
Almost three times.
- No need to stagger when next shot will kill
- No need to taze unshielded ennemies when your headshot will kill it.
- DPS acolyte X vs armor (sustained) in Gold : 162
- DPS of predator X vs armor (sustained) in Gold : 141
Yeah, still SOOO op compared to the predator X you get at the verry begining of the game...
Talking about playing ; as I said, you will have trouble trying to kill ennemies with it only. You will not be efficient. That's my 360h playing an AA with Acolyte in gold/platinum talking.
And,
This gun is a gun made for those who THINK. You have to coordonate with your powers to be efficient, and to think what to do frist and to who to be verry efficient.
If course it is good ! It is made to be good ! It is a "two side of the coin" gun. Weak in some parts (dps) but verry good in other parts (shields and incapacitating) so of course, when players can play with it, is is GOOD.
But that's the purpose of gun based on utilities : if they are lame even when you optimise yourself to play with it, it is not usefull to creat a weapon like this !
Next, you will say what ? Shotguns are overpowered because the do a lot of damage at close range and snipers have a scope and should be nerfed because of this utility?
Acolyte is the only gun I know you can't use if you can't play. If you spam acolyte rounds everywhere, you will hit sometimes but you will be dead in gold in no time.
Don't blame a gun because people learn to use it.
Or, change the game radically and give us lots of guns with differents skins but sames stats and that's it.
DHKany wrote...
And about the last line. So what are you saying? Nerfs = weapons becoming the same?
Modifié par Charaxan, 13 novembre 2012 - 02:36 .
Charaxan wrote...
DHKany wrote...
And about the last line. So what are you saying? Nerfs = weapons becoming the same?
I am saying that you can't nerf a gun because its usefull when risks are taken or when intelligence is used instead of blunt force.
But as I am stupid (insults comes form those who don't have strong arguments...), I can't say more than I have seen all the stats (and you can see them here too; analyse this whith you greater intelligence, human https://docs.google....R2ZWc5bWc&gid=8 ) and the conclusions are :
Either I am too good with other weapons than acolyte to see that acolyte is OP, or, you like to spam acolyte everywhere and find it OP and could do a lot more damages with other guns if you where a good player.
Have fun analysing.
Stardusk wrote...
When people tell you that a shield/barrier flamer build is bad because you can use the Acolyte, something is wrong.
Modifié par nicethugbert, 13 novembre 2012 - 02:52 .
DHKany wrote...
The conlusions are, you spell english like a five year old, Acolyte basically has 5 times its listed DPS on everything with protection. I do like to spam acolyte, because the whole game is about spamming weapons and powers. Exceptions to this might be single shot sniper rifles, and infinte ammo weapons but other than that name me scenario when you aren't spamming your gun/ power at an enemy.
Modifié par Charaxan, 13 novembre 2012 - 03:07 .
Charaxan wrote...
DHKany wrote...
And about the last line. So what are you saying? Nerfs = weapons becoming the same?
I am saying that you can't nerf a gun because its usefull when risks are taken or when intelligence is used instead of blunt force.
But as I am stupid (insults comes form those who don't have strong arguments...), I can't say more than I have seen all the stats (and you can see them here too; analyse this whith you greater intelligence, human https://docs.google....R2ZWc5bWc&gid=8 ) and the conclusions are :
Either I am too good with other weapons than acolyte to see that acolyte is OP, or, you like to spam acolyte everywhere and find it OP and could do a lot more damages with other guns if you where a good player.
Have fun analysing.
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
DH is an excellent player. I used to play with him, though I never see him online anymore.
nicethugbert wrote...
Acolyte is the new fad and the new under dog because of it. Prior to Acolyte, it was Piranha., before that, Krysae, Harrier, Reeger. It never ends.
Charaxan wrote...
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
DH is an excellent player. I used to play with him, though I never see him online anymore.
Some people says that of me too. So ?
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
So I was responding to your quote, "... if you were a good player." Which you directed at DH. I'm not sure what else you'd like me to elaborate on.
Charaxan wrote...
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
So I was responding to your quote, "... if you were a good player." Which you directed at DH. I'm not sure what else you'd like me to elaborate on.
True.
I meant "if you are", not "if you were", as like your friend said, my english is childish.
Sorry.
Zack and Miranda Make a wrote...
I must not have caught that post, I really only skimmed the first and last pages of this thread. Sometimes when I'm online I forget that English isn't everyone's first language. To be fair your I'm sure your English is much better than my knowledge of your native language.
DHKany wrote...
Alright Charaxan, peace.
I take back the nasty things i said and lets just go our separate ways. Balancing is up to bioware anyways.
@Zack, what was your PSN id?
Modifié par Drummernate, 13 novembre 2012 - 04:02 .
Modifié par Topographer, 13 novembre 2012 - 06:24 .