Aller au contenu

Photo

Casey Hudson wants to know if we prefer a sequel or a prequel.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
396 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Mathias

Mathias
  • Members
  • 4 305 messages
https://twitter.com/...668914273443840

I already tweeted him that i want to see a sequel. Push the series forward, where there's more legroom to expand the universe and it's lore. I want to see new races join galactic civilation, technology that's advanced even further, new characters, etc.

#2
Roenik

Roenik
  • Members
  • 186 messages
Seconded.

#3
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.

And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.

#4
Codebreaker819

Codebreaker819
  • Members
  • 4 670 messages
prequel

#5
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages
A story concurrent to ME3.

#6
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages
Sequel God damnit.

Not a fan of prequels at all. Especially since you already know whats going to happen before you finish the game. 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:13 .


#7
Mathias

Mathias
  • Members
  • 4 305 messages

Steelcan wrote...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.

And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.


I would argue canonizing an ending would not create a ****storm the size of what we saw with the ending. Unless maybe they choose Synthesis as canon. But you can find ways to work around the endings without canonizing any of them.

#8
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

Mdoggy1214 wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

A SEQUEL WILL CANONIZE AN ENDING. THAT CANNOT HAPPEN.

And yes I am being serious. i may be an adamant Destroy supporter but canonizing any ending would be disaster upon disaster.


I would argue canonizing an ending would not create a ****storm the size of what we saw with the ending. Unless maybe they choose Synthesis as canon. But you can find ways to work around the endings without canonizing any of them.

I highly doubt that.  First of all you have the very obvious problem of whether the Reapers are around or not.  But on top of that you have the fates of the Krogan, Quarians, Rachni, and Geth to consider.  And maybe the Hanar/Drell.

And if BioWare canonizes an ending they will canonize Synthesis.Image IPB

#9
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

Steelcan wrote...

I highly doubt that.  First of all you have the very obvious problem of whether the Reapers are around or not.  But on top of that you have the fates of the Krogan, Quarians, Rachni, and Geth to consider.  And maybe the Hanar/Drell.

And if BioWare canonizes an ending they will canonize Synthesis.Image IPB


They wouldn't canonize Synthesis. I say this with utmost confidence. Synthesis ending is "too perfect" there's little room for conflict. 

They would most likely canonize destroy. 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:15 .


#10
fiendishchicken

fiendishchicken
  • Members
  • 3 389 messages
If it's a sequel, it better have our decisions matter (for once)

#11
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages
They are going to canonize Synthesis. And it will be terrible

#12
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages
Sequel. The galaxy is left in a very interesting and precarious state post destroy ending. It's almost perfectly set up. In contrast prequels will always carry the problem with the reader/watcher/player knowing more about what is going to happen than they should. You can still tell a more intimate and less important story, but part of the mystery and surprise is always missing.

#13
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 285 messages
I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.

#14
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

Steelcan wrote...

They are going to canonize Synthesis.



Think. 

Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of  compelling video game story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, everything is utopic, and there is presumably no conflict. 

It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesis

iakus wrote...

I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.


I support this. . 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:19 .


#15
ParkBom

ParkBom
  • Members
  • 3 224 messages
Prequel. I don't feel like having my ME universe canon to have Reapers in it and others don't want their ME universe canon to be without Reapers. Basically, canonizing an ending is the only way to do a sequel and that wouldn't go along well with fans.

#16
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

ImperatorMortis wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

They are going to canonize Synthesis.



Think. 

Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of  competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic. 

It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesis

iakus wrote...

I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.


I support this. . 


It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason

#17
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

Steelcan wrote...

ImperatorMortis wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

They are going to canonize Synthesis.



Think. 

Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of  competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic. 

It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesis

iakus wrote...

I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.


I support this. . 


It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason


If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me. 

Its not gonna happen. 

Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species. 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:21 .


#18
fiendishchicken

fiendishchicken
  • Members
  • 3 389 messages
I want them to keep Shepard for one. So long as they show Shepard, Miranda, and the Normandy (and dead Reapers).

Modifié par fiendishchicken, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:24 .


#19
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

fiendishchicken wrote...

I want them to keep Shepard for one. So long as they show Shepard, Miranda, and the Normandy (and dead Reapers).


If this happens I will walk into a church and prostrate myself befor the altar.

I am an atheist.

#20
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

fiendishchicken wrote...

I want them to keep Shepard for one. So long as they show Shepard, Miranda, and the Normandy (and dead Reapers).


Really? 

You haven't had enough of Shepard at this point? 

#21
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 283 messages

ImperatorMortis wrote...

If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me. 

Its not gonna happen. 

Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species. 

Well Merizan said it would be considered canon, unreliable I know but still troubling.  And if i am wrong and they either A. implement all the ending choices succesfully then I will get it. or B. Canonize Destroy

#22
Gilbert Salarian

Gilbert Salarian
  • Members
  • 84 messages
Taking the series back around the time of the First Contact War would be interesting to see. Plenty of familiar faces, conflict galore, and still the chance to come across some new species.

#23
rallyfan

rallyfan
  • Members
  • 312 messages
SEQUEL

Modifié par rallyfan, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:30 .


#24
Chala

Chala
  • Members
  • 4 147 messages

ImperatorMortis wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

ImperatorMortis wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

They are going to canonize Synthesis.



Think. 

Why would they canonize Synthesis? What kind of  competling story could you make from that? Everyone in the Galaxy is half machine, and everything is utopic. 

It makes no sense for them to choose that a starting point. Also there's the fact that most people hate Synthesis

iakus wrote...

I don't care, as long as the endings are never referred to in any future ME product.


I support this. . 


It's BioWare's chosen ending for some unfathomable reason


If they canonize a specific ending they won't choose Synthesis. Trust me. 

Its not gonna happen. 

Anyway I really really want a sequel. I want to see how the Galaxy has changed. And there is potential for the Yahg as an antagonist species. 

Yep, the only thing that they've said is that Synthesis will happen sooner or later (Hate to say it, but it makes sense if this is the so called "Pinnacle of Evolution"). But this doesn't mean that the "Green ending" is canonic.

Of course, this also means that synthesis can be present in some form  or another, but not as it's shown in the ending. Maybe it will be mentioned in the codex as a theory/proyect of a random scientist or something like that.

Modifié par El_Chala_Legalizado, 20 novembre 2012 - 02:34 .


#25
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 742 messages
Mass Effect: The Next Generation.