254 réponses à ce sujet

[saracen16]

Synthesis. It doesn't leave the galaxy in as much tatters as it does in Destroy, nor does it run the risk of centralizing power as in Overlord. Synthesis is true equality for all.

[ghost9191]

saracen16 wrote...

Synthesis. It doesn't leave the galaxy in as much tatters as it does in Destroy, nor does it run the risk of centralizing power as in Overlord. Synthesis is true equality for all.

wait wait wait... sure it doesn't give power to one man ( or woman ) but the reapers will still be the most powerful race , but hey at least no one is able to keep them in check right   and nothing like promoting equality like saying organics are flawed and the only way to make them better is turning them into half synthetics , kinda removing the whole organic thing . but hey PERFECTION :innocent:

yes yes , it doesn't remove diversity , whatever . but it does kinda remove the differences between synthetics and organics. and as said upgrading organics with synthetic parts , kinda doesn't keep them as well organics . not fully

not disagreeing but felt like adding my thoughts , you added yours on destroy and control , and your not suppose to , the rules man

just saying lol . if i wanted to argue the endings i would make a better case,. that was just about those two points. I mean damn it this thread was not made to discuss pros and cons of the choices

[smilie]http://i1173.photobucket.com/albums/r589/duedify2/cb6fe651.gif[/smilie]


i choose mine for the kick a*s explosions and vaporizing husks. oh and that awesome scene with the marine shooting them , saving his buddy . well trying to

Modifié par ghost9191, 17 novembre 2012 - 02:05 .

[Zaalbar]

I may have liked Synthesis if I was playing a Final Fantasy game.
Destroy is the most believable scenario for Mass Effect but the collateral damage is just to much for me to handle.
Control is the lesser of 3 evils for me personally as it has less Collateral then Destroy and Shepard sort of lives on as a Reaper god like being which is kind of cool, it also reminds me a little of the fates of David Bowman from 2001 A Space Odyssey and Captain Ben Sisko from Deep Space Nine, 2 of my favourite sci fi's.

On a side note though I'm a little disappointed that shooting the Catalyst in the head triggers the Refusal ending. I enjoyed shooting that genocidal little b******!

[JBPBRC]

I just wanted the game to end. Red just happened to be the choice I picked, since I was trying to talk to the damn Starchild to get clarification on what in the world was in front of me, but no such luck.

[Linkenski]

I pick destroy, because EDI's story arc in ME3 turned into something completely lame, and i hate seeing human husks get along with humans. Control ending has such an evil tone to it now, and well i simply do not understand that. Destroy feels heroic, shepard clearly survives.

[xAmilli0n]

I pick my favorite endings because things don't go perfectly. A perfect ending is boring. No conflict. Its simply unbelievable.

I like Control because of the horrible, horrible things that could happen. Shep losing all sense of herself and resuming the harvest is a fascinating possibility. Or the Galaxy deciding to find a way to shut down their benevolent overlords, inadvertently starting another war. I love it.

I am also okay with destroy. Low-EMS is the most realistic (as in what I expected to happen, mass destruction of everything). In high-EMS we have thousands of Reaper corpses that still have the ability to indoctrinate lying all over the galaxy. Could provide some interesting conflict.

So I choose my endings because of the conflicts that may produce.

Modifié par xAmilli0n, 17 novembre 2012 - 03:55 .

[Arxduke]

I picked mine because Shepard lives. It may sound selfish, but it really isn't. Shepard has sacrificed more than any other being in the galaxy at that point, had the crappiest life, and went through more pain and anguish than any other person I could think of. He deserved to live and see what good he did for the galaxy that pushed him away, didn't believe or listen to him. For the chance to save their ignorant hides and live on with his LI for the rest of his life and even for eternity after death. 

I could at least give him that after all the crud he went though.

In a nutshell: Destroy, because at that moment, it was for Shepard. It was his moment. He deserved to live and enjoy all his hard work with his boyfriend/future hubby. 

Modifié par Arxduke, 17 novembre 2012 - 07:02 .

[Steelcan]

Not very much for Control either.... or Synthesis....

[FOX216BC]

Because it's slightly less worse then the other endings.
I think this goes for alot of ME gamers, no matter what choice they made.

Modifié par FOX216BC, 18 novembre 2012 - 05:38 .

[ImperatorMortis]

Because Destroy is the safest/least crazy choice.

Also it had a decent cost. Kill some mechs to destroy the Reapers? No prob. 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 18 novembre 2012 - 05:30 .

[Yuoaman]

I chose destroy because, especially with the added lines in the Extended Cut, I believe the Catalyst is lying to me to make Synthesis a more attractive option - because it is their choice, not mine. The fact that Shepard survives this ending, even after the Catalyst states that you would be at risk as well having several synthetic parts, just proves to me that he may have been exaggerating or outright lying on the effectiveness of the Crucible in that case. If Shepard survived, who likely has Reaper-influenced technology keeping him alive, then I don't doubt that at least some synthetics would also survive, if not all of them.

[ThisOneIsPunny]

xAmilli0n wrote...

I pick my favorite endings because things don't go perfectly. A perfect ending is boring. No conflict. Its simply unbelievable.

I like Control because of the horrible, horrible things that could happen. Shep losing all sense of herself and resuming the harvest is a fascinating possibility. Or the Galaxy deciding to find a way to shut down their benevolent overlords, inadvertently starting another war. I love it.

I am also okay with destroy. Low-EMS is the most realistic (as in what I expected to happen, mass destruction of everything). In high-EMS we have thousands of Reaper corpses that still have the ability to indoctrinate lying all over the galaxy. Could provide some interesting conflict.

So I choose my endings because of the conflicts that may produce.

There's also the Leviathans. Can't forget that can of worms.

[RethenX]

Well this is a new thread.

[Steelcan]

RethenX wrote...

Well this is a new thread.

'If you don't like it, don't participate

[Hadeedak]

Blue because I like me some heroic sacrifices.

And I had a Earthborn Sole Survivor paragade vanguard gunning for a heroic sacrifice since I started her way back when in ME1. She's not losing any more people or things than necessary, and she's not upsetting the balance she's always known.

My renegade went with destroy because she's got a one-track mind, and she wanted to get back to Kaidan.

My pure, pure, trusting paragon went synthesis, on account of being a great believer in cooperation.

My renegon will probably go refuse. I dunno.

I have a lot of Shepards. And I may make more. Depends on the Shepard! Right now I'm doing what I did after ME2 and spinning my wheels until all the DLC is out, so I can stop going back to just before Chronos over and over and over again.

[johnj1979]

I always pick the destroy ending because to me the those other ending are just pointless to me and should not be in the game. I also pick the destroy ending because for me that is Shepard as been fighting for since day one it just a shame that I have destroy EDI and Geth to achieve this goal.

[CyberEwan]

I always like Control, for several reasons.

-Shepalyst can use the Reapers to rebuild the Mass Relay Network, use them to transport supplies to colonies, possibly as a military force to keep the races in check etc.
-Shepalyst could potentially use the knowledge of the Reapers to create a clone of Shepard (might sound far-fetched, but the Reapers are incredibly technologically advanced, so why couldn't they make clones?)
-It doesn't sacrifice a sentient race nor forces such a large change on the people of the galaxy.

Also, why does everyone assume Shepalyst will keep the Reapers around forever? Mine would control them for perhaps 50 to 100 years whilst the galaxy recovered, then once they could look after themselves, have all the Reapers make their way to the nearest black hole before deleting itself.

[JPR1964]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

Destroy is the lesser of the three evils.

Only palatable playing a renegade Sheppard with a real dislike of geth and synthetics...

There is no ending for a parangon Sheppard, apart the refusal... But you should be playing your hero a bit nihilist...

(IMO)

JPR out!

[Applepie_Svk]

JPR1964 wrote...

BringBackNihlus wrote...

Destroy is the lesser of the three evils.

Only palatable playing a renegade Sheppard with a real dislike of geth and synthetics...

There is no ending for a parangon Sheppard, apart the refusal... But you should be playing your hero a bit nihilist...

(IMO)

JPR out!

[Voodoo2015]

Becaurse i had to.

[Steelcan]

Did anybody pick Destroy for reasons besides revenge and Shepard livng?

[Vigilant111]

Steelcan wrote...

Did anybody pick Destroy for reasons besides revenge and Shepard livng?

Plenty do, and it is unfair to be accused of being genocidal, trigger-happy sociopaths

Also, it is not "revenge", it is retribution

Despite what other ending factions think, reasons for choosing destroy is actually more diverse and complex than they think

Modifié par Vigilant111, 19 novembre 2012 - 02:29 .

[DoomsdayDevice]

Steelcan wrote...

Did anybody pick Destroy for reasons besides revenge and Shepard livng?

I picked destroy because I didn't trust the child. Control and synthesis were exactly the things the Illusive Man and Saren respectively had advocated, two indoctrinated villains.

I won't let the Reapers exploit my tendency to save as much people as I can.

Shepard: If you'd saved them all, would things have worked out better?
Vega: I... I don't know. I don't think so.
Shepard: The right choice is usually not the easy one.

Modifié par DoomsdayDevice, 19 novembre 2012 - 02:31 .

[KingZayd]

Steelcan wrote...

Did anybody pick Destroy for reasons besides revenge and Shepard livng?

Yes. Security.

We have 1 crucible, and we cannot beat the Reapers without it. The Reapers exist in all endings in control and synthesis, but the crucible does not. Therefore, in the event of Reapers attacking us, we would be screwed.