300 réponses à ce sujet

[Broganisity]

Rebel_Raven wrote...

Husks get super shrivelled when huskified so they all look generally the same. Male husk dongs are there, they're just so small no one has a screen with enough resolution to see them.

Only the geth can see them, but they don't care because...well, Geth.

[vivanto]

Because the texture artists were naughty but the modellers weren't.

Damn, I almost managed to not post here.

[MIA115]

Rebel_Raven wrote...

Husks get super shrivelled when huskified so they all look generally the same. Male husk dongs are there, they're just so small no one has a screen with enough resolution to see them.

You just made the horror that is huskification so much worse.

[Nissun]

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

[HiddenInWar]

What if the husks area is actually the retractable left leg, and the real husk leg is really a schlong?

[MIA115]

HiddenInWar wrote...

What if the husks area is actually the retractable left leg, and the real husk leg is really a schlong?

[Airealite]

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

[MIA115]

Airealite wrote...

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

Could it be that the Reapers found the thing and have a really sick sense of humor?

[KalilKareem]

The bigger question is what happens to all the human females that the reapers take? I wonder....

[Airealite]

MIA115 wrote...

Airealite wrote...

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

Could it be that the Reapers found the thing and have a really sick sense of humor?

I'm not sure what you mean, since I didn't click that link. But if this thread is gonna start going the way of "men get special treatment versus women get special treatment", I'm outta here

[himohillo]

KalilKareem wrote...

The bigger question is what happens to all the human females that the reapers take? I wonder....

I'm sure that is a question you don't want an answer for.

Think about it for a second. Human female. Giant squids.

[doozerdude]

KalilKareem wrote...

The bigger question is what happens to all the human females that the reapers take? I wonder....

Everyone's thinkin it, I'm just sayin'... Sammichs:wizard:

[IllusiveManJr]

It's not like many women play this game anyway. Why give in to the extreme minority?

[Nissun]

MIA115 wrote...

Airealite wrote...

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

Could it be that the Reapers found the thing and have a really sick sense of humor?

This is my headcanon now.

Airealite wrote...

I'm not sure what you mean, since I didn't click that link. But if this thread is gonna start going the way of "men get special treatment versus women get special treatment", I'm outta here

So that would get you out of here, but all the talk about banshee and husk parts hasn't? 

[Ziegrif]

MIA115 wrote...

Airealite wrote...

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

Could it be that the Reapers found the thing and have a really sick sense of humor?

Sick sense of humour?
I already found the ''turning your enemy into zombies and letting them loose on their own kind'' a very good and hilarious strategy. I'd do it.

Also a sculpture of a hermaphrodite (don't remember the pieces name) had feminine features and a mans genitals showing with clear sign of breasts.

Femininity was more illustrated with curves and shapes, breasts etc. The slit wasn't there usually if not at all. I always thought it was due to the slit being intricate and they just saved time. But weyhey! I dunno completely what went on in artists heads way back when.

Modifié par Ziegrif, 18 novembre 2012 - 10:31 .

[Airealite]

[quote]Airealite wrote...

I'm not sure what you mean, since I didn't click that link. But if this thread is gonna start going the way of "men get special treatment versus women get special treatment", I'm outta here[/quote]

So that would get you out of here, but all the talk about banshee and husk parts hasn't? 

[/quote]

Hey, I like a good laugh as much as anyone else

[Amftron]

GallowsPole wrote...

BW doesn't censor. I play naked all the time.

10/10.  Let's bang !

[doozerdude]

theillusiveman11 wrote...

It's not like many women play this game anyway. Why give in to the extreme minority?

Oh gawd not this...

[Ledgend1221]

I'm not sure what to believe now.

[doozerdude]

Ziegrif wrote...

 But weyhey! I dunno completely what went on in artists heads way back when.

We would not know, and there is not enough time to explain...

[MIA115]

Airealite wrote...

MIA115 wrote...

Airealite wrote...

Nissun wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Sinophile wrote...

Generally speaking, female nudity is more common than male nudity in western culture. Case in point, compare the number of nude paintings of women to the number of nude paintings of men.

Yes, true, but how often to you see a painting of nude women with men wearing magical flesh bikinis?

Also, if you're looking at classical art, you'll find that they actually censored the female genitals instead of the males. Think about it: when was the last time you saw a Venus with a clearly visible slit? And now think about the male nudes: no matter how small the size, their genitals are there, in all pure detail.

It's not a matter of who got the most nudes, it's about how said nudes were portrayed.

Also, for a more modern example of this censorship bias, look at the famous engraving on the Pioneer.

Oh, let's not go there. Let's not go there...

Could it be that the Reapers found the thing and have a really sick sense of humor?

I'm not sure what you mean, since I didn't click that link. But if this thread is gonna start going the way of "men get special treatment versus women get special treatment", I'm outta here

I was talking about the Pioneer Plaque. Click the link.

himohillo wrote...

KalilKareem wrote...

The bigger question is what happens to all the human females that the reapers take? I wonder....

I'm sure that is a question you don't want an answer for.

Think about it for a second. Human female. Giant squids.

It's kind of a given.

[InTheZone]

Blame the ESRB and white, Christian America. Nudity puts games over to AO. But blowing people up, stealing ****, and dealing drugs will give a game an M rating

[Airealite]

MIA115 - I was talking about the Pioneer Plaque. Click the link.



Eh...Nah. I'll pass

Modifié par Airealite, 18 novembre 2012 - 10:35 .

[Jay Leon Hart]

GuardianJosh wrote...

Heggy wrote...

Zero132132 wrote...

doozerdude wrote...

Serge_THE_GREAT wrote...

 Not sure why they gave the Banshees exposed genitals.

Zombies aren't exactly the most civilized of all beings, they don't generally care about clothing. It's unrealistic to NOT have them bare.

Yeah, that's the point of the OP; why do husks have their junk surgically removed during the huskification process?

Structural weakness.

They could solidify it to use as a spear?

I just got this image in my head... thanks 
Now I never want to be grabbed by a Husk/Abomination again...