Lotion Soronnar wrote...
The circle is needed. the Templars are needed.
Mages are not some poor, downtrotted, misundestood children who the big bad chantry abuses.
Untrue on all accounts. Neither the circle or templars, both Chantry constructs, are needed. We see in the game, that there are organizations independant of the Chantry that manage to function without hordes of abominations overruning Ferelden. The Dalish are a prime example. They have magic, and very powerful magic to boot, without imprisoning mages, robbing them from their families, ect. And then there is the Mages Collective, who also appear to be doing quite fine. And they do share certain philosophies with the Circle, such as an opposition to Blood Magic. One of the jobs they give you is to wipe a group of blood mages out.
So both Circle and Templars really exist to keep mages under the control of the Chantry, and it's clear that the Chantry has far more say in Circle affairs than is shown. Talking to Morrigan, Wynne, picking up codexes, ect, mages very rarely, if ever, get to live normal lives. Marriage amongst them is forbidden, children born to circle mages are automatically taken at birth from their mothers and given to the Chantry, and leaving the Circle, whether you are a malifecar or not, makes you an aopostate and is an automatic death sentance.
So I must disagree that mages are not oppressed. They live in a gilded cage, and the threat of death or being forced into being a Tranquil is always hanging over their heads. And despite the harsh measures of Circle and Chantry, we also see that abominations and maleficar are not prevented by such harsh measures. if anything, I wonder just how many abominations and blood mages are a result of backlash from such oppresive measures.
You don't have to live in a ghetto or alienage to be oppressed.





Retour en haut






