206 réponses à ce sujet

[garrusfan1]

Deadpool9 wrote...

Lock all the writers together in a room, and do NOT let Casey and Mac sneak off together under any circumstances.

I just spit cofee all over my phone that is hilarious but it is true as well

[Loki_344]

I'd rather have 3 high quality DLC's than 8 average to poor (Arrival-esque) ones. I'd say Leviathan fit the bill of high quality and we'll see about Omega soon, but Bioware clearly has other things on their plate and a limited window for new ME3 DLC. I'd gladly take 10 great DLC's if that was possible, but if all we can get is one more that meets or exceeds the standard set by Leviathan (squad dialogue, length, multiple mission and locations) then I can live with that.

[AlanC9]

Davik Kang wrote...

AlanC9 wrote...

I honestly can't decide if I hate IT or Puzzle Theory more; I keep going back and forth. What are the odds that Bio will really screw me and canonize both of them at once?

What do you hate about IT out of interest?  The idea of tricking the player?  Or that it would ruin the game for those who like Control or Synthesis?  Or that the story didn't end?  Something else?  I am genuinely curious

I don't have a problem with the IT concept. I do have a huge problem with the game tricking the player, as opposed to the character. it is OK for the game to lie to Shepard. It is unacceptable for it to lie to me. The problem is that I see things which contradict IT that are not seen from Shepard's POV. 

I'm not especially bothered by the end choice turning out to be fake;Bio's pulled that one often enough in the past that it's a little late for me to be bothered by this sort of thing.

[AlanC9]

SwobyJ wrote...
ITer here.

Bioware doesn't need us.

If IT DLC happens, it'll be because it was always planned. Has nothing to do with 'input' - it would just be explaination and elaboration of previous lines, character development, and plot arcs.

If IT DLC doesn't happen, *shrug* and move on. Bioware won't mean as much for me anymore, but my life isn't exactly ruined.

Bioware needs fans, but not any of a particular variety except perhaps those who love storytelling.

 Thought I'm obviously not an ITer, I do support this.

[Davik Kang]

AlanC9 wrote...
I don't have a problem with the IT concept. I do have a huge problem with the game tricking the player, as opposed to the character. it is OK for the game to lie to Shepard. It is unacceptable for it to lie to me. The problem is that I see things which contradict IT that are not seen from Shepard's POV. 

I'm not especially bothered by the end choice turning out to be fake;Bio's pulled that one often enough in the past that it's a little late for me to be bothered by this sort of thing.

I guess you mean the ending slides?  Because here we are seeing things which are not seen by Shepard at all but are purely for the player's benefit?

It's a fair point.  I guess the way fiction is presented to the audience is a kind of manipulation, but maybe that's one step too far in the deceptive/confising direction.

I think it's possible that the slides do show a kind of reality in each case (so they're not just made-up imaginary lies) but that there's maybe a sinister reality lurking under one or more of them.

Also, however, some games do have endings that were never intended to happen (because they'd already pre-decided on a canon), yet those endings are still explored and presented.  Given ME3 was going to be the final chapter of Shepard's story, it seems less likely that they'd do this, but it is possible.

[corporal doody]

AlanC9 wrote...

SwobyJ wrote...
ITer here.

Bioware doesn't need us.

If IT DLC happens, it'll be because it was always planned. Has nothing to do with 'input' - it would just be explaination and elaboration of previous lines, character development, and plot arcs.

If IT DLC doesn't happen, *shrug* and move on. Bioware won't mean as much for me anymore, but my life isn't exactly ruined.

Bioware needs fans, but not any of a particular variety except perhaps those who love storytelling.

 Thought I'm obviously not an ITer, I do support this.

i concur

[Evo_9]

I would like to know how the illusive man got on the citadel at the end and happened to bump into shepard...Just....In .....Time

Modifié par Evo_9, 24 novembre 2012 - 06:44 .

[corporal doody]

Evo_9 wrote...

I would like to know how the illusive man got on the citadel at the end and happened to bump into shepard...Just....In .....Time

would be explained when they come out the Siege of the Citadel DLC that we all know is coming!

[MegaSovereign]

What's with the low rating?

[Johnthejefi24]

What is this "IT" saying every one is quoting? Does it have to do with the Shepard Indoctrination theory?

[Mcfly616]

Evo_9 wrote...

I would like to know how the illusive man got on the citadel at the end and happened to bump into shepard...Just....In .....Time

he was already on the Citadel. The Prothean VI tells you on Chronos Station that The Illusive Man has "fled to the Citadel and has informed the Reapers of your plans"

By the time he bumps into you, he is under the Reapers/Catalyst's control. The Catalyst is obviously aware that Shepard is aboard the station.

[Mcfly616]

Johnthejefi24 wrote...

What is this "IT" saying every one is quoting? Does it have to do with the Shepard Indoctrination theory?

yes

[Ieldra]

xsdob wrote...
Either it means the squadmates will have dialouge or there will be a massive amount of plot in it.

All of which points to it being a good thing, since voiced squadmates means confirmed squadmates for the dlc and not silent or absent squadmates, and a more story dlc is always a plus.

This is pretty good news.

I wonder if I dare get my hopes up for ME2 team member content.

[Chaotic-Fusion]

Both Weekes and Dombrow? Dare I get excited?

I really hope it turns out great. I have faith in those two.

[Killdren88]

Sounds interesting. Just don't let myself get too excited...I've already been sad once.

[Yesmar]

OMG it is Indoctrination.

[Archonsg]

Wants to be excited but can't.
Will wait and see just what is done and if it'll effect the flavor in how the game ends.

If Shepard still has to commit forced suicide, and not at least die in dignity (refusal option aside) I will probably give this, as with the other DLCs, a pass.

If however, they can rewrite so that regardless of whether I play my Renegade or Paragon, and feel properly rewarded for the path I chose, then I'll pick up the other DLCs I have not purchased thus far as well, as it'll make the replaying worthwhile. 

Would be interesting to see just where it'll lead to. Just, not going to purchase in trust.

Wait.
See.
Then decide if its worth buying to replay ME3.

Modifié par Archonsg, 24 novembre 2012 - 10:34 .

[archangel1996]

Archonsg wrote...

Wants to be excited but can't.
Will wait and see just what is done and if it'll effect the flavor in how the game ends.

If Shepard still has to commit forced suicide, and not at least die in dignity (refusal option aside) I will probably give this, as with the other DLCs, a pass.

If however, they can rewrite so that regardless of whether I play my Renegade or Paragon, and feel properly rewarded for the path I chose, then I'll pick up the other DLCs I have not purchased thus far as well, as it'll make the replaying worthwhile. 

Would be interesting to see just where it'll lead to. Just, not going to purchase in trust.

Wait.
See.
Then decide if its worth buying to replay ME3.

I think the same........remember the good old days of DA:O and ME1?

Modifié par archangel1996, 24 novembre 2012 - 10:57 .

[Veganterror]

I dare not be excited....

[Cashmoney007]

We should see how this dlc turns out then maybe start thinking about the next one.

[dead_goon]

Zenor wrote...

Maybe we might see some romances since we got all the writers.

Ide hope not, if they've gone to the trouble of pulling in all the writers for this DLC, ide hope they'd be put to better use fixing far more pressing matters than adding romance content.