Article: "Why Halo 4 won't win Game of the Year." (and why games like Borderlands 2, Journey, and Mass Effect 3 will)
#1
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:02
#2
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:06
#3
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:07
Modifié par corporal doody, 20 novembre 2012 - 06:08 .
#4
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:08
dasGleamer wrote...
Article should explain why plot-hole ridden pieces of garbage shouldn't even be nominated.
This. Besides, ME3 fails horribly with it's boring firefight, horde mode, zombies knockoff.
#5
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:15
its still original Halo 4 is just another FPSTiconderoga117 wrote...
dasGleamer wrote...
Article should explain why plot-hole ridden pieces of garbage shouldn't even be nominated.
This. Besides, ME3 fails horribly with it's boring firefight, horde mode, zombies knockoff.
#6
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:16
And umm, ME3's combat far exceeded ME2's. Zombies....huh?
#7
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:18
Deadlysyns wrote...
its still original Halo 4 is just another FPS
ME3 is hardly original. Deus Ex:HR, Alpha Protocol, Fallout, etc.
#8
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:19
ME3 is more unique then FPS which are a dime a dozen now a daysTiconderoga117 wrote...
Deadlysyns wrote...
its still original Halo 4 is just another FPS
ME3 is hardly original. Deus Ex:HR, Alpha Protocol, Fallout, etc.
#9
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:19
Mcfly616 wrote...
And umm, ME3's combat far exceeded ME2's. Zombies....huh?
Not really, it's pretty much the same and I was referencing the zombies mode Black Ops has, which is much more satisfying then the boring crap ME3 multiplayer is.
#10
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:19
corporal doody wrote...
yup..he said it and i totally agree....ME3....BEST VIDEOGAME experience i have ever had....cept for the last 5-10minutes...which was fixed with the EC. a lot of people LET the pre-EC ending(s) ruin their entire ME....which is extremely sad and petty imho.
you can't retcon in your brain the immense let down and disbelief that occurred as you watch from the catalyst sequence onward
i can confidently say that almost everyone had the same experience that I did. we all stayed up for days playing the game and then sat and watched the biggest abortion of an ending ever. most of us, knowing how the previous games worked, scoured the internet going "where did i go wrong... what choices did i make to lead to this atrocity of an ending?"
it was the biggest slap in the face every delivered to a gaming community. you can't just overlook that with some piece of garbage, afterthough DLC.
#11
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:21
Deadlysyns wrote...
ME3 is more unique then FPS which are a dime a dozen now a days
Again, hardly. It's more third person shooter now, which are hardly original. Besides, ME3 could've been the most original game out there but if it's broken fundamentally at it's core (story or gamplay) then it doesn't deserve an award that says "This is how you make a good game." That will only lead to more broken games.
#12
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:23
Huh? Now that I think about it that could be a major obstacle. Not even being on the list.
It was released too late for consideration. Otherwise Halo 4 would have won hands down. As it is, my money is on AC3
#13
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:24
corporal doody wrote...
yup..he said it and i totally agree....ME3....BEST VIDEOGAME experience i have ever had....cept for the last 5-10minutes...which was fixed with the EC. a lot of people LET the pre-EC ending(s) ruin their entire ME....which is extremely sad and petty imho.
I actually think the EC is in some ways worse than the original ending, if only because it shows that Walters and Hudson never really had any artistic vision or integrity to begin with.
And it's still got all the same glaring problems the original had in how badly it breaks the narrative. About the only good thing it does for some fans is provide some emotional closure, but I honestly found its attempts to do so laughably pathetic.
#14
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:25
Modifié par liggy002, 20 novembre 2012 - 06:28 .
#15
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:25
The Story made Sense its just people who can't accept it who think it was full of plotholesTiconderoga117 wrote...
Deadlysyns wrote...
ME3 is more unique then FPS which are a dime a dozen now a days
Again, hardly. It's more third person shooter now, which are hardly original. Besides, ME3 could've been the most original game out there but if it's broken fundamentally at it's core (story or gamplay) then it doesn't deserve an award that says "This is how you make a good game." That will only lead to more broken games.
#16
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:25
It's funny, because both games impacted me on such an emotional level, that I can't think of any other games in the last few years that have brought on such feelings. The only difference is, I felt that way all the way through ME3, whereas in Halo 4 such feelings didn't really peak until the end.
My two favorite series' by far though. 2012 has been a good year to me.
#17
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:28
dasGleamer wrote...
corporal doody wrote...
yup..he said it and i totally agree....ME3....BEST VIDEOGAME experience i have ever had....cept for the last 5-10minutes...which was fixed with the EC. a lot of people LET the pre-EC ending(s) ruin their entire ME....which is extremely sad and petty imho.
you can't retcon in your brain the immense let down and disbelief that occurred as you watch from the catalyst sequence onward
i can confidently say that almost everyone had the same experience that I did. we all stayed up for days playing the game and then sat and watched the biggest abortion of an ending ever. most of us, knowing how the previous games worked, scoured the internet going "where did i go wrong... what choices did i make to lead to this atrocity of an ending?"
it was the biggest slap in the face every delivered to a gaming community. you can't just overlook that with some piece of garbage, afterthough DLC.
this.
it was almost as if they gave us a serious ****slap. the ending itself should be enough of a warning to anyone even thinking about me4. you want to play through a game and be told by the designers that its your fault you didnt get the ending, after watching the biggest pile of ..... ever to appear in gaming? thats what you got.
i find it astonishing people still defend the ending. the extended cut didnt fix the ending. it fixed the glaring errors in the bad ending. the ending is still bad. it throws away everything that made the trilogy enjoyable up to that point. mass effect 1 is made completely irrelevant.
we wanted shepard to win. instead we got 3 ways to lose. previous choices matter my bum.
#18
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:29
Deadlysyns wrote...
The Story made Sense its just people who can't accept it who think it was full of plotholes
All I ever hear from people who say this is "LA LA LA It makes sense shutup!" while everyone else says "This is why it doesn't work A, B, C, D... etc."
#19
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:30
Mcfly616 wrote...
Plotholes?
And umm, ME3's combat far exceeded ME2's. Zombies....huh?
Maybe if you like silly rolls, easy gameplay, overpowered casters, and little to no class differences anymore (plenty do)
Otherwise ME2 was superior. High difficulty, no stupid space ninjas, stronger rpg mechanics (class and squad matter).
Modifié par Binary_Helix 1, 20 novembre 2012 - 06:31 .
#20
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:31
umm its too late for the Spike VGA's.(which are pretty much illegitimate) But it will certainly be nominated by every other major publication out there. They don't release their results in late January usually. Just for reference, Skyrim came out on 11/11/11 and won 2011 game of the year. Halo 4 came out 11/6/12. Not too late at all. Not sure where you're getting your informationld1449 wrote...
how bout because it isn't nominated for game of the year???
Huh? Now that I think about it that could be a major obstacle. Not even being on the list.
It was released too late for consideration. Otherwise Halo 4 would have won hands down. As it is, my money is on AC3
#21
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:31
#22
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:34
#23
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:36
ha. So because you find ME2 more difficult, its better? Lol clunkiest controls ever. Stronger RPG mechanics?! Really? I'm sorry but I'm not even going to acknowledge this one. Ridiculous statement. Weapons pretty much all blow, no customization...I could go on about how awful the plot is or how linear and predictable the level design is, but that would go on foreverBinary_Helix 1 wrote...
Mcfly616 wrote...
Plotholes?
And umm, ME3's combat far exceeded ME2's. Zombies....huh?
Maybe if you like silly rolls, easy gameplay, overpowered casters, and little to no class differences anymore (plenty do)
Otherwise ME2 was superior. High difficulty, no stupid space ninjas, stronger rpg mechanics (class and squad matter).
#24
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:38
#25
Posté 20 novembre 2012 - 06:38
Maybe they don't care enough for your negativity to debate the topic?Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Deadlysyns wrote...
The Story made Sense its just people who can't accept it who think it was full of plotholes
All I ever hear from people who say this is "LA LA LA It makes sense shutup!" while everyone else says "This is why it doesn't work A, B, C, D... etc."





Retour en haut





