TristanHawke wrote...
They aren't going with the same approach to narrative they did with DA2. The story won't be told from someones point of view.
Tweets from Mark Darrah
.@JamesWrightNI
-not a steampunk setting
-Still in the Dragon Age so no huge time jumps
-no gryphon riding (sorry)
-not a framed narrative
Additional tweet from Mark
@SusanneSaville
Da2 had Varric as a narrator telling the entire story (like Princess Bride) DA3 doesn't do that
---
What do you think of this? Do you prefer Framed Narrative? Happy or sad?
Good. Griffons are extinct anyway and should stay that way.
As for the framing narrative, well, it was a good idea for one game. I like Varric a lot and wouldn't be at all opposed to him making an appearance or appearances in future titles. DA II might have been more effective if Cassandra had been interviewing more than one subject; at least then we really could have really questioned the reliability of each narrator's story and been left wondering where Hawke the man (or woman) ended and where the legend began, rather than just having Cassandra calling Varric out on his BS...
But yeah, the framing narrative does not need to be a thing and I'm glad they're not making it one.
Yeah on the no steampunk thing. It's overdone and steampunk aesthetics were a lot cooler before people turned into a cosplay/ lifestyle thing.


Besides there are other off-shoots of
cyberpunk that are underutilized, such as sandalpunk, biopunk, iPunk (see Examples, by period in the TVTropes article). Not suggesting any of these need to be applied to Dragon Age, but just generally speaking.
Modifié par The Teryn of Whatever, 22 novembre 2012 - 12:43 .