Casey Hudson wants to know if we prefer a sequel or a prequel.
#1
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 01:49
I already tweeted him that i want to see a sequel. Push the series forward, where there's more legroom to expand the universe and it's lore. I want to see new races join galactic civilation, technology that's advanced even further, new characters, etc.
#2
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 01:59
#3
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:07
A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.
And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.
#4
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:09
#5
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:10
#6
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:10
Not a fan of prequels at all. Especially since you already know whats going to happen before you finish the game.
Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:13 .
#7
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:11
Steelcan wrote...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.
And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.
I would argue canonizing an ending would not create a ****storm the size of what we saw with the ending. Unless maybe they choose Synthesis as canon. But you can find ways to work around the endings without canonizing any of them.
#8
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:13
I highly doubt that. First of all you have the very obvious problem of whether the Reapers are around or not. But on top of that you have the fates of the Krogan, Quarians, Rachni, and Geth to consider. And maybe the Hanar/Drell.Mdoggy1214 wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.
And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.
I would argue canonizing an ending would not create a ****storm the size of what we saw with the ending. Unless maybe they choose Synthesis as canon. But you can find ways to work around the endings without canonizing any of them.
And if BioWare canonizes an ending they will canonize Synthesis.
#9
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:13
Steelcan wrote...
I highly doubt that. First of all you have the very obvious problem of whether the Reapers are around or not. But on top of that you have the fates of the Krogan, Quarians, Rachni, and Geth to consider. And maybe the Hanar/Drell.
And if BioWare canonizes an ending they will canonize Synthesis.
They wouldn't canonize Synthesis. I say this with utmost confidence. Synthesis ending is "too perfect" there's little room for conflict.
They would most likely canonize destroy.
Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:15 .
#10
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:14
#11
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:15
#12
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:16
#13
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:17
#14
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:17
Steelcan wrote...
They are going to canonize Synthesis.
Think.
Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of compelling video game story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, everything is utopic, and there is presumably no conflict.
It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesis
iakus wrote...
I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.
I support this. .
Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:19 .
#15
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:17
#16
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:18
ImperatorMortis wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
They are going to canonize Synthesis.
Think.
Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic.
It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesisiakus wrote...
I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.
I support this. .
It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason
#17
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:20
Steelcan wrote...
ImperatorMortis wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
They are going to canonize Synthesis.
Think.
Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic.
It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesisiakus wrote...
I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.
I support this. .
It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason
If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me.
Its not gonna happen.
Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species.
Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:21 .
#18
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:24
Modifié par fiendishchicken, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:24 .
#19
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:25
fiendishchicken wrote...
I want them to keep Shepard for one. So long as they show Shepard, Miranda, and the Normandy (and dead Reapers).
If this happens I will walk into a church and prostrate myself befor the altar.
I am an atheist.
#20
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:25
fiendishchicken wrote...
I want them to keep Shepard for one. So long as they show Shepard, Miranda, and the Normandy (and dead Reapers).
Really?
You haven't had enough of Shepard at this point?
#21
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:26
Well Merizan said it would be considered canon, unreliable I know but still troubling. And if i am wrong and they either A. implement all the ending choices succesfully then I will get it. or B. Canonize DestroyImperatorMortis wrote...
If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me.
Its not gonna happen.
Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species.
#22
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:27
#23
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:29
Modifié par rallyfan, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:30 .
#24
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:29
Yep, the only thing that they've said is that Synthesis will happen sooner or later (Hate to say it, but it makes sense if this is the so called "Pinnacle of Evolution"). But this doesn't mean that the "Green ending" is canonic.ImperatorMortis wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
ImperatorMortis wrote...
Steelcan wrote...
They are going to canonize Synthesis.
Think.
Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic.
It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesisiakus wrote...
I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.
I support this. .
It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason
If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me.
Its not gonna happen.
Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species.
Of course, this also means that synthesis can be present in some form or another, but not as it's shown in the ending. Maybe it will be mentioned in the codex as a theory/proyect of a random scientist or something like that.
Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:34 .
#25
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 02:31





Retour en haut





