85 réponses à ce sujet

[Mr. Gogeta34]

Say that Bioware follows up on wanting to allow fans to interpret the endings that way (as they supposedly took special care not to debunk indoctrination in the extended cut). 

Would fans be interested in Indoctrination Theory DLC that ends the main story with that in mind (at 800-1200msp)?  An extended campaign where Shepard awakens and 'finishes the fight?'

What say ye?

Modifié par Mr. Gogeta34, 18 novembre 2012 - 07:27 .

[o Ventus]

I think I would be interested in it (rather, the creative merit of the IT), but I'm not sure of my critical opinion of it.

[Seboist]

Nope.

[HydroFlame20]

hell no

[CannotCompute]

Instant buy.

[Ajensis]

I'll take anything at this point :-P

Well, maybe not, but this one I'd likely buy. I've never believed in it, but the concept behind Indoctrination Theory is rather interesting and fits better (in my view) than the current ending. So yeah, bring it on!

I wouldn't hold my breath, though.

[Scott Sion]

I can't believe you people are still holding on to IT. I admit I was hoping it might be true before the EC, but no I'm pretty sure it's not. They already stated they aren't changing the endings again.

No, if they were to do anything to the endings it should be an actual epilogue that explains your choices.

[Zaalbar]

I.T. would have been a fantastic reveal had it been in the game to begin with. Adding it now after so much time has passed would make the reveal seem meh.

I personally would like to see a DLC that fixes the Priority Earth mission, It is for me the worst and most boring aspect of the entire series, It felt rushed.

[JMDekker2]

I am, and I think a lot of people are. I also think this was Bioware's intention.

[woxi]

Yes, because indoctrination has a big role in the entire series.
Instant buy!

[Chala]

I'm so tired about this matter than on the day of it's release I won't even bother thinking on it's existence.

Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 18 novembre 2012 - 02:26 .

[Andrew Waples]

the fact that they would need a dlc to explain the need futher proofs that bioware needed more time and it's sets a prescient that it's okay to release a game with a bad ending cause you got DLC!

[simonphoenix]

IT is fan-fiction nothing more......

[Seival]

simonphoenix wrote...

IT is fan-fiction nothing more......

+1

Modifié par Seival, 18 novembre 2012 - 03:08 .

[Freestate2nd]

Instant buy!

[ZajoE38]

IT? No! Fortunatelly IT is big enough crap that Bioware will never come up with it, so I don't need to worry.

[Seival]

There are some nice polls on the subject:
http://social.biowar...72/polls/40795/
http://social.biowar...72/polls/40026/

[Soultaker08]

oh god no if they want dlc for the ending just enhance priority earth and the epilogues >_>

[krizalid9999]

Indoctrination theory was stupid , nothing in the game even with the first ending was pointing in that direction.
It was the result of butthurt from people who falsely believed they were fans.

[ImperatorMortis]

No. The Extended Cut was fine.

Also I can't believe people haven't moved on from the Indoctrination Theory yet.

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 18 novembre 2012 - 06:26 .

[Remix-General Aetius]

the theory sucks lol, nothing more than fruitloop fan bull**** , get a hobby. jeez

[Snypy]

I wouldn't be interested in such a DLC because I don't believe in the IT. That said, I'd certainly buy a DLC that would either feature an additional ending or expand on the Refuse ending. (But BioWare gave up on us, so I don't expect anything anymore.)

[thebigbad1013]

Whoa...I'm surprsed that people are lashing out like this over the Idoc theory. It's one thing to not believe in it but to actually trash people who choose to believe otherwise....seems like quite the overreaction.