Lord_Sirian wrote...
I disagree.
When I used to PUG, I would run into the occasional group who were very decent, but I would still score 200k+. Why? Because while they weren't bad players, I would simply find and kill the spawns before they could. In PUG's, the ability to not die is underrated IMO. I'll only say someone is a bad player if they constantly go down AND don't contribute much on the scoreboard.
Couldn't agree more with this.
Reminds me of one pug I did a looooong time ago, this guy scored last but was the only one beside me who wasn't dying constantly or getting sync killed. For about three waves it was just the two of us almost from the start since the other two kept getting sync killed, and not once did I have to worry about him. He may not have been able to kill stuff fast, but he was more than capable of staying alive even when overwhelmed and was very helpful during objective waves.
As I said, on that game he was last on the scoreboard (though he still scored decently), but he was by far the one that made the best impression on me.
These days I'll add anyone from a pug I play to my friend list if they were good enough to make the match go smoothly, regardless of score, because seriously, for the past two weeks pugs have been giving me nightmares. So many players that are completely underequipped (unmodded avenger 3 without equipment on gold ftw) or who just leech.
RedJohn wrote...
As I said, Feneckus is a great player, one of the best, but also, the team was really bad.
Again, the team was bad, if you think the team was good then you should start changing your mind about what is a good or a bad team:wizard:
Nice attitude there...
Completely disagree on your definition of "good" and "bad" players.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 27 novembre 2012 - 07:32 .