Queen Ultima wrote...
RGFrog wrote...
because lore since before you even heard of ME was that asari are ALL biotics to one extent or another.
for an asari to use shields instead means that either the devs yet again tossed lore out the window or the huntress is a lazy asari that never bothered to work on her biotics.
Ok, I'm going to have to stop this straw logic. Right. Here.
"All asari are natural biotics, however some choose not to develop their biotic power. "
Taken directly from the wiki, and I'm pretty sure it's in the Codex too. Like I said, the Huntress seems like an Asari that uses biotics exclusively for offense, and even biotics are not strong like an Adept to be the whole offense so she adds in tech and weapon powers. Adding the strain of a barrier would be too much, or perhaps they're not skilled enough to create a strong barrier so they choose shields that they KNOW will protect them more. It's not being lazy, it's about not being shot in the head cause you chose inferior protection. (giggety)
And can I ask, honestly, if Asari using shields "breaks the lore", how did you cope with the Pre-EC ending?
Same way I coped with the post-EC ending that didn't change a thing... You?
Also, thanks for quoting the second sentence in my post: "...or the huntress is a lazy asari that never bothered to work on her biotics."
I'm fully aware of the lore. Your straw logic claim is invalid. If you're going to take something out of context, then perhaps you shouldn't quote the context you're attempting to debunk.
Cyonan wrote...
RGFrog wrote...
stuff...
Ah yes, the "it doesn't follow lore" argument. The MP board posters seem to love their lore.
How curious then, that nobody complained about how the Human Sentinel, who is obviously a biotic, has shields and the other numerous cases of Sentinels with biotics that don't have barriers.
Sentinel is a mix of tech and biotic... any mix. Without biotics AND tech together, the character is not a Sent. It's either adept or engineer/soldier... Shields are tech. TC is tech. An asari that uses sheilds and TC and biotics, is a Sent. In this case, there's precedence in the SP campaign where Shep and crew meet up with an Asari Inf. that only uses her widow.
Grenades, imo, don't count. So I don't count the vorcha to be a sentinel. Just a vorcha with a buddy that knows how to apply biotics to the vorcha's shiny balls.
Cyonan wrote...
Or perhaps it's not that people care about the lore as much as they claim, but rather that they just want to QQ about the devs?
Because apparently if you aren't hating on Bioware at every turn, you're an apologetic around here =P
If ALL you do is praise the devs, that's fine. You're a fan. Cool.
If ALL you do is praise the devs, AND vehemently defend the devs then yes you are an apologetic.
I enjoyed StarWars Ep's 1-3 because I enjoy the universe Lucas created. That doesn't mean that I think eps 1-3 were perfect (in fact, they were far from it). IMO, they were pale versions of what they could have been had Lucas not been wearing so many hats and pretty much did what he did for Ep.5.
Like I've already posted, there's SP lore and MP lore does not track anywhere close to 100% where the characters are concerned.
If you're fine with that because you enjoy the direction, then that's great. You're not an apologetic. You're a fan and are enjoying the game.
If you're fine with that and choose to defend the devs because they are somehow iinfallible, or blindly think it works because BW did it and for no other reason, then you're an apologetic.
Which are you? I"m the prior. Some stuff I enjoy, some I don't. But if it's not lore, I'm not going to act like it is and clap my hands and defend them.
Especially when they haven't even bothered to take the time and retcon