I want Mass Effect to continue but i also dont. If they are going to make a sequel they dont need to cannonize the endings.
Control - Reapers rebuild everything, Shepard is in command of the reapers, 100 or so years later, reapers go back to dark space.
Synthesis - Reapers and organics rebuild everything, Shepard dead. 100 years later green stuff wears off and reapers head back into dark space.
Destroy - Reapers are dead, Shepard is more memmorized, organics rebuild everything.
No need to cannon anything but the MAIN problem is...who's the antagonist? Thats the one thing i see from Bioware making a sequel, they need a antagonist.
For a prequel, i would be less excited and proabley more boerd. But i do prefer a sequel over a prequel. Or it can just stay the same and end off like this, that would be fine too, for me.
Edit one: I'm kinda starting to think that leaving mass effect now is the right choice and maybe coming back to it in a couple of years would good, but im 99% sure that won't happen. It's either gonna be a prequel or a sequel, which may mess everything up even more.
Modifié par SovereignX6, 21 novembre 2012 - 04:18 .





Retour en haut






