Aller au contenu

Photo

So... Will we be forced to be pro templar?


1297 réponses à ce sujet

#1226
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Auintus wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

You people baffle me.
If the police was searching for a serial rapist/pedophile in your neighborhood and had clues and reasons to suspect one guy from your street is hiding him, if that guy were to refuse a search you wouldn't defend him so fast.


That's a different situation.
The mage situation is more like a member of a group(religious, social, fan club, whatever) commits a crime and so the entire group has to have their houses gone through to make sure they aren't planning the same thing.


No, the situation is more like a group of mages having ties to criminals and having credible evidence of helping and training said criminals in forbidden arts. Thus searhcing their premises is valid.

And mind you, if police has evidence or reason to suspect other members of group X are involved or are a danger they can and will conduct a search.

#1227
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
Personally - while I won't side with mages or templars if the option is there - if I had to choose between those two groups, I would like them to force templars.

Dragon Age's mages are unique - if they are free (and their imprisonment outside of the Kirkwall Circle is wildly over-exaggerated) - they become boorishly common fantasy wizards.

#1228
Auintus

Auintus
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

TheJediSaint wrote...

Auintus wrote...

That's a different situation.
The mage situation is more like a member of a group(religious, social, fan club, whatever) commits a crime and so the entire group has to have their houses gone through to make sure they aren't planning the same thing.


Except, you know?  That group being capable of throwing fireballs, mind-controling people, and being somewhat prone to becoming possesed killing-machines.


And any member of this theoretical group would be capable of the exact same thing as the first member. Still doesn't give the right to judge them all based on the actions of a few.

#1229
Auintus

Auintus
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Auintus wrote...

That's a different situation.
The mage situation is more like a member of a group(religious, social, fan club, whatever) commits a crime and so the entire group has to have their houses gone through to make sure they aren't planning the same thing.


No, the situation is more like a group of mages having ties to criminals and having credible evidence of helping and training said criminals in forbidden arts. Thus searhcing their premises is valid.

And mind you, if police has evidence or reason to suspect other members of group X are involved or are a danger they can and will conduct a search.


What evidence is there that Circle mages have ties to criminals?
Hmm, point taken.

#1230
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 223 messages

It proves everyhing.
For one, Meredith isn't a mage-hater (go ahead and prove that if you can).
For another, she has every reason to be paranoid (even wihout the idol).

And lastly, that pathetic exuse can be used ALL THE TIME. That alone makes it worthless, because the guiltiest of the guilty can use it always and in every situation.

Are you really arguing that Meredith is a rational decision maker?  Either she was just looking for an excuse to annul the Circle or she genuinely believed that ridiculous excuse she gave for doing so.  Her feelings towards the dangers of mages go beyond reasonable paranoia.

This makes it untrue, how?

She can do something alright. She's still the knight-commander.
And sheltering and protecting criminals certanly wont' do the non-guilty mages any favors.

In other words, fighting agaisnt tthe search only makes the situation worse.

If this were someone level headed, I might agree.  Meredith, however, would take any evidence, no matter how flimsy, and use it to justify making mages tranquil or death anyway.  Sure, Meredith can place more restrictions without the search but I have difficulty imagining her searching the tower without a death or several resulting.  So no, I don't think the situation without the search could be worse than the situation with the search.

#1231
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
@Auintus: Yes it does. If the vast majority of mages turn a blind eye to the actions of their fellows who run around terrorizing the countryside - then they are guilty by association.

This is a basic reality taught to children - if your friend is a troublemaker, you will get in trouble right along with him. It is not relevant whether or not you did the deed - you were present and did nothing to stop it.

If mages are fine with their Libertarian rebel counterparts - then they are guilty of collusion.

#1232
Sylvius the Mad

Sylvius the Mad
  • Members
  • 24 106 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@Auintus: Yes it does. If the vast majority of mages turn a blind eye to the actions of their fellows who run around terrorizing the countryside - then they are guilty by association.

This is a basic reality taught to children - if your friend is a troublemaker, you will get in trouble right along with him. It is not relevant whether or not you did the deed - you were present and did nothing to stop it.

Many children, though, are taught the opposite: Snitches get stitches.

Moreover, how parents or adults manage children is not necessarily morally correct.  If I stand by and allow something to happen, I see no reason why I should be at all culpable for that.  Since my inaction is materially identical to my not having been there at all, and since I wouldn't have been held responsible had I not been there, then there's no justification for holding me responsible simply for being nearby.

#1233
Auintus

Auintus
  • Members
  • 1 823 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@Auintus: Yes it does. If the vast majority of mages turn a blind eye to the actions of their fellows who run around terrorizing the countryside - then they are guilty by association.

This is a basic reality taught to children - if your friend is a troublemaker, you will get in trouble right along with him. It is not relevant whether or not you did the deed - you were present and did nothing to stop it.

If mages are fine with their Libertarian rebel counterparts - then they are guilty of collusion.


Most mages are not "present and did nothing to stop it." They are made guilty by right of having the same powers as maleficar. And they aren't even mages by choice. Keili was willing to become tranquil rather than be a mage.
It isn't guilty by association. It's exactly like judging everyone by their race.

#1234
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Palidane wrote...

What are you guys even arguing? How is Meredith searching the tower a big deal? She was completely justified in doing it, and Orsino denied her to cover himself.


In point of fact, what she was searching for was there. But does she cite any evidence to Orsino when trying to force the searches? If so, she was justified. If not, she might still have been justified, we just don't have proof.

Edit: Notice that a justified search is not the same as a legal search, and I have no trouble believing either way that searches without evidence are legal or illegal under the Circle system.


She doens't have to cite evidence to Orsino (and for all we know she already has) - we KNOW she was justified because we saw all the connections between the Circle and blood mages.
Meredith can also put 2+2 together and so can other templars.

Mages running form the circle are using blood magic (where did they learn it if not in the Circle?). Mage underground has connections to the Circle. More than enough to search.

Hell, given the danger blood mages present, Meredith would have been justified even if she anal probed each and every mage.


So, she doesn't cite evidence to Orsino on-screen, apparently. Does she cite evidence to Hawke? One would think she'd try to cite evidence to him/her, seeing as either she or Orsino is trying to appeal to him/her for help.

As for putting two and two together, that's not evidence. The system under Thedas might accept that as evidence, I don't know. But the fact remains that it's not.

And regardless of that argument, how is anal probing justified? I can't think of any evidence of blood magic that can be hidden there.

#1235
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 914 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

Personally - while I won't side with mages or templars if the option is there - if I had to choose between those two groups, I would like them to force templars.

Dragon Age's mages are unique - if they are free (and their imprisonment outside of the Kirkwall Circle is wildly over-exaggerated) - they become boorishly common fantasy wizards.


This is a good point, except for the one where their imprisonment is wildly over-exaggerated outside of Kirkwall. Apparently, the same type of stuff goes on in other Circles, depending on whether or not the Knight-Commander is a tyrant or not. Kirkwall was just the worst, and the first to explode. If the harshness of the conditions is exaggerated, it is not exaggerated wildly. (Or at least, not all the time. I haven't seen all the posts here, some of them might be completely insane.)

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 03 décembre 2012 - 11:32 .


#1236
Todd23

Todd23
  • Members
  • 2 042 messages

TCBC_Freak wrote...

Todd23 wrote...

I'm fighting for the mages side full throttle. After all those who stand against us are crushed. I'll deal with the evil ones in are ranks.


Replace mage with Templar in your post and your stance is the same as what you claim makes the Templar evil bigots who all deserve to die... that, "They are corrupt and led by bad guys and the average Templar does nothing." Is this lost on every one but me?

I'm going to have to admit. I'm glad for the corruption in the templar's ranks. It makes us more right for fighting for are freedom.

#1237
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Arguable. Once a Circle Mage leaves without Chantry/Templar/Circle Mage approval, he's an apostate until such time as he's brought back -- wherein he becomes a Circle Mage again.

That severs his involvement to the Circle.

Even Cullen notes that the Mage Underground consists of apostates and civilians working together. The only way you have evidence of the Mage Underground having ties to the Circle is if they left evidence talking about it -- like "our agent in Kirkwall's Gallows helped us with Mission 54X-D".

Though if they said "agent", Templars would also have to be possibly considered.

Some implies multiple. That's not the case. It was only one, and I fervently believe that he was an unwitting accomplice in crimes most foul and when he did catch on about Quentin's true nature came to deeply regret his actions -- but could do nothing against Quentin in the sense of telling the Templars without simultaneously bringing ruin down upon the Circle due to the malevolent nature of Meredith's Templars -- who are noted to be, in-game, zealots and abusive of their authority.

Not just Alrik or Karras. Meredith actually promotes those with extreme views on Mages. Cullen, Mettin, etc.

And Kirkwall's suffered from blood mages for its entire existence. Meredith's predecessor never persecuted the Circle -- as you hear from Mages and Templars that before Meredith, the Circle was a different and more orderly place.

When you pursue monsters so much you're creating them, that makes you at fault. You can't push people into desperation by abusing them, torturing them, starving them, etc. and use their acts of fighting back as justification to perform more abuse, torture, starvation, etc.

And we know those things do in fact happen in Kirkwall's Circle.

Negotiation. Not acting hostile. If she had been consistently pleading for Orsino to help, then maybe I could see her viewpoint.

If she had said "Orsino, with the high rise of blood mages I would like to perform a search of the Circle, with your consent. I realize this is a violation of the Mages' privacy, but I implore you to grant me this."

Meredith had ample opportunities in the past to approach Orsino in a diplomatic fashion and desire to bring Kirkwall's Circle peace -- like the Best Served Cold arc, where she knew more then Orsino did.

Even Orsino was not unwilling to go to the Templars about that, but he wanted to know for certain who was involved so that not all Mages would be targeted. Meredith however didn't want to approach Orsino for assistance.

He even tells Hawke that if sinister acts are performed, he should interfere.

Yet she enacted anti-mage measures in the Circle since her ascent to Knight-Commander -- when it's the First Enchanter who guides the Circle and she's supposed to work with Orsino on all matters -- that caused more discontent, and then used that to justify further anti-Mage measures.

She actively breeded a Circle of malevolence. More so when she began telling her zealotous templars -- the ones she picked herself -- to "purge" mage sympathizers, as the third person omniscient journal tells us.

If you're ignoring all other methods of discourse to achieve a goal, then saying "Intimidation was my only option" is a falsehood plain and simple.


I assumed that the evidence was such a note.  Or notes.  And just because a mage is an apostate from the Circle does not mean that they have lost all of their contacts in the Circle.  Is the Lyrium smuggler from DA:O not evidence that, in spite of a Templar's best efforts (and I suppose Uldred, by that matter, for being able to formulate a plan with Loghain), there are ways inside the Circle?   And if the apostate was working with the group of mages, and returned to the Circle, should he not be found out and punished?  Or if he had never left and worked from the inside as a Circle Mage, should he not be found out and punished?

And yes, the Templar should be considered.  However, Meredith does not need permission to search them (or should not), considering she's their commander. 

Alright, we'll assume it's one (but if it is his policy that he should hide any connection with wrongdoer mages and the Circle, well, just look at all the dead Mages at Hawke's feeet).   But regardless, the Circle is corrupted.

Cut Cullen a break, I don't care for him, but I doubt anyone could walk away from what he experienced and still have his initial attitude towards Mages.

Was it?  Well, it didn't have Orsino at the head either.  :mellow:

Wait, so now we're taking what the journal and codexes say to hold truth?  Regardless, by that time, I think Meredith was beyond any form of sense. 

#1238
d4eaming

d4eaming
  • Members
  • 982 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@Auintus: Yes it does. If the vast majority of mages turn a blind eye to the actions of their fellows who run around terrorizing the countryside - then they are guilty by association.

This is a basic reality taught to children - if your friend is a troublemaker, you will get in trouble right along with him. It is not relevant whether or not you did the deed - you were present and did nothing to stop it.

If mages are fine with their Libertarian rebel counterparts - then they are guilty of collusion.


Uhhhh.. Sorry? /Fenris

Im part of a religious minority. I am certainly not guilty by association when one of our clergy was accused of a crime (and subsequently found not guilty). These mages are a member of a defined group, but they are not one big Borg-like hivemind. Some of them will agree and some won't. They are not guilty just by being mages when the person who is actually guilty just happens to also be a mage.

And not all people who were present and did nothing are guilty of collusion, if they have reasonable fear for their own well-being in turning against the guilt party. My mage Hawke will have no problem smacking down Anders- because he himself is poweful, brave, and has an array of freakishly strong friends to back him up. Random_mage_girl_19 does not have the same luxuries, but will be condemned anyway?

Modifié par d4eaming, 04 décembre 2012 - 04:55 .


#1239
TCBC_Freak

TCBC_Freak
  • Members
  • 743 messages
Let me post this again, cause either it got buried or y'all ignored it, lol

The legality of what Meredith did is irrelevant. Meredith was driven mad by a magic sword she got to help her do her job; she didn't know it would make her lose it but it did. It took someone who was maybe a little too zealous but otherwise decent and made them a mad fanatic. She did what she did because of the sword, she wasn't evil before going crazy, and her being a Templar had nothing to do with what she did. The sword made her paranoid and a functioning psychotic. Her being a Templar, and thus addicted to lyrium, is probably the only reason she was functioning at all and able to have somewhat rational conversations and stayed her hand as long as she did; unlike Bertrand who was exposed to less of the red lyrium and for a shorter time but lost all his faculties.

This isn't directed at any one post specifically just something I think needs to be noted. Meredith is still at fault for her action since she bought the sword to help her hunt mages and her underlying personality was what got pushed to its limits. But right and wrong, law and order, and her limits of power had little to do with what she ultimately did so arguing over the legality of her actions is foolish because she was becoming more and more unstable and would have gone bats**t crazy soon enough anyway.

d4eaming wrote...

Uhhhh.. Sorry? /Fenris

Im part of a religious minority. I am certainly not guilty by association when one of our clergy was accused of a crime (and subsequently found not guilty). These mages are a member of a defined group, but they are not one big Borg-like hivemind. Some of them will agree and some won't. They are not guilty just by being mages when the person who is actually guilty just happens to also be a mage.

And not all people who were present and did nothing are guilty of collusion, if they have reasonable fear for their own well-being in turning against the guilt party. My mage Hawke will have no problem smacking down Anders- because he himself is poweful, brave, and has an array of freakishly strong friends to back him up. Random_mage_girl_19 does not have the same luxuries, but will be condemned anyway?


And yet all Templar should die and their order should be dissolved because some are bigots and the average Templar didn't try and stop Meredith? I just love hypocrisy.

Note: I'm not talking you, d4eaming, specifically; just this idea has come up before. Not all mages are guilty when some mages go bad, but all Templar are guilty when ONE Templar (Meredith) goes bad.

#1240
DarkSpiral

DarkSpiral
  • Members
  • 1 944 messages

TCBC_Freak wrote...

Let me post this again, cause either it got buried or y'all ignored it, lol

The legality of what Meredith did is irrelevant. Meredith was driven mad by a magic sword she got to help her do her job; she didn't know it would make her lose it but it did. It took someone who was maybe a little too zealous but otherwise decent and made them a mad fanatic. She did what she did because of the sword, she wasn't evil before going crazy, and her being a Templar had nothing to do with what she did. The sword made her paranoid and a functioning psychotic. Her being a Templar, and thus addicted to lyrium, is probably the only reason she was functioning at all and able to have somewhat rational conversations and stayed her hand as long as she did; unlike Bertrand who was exposed to less of the red lyrium and for a shorter time but lost all his faculties.

This isn't directed at any one post specifically just something I think needs to be noted. Meredith is still at fault for her action since she bought the sword to help her hunt mages and her underlying personality was what got pushed to its limits. But right and wrong, law and order, and her limits of power had little to do with what she ultimately did so arguing over the legality of her actions is foolish because she was becoming more and more unstable and would have gone bats**t crazy soon enough anyway.


"Soon enough?" :D

We actually watch it happen.  The look on her face when Cullen defies her order to kill Hawke?  Her sudden and violent accusations towards every Templar in the area about being corrupted by blood magic?

Oh yeah.  Crazy.

#1241
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages
[quote]Lord Aesir wrote...

Are you really arguing that Meredith is a rational decision maker?  Either she was just looking for an excuse to annul the Circle or she genuinely believed that ridiculous excuse she gave for doing so.  Her feelings towards the dangers of mages go beyond reasonable paranoia.[/quote]

1) Sometimes. Even tough she had the idol for years, she is still capable or making sound decisions. Her decisions to search the circle is 100% rational.

2) What redicolous excuse? You admited yourself there were blood mages in the Circle.

3) Nope, they don't. Meredith doesn't hate mages, but she does take her duty way too seriously (idol).


[quote]
If this were someone level headed, I might agree.  Meredith, however, would take any evidence, no matter how flimsy, and use it to justify making mages tranquil or death anyway.  [/quot]

And this BS excuse can be used agaisnt anyone. "I don't trust you, therefore no search".
Since trust cannot be proven, you can always use it. ALWAYS.

You are basicly predicting. How do you know what Meredith WILL do? You don't.
By projecting the worst-case-scenario you are only making matters worse.

You are denying a reasonable action, provide NO ALTERNATIVE and then take a high stance? :?

#1242
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

d4eaming wrote...
Im part of a religious minority. I am certainly not guilty by association when one of our clergy was accused of a crime (and subsequently found not guilty). These mages are a member of a defined group, but they are not one big Borg-like hivemind. Some of them will agree and some won't. They are not guilty just by being mages when the person who is actually guilty just happens to also be a mage.

And not all people who were present and did nothing are guilty of collusion, if they have reasonable fear for their own well-being in turning against the guilt party. My mage Hawke will have no problem smacking down Anders- because he himself is poweful, brave, and has an array of freakishly strong friends to back him up. Random_mage_girl_19 does not have the same luxuries, but will be condemned anyway?


A tower search is not punishment - it's part of an investigation.

Think about it. You got many mages in one area. A large part of them practice blood magic (as evident by almsotevery mage escaping the Circle using it). There are connection ebtween them and underground movment full of blood mages. There are even letters implicating the first Enchanter (I don't think Meredith knows this, but she does about the toher two).

How is that not enough cause for a search?
How would you find those blood mages within the Cirlce?

Meredith said it best - if you cannot offer an alternative, do not brand her a tyrant for a room search.

#1243
Palidane

Palidane
  • Members
  • 836 messages
Seriously guys? People are dying because of all these maleficars, and you think its a miscarriage of justice for them to search your room? The Templars don't care about your porn stash, they are looking for tomes of forbidden knowledge. Somebody is teaching these mages blood magic, and it's someone in the circle. The only reason you'd turn down a simple search in such a dire time is if you were hiding something.

Kinda like Orsino...

#1244
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

And just because a mage is an apostate from the Circle does not mean that they have lost all of their contacts in the Circle.


Of course. But I meant that once a Mage becomes an apostate, he's no longer tied to the Circle by his own being. If he still holds contacts in the Circle and is talking with them, that's another thing.

I assumed that the evidence was such a note. Or notes.


There isn't anything implicating the Mage Underground as still having connections in the Circle. By Act 3, the remnants' priority is getting those that are already apostates out of Kirkwall, as they no longer have the leadership or manpower necessary to coordinate efforts into the Gallows to rescue more Mages.

Cut Cullen a break, I don't care for him, but I doubt anyone could walk away from what he experienced and still have his initial attitude towards Mages.


I'm not chastising him. I'm simply saying he does have an extreme view towards Mages during DAII -- which even the game cites as true, as it's the reason Meredith made him Knight-Captain. His views and experiences mirrored her own. Among Kirkwall's Templars, he's a moderate.

Outside, however, he's an extremist.

Hopefully, since he's seen the absolute worst of both sides along with the weight of a couple thousand of Mages' lives -- men, women, and children -- being slaughtered for a crime they had nothing to do with on his conscience, he'll be a more ideal form of a Templar.

Someone who knows what they have to do, but tries to get along with the Mages, help them, and knows where "Vigilance" enters the stages of "Oppression".

Wait, so now we're taking what the journal and codexes say to hold truth?


The journal is explicitly written in a third person omniscient viewpoint, saying "You have been tasked with killing Meredith's deathsquad, consisting of Templar zealots she hand-picked to "purge" Mage-sympathizers".

When it says "You have done X/You're going to do X", that's completely different from it saying "I just did X".

Also, I never talked about the codexes in that post.

Was it? Well, it didn't have Orsino at the head either.


Meredith took control of the Circle in 9:21 Dragon unofficially -- officially, it was in 9:23 Dragon.

We learn that Orsino took the role of First Enchanter as early as 9:26 Dragon -- but possibly earlier, and he may have even been First Enchanter during Guylian's term -- and that when Meredith took charge she immediately began instituting anti-Mage policies.

It's clear that Orsino was never the problem -- more so when one reads the Staff of Violation codex, which paints him in being of a similar viewpoint as the first Mage to hold the First Enchanter title for the Gallows.

He even remarks that the lesson of the staff -- that the Mages and Templars should work together for the betterment of both sides -- is often forgotten and people dwell on its form, to his lament. And based on its introduction, it may have been a note to Quentin given the 'Old Friend' moniker. 

So if he's talking about how Casimira had to fight the Templars who were one step away from calling for the RoA/Tranquility on the Mages and how he wishes the lesson of Mages and Templars working together was remembered more then the form of the staff... then Orsino is not the "villain" he's often branded as. 

Meredith took control of her rank before Orsino ever did, from what we know, and began causing problems immediately. Kirkwall's Circle was fine before her.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 05 décembre 2012 - 04:24 .


#1245
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages
Wait, there is no evidence? Then what's the point? :/

#1246
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages

BlueMagitek wrote...

Wait, there is no evidence? Then what's the point? :/


Of Meredith calling for a search? She just wants an excuse to get the RoA granted to her. So long as Elthina was refusing, she was stuck trying to find something that would convince Elthina -- no matter what methods she needed to employ. Be it a search with no reasons to justify it, or appealing to the Divine, or whatever.

A search is a fine thing and one I'll back, provided the Templar suggesting it is of a mindset similar to Cullen or Gregoir and they're doing it for the right reasons, not so they can kill the Mages. Provided they make a good case for why they must do so and try to negotiate with the First Enchanter on why they must do so.

And when the RoA begins, Meredith is eager to kill the Mages and glad she's doing so, even right after she called for it.

With the events of Best Served Cold, the rebellion that was spearheaded by Thrask was put to rest. The Mages and Templars were interrogated, confined, and for the latter suspended without pay for their (justified) actions -- those being that they sought only an end to Meredith and her like-minded cronies, but wanted the Circle to remain.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 05 décembre 2012 - 04:32 .


#1247
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
The CIrcle of Kirkwall was not "fine" before Meredith. It has always, for as long as it has existed, had a higher than usual amount of failed Harrowings, and the entire area around Kirkwall has been plagued by Blood Mages for much longer than Meredith has even been alive. So no, the Gallows weren't "fine" before Meredith...

Also, there has been Mage Undergroun connections within the Circle as early as Act 1, and there is no reason to believe that they had been rooted out yet by Act 3, so Meredith, after having dealt with the apostate part of the underground, was fully justified in finally purging those rebels from the Circle.

Modifié par EmperorSahlertz, 05 décembre 2012 - 04:33 .


#1248
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 987 messages
Fine in the sense that, while having a higher percentage of Blood Mages then elsewhere, the Templars and Mages were working together.

We have both Mages and Templars in-game telling us that before Meredith the Circle was better run.

#1249
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages
There are also Mages and Templars telling us in-game that it is not as bad as some try to make it out to be....

#1250
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Of Meredith calling for a search? She just wants an excuse to get the RoA granted to her. So long as Elthina was refusing, she was stuck trying to find something that would convince Elthina -- no matter what methods she needed to employ. Be it a search with no reasons to justify it, or appealing to the Divine, or whatever.

A search is a fine thing and one I'll back, provided the Templar suggesting it is of a mindset similar to Cullen or Gregoir and they're doing it for the right reasons, not so they can kill the Mages. Provided they make a good case for why they must do so and try to negotiate with the First Enchanter on why they must do so.

And when the RoA begins, Meredith is eager to kill the Mages and glad she's doing so, even right after she called for it.

With the events of Best Served Cold, the rebellion that was spearheaded by Thrask was put to rest. The Mages and Templars were interrogated, confined, and for the latter suspended without pay for their (justified) actions -- those being that they sought only an end to Meredith and her like-minded cronies, but wanted the Circle to remain.


I was informed there was evidence linking the two.  If there is not, then while a search should not be out of the ordinary for the Kirkwall Circle, it really doesn't matter.

Meredith is also completely insane at that point.