Aller au contenu

Photo

Latest Smudboy video


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
461 réponses à ce sujet

#326
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages
[quote]Maxster_ wrote...

[quote]Ciryx wrote...

[quote]Maxster_ wrote...

[quote]Ciryx wrote...

[quote]Maxster_ wrote...

That was really pathetic, my friend. All four of your points are false.
[/quote]

You argued against one point, not all 4. 

And no, I am not above admitting that my statement was wrong. I wrongly assumed their general approach to harvesting life indicates that they wont use orbital bombardment to oblitarete whole planets. Ehm.... they dont actually do that, do they? As far as I can see they use it to destroy cities, but still deploy groundforces after that. Whatever.
[/quote]
You are.
You said that i argued against one point, but i argued against 4.
[quote]
The original point was that the united Fleet isnt doing any dmg to earth with their shots at the reapers as they approach earth.
[/quote]
And i proved that point is wrong.
It is even written in fleet tactics, which you of course ignoring.

Your first point, about Klenagon is false, you have no proof. And there is plenty of proof of the opposite

second - obviously wrong, fact that reapers bombarding planets is stated even in ME1.

third - obviously wrong, reaper main gun is what latter became Thanix Cannons of council races. Thanix Cannon is kineto-thermal weapon, which main damage goes from kinetic impact. Which is also stated in codex, and obvious having basic knowledge of physics. Orbital bombarding is also possible(and effective, given enormous acceleration possible with eezo in ME universe) and is standart reaper tactics. And obvious to anyone with basic knowledge of atmosphere(fluid dynamics) and orbital mechanics.

fourth - obviously rubbish, showing you have no idea of physics, not even basics. it sounds reasonable that beamweapons burn a path clear for the payload to be delivered - was especially funny, given the speed of projectiles. :lol:

[quote]
I am, however, above discussing on a level of name-flinging and calling others "pathetic". Have a nice day.

[/quote]
When someone, defending ME3 garbage writing, resorting to a inventing things to prove their point - i call that pathetic.
Have a nice day.
[/quote]

That was so... thoughtless.

I will humor you this one time and answer you:

Whats written in fleet tactics is how a fleet usually approaches a hostile planet which it tries to occupy and/or destroy. It goes into great detail how it is difficult if the planet is a habitable garden world etc etc.
[/quote]
Bwahahaha :lol::lol::lol:
So, if planet is not hostile, it is ok to bombard it with WMD grade weaponry. Riiiight.
[quote]
Thats all nice and dandy if the united fleet would actually try to attack earth. They dont. They try to save it. From the reapers. Thats what the game is about.
[/quote]
It shows that EAWare does not care for lore and common sense.
[quote]
My first point about Klendragon is wrong? How? You say something here without elaborating. You proof nothing, you dont argue at all. In fact I think you are trolling.
[/quote]
You already proven wrong and you even admitted it.
You are just inventing things. ME lore have a lot of information about kinetic weapons, and your assertion about Klendagon attacked by an FTL weapon is based on nothing. It even contradicts ME3 codex, but it is obvious you don't care.
[quote]
Third: It is stated in the codex that the slugs are 4025m/s fast. The rest of you whole "argument" is just... I have a hard time calling it anything but rubbish. I also calculated the impact energy a 4kg-5kg would have if fired at that speed. And its not stated that reapers use these kind of weapons for orbital bombardment. In fact, we dont even know what they are useing. And also: NO the reaper main weapon isnt a Thanix gun. They derived the design of the Thanix from the reaper weapon, its still a far less effective then actual reaper weapons. As evident in the game.
[/quote]
Pathetic.
Yes, we know what reapers use in orbital bombardment. They using their spinal mounted main gun with kinetic impact of approximate 400kt tnt equivalent. This is a WMD. It is shown and written in codex.

And yes, reaper main gun is thanix cannon, which is also stated in codex.


Development
After the Battle of the Citadel in 2183, human
and turian volunteers spent three months clearing the station's orbit
of debris. During the cleanup, the turians secretly salvaged Sovereign's
powerful main gun along with much of the weapon's element zero core.
Eleven months later, the turians introduced the Thanix, a scaled-down
version of the weapon.

Design
The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and tungsten
suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero. The
molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of
light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with
enough force to pierce any known shield or armor. The gun can fire
reliably every five seconds. The weapon's relatively small size allows
it to be mounted on most fighters or frigates, including the Normandy SR-2, and gives them firepower rivaling cruisers.


And of course, turian version is less powerful, because of the length of the barrel. It is not spinal mounted, so it is obvious that it is much less powerful.
Also, reapers have twice larger gun(2km) than any ship, and more powerful eezo core, and their estimated kinetic impact is ten times more than of Earth Alliance dreadnought.

You just demonstrated, that you completely ignoring codex and inventing things to prove your point.
[quote]
Fourth: You know that ME is Sci-Fi and Ezo doesnt exist? Good. These weapons heavily use ezo, so what i presume these things are capable of has nothing to do with physics. Thats also why I said I presume it, not stating it as a fact. Again: If you claim something is rubbish, please elaborate. 
I think its especially usefull for high-speed weapons to "burn a path" through athmosphere. Even todays experimental rail guns face that problem:

"The rails and projectiles must be built from strong conductive materials; the rails need to survive the violence of an accelerating projectile, and heating due to the large currents and friction involved."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun
http://upload.wikime...usnavy_2008.jpg


[/quote]
Eezo is fictional material, allowing for effective acceleration of projectiles. And those projectiles is obeying laws of physics.
It is also stated in codex, in game, and you know, in physics and real life research and experiments.
Yes, it is impossible for human-made projectiles to reach such speeds based on current technology. But, you know, such projectiles exists, science have a lot of evidence, that newton's laws works.

Also shows your ignorance.

it sounds reasonable that beamweapons burn a path clear for the payload to be delivered - that's what i called rubbish. Well, you have no idea about fluid dynamics anyway, so it is pointless.
[/quote]

You are a very intelligent person.

#327
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Maxster_ wrote...

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...
Lol.Poor cosmonauts, they all burned in the atmosphere. Goverment is lying 
Clearly you have no idea about fluid dynamics. Care to prove your assertion with formulaes, with coefficients from Earth atmosphere?No? I thought so.
http://en.wikipedia....ki/Aerodynamics
http://en.wikipedia....tic_bombardment
It seems it is pointless to argue with you, so i leave it here


I am pretty sure if you fired your cosmonauts with 4025m/s straight down to earth from orbit they would burn up. That thought alone is so ridiculous... Yeah, lets leave it here.

I wont even reply to rest of your post. Its the same kind of half-assed thoughts. 

I like how you ignored metal meteorites shown in museums.
You are so pathetic, ignoring codex, ignoring real life facts, ignoring anything that contradicts your alternative reality.

So, as i thought, you refused to prove your assertions with formulaes. You just stating they are right, because... they are right.
To hell with real life evidence, and physics. Who cares for that obviously false delusions? :lol::lol:


You are way smarter then I am, I bow low before your mighty intellect.
Its evident in all your reasonings and thorogh calculations.

#328
ABCoLD

ABCoLD
  • Members
  • 809 messages
So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?

#329
Maxster_

Maxster_
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...
Lol.Poor cosmonauts, they all burned in the atmosphere. Goverment is lying 
Clearly you have no idea about fluid dynamics. Care to prove your assertion with formulaes, with coefficients from Earth atmosphere?No? I thought so.
http://en.wikipedia....ki/Aerodynamics
http://en.wikipedia....tic_bombardment
It seems it is pointless to argue with you, so i leave it here


I am pretty sure if you fired your cosmonauts with 4025m/s straight down to earth from orbit they would burn up. That thought alone is so ridiculous... Yeah, lets leave it here.

I wont even reply to rest of your post. Its the same kind of half-assed thoughts. 

I like how you ignored metal meteorites shown in museums.
You are so pathetic, ignoring codex, ignoring real life facts, ignoring anything that contradicts your alternative reality.

So, as i thought, you refused to prove your assertions with formulaes. You just stating they are right, because... they are right.
To hell with real life evidence, and physics. Who cares for that obviously false delusions? :lol::lol:


You are way smarter then I am, I bow low before your mighty intellect.
Its evident in all your reasonings and thorogh calculations.

So, you have calculations about 4-5 kg slugs burning in atmosphere? No, you have not.
Your assertion is baseless and contradicts lore, mine based on rl meteorities, ME lore and various fields of physics.

#330
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


I think he just came to the conclussion that his solution isnt working anymore and that he needs new "input". I think he doesnt really care if your choice kills him too. He sees himself as a tool for a specific purpose, and self preservation for him is only of relevance if it coincides with his mission.

Maybe its wrong to see and judge the actions of the catalyst with human mindset. 

#331
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Maxster_ wrote...

So, you have calculations about 4-5 kg slugs burning in atmosphere? No, you have not.
Your assertion is baseless and contradicts lore, mine based on rl meteorities, ME lore and various fields of physics.


You life in a strange world were cosmonauts survive an straight-down entry into earth athmosphere at almost 15.000km/h. :) But again: You are right in all points you made and I am totally wrong with all my points. Its fine boy, let it rest. :)

Modifié par Ciryx, 15 novembre 2012 - 11:13 .


#332
ABCoLD

ABCoLD
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Ciryx wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


I think he just came to the conclussion that his solution isnt working anymore and that he needs new "input". I think he doesnt really care if your choice kills him too. He sees himself as a tool for a specific purpose, and self preservation for him is only of relevance if it coincides with his mission.

Maybe its wrong to see and judge the actions of the catalyst with human mindset. 

I can sorta get behind that.  But he doesn't explain why it doesn't work anymore.  And if his effort to this point is to preserve organic life, and he believes he has in the Reapers... why would he blow them up?

Heck, why not make them simply non-hostile, or into intergalactic policemen (ala the Control ending?)

#333
LinksOcarina

LinksOcarina
  • Members
  • 6 560 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


Because the Catalyst is acting in the reigns of its programming, finding a solution to the problem of Chaos. 

As for why it didn't build it, because there was no reason to change its solution until Shepard showed them that it can change. 

Got to remember the Catalyst is still acting on the hubris that the Leviathans put into it; it is basically stuck in the confines of its creators shortcomings.

Modifié par LinksOcarina, 15 novembre 2012 - 11:16 .


#334
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

Ciryx wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


I think he just came to the conclussion that his solution isnt working anymore and that he needs new "input". I think he doesnt really care if your choice kills him too. He sees himself as a tool for a specific purpose, and self preservation for him is only of relevance if it coincides with his mission.

Maybe its wrong to see and judge the actions of the catalyst with human mindset. 

I can sorta get behind that.  But he doesn't explain why it doesn't work anymore.  And if his effort to this point is to preserve organic life, and he believes he has in the Reapers... why would he blow them up?

Heck, why not make them simply non-hostile, or into intergalactic policemen (ala the Control ending?)


Hm, I dont think he cares much for the lifeforms he created (the reapers). If a new solution requires him and all reapers to be dead, then thats how it is. That he is willing to take losses for the "greater good" is quite evident with him constructing the reapers in the first place. (or rather that many spezies that cannot be made into reapers just die along with the rest)

I dont think he is about being "logic" in our terms of defination (self preservation, useing of all resources, not wasteing stuff etc). I think he just wants to preserve life, on matter the cost. And that purpose involves shepards input. He just takes that input and follows it through, to whatever end that may lead.

#335
Maxster_

Maxster_
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...

So, you have calculations about 4-5 kg slugs burning in atmosphere? No, you have not.
Your assertion is baseless and contradicts lore, mine based on rl meteorities, ME lore and various fields of physics.


You life in a strange world were cosmonauts survive an straight-down entry into earth athmosphere at almost 15.000km/h. :) But again: You are right in all points you made and I am totally wrong with all my points. Its fine boy, let it rest. :)

And you are lying, of course. I never said that cosmonauts entry speeds are so high.
False statement from your post : However, it doesnt change the fact that 4kg-5kg slugs would burn in the athmosphere. It is obviously false, hence the cosmonauts "example".
And meteorities in museums also want to have a word with you.

You have no proof of your obviously false assertions, as for ME lore in-universe(which you are completely ignoring), and for real life physics.

I proved you wrong from ME lore and real life examples, you have no proof at all.

Sure, continue spreading you delusions as facts, it is so funny. :wizard:

#336
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

LinksOcarina wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


Because the Catalyst is acting in the reigns of its programming, finding a solution to the problem of Chaos. 

As for why it didn't build it, because there was no reason to change its solution until Shepard showed them that it can change. 

Got to remember the Catalyst is still acting on the hubris that the Leviathans put into it; it is basically stuck in the confines of its creators shortcomings.


Good post. :wizard:

#337
ABCoLD

ABCoLD
  • Members
  • 809 messages

LinksOcarina wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


Because the Catalyst is acting in the reigns of its programming, finding a solution to the problem of Chaos. 

As for why it didn't build it, because there was no reason to change its solution until Shepard showed them that it can change. 

Got to remember the Catalyst is still acting on the hubris that the Leviathans put into it; it is basically stuck in the confines of its creators shortcomings.

Except that the Catalyst was created to protect life, not to end chaos.  That's from the Levathan DLC, a dicussion with the race that created the Catalyst.  (Spoilers!)

#338
Maxster_

Maxster_
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?

He is crazy.
It would be normal, if there was a way to force him, or aguing with him and proving he is wrong.
But there is no such way.

#339
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Maxster_ wrote...

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...

So, you have calculations about 4-5 kg slugs burning in atmosphere? No, you have not.
Your assertion is baseless and contradicts lore, mine based on rl meteorities, ME lore and various fields of physics.


You life in a strange world were cosmonauts survive an straight-down entry into earth athmosphere at almost 15.000km/h. :) But again: You are right in all points you made and I am totally wrong with all my points. Its fine boy, let it rest. :)

And you are lying, of course. I never said that cosmonauts entry speeds are so high.
False statement from your post : However, it doesnt change the fact that 4kg-5kg slugs would burn in the athmosphere. It is obviously false, hence the cosmonauts "example".
And meteorities in museums also want to have a word with you.

You have no proof of your obviously false assertions, as for ME lore in-universe(which you are completely ignoring), and for real life physics.

I proved you wrong from ME lore and real life examples, you have no proof at all.

Sure, continue spreading you delusions as facts, it is so funny. :wizard:


Ok, last time I answer seriously: 

How much friction is generated on an entry level and how much it strains the material is dependent on many factors. One of these is the form of the slug. Blunt objects create a shock wave which keeps the heat away on entry in the athmosphere at certain speeds while sharp/aerodynamically formed objects dont do it etc etc.
There are SO many other factors involved (material of the slugs, degrees of entry into the athmosphere etc) that you cant make a proper calculation since you are missing FACTs. Its damn likely they use highly inflameable slugs. As soon as these slugs heat up due to friction they simply burn out. You cant know, dont you get it? 
On your metorite: and how big was the metorite as it entered the athmosphere? at which angle of entry? etc etc?

All your argumentations are so full of holes and flames and apparent lack of knowledge I simply wont answer to you anymore. For what its worth and so you might finally shut up: YOU ARE RIGHT! I AM WRONG! 

Jeez.

#340
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

LinksOcarina wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


Because the Catalyst is acting in the reigns of its programming, finding a solution to the problem of Chaos. 

As for why it didn't build it, because there was no reason to change its solution until Shepard showed them that it can change. 

Got to remember the Catalyst is still acting on the hubris that the Leviathans put into it; it is basically stuck in the confines of its creators shortcomings.

Except that the Catalyst was created to protect life, not to end chaos.  That's from the Levathan DLC, a dicussion with the race that created the Catalyst.  (Spoilers!)


I had the impression that the Catalyst would sacrifice all life, if there would be a chance that only one lifeform could escape certain extinction. And since his present solution isnt working anymore it equals conflict, chaos and ultimatly death and extinction for all life.... so he goes along with whatever you come up. does that make sense?

Modifié par Ciryx, 15 novembre 2012 - 11:36 .


#341
LinksOcarina

LinksOcarina
  • Members
  • 6 560 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

LinksOcarina wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

So, to get back on topic. smudboy made me think. Why the heck did the Catalyst even offer the Destroy ending?

And if the Catalyst was on board with changing things up, why didn't it just build the Crucible itself?


Because the Catalyst is acting in the reigns of its programming, finding a solution to the problem of Chaos. 

As for why it didn't build it, because there was no reason to change its solution until Shepard showed them that it can change. 

Got to remember the Catalyst is still acting on the hubris that the Leviathans put into it; it is basically stuck in the confines of its creators shortcomings.

Except that the Catalyst was created to protect life, not to end chaos.  That's from the Levathan DLC, a dicussion with the race that created the Catalyst.  (Spoilers!)


See, thats the inherent flaw with the Catalyst, it sees Chaos as the thing that kills life. So basically, it is protecting life by eliminating the random nature of Chaos with the cycle. 

#342
Maxster_

Maxster_
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...

So, you have calculations about 4-5 kg slugs burning in atmosphere? No, you have not.
Your assertion is baseless and contradicts lore, mine based on rl meteorities, ME lore and various fields of physics.


You life in a strange world were cosmonauts survive an straight-down entry into earth athmosphere at almost 15.000km/h. :) But again: You are right in all points you made and I am totally wrong with all my points. Its fine boy, let it rest. :)

And you are lying, of course. I never said that cosmonauts entry speeds are so high.
False statement from your post : However, it doesnt change the fact that 4kg-5kg slugs would burn in the athmosphere. It is obviously false, hence the cosmonauts "example".
And meteorities in museums also want to have a word with you.

You have no proof of your obviously false assertions, as for ME lore in-universe(which you are completely ignoring), and for real life physics.

I proved you wrong from ME lore and real life examples, you have no proof at all.

Sure, continue spreading you delusions as facts, it is so funny. :wizard:


Ok, last time I answer seriously: 

How much friction is generated on an entry level and how much it strains the material is dependent on many factors. One of these is the form of the slug. Blunt objects create a shock wave which keeps the heat away on entry in the athmosphere at certain speeds while sharp/aerodynamically formed objects dont do it etc etc.
There are SO many other factors involved (material of the slugs, degrees of entry into the athmosphere etc) that you cant make a proper calculation since you are missing FACTs. Its damn likely they use highly inflameable slugs. As soon as these slugs heat up due to friction they simply burn out. You cant know, dont you get it? 
On your metorite: and how big was the metorite as it entered the athmosphere? at which angle of entry? etc etc?

All your argumentations are so full of holes and flames and apparent lack of knowledge I simply wont answer to you anymore. For what its worth and so you might finally shut up: YOU ARE RIGHT! I AM WRONG! 

Jeez.

I like how you contradicting yourself.

There are SO many other factors involved (material of the slugs, degrees
of entry into the athmosphere etc) that you cant make a proper
calculation

Its damn likely they use highly inflameable slugs. As soon as these
slugs heat up due to friction they simply burn out. You cant know, dont
you get it?

So, you said you can't know, but then you said it is fact. You are so funny, stating your delusions as facts.

On your metorite: and how big was the metorite as it entered the athmosphere? at which angle of entry? etc etc?

You are so pathetic.
Prove your assertion about projectiles burning out with formulaes and calculations first. Then we can talk about meteorities.
Oh, you already said, that you can't. But nevertheless you are right, because... you a right.

I'm not even saying about ME lore, it is clear that you completely ignoring that.

So, will you prove your assertion or not?:police:

#343
ABCoLD

ABCoLD
  • Members
  • 809 messages
Hey, Maxster, I made a whole thread for that. If you're gonna rough-house in the pool, at least make sure you don't get this one closed. :)

LinksOcarina: Except that destroying the Reapers doesn't accomplish either of those goals, it doesn't preserve life (from the Catalyst's point of view it would be a tremendous waste of life) and it also doesn't stop Chaos. (How would the removal of synthetic life stop 'Chaos' as a force?)

#344
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

Maxster_ wrote...
horseload of bullsh*t


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/likely

=/= 

Fact

You are to dense to comprehend simple words.
Welcome @ ignore + reported for flaming and trolling.

#345
Maxster_

Maxster_
  • Members
  • 2 489 messages

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...
horseload of bullsh*t


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/likely

=/= 

Fact

You are to dense to comprehend simple words.
Welcome @ ignore + reported for flaming and trolling.

So, you will provide no proof of your assertions like this one However, it doesnt change the fact that 4kg-5kg slugs would burn in the athmosphere, which you stated as facts(they are obviously not).

No proof - debate lost. Well, you already shown that you ignoring parts of ME lore that do not fit your delusions.
See ya. :wizard:

#346
Guest_The Mad Hanar_*

Guest_The Mad Hanar_*
  • Guests
How come you guys are willing to defend the Nihlus scene, but not the TIM scene? Bias, perhaps?

I seriously doubt that TIM's shields were more powerful than Spectre Nihlus' shields.

#347
Ciryx

Ciryx
  • Members
  • 581 messages

ABCoLD wrote...

Hey, Maxster, I made a whole thread for that. If you're gonna rough-house in the pool, at least make sure you don't get this one closed. :)

LinksOcarina: Except that destroying the Reapers doesn't accomplish either of those goals, it doesn't preserve life (from the Catalyst's point of view it would be a tremendous waste of life) and it also doesn't stop Chaos. (How would the removal of synthetic life stop 'Chaos' as a force?)


He doesnt know if it would help. He knows his solution doesnt work, so maybe he realises that his reasoning was flawed to begin with. And thus accepts whatever shepard may choose, since he values shepard who has gone against such impossible odds as a better judge for the universe then himself?

#348
ABCoLD

ABCoLD
  • Members
  • 809 messages

Ciryx wrote...

ABCoLD wrote...

Hey, Maxster, I made a whole thread for that. If you're gonna rough-house in the pool, at least make sure you don't get this one closed. :)

LinksOcarina: Except that destroying the Reapers doesn't accomplish either of those goals, it doesn't preserve life (from the Catalyst's point of view it would be a tremendous waste of life) and it also doesn't stop Chaos. (How would the removal of synthetic life stop 'Chaos' as a force?)


He doesnt know if it would help. He knows his solution doesnt work, so maybe he realises that his reasoning was flawed to begin with. And thus accepts whatever shepard may choose, since he values shepard who has gone against such impossible odds as a better judge for the universe then himself?

That's an incredible leap.  That's ascribing hope and faith to a construct that's continued a cycle of murder for millions if not billions of years.  And he doesn't seem to believe that Shepard is really that special, does he?  He doesn't acknowledge any special accomplishment that Shepard has made at all.

#349
Dark_Caduceus

Dark_Caduceus
  • Members
  • 3 305 messages

Ciryx wrote...

Maxster_ wrote...
horseload of bullsh*t


http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/likely

=/= 

Fact

You are to dense to comprehend simple words.
Welcome @ ignore + reported for flaming and trolling.


Just be humble and admit you were wrong, there's nothing wrong with that; I do it about something almost every day.

The amount of cognitive dissonance and special pleading you've expressed is... a lot.

#350
Tomwew

Tomwew
  • Members
  • 664 messages

The Mad Hanar wrote...

How come you guys are willing to defend the Nihlus scene, but not the TIM scene? Bias, perhaps?

I seriously doubt that TIM's shields were more powerful than Spectre Nihlus' shields.

not shields armour, and TIM didn't take a close range headshot, and Nihlus didn't have funky reaper upgrades which bestow inexplicable super biotic powers and a handy AM/FM radio.

gameplay/ cutscene segragation has always been a problem in the mass effect series, especially in regards to how powerful weapon and shielding/armour tech is but given the importance of the scene, and the ridiculousness that surrounds it TIM's one body shot kill is more heavily scrutinized. 

also one renegade prompt is the final boss? not video-gamey enough for my taste in video games.