najzere wrote...
You will sandbag yourself and the team just to spite me?Tarelgeth wrote...
Perhaps, but you can be certain that you won't be a priority revive.
Haha, that was a massively conceited thing to post.
najzere wrote...
You will sandbag yourself and the team just to spite me?Tarelgeth wrote...
Perhaps, but you can be certain that you won't be a priority revive.
Modifié par IndigoVitare, 21 novembre 2012 - 11:11 .
najzere wrote...
Yeah I agree, in-game consumables are a must. I will actually buy some JEPs if I get too low on those.
Modifié par Charaxan, 21 novembre 2012 - 11:22 .
Flies_by_Handles wrote...
No it's not......... It sounds like you've set an unrealistic standard for the general gaming populace. I've had games against the Collectors on Gold where everyone was at around that mark, score wise. Beats me why this happens, but calling someone subpar is absurd. That score sounds fine to me.
~~~
To answer the question, yes you should feel bad. No consummable equipment whatsoever sets off red flags in my book. It shows a lack of commitment to the match and indicates that the player is also out of medigels and rockets.
najzere wrote...
I've never been in a game where everyone was over 100K, so I guess my Gold PUGs are different than yours. In my experience 80K is about par, meaning whoever is in second or third is usually around there.
Flies_by_Handles wrote...
Right? Statements like this have me convinced that a small portion of players are out of touch with the general ME3 population. I would think 60,000 to 80,000 would be an average range but even then, that doesn't account for game time, amount of deaths, and the skill level of the other players and their play style.
MuKen wrote...
That is still, averaged over the long run, irrelevant. You get X consumables per match, then you should be using X consumables per match on average. If some portion of those are 'undesirables', then that just means that portion of those you use are not that great, but why should that keep you from using them? You'll just keep that slot empty in some matches, despite that you have an ever growing pile of some "crap" consumable you refuse to ever use?
If you are not using consumables when the other players are, you are hoarding at their expense.
Modifié par iOnlySignIn, 21 novembre 2012 - 11:45 .
I may have to reevaluate what I consider a fair contribution then, as far as points go. I'll start paying better attention to how many points we're earning at the end of matches.megabeast37215 wrote...
najzere wrote...
I've never been in a game where everyone was over 100K, so I guess my Gold PUGs are different than yours. In my experience 80K is about par, meaning whoever is in second or third is usually around there.
I am being 100% honest when I say that 100k+ per person is the norm in my games. Usually 100k-160k per person.
Didn't they buff the XP values on Gold/Plat last week anyway? Even more reason 80k doesn't cut it.
Bolo Xia wrote...
najzere wrote...
So 485 challenge points with Harrier I but using consumables sounds like an awesome player that will provide you with a smooth match? LOLLePetitRobo wrote...
If I'm in a Gold lobby with friends and you drop in showing your 485 challenge points, rocking your Piranha V or Harrier I, and ready up with no consumables - our assumption is not going to be "hey, this guy looks like an awesome player, we're guaranteed a smooth match here".
maybe not smooth, but the player is risking their equipment, which in turn mean they will most likely care more about winning than those without.
a player without could rage quit at any givin time knowing that they will lose nothing, whereas the player with equipment will most likely not want to waste it.
so i agree that i would rather take the player with equipment, just based on the idea that he will "care" more about winning in my opinion.
Guest_Flies_by_Handles_*
megabeast37215 wrote...
Flies_by_Handles wrote...
No it's not......... It sounds like you've set an unrealistic standard for the general gaming populace. I've had games against the Collectors on Gold where everyone was at around that mark, score wise. Beats me why this happens, but calling someone subpar is absurd. That score sounds fine to me.
~~~
To answer the question, yes you should feel bad. No consummable equipment whatsoever sets off red flags in my book. It shows a lack of commitment to the match and indicates that the player is also out of medigels and rockets.
Collectors is a fair point... their XP values don't make sense.
Every faction except Collectors gives 450k-550k in U/U/G... except them. So by that definition, if someone got 80k in a game with 450-550k xp... they didn't pull their own weight... in fact they didn't even pull 20% of the total score.
najzere wrote...
No argument there, I don't expect my teammates to be able to accurately gauge my commitment in the lobby for our first match.
Flies_by_Handles wrote...
There are a lot of factors that contribute to score and the game isn't always fair or even logical in how it doles out points. Someone can still contribute to the team with an average score. Claiming that 80,000 is sub par is an exagerration and doesn't take into account different play styles and team compatability.
Me thinks you need to get your head out your @ss and stop using your "stud" friends (who comprise a very tiny slice of the ME3 playerbase) as examples of how everyone else should play. Right now you sound like an unreasonable snob who thinks a bit too highly of his gameplay. I'm not sure if you're just joking but if not, I'd have very little interest in playing in any games with you again no matter how often I might have topped your score and held my own. Cheers~
I think our PUGs are just very different, maybe because we're on different systems or we play at different times or something. I never see people quit out of matches, Collectors or not.megabeast37215 wrote...
najzere wrote...
No argument there, I don't expect my teammates to be able to accurately gauge my commitment in the lobby for our first match.
The trend tends to be... they are fine until wave 8... that's when it really hits the fan and they'd rather bleed out than help.
Also... I would say OVER HALF OF PUGS will quit a Gold lobby, if we draw Collectors. That's the other reason I demand equipment from randoms in my games... so they won't quit if we get Collectors.
When they see Collectors... it's like roaches fleeing when you turn a light on...
I keep reading all this crap about "Herp a derp... I HAVE TO ONLY BUY PSPs B/C OF DA RARE CARDS!" This couldn't be further from the truth.
The best value is easily two spectre packs for 120k. You get 10 total rockets/gels/etc. and 6 level 3 consumables... in addition to your precious rare cards. Getting all those level 3 gears for a measly extra 21k... it beyond worth it. The level 3 gear will ensure every match is a future victory. It will also ensure FASTER victory, so you can get 3 Gold games per hour instead of 2... which leads to more credits anyway.
When you buy a PSP... you get 2 level 3 gears... if you don't get a character card. Such a poor value IMO....
Also.. you tend to get more URs when you buy multiple packs.
najzere wrote...
Also my Gold games don't seem any slower than when I used equipment, they've always been anywhere from 25–30 minutes for me.
Modifié par MuKen, 22 novembre 2012 - 12:25 .
najzere wrote...
I think our PUGs are just very different, maybe because we're on different systems or we play at different times or something. I never see people quit out of matches, Collectors or not.
Also my Gold games don't seem any slower than when I used equipment, they've always been anywhere from 25–30 minutes for me. Lastly, the two-SP buying strategy sounds good if you use equipment, but if you don't it comes down to 49,500 credits per rare card versus 60,000 credits per rare card. Also PSPs are supposed to have an increased chance of URs.
Guest_Flies_by_Handles_*
megabeast37215 wrote...
You're right... there are alot of factors that affect score... like medals. If you're getting a bunch of kills, you get alot of medals.. which stack up the XP. Also.. using shield gear increases survivability, which gets Waves Survived medals. Using rockets for killstreaks instead of saving them for "Ohh ****" moments, gets medals which increases XP (and makes the games go by faster, increasing credits per hour). 80,000 is only an exaggeration if map and/or faction have been selected. In an U/U game.. I stand by what I said. Like I said before... you're too easy on them. Your standards are too low IMO.
Why shouldn't I use the best of the best as an example of how people should play? What should we be doing differently? Explain please.
You did top me once... can't deny it. You're just way nicer than me Sue... you tolerate alot more BS than I care to put up with. I cannot stand inefficiency, other players slacking off, people leeching by not using gear, and generally... them placing unfair burdens on others. I won't tolerate it... and I'm not afraid to say so. If I die... and someone has to clutch... I apologize to that person for my poor play putting them in that situation.
I've met 2 people who insisted on not using equipment who were good enough to back it up (top score). Those people were Godless_Paladin and my friend Abbadon. I know they exist... but they are the exception.
Modifié par Flies_by_Handles, 22 novembre 2012 - 12:23 .
MuKen wrote...
Of course not, because you're only thinking of the direct value to you of using equipment. This is exactly why people say not using equipment is a selfish act.
You use equipment, it shaves a couple minutes off the match. You only saved a couple minutes, so you think "Hey, that didn't do much. For me." You're not counting the fact that it also shaved a couple minutes off player 2's match, a couple minutes off player 3's match, and a couple minutes off player 4's match. Overall time saved per player is very good. And if you all do it, you all give each other that time savings, it adds up, what would have been a normal match for all of you is now closer to a 20 min match because you are all using equipment. And you all get more credits per time in the long run.
But if the other three use equipment and you don't, you saved maybe 5 minutes due to their expenditure, and gave nothing back to them.
Flies_by_Handles wrote...
No, Mega, I have good memory. I've topped your score more than "once" whether it was with Devil or back in spring or summer when we partied up for several games with someone by the name of Les. And I mention this only because you are so caught up in achieving a certain score and using this as a basis to dismiss other players. Otherwise I wouldn't care how I placed.
As to why it's stupid to compare everyon to a tiny fraction of dedicated players; say you have a group of friends who like to play baseball. They might be decent players but would it be fair to constantly criticize them because they don't play at a professional level? Would that negate a player's one nice triple hit or nice outfield catch? You make it seem like this game is serious business. I suggest you go outside for some more spear fishing and social interaction that extends beyond internet friends jerking each other off.
As for tolerating more BS, let's just say I have one less smidgen of BS to deal with from here on. :happy: