If you want to keep your machine quiet go to SPCR. They review new computer parts/cases/coolingsystems in order to create a stable, quite, powerful machine. Nothing like the sound of your fans destroying immersion.Komodo120 wrote...
Flem1 if I could and if you would let me I would kiss you. My god thats a great list *keeps the list for his own needs* Thank you ever so much
PC Requirements test
#26
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:00
#27
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:36
I have found that Amazon is highly competetive in the PC component market, or any market for that matter. Sometimes they don't charge state tax, and you usually don't have to pay shipping. You may find the item cheaper on other sites like newegg, but when you factor in sales tax and shipping you end up spending more. Of course this isn't always the case, but it pays to compare a bit.flem1 wrote...
There are other vendors I'd check before TigerDirect.
I've tried to compile a list of vendors and review resources here.
Modifié par H8Cr1me, 20 octobre 2009 - 07:37 .
#28
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:36
#29
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:39
#30
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 07:55
The problem with GeForce cards is that people usually only look at the first number, nod and move on. In actuality, it is the second number that is telling of how good the card is. 9500 is actually worse than a 8700.Rivie wrote...
o_O This site is odd. It says I don't meet recommended requirements for either video card or processor.
I have a GeForce 9500 GT with 1gb of ram. It's higher than the one given in the recommended example.
My Processor is an Intel Duo, but it also has the same amount of memory as the recommended quad.
Huh? Anyone else know what's up?
#31
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 08:09
Yeah dude thats bad, somethings wrong. I have a 3.16 gig, 4g ram ( I forget if its ddr3 or 4), and a 9800GT and I'm running maxed at 40+ fps (8x AA, 16xAF, etc), however I'm running a rez made for a HDTV (1440x900) so thats about 1 million pixels less that has to be rendered than 1080p (1280x1080). However thats out of like 13 million total, so its about 9% less instensive to run, but thats the native computer monitor rez for my HDTV.H8Cr1me wrote...
I am wondering if fps in the character creator is representative of the game itself. I am running win7 64bit with an E8400 @ 3.82Ghz, 4GB RAM, and (2) GTX 260s in SLI; and I am only getting 15-17 fps in the character creator with settings maxed and 8x AA. Considering that I get 40 fps in Crysis on Enthusiast settings with no AA, this seems a little funny to me.
I noticed you are running 64bit windows 7. I use 64bit vista.
Modifié par Halfcab, 20 octobre 2009 - 08:11 .
#32
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 08:18
There is something wrong if your CC is giving you only 15ish FPS with everything turned up when you have to GTX 260s. What resolution are you running it at?H8Cr1me wrote...
I am wondering if fps in the character creator is representative of the game itself. I am running win7 64bit with an E8400 @ 3.82Ghz, 4GB RAM, and (2) GTX 260s in SLI; and I am only getting 15-17 fps in the character creator with settings maxed and 8x AA. Considering that I get 40 fps in Crysis on Enthusiast settings with no AA, this seems a little funny to me.
I get 50+ fps with everything maxed on my i7 920(not OC'd), 6 gb ddr 3 corsair ram, and an 8800GTS 640mb running at 1680x1050 on Windows 7 64bit. Maybe it is the SLI causing problems?
Modifié par Kilsot, 20 octobre 2009 - 08:19 .
#33
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 08:48
Pentium 3.2D
4Gb DDR2 RAM
GeForce 8600GT XXX Extreme Edition
Theoretically it should run on around normal, which would be fine as I am not a multi-millionaire yet.
I rate that if I can run Mirrors Edge and the Witcher on almost full I should be fine?
Will I? (Crosses fingers and begins praying)
#34
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 09:48
#35
Posté 20 octobre 2009 - 11:09
#36
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:00
I have an Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and 6GB of ram, but my graphics card is the Nvidia GeForce g100 that came with it.
I want the game to run smoothly and am hoping my computer can handle it since I won't have the resources to upgrade the card for a few months.
#37
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:12
#38
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:16
6420 dual core (2.2 ghz i think)
4 mb ram on vista
8800 gt
#39
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:39
The amount of memory the card has? The type of memory it runs (I think mine said ddr3)? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I honestly don't know what you mean when you say second number. I'd always assumed the 9500 or 8800 or 9800 or whatever was what determined how good it was, well, that plus the amount of memory in the card.Mordaedil wrote...
The problem with GeForce cards is that people usually only look at the first number, nod and move on. In actuality, it is the second number that is telling of how good the card is. 9500 is actually worse than a 8700.
I'm gonna be totally hosed if you can't go by the first number at all when you're shopping for a video card.
#40
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:45
it says i can run it but will need to run at low resolution and low detail.
AMD 9750 quadcore rated at 2.4Ghz with a gtx260 and 4GB or RAM. Surely that is wrong?
#41
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 12:51
The first digit indicates the "generation" of the card, while the second digit indicates the series (which is a rough measure of whether it's a high- or low-end card).Rivie wrote...
The amount of memory the card has? The type of memory it runs (I think mine said ddr3)? I'm not trying to be a jerk, I honestly don't know what you mean when you say second number. I'd always assumed the 9500 or 8800 or 9800 or whatever was what determined how good it was, well, that plus the amount of memory in the card.
I'm gonna be totally hosed if you can't go by the first number at all when you're shopping for a video card.
For example, a 9500 is a mid-range 9th gen card, while an 8800 is a high-end 8th gen.
#42
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 01:05
lawsie100 wrote...
![]()
it says i can run it but will need to run at low resolution and low detail.
AMD 9750 quadcore rated at 2.4Ghz with a gtx260 and 4GB or RAM. Surely that is wrong?
Yes, it is wrong. The auto-detect settings in the CC are different than those in final game, according to the devs, so I wouldn't be too worried with your sweet setup.
#43
Posté 21 octobre 2009 - 01:16





Retour en haut






