804 réponses à ce sujet

[SiIencE]

darkshadow136 wrote...

WarBaby2 wrote...

To short
To expensive
The story was ok, but presented without soul
The much hyped Nyreen, while beeing a cool character, had hardly any screen time
The environments got old pretty quick
The DLC had NO impact on the main game... hell, Aria is even sitting there in Purgatory afterwards...

In short... pitiful... I hope BW is done with ME3 after the next DLC, they keep adding insult to injury over and over.

Glad I waited for reviews of this DLC.  I shouldn't be surprised that the DLC was a letdown for most people. Bioware should learn that if you want people to spend $15.00 for a DLC it better be worth it.

I agree, but it was expected...  But i'm still surprised so many people bought it instead of waiting for someone to review it. I mean ME3 wasn't what people expected (the ending and nothing having any effect whatsoever). And first it was From Ashes.. DLC on release...? And later on stupid custom outfit packs.. "luckely" there is ME3MP else this game would've been dead long ago..

To me it looks like they made ME3, already had From ashes, Omega, Leviathan ready, just cut em all out to sell as DLC.. Why is it that in a series like Mass Effect it goes from good to bad.. i mean ME1 was to me a masterpiece and a complete game that took about 80 hours of my time to 'finish' , ME2 had 'better' combat and was awesome also but i found ME1 to be better. Then came ME3.. It all felt 'less' and short... and until you find out that nothing you did in ME1/2 or until the Cerberus base attack in ME3 matters.. That last part is just to close the story... and to leave space for more DLC that doesn't matter... I mean War Assets are really awesome...

[Teddie Sage]

I don't see why people should be surprised after the many disappointments people got lately. I'm personally losing faith in this company. The fact is, I spent more hours online on BSN than I ever did on Mass Effect 3. 

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 29 novembre 2012 - 12:27 .

[ioannisdenton]

Teddie Sage wrote...

I don't see why people should be surprised after the many disappointments people got lately. I'm personally losing faith in this company. The fact is, I spent more hours online on BSN than I ever did on Mass Effect 3. 

Dragon age all the way man. give DA2 a chance as the latest patch fixed some annoying things about combat.. buy legacy and MOTA and see that Dragon age team actually listened to the fans. Great bosses which do not feel videogamy and put your abilities to good use this time (unlike meredith).

[doraymon]

no lore progress
most of content in this DLC is "gun them down and walk to the next target"

if i want to gun enemy down without lore involve i login to multiplayer
not worth 15$

hell they introduce general oleg which is very interest character in the book and all he do is talk to you 2 sentence and become useless war asset

[-sKy-]

I just wrote my Review on Omega DLC: doesthisunithaveasoul.blogspot.co.at/2012/11/review-mass-effect-3-omega-dlc.html

Basic Line: Its not satisfying for 14€ in total, but still an enjoyable addition to the Mass Effect Universe. 

[KrazyKiko]

My feedback:

- Script, I thought, was better thought-out than I expected (i.e. why the rest of the Normandy crew weren't invited; why Aria will still on the Citadel 'after' the events on Omega.)
- I enjoyed the hommage to elevators (a la ME1) and dialogue.
- Enjoyed the new Mecs; Found them more difficult than the Adjutants.
- The sudden surrender after Afterlife is cleared of baddies was kind of lame.
- Combat locations seemed to be smaller - yes...it was a spaceship, but Omega in ME2 seemed "larger" though.
- Was it worth $15? I did spend a good 4 hours playing it (I like to take my time and explorer the nooks and crannies) but felt $10.00 would've been a better price point.

As a side note...and I don't think it's been addressed or referenced: the 2GB Xbox Live DLC limit...how much do you think it plays into the content we receive? Sure it's compressed, but I'm beginning to wonder if this inhibits BioWare from expanding the game as much as we would like?

[ioannisdenton]

My feedback
Seriously BG enhaned edition got out along with Omega.
One is an rpg by bioware (sometime ago) while Omega think sit is an rpg.

[Voodoo2015]

BioWare  soooooo boring.....!

[Blueprotoss]

The Night Mammoth wrote...

So you're saying the backlash wasn't unprecedented?

I'm not doing any of that. 

I'm pretty you didn't witness the contraversy that happened in the 90s like how one of the reasons why the ESRB was created because of Mortal Kombat.  Either way the closest to a modern day contraversy that has been a negative is the US and British military's veiw on the Medal of Honor series since the reboot.  Contraversy will always be around and most of them aren't negatives.

Oddly enough you're still creating nothing out of nothing and you're also letting opinion get the better of you.

Lance Gardner wrote...

Highly misleading trailer - Illusive Man featured heavily, and had nothing to do with this mission.

I wouldn't say a 2-3 second clip and mentioning of the Illusive Man was a "heavily" focused feature of Omega.

Tootles FTW wrote...

So Omega isn't a hub, our ME3 squaddies have *no* new dialogue, and afterwards Aria goes back to sitting in the Purgatory bar (for no reason at all)? I never, ever thought this day would come...but considering the price, I think I'll wait until XBox has some sort of sale and download it then. I don't see how the price justifies the content from all I'm hearing. Major bummer.

...though nice to hear we get some more stuff to fill up Shep's cabin, I guess.

To be fair Omega was always going to be based around Aria and Shepard would be taking the backseat on this mission.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 29 novembre 2012 - 06:31 .

[Blueprotoss]

TMA LIVE wrote...

Not worth 15 dollars. Not even worth 10.

The story isn't good. It's really an meh story from beginning to end. There's nothing about it that makes me care.

Why is this game worth $15? Because they force this temp turian squadmate on me? How is that worth $15 when this character is barely in my party during most of the DLC. She keeps running off, leaving me with just Aria. Did she have to be a squadmate? No. She didn't. I could argue that she didn't need to exist. What's the point of her character? Because we don't get much out of her character. All I know is that she doesn't like what Aria does, and wants to save civilians. She's very much a one note character. And the romance between her and Aria is pretty much forced, and nothing more then to be a forced plot mechanic. When she died, I did not care. Why should I care? I barely know her. The most I got out of her is "We need to save civilians".

This game also does nothing for me to like Aria. Yes, you can someone change Aria based on your choices, but I never felt like I got any form of friendship or whatever out of the whole experience. I didn't get any closer to knowing her.

Again, why is this worth 15? Because of new enemies? Like a robot from ME2 that just rushes you? Or a Reaper enemy that just runs around throwing ****? They're utterly disappointing.

Is it because of the new levels? Because guess what, that's not good enough. I got new levels out of Leviathan, and that wasn't $15. That was 10. And these new levels are based on a Hub from the second game.

What would make this worth 15? If I got a new hub. If I had new squad banter. If I got cameos from characters from ME2 Omega, showing how some of those side missions mattered. If the Collector Base mattered. A new squadmate.

Nope. All I got from Omega was a waste of my time, and my money so I could fund assets for Multiplayer. Because that's why I got a female turian in 2 different costumes. That's why I got Omega levels. And new enemies. That was Bioware's priority. Me funding their multiplayer by being single player DLC.

I'm not surprised that some people are focusing way too much on a $5 increase while it sounds like you weren't interested in new things like new characters, new enemies, new storyline, and etc.  Eventually you'll go crazy when you look into money management based on that $5 like how most movies don't cost $5 to see at a Theater and they normally don't last over 2 hours.

ioannisdenton wrote...

Me3 really TRIES to fail harder and harder.
WHAT IS WRONG with you bioware Mass Effect team??
IF this DLC was any good then people WOULD be happy. instead all i see is dissapointment in here and in the No spoilers section.
Some person from your team is simply doing it wrong.
What is wrong with you??
This will be the first bioware DLC i will reject.
I bought the 2 DLCS for DA2 a month ago and they were fantastic!!!
Dragon age team really nailed it !!!
Instead Me3 DLC falls short. Every time!
I forsee bioware going down in a couple of years and by down i mean "Closing".
We do not want FIGHTS an BIOTIC BOOM BOOM explotions ALL the fricking time.We are not horny Teenagers !
We want Story atmosphere and characters and DIALOGUE FOR GODS SAKE!!!!
Mass Effect team you are becoming VERY dissapointing 
+1. Mass effect team is doing it SO wrong!!
some FACTS:
Me1 cooldowns were a minute long
Me2 cooldowns were a few seconds long
Me3 cooldowns were Instant.
Screw this.

Its not suprising that some people don't want change even when ME1 is the best while it does have a lot of flaws like anything else.  Nothing is perfect and its odd that some people will always expect the impossible goal of perfection even when its only about opinion.  It sounds like you're complaining about ME3 DLCs based on how ME3 is the end of Shepard's tale and to be fair every peice of ME DLC is optional, which in reality doesn't add that much to the series.  Btw ou do realize that the cooldowns in ME3 are mostly based on the carrying weight of your character then there are other factors like class, tech tree choices, weapon mods, and armor.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 29 novembre 2012 - 06:40 .

[Teddie Sage]

Omega DLC Spoilers.

Alright, I'm a **** and whine a lot but I tried Omega. It wasn't that bad. But still overpriced in my honest opinion. It does lack the RPG feels that the earlier games had, but I actually grew to like Aria a little. This DLC changed my opinion on her character in some way, but I'm still disappointed that they couldn't reach the other voices actors for post-mission comments.

I would've like to recruit Aria as a squadmate too or at least Nyreen if she didn't have to meet this fate. Her death was heroic and I felt so sad when I saw her remains burning after the explosion. It's the first time I wanted to get to know a character more, she was charismatic and fun to have around, her dynamic with Aria was interesting too.

I couldn't find two of the sidequests items, I don't really mind for now. It was Aria's couch and the mechanist' tool.

I felt like Shepard had some good influence on Aria as a full paragon player. The only renegade action I took was shooting down a camera which Pretrovsky was using to spy both Shepard's group. It is sad though that you won't get to see Aria in the ending with the other war assets. I'm still hopeful that they're going to do something about this, even though they're not planning to fix the endings again. (Chris Priestly's words.)

I won't rate this DLC, but I find it better than Leviathan in terms of content. It was a fun ride, I enjoyed the interactions between the characters, the fights weren't that long and the new Omega settings in Mass Effect 3's DLC were well designed.

Another of my complaints though would be that some of the graphics are a little buggy, Aria's moon walk when she makes a speech, weird white lines on top and bottom of the screen. Also on PS3, the subtitles seem higher than usual just for this DLC.

That's all I had to say about Omega DLC. While I appreciate the effort, I think I could've waited a little longer for even more.

Modifié par Teddie Sage, 29 novembre 2012 - 06:09 .

[Blueprotoss]

MassEffectFShep wrote...

Constant Motion wrote...

Loved it. Waiting for the moan-wave to subside. I'm sure it's not going to be to everyone's tastes, but... everyone hated ME2, now they love it, everyone hated Leviathan and now Omega's being compared negatively to it. Have to question how much of it's rational criticism and how much of it's children clinging to vendettas. Confirmation bias - they expect to be disappointed, so anything that's slightly different to what they would've done gets tasered. Leave them to it. Half the feedback rings very whiny, though.

I don't have any numbers, but my general sense from reading a lot of the forums was actually that Omega was going to be a good DLC- not contribute to the main storyline (i.e., reaper war), but be LoTSB style and blow people away for a few hours with good cinematics, compelling dialogue/storyline, and a twist or moment-of-intrigue somewhere near the end. I got the sense that it was highly anticipated by a lot of people, even those who didn't particularly like ME3 (or its ending). 

Though I'm not *totally* surprised that the general consensus on this thread is that it's sort of flopping (I told my friends that Omega will either fly or crash and burn), I was expecting a lot more praise than what people are saying on here.

Its hard to judge if Omega is "good" or "bad" especially when most of the people disliking Omega just like Leviathan are either still carrying a grudge from the ending of ME3 or watched a playthorugh on Youtube.  To be fair if some people expected Omega to be LotSB then they only paid attention to the size of the download while I still need to play Omega.  Also we don't know if all of the people that disliked Omega because of the general stubbornness that people have.

DarkSeraphym wrote...

LeVaughnX wrote...

I've been a loyal damn fan up till ME3 and now with the reviews of this new DLC I'm not buying it. I want to buy it - as I've bought and played all of the Mass Effect games/DLCs, but ever since ME3 I've seen how stupid **** has gotten. Hell I noticed something was wrong BEFORE I even played ME3! My pre-orered Collectors edition was canceled ****ing five times starting way back in July when they opened the pre-ordered things. Then once I got my hands on it - I won't lie - the game felt great. I had to buy the Ashes dlc which I felt was a bit stupid but the new character was really awesome (****ing Javik man). I hated the whole Leviathan DLC though as I expected a lot more from the underwater thing. That had so much god damn potential and they just blew it. Then Omega sounded appealing until I read all this..

What the ****ing christ is EAWare doing?

Buy it, but wait until it goes on sale. My complaints were never that it was of poor quality. My complaints were that the quality were not up to par with the sticker price, a price you cannot negotiate.

To be fair nothing can really match Undead Nightmare when its a $10 or $15 add-on while to complain about a $5 price increase for one DLC seems ridiculous to me even though it adds 3-5 hours of gameplay.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 29 novembre 2012 - 06:40 .

[TMA LIVE]

Blueprotoss wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

Not worth 15 dollars. Not even worth 10.

The story isn't good. It's really an meh story from beginning to end. There's nothing about it that makes me care.

Why is this game worth $15? Because they force this temp turian squadmate on me? How is that worth $15 when this character is barely in my party during most of the DLC. She keeps running off, leaving me with just Aria. Did she have to be a squadmate? No. She didn't. I could argue that she didn't need to exist. What's the point of her character? Because we don't get much out of her character. All I know is that she doesn't like what Aria does, and wants to save civilians. She's very much a one note character. And the romance between her and Aria is pretty much forced, and nothing more then to be a forced plot mechanic. When she died, I did not care. Why should I care? I barely know her. The most I got out of her is "We need to save civilians".

This game also does nothing for me to like Aria. Yes, you can someone change Aria based on your choices, but I never felt like I got any form of friendship or whatever out of the whole experience. I didn't get any closer to knowing her.

Again, why is this worth 15? Because of new enemies? Like a robot from ME2 that just rushes you? Or a Reaper enemy that just runs around throwing ****? They're utterly disappointing.

Is it because of the new levels? Because guess what, that's not good enough. I got new levels out of Leviathan, and that wasn't $15. That was 10. And these new levels are based on a Hub from the second game.

What would make this worth 15? If I got a new hub. If I had new squad banter. If I got cameos from characters from ME2 Omega, showing how some of those side missions mattered. If the Collector Base mattered. A new squadmate.

Nope. All I got from Omega was a waste of my time, and my money so I could fund assets for Multiplayer. Because that's why I got a female turian in 2 different costumes. That's why I got Omega levels. And new enemies. That was Bioware's priority. Me funding their multiplayer by being single player DLC.

I'm not surprised that some people are focusing way too much on a $5 increase while it sounds like you weren't interested in new things like new characters, new enemies, new storyline, and etc.  Eventually you'll go crazy when you look into money management based on that $5 like how most movies don't cost $5 to see at a Theater and they normally don't last over 2 hours.

I'm start my post by saying the story is meh, and your saying "I'm not interested in new storylines?". I detailed in my post how I think these characters were pointless or underdeveloped, and you're saying "Not interested in new characters"? I detail in my post that the new enemies aren't so great, and you're saying "I'm not interested in new enemies"?

I'm not surprised you don't know what your talking about. Because my post is very clear "I got meh, pointless, underdevelop crap, that's overpriced, and was made more for future multiplayer DLC". Nothing about it says "I don't want good, new content done well". And if that new content that wasn't done well, is overpriced, hell yeah I'm going to make a point about it.

Modifié par TMA LIVE, 29 novembre 2012 - 07:09 .

[Amirit]

Here is your more a less civilized report: http://social.biowar...ndex/15072355/1

Modifié par Amirit, 29 novembre 2012 - 07:36 .

[Blueprotoss]

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm start my post by saying the story is meh, and your saying "I'm not interested in new storylines?". I detailed in my post how I think these characters were pointless or underdeveloped, and you're saying "Not interested in new characters"? I detail in my post that the new enemies aren't so great, and you're saying "I'm not interested in new enemies"?

This shows you're not really interested especially when you're being so quick and brash.  It sounds like you haven't played that much of the ME DLCs to be acting like this.

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm not surprised you don't know what your talking about. Because my post is very clear "I got meh, pointless, underdevelop crap, that's overpriced, and was made more for future multiplayer DLC". Nothing about it says "I don't want good, new content done well". And if that new content that wasn't done well, is overpriced, hell yeah I'm going to make a point about it.

I see you're now contradicting yourself here since Omega isn't overpriced and $5 isn't that much of an incrase for a cost even when its the 1st $15 add-on for a ME game.  I hope you don't forget about a thing called opinion.  I'm pretty sure that more people would rather pay for $10 or $15 for a DLC rather then $20. The way that you're talking about DLC makes me wonder on how often you by DLC and if you prefer SP or MP.  Btw the MP DLC in ME3 has been free and thats a poor reason to complain about DLC.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 29 novembre 2012 - 08:06 .

[Spectre Impersonator]

Omega DLC is further proof that EA has sucked the soul from Bioware's ass and consumed it.

Let's shoot for "Worst Company In America" two years in a row = their business model.

[Blueprotoss]

JohnShepard12 wrote...

Omega DLC is further proof that EA has sucked the soul from Bioware's ass and consumed it.

Let's shoot for "Worst Company In America" two years in a row = their business model.

Thats a petty and immature reason to complain while I'm pretty sure that EA didn't cause a recession and hasn't broken any international laws like the real companies that deserve the "Worst Company In America" like Bain Capital or Goldmen Sachs.  Btw EA has only gotten that title for 2012 and its odd that with childiness that associated with this.

[Seival]

Seival wrote...

I finished Omega yesterday, and I want to say that I liked the DLC. It's a well done side mission that reminds me Lair of the Shadow Broker. Omega has some very noticeable bugs (like Aria teleportation during her speech), but what game doesn't have bugs? Bugs can be fixed sooner or later.

New Elcor appearance is very good. I noticed that ME2 was also updated after Omega DLC was released. Did they improve all Elcor looks both in ME2 and ME3?

...Just wanted to re-post my question

[TMA LIVE]

Blueprotoss wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm start my post by saying the story is meh, and your saying "I'm not interested in new storylines?". I detailed in my post how I think these characters were pointless or underdeveloped, and you're saying "Not interested in new characters"? I detail in my post that the new enemies aren't so great, and you're saying "I'm not interested in new enemies"?

This shows you're not really interested especially when you're being so quick and brash.  It sounds like you haven't played that much of the ME DLCs to be acting like this.

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm not surprised you don't know what your talking about. Because my post is very clear "I got meh, pointless, underdevelop crap, that's overpriced, and was made more for future multiplayer DLC". Nothing about it says "I don't want good, new content done well". And if that new content that wasn't done well, is overpriced, hell yeah I'm going to make a point about it.

I see you're now contradicting yourself here since Omega isn't overpriced and $5 isn't that much of an incrase for a cost even when its the 1st $15 add-on for a ME game.  I hope you don't forget about a thing called opinion.  I'm pretty sure that more people would rather pay for $10 or $15 for a DLC rather then $20. The way that you're talking about DLC makes me wonder on how often you by DLC and if you prefer SP or MP.  Btw the MP DLC in ME3 has been free and thats a poor reason to complain about DLC.

I see you're a troll.

[Blueprotoss]

TMA LIVE wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm start my post by saying the story is meh, and your saying "I'm not interested in new storylines?". I detailed in my post how I think these characters were pointless or underdeveloped, and you're saying "Not interested in new characters"? I detail in my post that the new enemies aren't so great, and you're saying "I'm not interested in new enemies"?

This shows you're not really interested especially when you're being so quick and brash.  It sounds like you haven't played that much of the ME DLCs to be acting like this.

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm not surprised you don't know what your talking about. Because my post is very clear "I got meh, pointless, underdevelop crap, that's overpriced, and was made more for future multiplayer DLC". Nothing about it says "I don't want good, new content done well". And if that new content that wasn't done well, is overpriced, hell yeah I'm going to make a point about it.

I see you're now contradicting yourself here since Omega isn't overpriced and $5 isn't that much of an incrase for a cost even when its the 1st $15 add-on for a ME game.  I hope you don't forget about a thing called opinion.  I'm pretty sure that more people would rather pay for $10 or $15 for a DLC rather then $20. The way that you're talking about DLC makes me wonder on how often you by DLC and if you prefer SP or MP.  Btw the MP DLC in ME3 has been free and thats a poor reason to complain about DLC.

I see you're a troll.

I see that you don't know what a "troll" is even when I'm not insulting people and I'm on topic.  Maybe you should have a simple discussion with people instead of trying to use insults, which doesn't make you be the "better" man.

[silverexile17s]

Blueprotoss wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

Blueprotoss wrote...

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm start my post by saying the story is meh, and your saying "I'm not interested in new storylines?". I detailed in my post how I think these characters were pointless or underdeveloped, and you're saying "Not interested in new characters"? I detail in my post that the new enemies aren't so great, and you're saying "I'm not interested in new enemies"?

This shows you're not really interested especially when you're being so quick and brash.  It sounds like you haven't played that much of the ME DLCs to be acting like this.

TMA LIVE wrote...

I'm not surprised you don't know what your talking about. Because my post is very clear "I got meh, pointless, underdevelop crap, that's overpriced, and was made more for future multiplayer DLC". Nothing about it says "I don't want good, new content done well". And if that new content that wasn't done well, is overpriced, hell yeah I'm going to make a point about it.

I see you're now contradicting yourself here since Omega isn't overpriced and $5 isn't that much of an incrase for a cost even when its the 1st $15 add-on for a ME game.  I hope you don't forget about a thing called opinion.  I'm pretty sure that more people would rather pay for $10 or $15 for a DLC rather then $20. The way that you're talking about DLC makes me wonder on how often you by DLC and if you prefer SP or MP.  Btw the MP DLC in ME3 has been free and thats a poor reason to complain about DLC.

I see you're a troll.

I see that you don't know what a "troll" is even when I'm not insulting people and I'm on topic.  Maybe you should have a simple discussion with people instead of trying to use insults, which doesn't make you be the "better" man.

Actually, you are the one who doesn't understand the concept of trolling.
You don't need to be insulting to be a troll. A troll is someone who constantly derails a topic by attacking the logic and meanging of the opposing party with an endless stream of strawmen and red herrings, pretending to refute the point without ever doing so.
That would be you. Don't accuse him of things like not being the better man, when no one here seems to think your opinion has any credibilaty to it.

[MKfighter89]

The aria female kiss is longer and seems more in joyable then the male shep kiss.

http://24.media.tumb...iunc5o1_250.gif
http://24.media.tumb...iunc5o2_250.gif

[-sKy-]

JillBSuiT wrote...

The aria female kiss is longer and seems more in joyable then the male shep kiss.

http://24.media.tumb...iunc5o1_250.gif
http://24.media.tumb...iunc5o2_250.gif

now that is weird.... 

[Blueprotoss]

silverexile17s wrote...

Actually, you are the one who doesn't understand the concept of trolling. 
You don't need to be insulting to be a troll. A troll is someone who constantly derails a topic by attacking the logic and meanging of the opposing party with an endless stream of strawmen and red herrings, pretending to refute the point without ever doing so.
That would be you. Don't accuse him of things like not being the better man, when no one here seems to think your opinion has any credibilaty to it.

I see you're still "trolling" even when you choose to deny it.  "Trolling" is when someone would rather focus on railroading a topic, which is what you're doing, and one of the ways to do that is by insulting someone, which is also what you're doing,  You shouldn't cast the 1st stone since you aren't a man without sin and a good way to prevent that problem is by practicing what you preach.  Its ironic on how you're talking about credabiity when all you're doing is using opinion to "counter" facts and insulting people when they're trying to have a discussion with you.  You're doing everything to avoid being wrong so you don't admit that you're wrong.

Modifié par Blueprotoss, 03 décembre 2012 - 01:35 .